Pages

Showing posts with label Fats-Dietary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fats-Dietary. Show all posts

Friday, 7 February 2020

What is the difference between the keto diet and the Atkins diet? A comparison guide

The keto diet requires you to be on an extremely low-carb diet for the entire time you are dieting, but the Atkins diet only requires severe carb limiting in the first of its four phases.

06 Feb 2020
 
a woman standing in front of a store
© Joos Mind/Getty Images

  • Though the keto diet requires dieters to consume copious amounts of healthy fats to aid in ketosis, the Atkins diet limits fat and encourages protein consumption instead.
  • The Atkins diet has no qualms with processed food, but the keto diet favors whole, fresh foods.
  • This article was reviewed by Samantha Cassetty, MS, RD, nutrition and wellness expert with a private practice based in New York City.
  • Visit Insider's homepage for more stories.
Both the ketogenic diet and the Atkins diet cut carbs and encourage weight loss, but that's about all they have in common.
The ketogenic diet was created in the 1920s as a therapy for epilepsy, but the diet has gained popularity in recent years as a rapid weight loss tool. Commonly referred to as keto, the diet is similar to other low-carb diets, including Atkins, but its guidelines include some key differences.
The difference in carb limitation for the keto diet and Atkins diet

According to the Mayo Clinic, a person who consumes 2,000 calories a day should get between 45% and 65%, or 225 to 325 grams, of those calories from carbohydrates. But when you eliminate the number of carbs stored in your body, it goes through a series of adaptations in order to, ultimately, burn fat reserves to get the energy it needs to function. This fat-burning state is called ketosis and the ketogenic diet requires you to remain in this fat-burning state long-term. The Atkins diet, on the other hand, induces ketosis, but only in the first phase.
The makeup of a typical keto diet is around 60% fat, 30% protein, and just 10% carbohydrates, although it's common to go as low as 5% carbs. For someone who consumes 2,000 calories per day, this means eating no more than 50 grams of carbohydrates a day, and sometimes as few as 20 grams. That's about 80 to 200 calories' worth of carbs. This is the way you eat for the entire time you're on the keto diet. The Atkins diet is different.
That Atkins diet is comprised of four phases: induction, ongoing weight loss (OWL), pre-maintenance and lifetime maintenance. The phases start with a dramatic reduction in carbohydrate intake - you're only allowed around 20 grams per day. But then you slowly reintroduce carbs once you achieve your weight loss goals. And once you've maintained your goal weight for a month, you enter the final phase, lifetime maintenance, which as the name suggests, should be the way you eat for life. In this last phase, you can increase your carbohydrate consumption and you're allowed to consume anywhere from 40 to 120 grams of carbs daily.
The Atkins Diet also functions on net carbs. You can calculate net carbs by checking the nutrition labels on your food. Just subtract the grams of fiber you consume from the total grams of carbs and that's your net carb intake for that meal.
Fiber has very little impact on blood sugar, which is why fiber-filled carbs don't count towards your daily limit on Atkins. The keto diet, on the other hand, makes no exception for carbs, fibrous or not.
The keto diet requires generous portions of fat, but the Atkins diet favors protein

According to Amy Miskimon Goss, an assistant professor of nutrition sciences at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, the Atkins diet has traditionally recommended eating protein to subdue hunger, whereas a well-formulated ketogenic diet limits protein and uses fat to soothe a rumbling stomach instead.
Since the Atkins diet is more holistic, especially in its "lifetime maintenance" phase, there are no exact percentages for protein consumption.
The keto diet, on the other hand, is strict in its insistence upon high-fat consumption. In order to maintain ketosis, the keto diet requires dieters to consume a diet of mostly fats. In fact, you should be consuming about 60% to 75% of your daily calories from healthy fats found in foods like avocados, nuts, and extra virgin olive oil.
Keto encourages whole foods, but Atkins does not

Goss explains that a ketogenic diet should also be based on whole foods. This means eating salmon instead of beef jerky, unprocessed foods rather than anything heavily processed with excess sodium, and staying away from artificial preservatives.
The Atkins Diet, however, does not have these restrictions. The Atkins diet company encourages people to eat Atkins-brand bars, shakes and other pre-packaged foods that are specifically designed to support the lifestyle. That said, with the popularity of the keto diet, you can find many keto-friendly, processed, packaged foods as well.
If you're doing a keto diet, you might want to work with a doctor

Goss says that maintaining a keto diet without the assistance of a doctor or nutritionist can be tricky and even dangerous. According to the Merck Manual, a popular resource for medical professionals, eating fewer than 100 grams of carbohydrates every day causes keto acids to accumulate in the body from ketosis. In small amounts, keto acids don't harm the body, but if the body sustains ketosis, the acids can trigger side effects that range from nausea and fatigue to dizziness and abnormal heart rhythms.
"It's critical that patients with any chronic condition, especially diabetes or hypertension taking medication, to consult with their doctor before starting a keto diet because it's likely that medication adjustments will need to be made," says Goss.
Related stories about popular diets:

https://www.msn.com/en-my/health/nutrition/what-is-the-difference-between-the-keto-diet-and-the-atkins-diet-a-comparison-guide/ar-BBZJWxF?ocid=ientp

Wednesday, 9 October 2019

Get an Extra Edge Against Cancer

Here’s how an integrative plan can help you…

Mark A. Stengler, NMD, a naturopathic physician and founder of The Stengler Center for Integrative Medicine in Encinitas, California (MarkStengler.com).

