Pages

Showing posts with label Heart Scans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heart Scans. Show all posts

Thursday, 8 June 2023

Deadly ‘irreversible’ heart condition reversed for first time in major breakthrough

 Three patients who suffered from potentially deadly heart failure were remarkably freed from their symptoms after their condition was found to have spontaneously reversed, found a new study that reported on the unprecedented cases.


·2-min read

Deadly ‘irreversible’ heart condition reversed for first time in major breakthrough


Three patients who suffered from potentially deadly heart failure were remarkably freed from their symptoms after their condition was found to have spontaneously reversed, found a new study that reported on the unprecedented cases.

Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis, the deadly condition, is caused by the build-up of sticky, toxic proteins in the heart. Until now, it was thought to be irreversible as half the patients suffering from the condition died within four years of diagnosis.

But the new study, published recently in the journal The New England Journal of Medicine, reported the cases of three men, aged 68, 76 and 82, who were diagnosed with the condition but later recovered.

Researchers, including those from University College London (UCL), confirmed the symptom reversal using heart scans that showed the build-up of amyloid proteins had cleared.

“We have seen for the first time that the heart can get better with this disease. That has not been known until now and it raises the bar for what might be possible with new treatments,” said study lead author Marianna Fontana from UCL.

Researchers also found evidence that the three men had antibodies that specifically targeted the amyloid proteins – an immune response that was not found in other patients whose condition progressed as normal.

“Whether these antibodies caused the patients’ recovery is not conclusively proven. However, our data indicates that this is highly likely and there is potential for such antibodies to be recreated in a lab and used as a therapy,” said UCL’s Julian Gillmore, another study author.

The condition is known to be caused by deposits composed of a blood protein called transthyretin, and can be either hereditary or non-hereditary.

While current treatments aim to relieve the symptoms of heart failure such as fatigue, swelling in the legs or abdomen and shortness of breath, they do not tackle the amyloid, scientists said.

With advancements in imaging techniques over the decades, clinicians have been able to diagnose substantially more people with the disease.

In the latest study, researchers looked through records of 1,663 patients diagnosed with the deadly condition after one man, aged 68, reported his symptoms improving.

Two more cases were identified after which all three men’s recoveries were confirmed via blood tests and imaging techniques like echocardiography.

Then a heart muscle tissue analysis of one of the patients revealed a strange inflammatory response surrounding the amyloid protein deposits in the heart – a response that was not seen in biopsies from patients in whom the condition had not reversed.

On further analysis, researchers found antibodies in the three patients that bound specifically to the heart protein deposits.

Scientists believe these proteins could be harnessed to build therapies that can suppress the toxic, sticky protein’s production.

“This work not only represents a major breakthrough in our understanding of cardiac amyloidosis, but crucially opens up new possibilities for more effective treatment options,” said Jon Spiers, chief executive of the Royal Free Charity.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/deadly-irreversible-heart-condition-reversed-055058928.html

Thursday, 7 March 2019

New imaging machines for IJN

Technological advances increasingly mean that doctors are able to see and assess the function and structure of our organs without having to cut our bodies open or insert instruments into us.

Dr Ahmad explaining the features of the new PET-CT scan machine, which includes reduced radiation exposure for the patient and the ability to measure coronary flow reserve.

Imaging methods like X-rays and ultrasound are familiar to us all, with many of us having undergone at least a chest X-ray (as part of a health check-up before being hired) or an abdominal ultrasound (for pregnant women).
Some of us with medical concerns or conditions might have undergone more advanced imaging like CT (computed tomography) scans, PET (positron emission tomography) scans and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging).
According to National Heart Institute (commonly known by its Malay acronym, IJN) consultant cardiologist Datuk Dr Ahmad Khairuddin Mohamed Yusof, CT scans are actually multiple X-ray images taken from various different angles.
“From there, we reconstruct images so we can see the anatomical structures in the patient’s body,” explains the specialist in cardiovascular imaging and interventional cardiology.
The multiple X-ray images are combined into a number of cross-sectional images – also known as “slices”– of the targeted body part via a computer programme.
“On the other hand, the PET scan is the mechanism of seeing the function of the organ by introducing a radioisotope into the patient’s body. Once the radioisotope gets into the patient’s body, it will decay, and the decaying process will produce gamma-radiation,” he says.
“This radiation will be detected by special detectors, which will produce and reconstruct images via multiple complex algorithms, and from there, we can see how the organ functions as a whole.”
For example, the radioisotope fluorine-18 is commonly combined with glucose to form fluorodeoxyglucose, a common tracer for PET scans.
As a form of glucose, fluorodeoxyglucose is taken up by cells as part of their energy-producing process, thus enabling its concentration in various tissues and organs to be measured.
Cancer cells, for example, tend to use far more glucose than ordinary cells, making PET scans useful for identifying malignant tumours.
There are also PET-CT scan machines that combine both these methods into one piece of equipment. This allows for more accurate imaging as the anatomical images from the CT scan and the functional images from the PET scan, which are done consecutively in the same session, can be combined into a precise picture of the targeted organ.
IJN Imaging Centre manager Norizam Mois explains: “This advanced hybrid imaging modality or scanner has been shown to be superior to conventional imaging in terms of diagnostic accuracy, efficiency and lower dose.
“The primary purpose of using this scanner is to improve the evaluation of the functions of the heart and associated thoracic oncology.”
She adds: “IJN not only receives referrals for cardiovascular disease, but also for cases of thoracic surgery involving tumours, as well as other cancerous areas. We also offer PET-CT services to other hospitals for diagnostic evaluation.”
One of the main differences between PET scans and CT scans, she says, is that the PET scan reveals metabolic changes in an organ or tissue earlier at cellular level. “So, the use of the PET-CT scanner with the 128 slices, will help us manage these patients more effectively.”
Norizam adds: “IJN is also committed to establish an imaging centre that offers a comprehensive range of non-invasive diagnostic imaging for a wide scope of medical needs.”
IJN
Norizam notes that IJN not only receives cardiovascular cases, but also patients with lung cancer. The hospital also provides imaging services to other hospitals.

Advantages of PET-CT

“We handle a lot of patients with heart disease, so PET-CT is one way of assessing the function of the heart,” says Dr Ahmad.
“Although we do have SPECT, or single-photon emission computed tomography, which is another method of assessing the function of the heart, we consider PET-CT another newer method with advantages over the older one.”
One advantage is reduced radiation exposure for the patient, as the radioisotope dose profile for PET-CT scans are lower than those for SPECT.
Another is the ability to measure coronary flow reserve, which is the maximum increase in blood flow through the coronary arteries that supply the heart, above the normal resting volume.
This is usually done for patients suspected of having at least 50% stenosis, or narrowing, of one or more of their coronary arteries to see if they require treatment.
“By introducing a nitrogen-13–ammonia or rubidium-82 tracer, which are the special radioisotopes for this PET-CT scan, into the patient, we will be able to assess the coronary blood flow during rest and during stress.
“With these two pieces of information, we will be able to calculate the ratio and come up with the coronary flow reserve of this patient.”
Previously, the patient would have to undergo coronary angiogram, which requires inserting a catheter into a blood vessel in the groin or arm all the way up to the heart. If the cardiologist decides that there is a narrowing of 70% or more based on the angiogram, treatment will proceed.
If it is less than 70%, the patient would need to go for another test, a dopamine-stress test, to see if there is a significant disruption in coronary blood flow during stress.
“However, once we have this PET-CT scanner, this issue can be addressed by asking the patient to undergo this scan. From there, we can immediately decide whether the patient needs ballooning or angioplasty,” he says.
The third advantage is being able to assess the viability and functionality of heart muscle. Says Dr Ahmad: “Let’s say the heart muscle is weak, and we want to know if the weakness is due to poor blood supply, or damaged or dead heart muscle.”
He explains that when the heart muscle has poor blood supply, it adapts by changing its metabolic activity. “Instead of using fat as the source of energy, it will use glucose as the source of energy. But this glucose is limited in supply, so the ability of the heart to pump is reduced,” he says.
Therefore, when the tracer fluorodeoxyglucose is introduced, it would be avidly taken up by the poorly-supplied heart muscle, which can be seen on the PET-CT images. If the muscle is damaged or dead, there would be no difference in the fluorodeoxyglucose levels.
This helps the cardiologist to decide on whether or not to treat any narrowed coronary arteries – yes, if the problem is poor blood supply, and no, if the heart muscle is already dead or damaged.
IJN
Dr Ahmad explaining the features of the new PET-CT scan machine, which includes reduced radiation exposure for the patient and the ability to measure coronary flow reserve.