Published Date: June 1, 2018   Publication: Bottom Line Health

More than one-third of American adults reach for vitamins, herbs or other natural medicines when they have colds or other routine (and hopefully mild) health problems. Similar remedies can help when you have cancer.
To learn more about the best and safest ways to use natural therapies—also known as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)—to fight cancer and its complications, Bottom Line Health spoke with Mark A. Stengler, NMD, a naturopathic physician who treats cancer patients.

HOW CAM CAN WORK

Research has shown that many so-called “alternative” treatments can enhance the effects of conventional cancer care such as surgery, radiation or chemotherapy…reduce treatment side effects…and possibly improve survival.
This type of integrative care doesn’t replace conventional cancer treatments. Rather, with the guidance of a doctor, complementary therapies are added to a patient’s treatment plan.
Important: To ensure that the therapies described below would be appropriate for you, consult the Society for Integrative Oncology (IntegrativeOnc.org) to find an integrative oncologist near you…or check with The American Association of Naturopathic Physicians (Naturopathic.org) to locate a naturopathic doctor who also treats cancer patients. 
Also: Be sure to ask the doctor you choose to be in touch with your oncologist. Here’s how CAM can help with problems that plague most cancer patients…
• Get relief from “chemo brain.” It’s estimated that three-quarters of cancer patients will experience some degree of mental cloudiness. Known as “chemo brain,” it can include mood swings, memory loss and mental fatigue. It eventually improves, but some patients will feel like they’re in a mental fog years after their treatments have ended.
What helps: The omega-3 fatty acids in fish oil supplements—a typical daily dose is 1,000 mg total of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) combined—help regulate acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter that increases nerve growth factor and improves memory as well as energy levels.
The omega-3s also increase the effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil and other chemotherapy drugs, according to a study published in Clinical Nutrition Research. In research published in Cancer, lung cancer patients who took fish oil along with chemotherapy had a greater one-year survival rate than those who didn’t take the supplements.
Note: Fish oil may cause stomach upset in some patients, along with bleeding in those who are taking anticoagulant medications such as warfarin (Coumadin), apixaban (Eliquis) and rivaroxaban (Xarelto).
• Boost energy levels. Ginseng is one of the more effective supplements for cancer patients. A number of studies have shown that it reduces treatment-related side effects, including weakness and fatigue. A double-blind study in Journal of the National Cancer Institute found that patients who took ginseng had less fatigue than those given placebos.
My advice: The American form of ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) is more effective than the Asian form. Typical dose: 1,300 mg to 2,000 mg daily. It rarely causes side effects, although it may lower blood sugar in those with diabetes.
Also helpful: Glutathione, a “super antioxidant” that can be combined with chemotherapy to reduce toxin-related fatigue and other side effects. It’s usually given in an IV solution. Side effects are unlikely, but it may interfere with some chemotherapy drugs. Be sure to consult an integrative oncologist to see whether you will/won’t benefit from glutathione.
• Improve immune response. Turkey tail is one of the best–studied medicinal mushrooms. Available in capsule form, the supplement has chemical compounds (beta–glucans) that stimulate many aspects of the immune response, including antibody activity—important for inducing the death of cancer cells.
Impressive research: A study published in Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy found that postsurgical remissions in colorectal cancer patients were twice as common in those who were given turkey tail. Typical dose: 3,000 mg daily. Side effects are unlikely.

A NUTRITIONAL BOOST

Conventional oncologists receive little training in nutrition, but it’s a critical issue for cancer patients. One study found that 91% of cancer patients had nutritional impairments, and 9% were seriously malnourished. Research shows that malnutrition contributes directly or indirectly to a significant number of cancer deaths due to poor appetite and the disease process of advanced cancer.
Loss of appetite is a major cause of malnutrition and muscle loss (cachexia). I advise patients who are losing weight to address these problems by getting more calories.
With every meal, include high-fat foods such as olive oil, coconut oil, avocado, nuts and seeds. A 10-year study, published in Archives of Internal Medicine, looked at more than 380,000 adults and found that a Mediterranean-style diet, which is high in olive oil and other healthy fats, reduced cancer deaths in men by 17% and 12% in women.
Also helpful: Protein shakes. They can provide the extra protein that’s critical for cancer patients. Up to 80% of those with advanced cancer experience muscle loss. Protein shakes can help reverse it. Best option: Ready-made whey protein or pea protein shakes—both are nutritious, have 5 g of sugar or less per serving and are readily available in health-food stores.
My advice: Get 1 g to 1.2 g of protein per kilogram (2.2 pounds) of body weight daily. This means that someone who weighs 150 pounds will need about 68 g to 82 g of protein daily. You can get that much from two or three servings of a typical whey protein beverage, which comes ready-mixed or in powdered form. Caution: If you have moderate or severe kidney disease, check with your doctor for advice on your protein intake.
https://bottomlineinc.com/health/cancer-treatment/when-fighting-cancer-integrative-care

Thursday, 28 April 2016

What we know about fat may be wrong

Dr Ancel Keys (Jan 26, 1904–Nov 20, 2004) was an American scientist who studied the influence of diet on health. He is responsible, almost more than any other individual, for the public health misconception around fats that exists today. Through published work that was vaunted across the world, Dr Keys has had a far-reaching impact on how we think about the role of fats.