Upgraded CT scan

IJN recently acquired a brand new PET-CT scanner. In addition, the institute upgraded one of its CT scanners, which now provides 512 slices, compared to the 64 slices of the older machines.
“This CT scan has less radiation exposure to the patient,” says Dr Ahmad. “The detector is bigger, so we will be able to image the heart at high quality without exposing the patient to high radiation, as compared to the old CT scanner.”
Due to the faster image capture, patients need only hold their breath for one to two seconds, compared to around 12 seconds for the older one. Most anxious patients can also skip a beta-blocker drug to slow down their heart rate, as this scanner can capture high-quality images in a heartbeat.
“This CT scan also has the capability of doing fractional flow reserve, which is a special technology not available in our previous CT scanner,” says Dr Ahmad.
Fractional flow reserve is the blood flow through a specific segment of the coronary artery. It is used to determine whether or not the narrowing of the artery results in a disruption of blood flow through it, and thus, whether or not it needs to be treated.
He added that the upgraded CT scanner can also function similarly to a cardiac MRI where it can detect stress-induced ischaemia, i.e. inadequate blood supply to the heart during physical stress. It does this by taking images while the patient is at rest and under drug-induced stress.
“So, in the future, we can offer this CT scan to those patients who are not able to get into a cardiac MRI scanner because of claustrophobia – fear of a closed environment,” says Dr Ahmad.
He explains that for an MRI, the patient’s body is fully enclosed by the machine, while only half of their body is enclosed for a CT scan.
IJN
IJN aims to provide high quality, but affordable care to Malaysian, says Dr Azhari. The hospital will be charging a maximum of RM3,000 for oncology screening by PET-CT, compared to over RM4,000 in private centres.

Latest tech

“We, being the National Heart Institute, are at the forefront of technology, and cardiac imaging is the area where the advancements are,” says IJN CEO Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Azhari Yakub.
“We are investing in this technology to provide patients non-invasive cardiac imaging, which can give us a lot of information without the patient having to go for an invasive technique.”
He added that they have also invested in their people by sending two doctors and four medical technicians overseas to be trained and certified in reading the PET-CT images and handling the machine respectively. While PET-CT scans are available in Malaysia, they are focused in the area of oncology, or cancer.
“Here we are providing not only screening or investigation for oncology patients, but also sub-specialising in cardiac PET-CT,” says the senior consultant cardiothoracic surgeon.
The two new and upgraded machines were sponsored by Permodalan Nasional Bhd (PNB) as part of their corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts. “With their contribution, we are able to provide a very competitive fee for the imaging, which will benefit the patients,” says Dr Azhari.
He adds that IJN will be charging a maximum of RM3,000 for oncology screening by PET-CT. PET-CT cardiac imaging will cost slightly more than RM3,000 due to the more expensive radioisotope they have to use, he says.
He adds that IJN will be reducing the cost of CT scans in their centre with the addition of the two new machines, as they now have three CT-capable machines in total. “This is all part of the vision of IJN: to provide high-quality care, which is affordable to the ordinary Malaysian,” he says.

https://www.star2.com/health/2019/03/05/new-imaging-machines-ijn/

Friday, 8 September 2017

Do I need a heart scan?

A heart scan can be used to check for calcium in the lining of the heart’s arteries – an early sign of heart disease.
AUGUST 19, 2017
Typically, the test is most useful in men between 50 to 60 years of age and women 60 to 70, who may have a moderate risk for heart disease or whose heart disease risk is unclear.
Heart disease happens when arteries in the heart become narrowed or blocked. That’s most often a result of inflammation and deposits of plaque that build up in the arteries.
Plaque, made up mainly of calcium, fats and cholesterol, builds up slowly over time. Calcium is deposited in the lining of heart arteries as the body repairs damage within the artery. Its presence signals that something is damaging the artery.
The damage could be a result of high blood pressure, high cholesterol, stress or genetics, among other factors. A heart scan can reveal if you have any calcium in your heart’s arteries.
The test itself doesn’t take long – usually about 10 to 15 minutes. The entire appointment may take up to an hour.
The risks associated with a heart scan are minimal. A heart scan exposes you to radiation, but the amount is considered safe. It’s about the same as you’re naturally exposed to in a year. If you’re concerned about the risks of a heart scan, talk with your healthcare provider.
The amount of calcium a heart scan detects – when coupled with other information, such as blood pressure, cholesterol levels, age, family history and health history – can give your healthcare provider valuable information about your overall risk for developing heart disease.
Although a heart scan can often provide helpful information regarding a person’s risk of heart disease, it’s not right for for everyone.
The test is not typically recommended for men younger than 40 or women younger than 50. That’s because it’s rare to be able to detect calcium development with a scan during those younger years.
Also, a heart scan is not necessary for people who already know they have a high risk of heart disease or for people who have symptoms of heart disease. For these individuals, results of a heart scan won’t provide any additional useful information.
For those in the suitable age range though, a heart scan can be an excellent way to assess the early signs of heart disease. That’s particularly true if other health conditions or lifestyle factors may point to a possible increase in heart disease risk.
If a heart scan shows calcium deposits, that can help you and your healthcare provider decide on ways to reduce your risk moving forward.
If the test shows you don’t have calcium in your heart arteries, that puts you at a low risk for a heart attack over the next five years.
It’s important for a heart scan to be used as part of a comprehensive heart health assessment.
Some medical facilities offer walk-in heart scans to the general public, without a referral from a healthcare provider. Using such a service can pose several problems.
A heart scan is only valuable in a select group of people. If you don’t fall into that group, having the test done is not worthwhile.
And, if the results of the test aren’t interpreted within the context of your health overall, they may not give you an accurate picture of your heart disease risk. – Mayo Clinic News Network/Tribune News Service

http://www.star2.com/health/wellness/2017/08/19/do-i-need-a-heart-scan/

Thursday, 25 June 2015

4 Must-Have Heart Tests - MUST READ

Heart disease is tricky. Like other “silent” conditions, such as high blood pressure and kidney disease, you may not know that you have it until you’re doubled over from a heart attack.

HEALTHWISE

Published
 
June 1, 2015
 
Publication
 
Bottom Line Health
 
Source
Joel K. Kahn, MD, Wayne State University School of Medicine

THEY TRULY ARE LIFESAVING…

Heart disease is tricky. Like other “silent” conditions, such as high blood pressure and kidney disease, you may not know that you have it until you’re doubled over from a heart attack.
That’s because traditional methods of assessing patients for heart disease, such as cholesterol tests and blood pressure measurements, along with questions about smoking and other lifestyle factors, don’t always tell a patient’s whole story.
Shocking finding: In a recent study, doctors followed nearly 6,000 men and women (ages 55 to 88) who had been deemed healthy by standard heart tests for three years and then gave them basic imaging tests (see below).Result: 60% were found to have atherosclerosis. These study participants were eight times more likely to suffer a heart attack or stroke, compared with subjects without this fatty buildup (plaque) in the arteries.