What we know about fat may be wrong
What we know about fat may be wrong.


When Dr Keys first published his theories, alleging that saturated fats were uniquely harmful, they were controversial. This controversy remains strong today as the debate on the roles of fat and sugar in relation to cardiovascular disease (CVD) associated with atheroma (the fatty material that forms plaques in arteries) goes on.
This article reflects upon two main subjects: understanding the complexity of chronic diseases as the antithesis of acute infectious diseases; and the principle of falsifiability applied to atheroma theories and the practical consequences this entails.
After World War II, the work of Dr Keys played a fundamental role in the debate around fats. How?
Because it claimed to demonstrate a link between saturated fats consumption and atheroma: “Many factors are probably involved in the atherosclerotic development and in the clinical appearance of coronary heart disease, but there is no longer any doubt that one central item is the concentration, over time, of cholesterol and related lipids and lipoproteins in the blood serum. No other etiological (sic) influence of comparable importance is as yet identified.” (A. Keys, American Journal of Public Health, Nov 1953, vol 43, 1399-1407.)
Today, in reality, scientists see tobacco, diabetes and hypertension to be much more powerful risk factors. We condemn researchers who, for over 40 years, have not been keen to verify the data and the conclusions it suggested.
Epidemiology in modern history
Epidemiologic observations have drawn the attention of scientists for a long time on the link between dietary change and cardiovascular diseases. Examples of populations with low CVD prevalence or populations where CVD are the first cause of mortality have led epidemiologists to do research on food.
This is what we called the Diet-Heart Hypothesis. But it is so incredibly complex that even till today, we have yet to come up with a definitive answer. Simple hypo- theses (i.e. single-factor cause) and invalid experimental models have produced abundant literature, of which little is actually helpful.
We can, however, wonder about the recent dietary changes brought by the recent industrial transition. In the West, those changes can be qualified with three factors:
• Abundance of calories
• Abundance of carbohydrates
• Abundance of processed foods
Further to these, we should not forget about calorie expenditure. In industrialised countries, we have shifted to a sedentary lifestyle (at work, in public transportation or for personal activities).
Dr Keys supported his hypothesis with charisma.
How is that possible?
He and his team set out to study the dietary characteristics and lifestyles of different populations worldwide and compare the prevalence of coronary diseases. It was a rather large study at the time and needed significant funding.
This study addressed the issue of the heart attack epidemic that was hitting the United States and other developed countries at the time. He quickly focused on diet-related risk factors, mostly because they were easier to measure, particularly through blood levels.
Among macronutrients, Dr Keys had already explored fat and the indirect measure of blood lipids via blood cholesterol.
The study would be published in a book in 1980 (Seven Countries. A multivariate analysis of death and coronary heart disease).
In the meantime, Dr Keys got more famous, was interviewed often, and in January 1961, was on the cover of Time Magazine.
Dr Keys described a link in the studied cohorts between the percentage of saturated fats in the diet and the death rate by coronary events. The correlation was dependent on the number of countries studied, but it was significant in the cohorts he chose.
As there was a correlation between total blood cholesterol and the same events, and as Dr Keys highlighted that saturated fats (especially palmitic acid as it is the most common) increased blood cholesterol, a conclusion appeared.
He stated that saturated fats, including palmitic acid, were link-ed to coronary atheroma. Others have then bridged the gap, saying they cause coronary diseases.
Obviously, all of this was not true. Inaccuracies and biases made his observations invalid.
Even Dr Keys ended up publishing more balanced conclusions than others: “Our 10 year finding, and concordance with other studies, make it clear that the big three risk factors for coronary heart disease now established are age, blood pressure, and serum cholesterol. The findings about cigarette smoking as a risk factor indicate that here, too, relationships are not as simple as first supposed.” (Seven Countries, page 341).
He later became an advocate of the Mediterranean diet and kept studying it for a while. In 1975, he published How to Eat Well and Stay Well the Mediterranean Way.
Consequences still felt today
Dietary guidelines from experts and governments have been largely based on Dr Keys’ work.
To lower our intake in cholesterol and saturated fats, populations have massively consumed food products in which fats have been replaced with carbohydrates, and saturated fats with vegetable oils rich in omega-6.
This did not change the prevalence of atheroma-related diseases. New research even shows these changes may be linked to the obesity epidemic and type 2 diabetes.
Palm oil for one, which has a good balance between saturated and unsaturated fats, constitutes a healthy alternative – but it has been unjustly maligned for containing saturated fats.
There have been economic consequences too. This is linked to the food industry’s ability to quickly find a new market opportunity with low-fat food products. It has, as always, been shown to be very innovative in that regard.
Its lobby was powerful and the “low-fat” concept developed globally even though it is not possible as of yet to show it has any positive impact of cardiovascular health.
In the 40 years between Dr Keys’ work and the shadow cast upon it, many scientific articles have been published to try and explain the anomalies observed in real populations.
None ever questioned what had become a dogma. The different paradoxes, including the famous French Paradox, have only started to shake the foundation of his hypothesis.
Who bears the responsibility?
Surely, Dr Keys cannot be held responsible for how his data was used.
But his vision clearly influenced medicine for generations and overstated the importance of saturated fats and cholesterol in cardiovascular risk.
A summary of the Seven Countries Study on the University of Minnesota, US (where the study was coordinated), website, had this to say: “The main implications of the Seven Countries Study are that the mass burden and epidemic of atherosclerotic diseases has cultural origins, is preventable, can change rapidly, and is strongly influenced by the fatty composition of the habitual diet.
“The study implies the universal susceptibility of humans to CVD, but that the frequency of susceptible phenotypes is greatly reduced in favourable environments. It suggests there may be other and important protective elements in the diet and lifestyles of Crete and Japan.”
The only concession made to Dr Keys’ theories is the confirmation of a strong influence of the composition of lipids in the diet, but the words “saturated fats” are no longer used.
The Journal of the American College of Cardiology recently reminded physicians:“Atherosclerosis is a multifactorial disease and requires a multifactorial approach with smoking cessation, dietary modification and weight management, regular physical activity, attention to psychosocial risk factors, and pharmacological therapy of lipid and nonlipid risk factors.
“Comprehensive risk factor control is associated with improved prognosis, and our challenge is to develop care models that will allow us to achieve such control.”
We need to keep in mind that tobacco, type 2 diabetes and hypertension are, in that order, more powerful atheroma risk factors than LDL particles. There is no interest in dietary cholesterol in preventing CVD.
Saturated fats, like monounsaturated fats, and like carbohydrates, increase the amount of LDL particles when in calorie excess and promotes atheroma if other risk factors are present, and if phenotype is susceptible.
This is the reason why we cannot predict among high-LDL patients those who will have a cardiovascular, cerebral or peripheral event, other than watching the three aforementioned powerful risk factors, or having proper atheroma plaques exams.
In summary, Dr Keys was wrong, and his mistake has been compounded over the decades. It is time now to end the crusade against saturated fats.