THE MUST-HAVE TESTS

Below are four simple tests that can catch arterial damage at the earliest possible stage—when it can still be reversed and before it has a chance to cause a heart attack or stroke. My advice: Even though doctors don’t routinely order these tests, everyone over age 50 should have them at least once—and sometimes more often, depending on the findings. Smokers and people with diabetes, very high cholesterol levels (more than 300 mg/dL) and/or a family history of heart disease should have these tests before age 50. Having these tests can literally save your life…
 Coronary calcium computed tomography (CT) scan. This imaging test checks for calcium deposits in the arteries—a telltale sign of atherosclerosis. People who have little or no calcium in the arteries (a score of zero) have less than a 5% risk of having a heart attack over the next three to five years. The risk is twice as high in people with a score of one to 10…andmore than nine times higher in those with scores above 400.
While the American College of Cardiology recommends this test for people who haven’t been diagnosed with heart disease but have known risk factors, such as high blood pressure and/or a family history of heart disease, I advise everyone to have this test at about age 50.* The test takes only 10 to 15 minutes and doesn’t require the injection of a contrast agent.
Cost: $99 and up, which may be covered by insurance. 
I use the calcium score as a onetime test. Unless they abandon their healthy habits, people who have a score of zero are unlikely to develop arterial calcification later in life. Those who do have deposits will know what they have to do—exercise, eat a more healthful diet, manage cholesterol and blood pressure, etc.
One drawback, however, is radiation exposure. Even though the dose is low (much less than you’d get during cardiac catheterization, for example), you should always limit your exposure.
My advice: Choose an imaging center with the fastest CT machine. A faster machine (a 256-slice CT, for example) gives less radiation exposure than, say, a 64-slice machine.
 Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT). The intima and media are the innermost linings of blood vessels. Their combined thickness in the carotid arteries in the neck is affected by how much plaque is present. Thickening of these arteries can indicate increased risk for stroke and heart attack.
The beauty of this test is that it’s performed with ultrasound. There’s no radiation, it’s fast (10 minutes) and it’s painless. I often recommend it as a follow-up to the coronary calcium test or as an alternative for people who want to avoid the radiation of the coronary calcium CT.
The good news is that you can reduce CIMT—with a more healthful diet, more exercise and the use of statin medications. Pomegranate—the whole fruit, juice or a supplement—can reduce carotid plaque, too. In addition, research has found Kyolic “aged” garlic (the product brand studied) and vitamin K-2 to also be effective.
Cost: $250 to $350. It may not be covered by insurance.
 Advanced lipid test. Traditional cholesterol tests are less helpful than experts once thought—particularly because more than 50% of heart attacks occur in patients with normal LDL “bad” cholesterol levels.
Experts have now identified a number of cholesterol subtypes that aren’t measured by standard tests. The advanced lipid test (also known as an expanded test) still measures total cholesterol and LDL but also looks at the amounts and sizes of different types of cholesterol.
Suppose that you have a normal LDL reading of 100 mg/dL. You still might have an elevated risk for a heart attack if you happen to have a high number of small, dense LDL particles (found in an advanced LDL particle test), since they can more easily enter the arterial wall.
My advice: Get the advanced lipid test at least once after age 50. It usually costs $39 and up and may be covered by insurance.
If your readings look good, you can switch to a standard cholesterol test every few years. If the numbers are less than ideal, talk to your doctor about treatment options, which might include statins or niacin, along with lifestyle changes. Helpful supplements include omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin E and plant sterols.
 High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). This simple blood test has been available for years, but it’s not used as often as it should be. Elevated C–reactive protein indicates inflammation in the body, including in the blood vessels. Data from the Physicians’ Health Study found that people with elevated CRP were about three times more likely to have a heart attack than those with normal levels.
If you test low (less than 1 mg/L) or average (1 mg/L to 3 mg/L), you can repeat the test every few years. If your CRP is high (above 3 mg/L), I recommend repeating the test at least once a year. It’s a good way to measure any progress you may be making from taking medications (such as statins, which reduce inflammation), improving your diet and getting more exercise.
Cost: About $50. It’s usually covered by insurance.
* People already diagnosed with heart disease and/or who have had a stent or bypass surgery do not need the coronary calcium CT.

Source: Joel K. Kahn, MD, a clinical professor of medicine at Wayne State University School of Medicine and director of Cardiac Wellness at Michigan Healthcare Professionals, both in Detroit. He is also a founding member of the International Society of Integrative, Metabolic and Functional Cardiovascular Medicine and the author of The Whole Heart Solution.

Friday, 21 June 2013

Men Over 40 Should Think Twice Before Running Triathlons

By Natasha Khan & Shannon Pettypiece - Jun 21, 2013 6:00 AM GMT+0800

For men competing in triathlons past the age of 40, the grueling slog to the finish line could be their last.

As the average age of competitors in endurance sports rises, a spate of deaths during races or intense workouts highlights the risks of excessive strain on the heart through vigorous exercise in middle age. Among the recent casualties: Michael McClintock, senior managing director of Macquarie Group Ltd. and a triathlete, who died at age 55 of cardiac arrest earlier this month after training.
                  

Middle Aged Men in Spandex Show Heart Risk of Triathlons

Middle Aged Men in Spandex Show Heart Risk of Triathlons                      
A cyclist rides near Gaiole in Chianti, Italy.
Photographer: Gabriel Bouys/AFP/Getty Images

The 40-to-60-year age bracket, often referred to as middle aged men in Lycra, or Mamils, now holds 32 percent of the membership in USA Triathlon, the official governing body of triathlon racers in the U.S. More fitness conscious than previous generations, their numbers in competitive races are swelling, along with their risk of cardiac arrest. Triathlons, the most robust of endurance races requiring swimming, biking and running, are also believed to be the most risky.

“People need to understand that they’re not necessarily gaining more health by doing more exercise,” said David Prior, a cardiologist and associate professor of medicine at the University of Melbourne. “The attributes to push through the barriers and push through the pain are common in competitive sport, but that’s also dangerous when it comes to ignoring warning signs.”

While benefits of exercise are well-known, researchers now suspect that there may be a point at which exertion becomes dangerous, especially for middle aged men who, because of gender and changes that accompany aging, are more susceptible to cardiac arrest caused by vigorous exercise.

Cardiac Arrest


Cardiac arrest, which occurs when the heart suddenly stops beating, can be caused by almost any heart condition, including abnormal heart rhythm, thickening heart muscle and arteries -- changes that can occur silently as healthy people age. The risk of sudden cardiac arrest, which can be brought on with physical stress, increases with age, and men are two to three times more likely to suffer from it than women, according to the National Institutes of Health.

McClintock, the Macquarie Bank executive who died on June 2 at his home in Larchmont, New York, was an avid skier, biker and golfer. The previous September, he completed the Jarden Westchester Triathlon, his first Olympic-length event, taking less than 4 hours to swim 0.9-miles (1.4 kilometers), cycle 25 miles and run 6.2 miles.

While McClintock’s death can’t be directly linked to the race, USA Triathlon has noted an increase in race-related fatalities, with the highest number occurring in the 40-to-49-year age group.

Triathlon Risk


The death rate for triathlons is about twice that of marathons because of increased intensity of the competition and the initial swimming leg of the events, according to a 2012 study published last year in the journal Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

“The swim seems to be a particularly dangerous time,” said Andre La Gerche, a cardiologist at Melbourne’s St Vincent’s Hospital and marathoner. “Paradoxically, in the marathon, it’s the opposite: it’s the last mile of the event where the vast majority of fatalities occur.” Researchers speculate that sprinting to the finish produces a rush of adrenalin that may trigger an abnormal rhythm in runners with susceptible hearts.

Runners should maintain their pace or slowdown in the last mile and not sprint unless they have trained for it, the International Marathon Medical Director’s Association, a doctor’s group, said in 2010 in a list of recommendations in response to race-related sudden deaths.

Safe Running


Running appears to lower the risk for mortality when an athlete doesn’t exceed more than 20 miles a week, log more than five to seven miles per hour, or run more than two to five times a week, researchers at the Ochsner Health System of New Orleans and the University of South Carolina found in a study last year.

More than 2 million people participate in long-distance running races in the U.S. each year -- a number that has doubled since 2000. Even though the risk of death from marathon-running is small, increased participation has resulted in a higher incidence of sudden death at the events, according to a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in January 2012. Out of 11 million long-distance runners, 59 people suffered cardiac arrest, 51 of them men.

Causes of cardiac events in athletes vary depending on age. For those under 35, cardiovascular conditions are usually inherited. Heart incidents in older athletes can be due to coronary artery disease that they don’t know they have, Melbourne cardiologist Prior said.

Vessel Disease


By middle age, most people have developed some underlying early stage vessel disease, such as hardening or plaque buildup in their coronary arteries, said Kade Davison, who teaches clinical exercise science at the University of South Australia in Adelaide.