Dr Guy-André Pelouze is a French cardiothoracic surgeon, and a founder of the French think tank and research group Institut de Recherche Clinique (Institute of Clinical Research). Dr Pelouze is a widely quoted writer and commentator on health and nutrition in France. This article contains extracts from the scientific paper, ‘Ancel Keys: Science is not believing’.
http://www.star2.com/health/wellness/2016/04/24/what-we-know-about-fat-may-be-wrong/


This post is on Healthwise

Wednesday, 27 April 2016

A fat lot of good – Part 1

Fat lies, thin lies ... the truth about fat lies in this four-part saga on everything you ever wanted to know about fats, and maybe more.


If the oil used for frying food is rancid or overused, the food cooked in such oils is potentially toxic.
The idea for this article started when an oversized lady bumped into me in the supermarket while desperately reaching for the last pot of low-fat cottage cheese on sale.
Startled by the unexpected rudeness (wholly un-intentioned, I’m sure), the incident started a long chain of thought about fats on the slow walk home – and the result is this somewhat intricate discourse into the curious world of fat, its consumption and the consequences.
It is hoped you will find it at least a little informative – and perhaps it might even change some long-standing perceptions.

A world of manufactured lies and half truths

For a long time, it bemused me that people wanting to eat healthy food choose some low-fat or fat-free product to consume over a food option made with natural ingredients.
What do they think they are getting with a “low-fat” or “fat-free” alternative? The not too palatable answer is they are probably ingesting some heavily processed concoction made from a cocktail of chemicals – and with indeterminate side effects on health.
So perhaps “low-fat” is not exactly wholesome – but if enough people (and marketing departments) say it is healthy, sooner or later public opinion will change and then suddenly these chemical concoctions get perceived as “healthy”.
For anyone who believes in good statistics and facts, public opinion can often be an intellectual and illogical nightmare. But the public is not to blame for its opinions – in modern times, it seems that around 85% of what we see, hear or read about scientific food or health research is directly or indirectly sponsored.
This is compared to much less than 20% a hundred years ago – and to be fair, there were proportionately a lot more investigative journalists then and access to news was seldom free and rather limited.

Some really disturbing trends

There are now millions of people in the media business busily creating “content” rather than doing proper science journalism or fact reporting – and why bother with hard investigative work when it’s easier to pick up and re-write newsflashes from drug companies about new “weight loss” pills, or another “cure for cancer” or whatever item the marketing departments want to push that day.
Evidence of this is the propagation of the same story (perhaps written only as the viewpoint of one researcher or editor) on hundreds of internet news sites – often blindly boosted by social media.
Such rampant repetition of any narrative would tend to confer some sort of undeserved credibility to the premise behind any story, especially in the eyes of the uninquisitive public.
So quite often, whole sections of public opinion today are based on sketchy or even incorrect information.
Facts and logic are, to some extent, almost becoming irrelevant – note the current blight of religious militancy globally and the backlash against intellectual thinking in the Donald Trump 2016 campaign for the US Presidency.
It might seem that millions of people are actually proud of being irrational and ignorant – and this is something you should find really disturbing.
In general, people also have a habit of disliking facts when facts are disagreeable to their lifestyles, though their reaction is often not as extreme as others. For example, corrupt politicians in power really don’t like awkward facts about their crimes to be publicised, to the extent that they even try to influence public opinion by lying, issuing fake or distracting propaganda, banning the free press, blocking access to the internet and usurping the legal system, a common tactic used by tin pot dictators such as in North Korea or some African countries.
In short, public opinion matters – and to people with vested interests, it really matters a lot.

Fat – a subject close to the heart, literally

On a more mundane level, my own family didn’t believe me when I protested for many years that eating low-cholesterol and low-fat foods doesn’t make sense. Their objections are very well-intentioned as the accepted public opinion is that it is really necessary to cut down our consumption of fats (and especially cholesterol) – and this has been drummed into us for decades.
Fat deposits causing a clog in blood vessels.
Fat deposits causing a clog in blood vessels.
The uncomplicated rationale is that cholesterol is known to be one of the main components of the plaque (known as atheroma) which plugs up the arteries – over time, this becomes a disease called arteriosclerosis which leads on to coronary heart disease (CHD) and heart attacks. The other components of atheroma are calcium, fibrin (a blood clotting agent), various fatty substances and other white blood cell-related detritus. Incidentally, CHD is the number one killer in the USA and has the same unenviable standing in pretty much the rest of the developed world.
The problem with this advice is that the human body itself produces every day far more cholesterol than we can obtain from food. Cholesterol is a vital compound needed for the proper functioning of the body – without it we would die immensely faster than from CHD.
For a start, the mobility of the blood cells in our body wouldn’t be possible without cholesterol – and we wouldn’t be able to digest fats or vitamin D either, among other things. So in my mind, eating food with cholesterol really should not be the cause of any significant health problems.
It turns out that the actual underlying cause of arteriosclerosis is arterial damage – and it is a bit of a tangled story. Cholesterol forms the bulk of the components which attend damaged arteries – and there is some debate over whether it is present there by design or by coincidence.
Regardless, if the causes of the arterial wall damage are not removed, then the persistent build-up of cholesterol (and other atheroma compounds) will cause arteriosclerosis.
Patching up damaged arteries with cholesterol is known as atherogenesis and might have been an evolutionary development – this is deduced from the fact that arteries can detect the formation of atheroma and widen themselves to some degree.
However, this offers only a temporary and limited degree of protection if the underlying causes of arterial damage are not removed as the atheroma compounds will then keep building up and eventually result in arteriosclerosis.

Cholesterol – the bad and the good

So is cholesterol bad or good? The answer is both. We need cholesterol to survive and our own bodies produce it in greater quantities than we can normally get from food.
However, the profound role of cholesterol in atheroma and arteriosclerosis means that some people desperately need to reduce the amount of cholesterol (held inside the atheroma) in their arteries. What they need even more is to reduce the amount of damage to their arteries so that the atheroma has a chance to dissipate.
Blaming cholesterol solely for the cause of arteriosclerosis is simply not correct – although once someone has arteriosclerosis, it is really sensible to take medication to reduce the cholesterol in the arteries – please do take medical advice on this if it affects you.

Causes of arterial wall damage

And what causes arterial wall damage? This is where more unpalatable facts come in, for they are mostly comments on modern lifestyles. It has been proven conclusively that the following items are significant causes of arterial wall damage:
Smoking – there is overwhelming evidence that the toxins in cigarette smoke cause cell damage not only in the lungs but also in arteries and other organs. It also decreases haemoglobin’s ability to transport oxygen in the blood, leading to the heart pumping harder – and you would doubtless already know that smoking is the leading cause of cancer in most countries
High blood pressure – this is obviously a leading cause as high blood pressure simply means more strain on the arterial walls, especially as you grow older. There are several causes of high blood pressure, such as obesity, stress, smoking, inactivity, too much dietary salt, alcohol, etc.
Sadly, it seems that there is a 90% chance of modern humans getting prehypertension at some point in life – this is a condition where blood pressure is higher than normal but not to the point of hypertension.
Glucose and diabetes – a surplus of glucose in the blood is actually toxic and eventually an excess of this monosaccharide will damage the cells in arterial walls. Too much blood glucose occur when you overeat certain carbohydrates (such as jasmine rice, potatoes, white bread, etc) and sugary foods – and problems occur if the excess blood sugar isn’t removed by insulin directing it away into skeletal muscle tissues. Insulin is produced by the pancreas to regulate blood glucose, but chronic exposure to high levels of insulin causes tolerance and eventually a form of Type 2 diabetes.
Obesity – there are pretty definite correlations between obesity and high blood pressure and also diabetes, so arterial wall damage is a highly probable consequence of obesity.
Genetics – some people are simply more prone to getting arterial wall damage and there isn’t much they can do, except perhaps take medication once the condition has been detected
Inflammation response – there is a lot to say about this subject – and I mean, a LOT. Please read on for more on this subject.
AGEs – Advanced Glycation End-products (AGEs, also sometimes known as glycotoxins) are produced when food is cooked with dry heat (ie. baked, fried, roasted, grilled, etc). They are usually the result of monosaccharides (simple sugars) combining with amino acids (components making up proteins) when food is cooked in dry heat at temperatures of over 135°C – it is a process known as the Maillard Reaction.
AGEs are created via heat-induced, somewhat random chemical interactions and can end up as simple molecules or more usually, longer or highly complex chained compounds (or polymers).
Some AGEs are rabidly toxic to the body because they are so reactive – and it is critical to note that the human body is unable to easily remove AGEs once ingested. One common AGE known as glucosepane can never be removed from the human body.