“If anyone is going to have a cardiac event they’re far more likely to have one during exercise,” said Davison. A person is seven times more likely to have a heart incident while exercising than at rest, he said, citing a 1984 New England Journal of Medicine study.

A person’s electrolyte balance changes while doing long distance endurance events like marathons or long cycle rides, Davison said. People might also suffer potassium or sodium depletion, or become dehydrated, which also contributes to extra stress on the heart.

Intense exercise for periods longer than one to two hours can cause over-stretching and tiny tears of the heart’s tissue, said James O’Keefe, a sports cardiologist and head of preventative cardiology at the Mid America Heart Institute in Kansas City, Missouri. This type of repeated injury over years can cause irregular heart rhythms, increased inflammation, scarring and stiffening of the arteries, he said.

CT Scan


Athletic over-achievers tend to think that “more is better,” though when it comes to health, “moderation is almost always best,” said Mid America Heart Institute’s O’Keefe.

As a precaution, getting a computerized tomography, or CT, scan of the heart to look for calcified plaque is a good way for endurance athletes to check if their workouts are putting their heart at risk, O’Keefe said. Yet there is no agreement on what the best strategy is for testing.

“The throwaway line is to consult your doctor to make sure you’re fit to race,” said Melbourne cardiologist La Gerche. “The only good tests depend on people having symptoms and telling their doctors. In healthy asymptomatic people, there is no good test to see if someone is at risk of sudden death.”

Screening Value


Those who experience a bit of chest pain or become breathless should see a doctor to check it out, especially if the discomfort occurs during training, said University of South Australia’s Davison. Sudden events that occur in people who have had no previous sign of heart disease usually indicate a build-up of plaque.

When plaque ruptures, it can cause a clot in an artery, which often doesn’t show up in typical stress tests of ECG monitoring of the heart’s electrical activity. Clots aren’t often detected until the heart becomes stressed enough to cause a rupture, causing sudden onset of chest pain, Davison said.

Screening typically would have more value in people who are new to exercise and don’t know whether they have developed a disease. People who regularly exercise without any symptoms aren’t likely to show any signs in a stress test, Davison said.

Competition Changes


World Triathlon Corp., the owner of the sport’s Ironman-branded events, made changes to the swim portion of select races after an increase in competitor deaths in recent years, the company announced last month.

Events in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho; Lake Placid, New York; and Mont-Tremblant, Quebec, no longer feature a mass swim start, eliminating a long-standing Ironman tradition. Athletes at those races will either enter the water in a continuous stream through an access point, with their time starting when they cross a timing mat, or in staggered waves based on their age group.

The changes came two months after Ross Ehlinger, a 46-year-old man from Austin, Texas, died during the swim portion of the Escape from Alcatraz Triathlon and nine months after Andy Naylor, a 43-year-old member of the Hong Kong Police Force, died near the conclusion of the 2.4-mile swim portion of the New York City Ironman. In 2011, two competitors died during the swim portion of the Olympic-distance New York City Triathlon.

MetaMan Iron


Other organizers are also taking precautions. On the last day of August, triathletes will gather on the beach of Bintan, Indonesia and participate in the MetaMan Iron Distance race. Two speedboats will be on hand to help racers in the event of a medical emergency, said organizer spokeswoman Hollie Avil.

O’Keefe advises his patients, especially those over 45, to run no more than 20 miles a week, spread out over three to four days.

“That’s not to say you can’t get problems when you’re under 45,” said O’Keefe. “But you’re much more susceptible when you’re over 45 because it just takes longer for your body to recover and when you hammer it day in and day out, it just takes a toll on your body.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-20/men-over-40-should-think-twice-before-running-triathlons.html

Tuesday, 17 January 2012

Instant scans to give doctors extra insight

29 October 2010 Last updated at 01:14 GMT

MR Diffusion Tractography
Experts will use the equipment to scan organs in under a second
 
State of the art scanners at a unique £20m facility in Edinburgh will be used to improve diagnosis and treatment of illnesses, it has been announced.

The scanners will help doctors study the causes and spread of diseases and assess their impact on the body.

The Clinical Research Imaging Centre, the first of its kind in the UK, is due to be opened by The Duke of Edinburgh.

The centre is a collaboration between the University of Edinburgh and NHS Lothian.

It is based at the university's Medical Research Institute, in the Little France area of Edinburgh.

The scanners will allow investigations to take place without invasive procedures - reducing the need for biopsies or angiograms, where catheters are used to identify vessel and organ damage.

Speed scans

Experts will use the imaging equipment to scan organs in under a second and to see in great detail how they function.

They will also be able to track the flow of blood through vessels, for instance in the heart, determine the spread of disease and assess the effectiveness of new drugs treatments.

The centre features a high strength magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, which can safely identify abnormalities in tissues, whether in the developing foetus in the womb or in old age.

The world's most advanced computerised tomography (CT) scanner is able to scan entire organs such as the heart or brain in less than a second.

A CT-positron emission tomography (PET/CT) scanner can identify the spread of cancer using tracers created by a cyclotron and radiochemistry laboratories on-site.

Novel tracers will be produced to investigate inflammation in tissues - a key factor in heart and lung diseases as well as changes in the brain in diseases such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease.

Professor Edwin Van Beek, director of the Clinical Research Imaging Centre, said: "There have been dramatic advances in imaging over the past decade, changing the way we look at disease and our understanding of the biological processes involved.

"As opposed to simply looking at the structures of the body - such as the heart and the brain - we can look at how organs are functioning in real time.

"This will not only help us better understand disease but it will help us to improve both diagnosis and treatments."

Head of Research and Development for NHS Lothian, Professor David Newby, said: "This world-leading new centre brings together the very latest imaging technologies in a single facility.

"With the University of Edinburgh's world-leading clinical research, this will allow a major improvement in our ability rapidly to investigate and understand the most serious and distressing diseases in our patients."

More on This Story


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


Monday, 16 January 2012

MRI scans 'are better for heart checks', experts say

23 December 2011 Last updated at 00:06 GMT

Patient going into an MRI scannerMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans should be used to assess patients with suspected heart disease, rather than standard checks, experts say.

A University of Leeds study of 750 people found MRI was better at detecting the condition, and of ruling it out in unaffected patients.

MRI was also non-invasive and did not use radiation, unlike the usual tests.

A spokesman for the British Heart Foundation, which backed the study, said MRI should be used more widely.

CHD is caused when vital arteries serving the heart become narrowed or blocked by a build-up of fatty substances.

This can lead to severe chest pain, known as angina, and if the condition worsens and remains untreated, patients may have a heart attack.

Expertise

Patients with suspected angina are currently most likely to have either an angiogram - an invasive test where dye is injected directly into the heart's arteries - or a non-invasive imaging test called SPECT.

Angiograms and SPECT tests both involve ionising radiation.

MRI scans, which use strong magnetic fields and radio waves to produce a detailed image of the inside of the body, are already widely used to help diagnose other conditions.

In the five-year, £1.3m study published by The Lancet, patients with suspected angina and at least one risk factor for heart disease underwent both kinds of imaging test.

The results were compared using an angiogram.

Dr John Greenwood, who led the study, said: "We have shown convincingly that of the options available to doctors in diagnosing coronary heart disease, MRI is better than the more commonly-used SPECT imaging test.

"As well as being more accurate, it has the advantage of not using any ionising radiation, sparing patients and health professionals from unnecessary exposure."

Prof Peter Weissberg, medical director at the British Heart Foundation, said: "For patients suffering with chest pains, there are a number of tests that can be used to decide whether their symptoms are due to coronary heart disease or not.

"This research shows that a full MRI scan is better than the most commonly used alternative - a SPECT scan using a radioactive tracer."

He added: "MRI has the additional advantage that it doesn't involve radiation.

"At present, not all hospitals have the expertise to undertake such scans but these findings provide clear evidence that MRI should be more widely used in the future."

And in a commentary in the Lancet, Dr Robert Bonow of Northwestern University in Chicago, said the improved accuracy of MRI "must be balanced against availability and cost-effectiveness".

More on This Story

Related Stories


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites



Saturday, 24 December 2011

MRI scans 'are better for heart checks', experts say