AGE, RAGE and frying oil

I want to expand a little about AGEs as their role in arterial wall damage is often overlooked.
AGEs are known to cause damage to the protein structures in cells (including arterial walls) and also induce inflammation in various parts of the body – one major reason is an odd gene in the human body known as the Receptor for AGE (or RAGE).
When a RAGE binds with an AGE, it triggers an inflammatory reaction in tissues – and oddly, that is about all it does. Normally, inflammation is a protective mechanism and is part of the body’s response to pathogens, cell damage or irritants – but with AGEs, the body often cannot clear them and the affected cells eventually get damaged due to the persistent RAGE-induced inflammation.
The problem is that most of us seriously enjoy eating food loaded with AGEs – for these are the aromatic compounds that give that special delicious flavour to grilled, fried or roasted meats and baked goods. Photo: The Star
The problem is that most of us seriously enjoy eating food loaded with AGEs – for these are the aromatic compounds that give that special delicious flavour to grilled, fried or roasted meats and baked goods. Photo: The Star
Chronic inflammation in the cells lining the arterial walls due to RAGEs will eventually damage them.
The problem is that most of us seriously enjoy eating food loaded with AGEs – for these are the aromatic compounds that give that special delicious flavour to grilled, fried or roasted meats and baked goods.
Why most humans love AGEs may have an evolutionary basis – the smells and aromas of AGEs confirm that the food has been cooked with fire (or dry heat) and therefore unlikely to harbour dangerous bacteria or parasites, like those found in uncooked food.
As a little aside, there is some odd research evidence that milk from the Ethawah goat can reduce the inflammation caused by RAGEs – and I would bet that you didn’t know this before.
And before you ask, the answer is No, I don’t know about the effect of milk from other goats – but for a fee, I can find out for you.
So although life would probably be not worth living without AGEs to flavour our food, especially for gourmets, there are some ways we might be consuming excessive, dangerous amounts of these compounds and other related toxins which lead directly or indirectly to arteriosclerosis – and one major culprit appears to be the utilisation of unsuitable, rancid or overused cooking oils.
The oils used for commercial baking and cooking are very often plant-based – usually that’s because they are the cheapest oils available. All oils decompose when heated – this decomposition can be most clearly observed by the smoking effect once the oil exceeds a certain temperature (known as the smoking point).
The smoking point and rate of decomposition is different for the various kinds of cooking oils. The lower the smoking point, the less suitable the oil is for frying, although this is by no means the only criteria of unsuitability.
And if the oil is rancid or overused, then food cooked in such oils is actually potentially toxic. You are much more likely to encounter problems with oils when eating out as your home will very probably maintain cooking products in good storage conditions.
But actually that is also not the full story – else it would be easy to attain great cardiovascular health by just avoiding food cooked in a few oils, and that is simply not true.
In fact, as you will see, the story is not straightforward at all and the story of fats and health has been riddled with misunderstandings for years.
It sometimes reminds me of a lady visiting the Far East who asked, “I’ve had fish balls now for three days in a row – do Asians eat any other part of the fish?”
Next: A slippery, oily look into the role of hydrogen in fats

Friday, 25 March 2016

MUST READ: Cholesterol Is Finally Officially Removed From 'Naughty' List

Cholesterol has been on the "naughty" list of nutrients for nearly 40 years, with health officials warning us to stay away from high-cholesterol foods since the 1970s to avoid heart disease and clogged arteries.
The US Department of Agriculture, which is responsible for updating the guidelines every five years, stated in its findings for 2015: "Previously, the Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommended that cholesterol intake be limited to no more than 300 mg/day.

"The 2015 DGAC will not bring forward this recommendation because available evidence shows no appreciable relationship between consumption of dietary cholesterol and serum (blood) cholesterol, consistent with the AHA/ACC (American Heart Association / American College of Cardiology) report.

"Cholesterol is not a nutrient of concern for overconsumption."


The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee will, in response, no longer warn people against eating high-cholesterol foods and will instead focus on sugar as the main substance of dietary concern.

The 70s, 80s and 90s were the 'non fat' years, with the government warning people to limit the amount of high-cholersterol foods in their diets to avoid heart disease and strokes.

But nutritionists and scientists have long been campaigning for the U-turn, which started with introducing "good cholesterols" back into the 'safe zone'.



Full-fat dairy products and advocados are high in good fats. Copyright [Rex]
Full-fat dairy products and advocados are high in good fats. Copyright [Rex]
Eggs are no longer on the 'naughty list'. Copyright [Rex]
Eggs are no longer on the 'naughty list'. Copyright [Rex]

US cardiologist Dr Steven Nissen said: "It's the right decision. We got the dietary guidelines wrong. They've been wrong for decades."

He esitmated that about 20 per cent of cholesterol levels in your blood come from your diet, which means the rest is produced by your liver and is actually needed by the body.

Dr Chris Masterjohn added:“Since we cannot possibly eat enough cholesterol to use for our bodies’ daily functions, our bodies make their own.

"When we eat more foods rich in this compound, our bodies make less. If we deprive ourselves of foods high in cholesterol - such as eggs, butter, and liver - our body revs up its cholesterol synthesis."
Sugar has now been identified as the "worst" food culprit for health problems, with GPs now focusing on weaning patients off the sweet stuff.

Cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, who works with group Action On Sugar, says a clamp-down on the food industry is next.

He said: "It's very clear that added sugar has absolutely no nutritional value whatsoever and, contrary to what the food industry want you to believe, the body doesn't require any carbohydrate for energy from added sugar.

"And we know the food industry have been spiking our food with added sugars. We also know that carbohydrates and particularly refined carbohydrates - so carbohydrates that lack fibre, sugar being one of them - have the biggest impact on insulin in terms of surges of insulin in our body. And insulin is a fat storing hormone."



Nuts were previously thought to contain too much cholesterol. Copyright [Rex]
Nuts were previously thought to contain too much cholesterol. Copyright [Rex]

So, in summary, ditch your skinny latte for a full-fat latte and get some avocados down you.

The following on the same subject is from:  http://svsaibaba.blogspot.my/2016/01/cholesterol-is-finally-officially.html


So far all of us are worried about cholesterol levels in our body and taking medicines to control the levels as per the advice of doctors, Now read this interesting article which has a different dimension on cholesterol levels:


The US government has finally accepted that cholesterol is not a 'nutrient of concern', doing a U-turn on their warnings

In the meantime of 40 years US Drug Industry in connivance with Health Department made over 1.5 trillion US Dollars by selling cholesterol lowering drugs. This fear probably caused death of a million gulliable citizen who believe the US drug industry. 

Cholesterol has been on the "naughty" list of nutrients for nearly 40 years, with health officials warning us to stay away from high-cholesterol foods since the 1970s to avoid heart disease and clogged arteries.

"Full-fat dairy products and avocados are high in good fats."

But US officials have finally given the green light for a U-turn on previous warnings, which means eggs, butter, full-fat dairy products, nuts, coconut oil and meat have now been classified as "safe" and have been officially removed from the "nutrients of concern" list.

The US Department of Agriculture, which is responsible for updating the guidelines every five years, stated in its findings for 2015: "Previously, the Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommended that cholesterol intake be limited to no more than 300 mg/day.

"The 2015 DGAC will not bring forward this recommendation because available evidence shows no appreciable relationship between consumption of dietary cholesterol and serum (blood) cholesterol, consistent with the AHA/ACC (American Heart Association / American College of Cardiology) report.

  • "Cholesterol is not a nutrient of concern for overconsumption." 

  • "Eggs are no longer on the 'naughty list'. "

The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee will, in response, no longer warn people against eating high-cholesterol foods and will instead focus on sugar as the main substance of dietary concern.

The 70s, 80s and 90s were the 'non fat' years, with the government warning people to limit the amount of high-cholesterol foods in their diets to avoid heart disease and strokes.

But nutritionists and scientists have long been campaigning for the U-turn, which started with introducing "good cholesterols" back into the 'safe zone'.

US cardiologist Dr Steven Nissen said: "It's the right decision. We got the dietary guidelines wrong. They've been wrong for decades."

He estimated that about 20 per cent of cholesterol levels in your blood come from your diet, which means the rest is produced by your liver and is actually needed by the body.

Dr Chris Masterjohn added:“Since we cannot possibly eat enough cholesterol to use for our bodies’ daily functions, our bodies make their own.

"When we eat more foods rich in this compound, our bodies make less. If we deprive ourselves of foods high in cholesterol - such as eggs, butter, and liver - our body revs up its cholesterol synthesis."

"Nuts were previously thought to contain too much cholesterol."

Sugar has now been identified as the "worst" food culprit for health problems, with doctors now focusing on weaning patients off the sweet stuff.

Cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, who works with group Action On Sugar, says a clamp-down on the food industry is next.

He said: "It's very clear that added sugar has absolutely no nutritional value whatsoever and, contrary to what the food industry want you to believe, the body doesn't require any carbohydrate for energy from added sugar.

"And we know the food industry have been spiking our food with added sugars. We also know that carbohydrates and particularly refined carbohydrates - so carbohydrates that lack fibre, sugar being one of them - have the biggest impact on insulin in terms of surges of insulin in our body. And insulin is a fat storing hormone."
 
So, in summary, ditch your skinny latte for a full-fat latte and get some avocados down you.
The Real Truth about Cholesterol
The majority of the cholesterol in you is produced by your liver. Your brain is primarily made up from cholesterol.  It is essential for nerve cells to function. 
Cholesterol is the basis for the creation of all the steroid hormones, including estrogen, testosterone, and corticosteroids.  
High cholesterol in the body is a clear indication which shows the liver of the individual is in good health.
Dr. George V. Mann M.D. associate director of the Framingham study for the  incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its risk factors states: 
  • "Saturated fats and cholesterol in the diet are not the cause of coronary heart disease. That myth is the greatest deception of the century, perhaps of any century" 

Cholesterol is the biggest medical scam of all time.
 There is no such thing as bad Cholesterol!  Men of science have abandoned truth for money. Attempting to control cholesterol is a very, very dangerous practice that occurs in every hospital and medical clinic daily. 

By Ron Rosedale, MD
"Statin Drugs Actually Increase Heart Disease"


So you can stop trying to change your Cholesterol level. Studies prove beyond a doubt, cholesterol doesn't cause heart disease and it won't stop a heart attack.  The majority of people that have heart attacks have normal cholesterol levels.   

THE GREAT CHOLESTEROL SCAM 
By K.L. Carlson, MBA
 Cholesterol guidelines have been created to increase pharmaceutical profits, not to improve peoples’ health.  I know from my experience as a pharmaceutical sales representative for a statin drug.  We were trained to emphasize to physicians the new lower LDL guidelines that were ostensibly created by health experts. 

The truth is the majority of the experts who created the lower guidelines have multiple financial ties to pharmaceutical companies.  One expert was found to have ties to ten drug firms


OUR BODY NEEDS 950 mg OF CHOLESTEROL FOR DAILY METABOLISM AND  THE LIVER IS THE MAIN PRODUCER. ONLY 15% OF CHOLESTEROL IS BEING  DONATED BY THE FOOD WE EAT.  
If the fat content is less in our food we eat, our liver got to work more to maintain the level at 950 mg.  If the cholesterol level is high in our body, it shows the liver is working perfect.  Experts say that there is nothing like LDL or HDL. 
Cholesterol is not found to create block any where in human body.  Why does it create block only in heart, where as calcium sediments create block all over the body .. for example kidney, pancreas. Urinary bladder, gall bladder etc etc

Also see:


2015 Dietary Guidelines Include Healthy Revisions, but Still Falls Short for Effective Prevention of Heart Disease





Jun 3, 2015 ... Approximately 25 million people take statin drugs to reduce theircholesterol, yet heart disease remains the number one killer of Americans.1-3.
healthticket.blogspot.com

Sep 12, 2015 ... With all the talk of fighting, battling, combating and beating cholesterolinto submission, you'd think it had a black plastic body suit and James ...
healthticket.blogspot.com

Jul 1, 2014 ... Three weeks ago l went for a cholesterol check. To my surprise, it was above the normal range which should be less than 5.2 mmol/L.
healthticket.blogspot.com


Nov 28, 2011 ... Black Fungus to lower Cholesterol levels. Black Fungus Black fungus kills badcholesterol, dechokes blocked arteries and lowers high blood ...
healthticket.blogspot.com


Dec 14, 2011 ... She also believes conventional medicine is seriously confused about cholesterol, which is closely interrelated with sulfur. Furthermore, healthy ...
healthticket.blogspot.com
Mar 21, 2012 ... If you're like most people, you're tripped up by some fundamental questions about the connection between the cholesterol you eat and that in ...
healthticket.blogspot.com
Apr 20, 2012 ... It's time to finally quit believing the cholesterol-heart disease theory. Although doctors and their patients embrace the idea that cholesterol ...
healthticket.blogspot.com



Dec 7, 2011 ... If you're looking for a natural way to lower your cholesterol—in addition to watching what you eat and exercising—there are plenty of dietary ...
healthticket.blogspot.com
Dec 13, 2011 ... Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is usually known as the "bad" cholesterol, and is often associated with cardiovascular problems. LDL particles ...
healthticket.blogspot.com
Dec 14, 2011 ... A lot of sugar in your diet may lead to unhealthy cholesterol levels, a new study finds. Researchers looked at sugar intake and blood fat levels ...
healthticket.blogspot.com
Dec 9, 2011 ... Pharmacist and Natural Health Consultant Niraj Naik MPharm attempts to givecholesterol, a substance found in every human being, a fair trial, ...
healthticket.blogspot.com

Dec 9, 2011 ... Does a diet heavy in eggs raise the risk of high cholesterol, disease, heart attacks and obesity? Or does having eggs in ones diet contribute to ...
healthticket.blogspot.com

Dec 19, 2011 ... Even though it is natural, red yeast rice is not a panacea or miracle cure for those of you looking to lower your cholesterol. In fact, using it is an ...
healthticket.blogspot.com

Nov 24, 2012 ... The side effects of Lipitor and other cholesterol lowering medications (called statins) have been the subject of much controversy in recent years.
healthticket.blogspot.com

Feb 19, 2016 ... Statin cholesterol-lowering drugs are widely touted as the best way to lower your cholesterol and thereby prevent a heart attack. They're ...
healthticket.blogspot.com



May 9, 2015 ... Research on C-reactive protein indicates that cholesterol-filled plaques in blood vessels may not pose any real danger unless they are affected ...
healthticket.blogspot.com

Dec 26, 2013 ... It's not that he doesn't enjoy eggs—in fact, he loves a good omelet. But he worries about his heart and he's watching his cholesterol…and he ...
healthticket.blogspot.com
Apr 26, 2012 ... Now the latest research proves that garlic can control cholesterol, ward off colds and reduce cancer risk, according to Ellen Tattelman, MD, ...
healthticket.blogspot.com
Dec 28, 2013 ... The new cardiovascular risk reduction guidelines (aka cholesteroltreatment guidelines) are extremely important to physicians and their ...
healthticket.blogspot.com


Oct 24, 2012 ... Contrary to popular belief, virgin coconut oil (VCO) is virtually cholesterol free. There are no major studies implicating VCO in heart disease or ...
healthticket.blogspot.com

Mar 18, 2013 ... While conventional treatments focus on lowering total cholesterol and/or reducing blood thickness, complementary therapy works differently in ...
healthticket.blogspot.com


Apr 6, 2012 ... Many people throw away the egg yolk because they think that's where all the nasty fat and cholesterol is". This is a perfect example of how ...
healthticket.blogspot.com