Pages

Showing posts with label Sugary Drinks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sugary Drinks. Show all posts

Sunday, 31 May 2020

A soda a day ups heart risk

ANOTHER study concludes that just one sugary drink a day can increase your risk of developing cardiovascular, or heart, disease.

  • The Star Malaysia
  • By NANCY CLANTON
  • A father and daughter check the ingredients label on a fruit drink at the supermarket. drinking sugary beverages daily, including fruit drinks with added sugar, can increase a person’s risk of heart disease. — Positive Parenting

    ANOTHER study concludes that just one sugary drink a day can increase your risk of developing cardiovascular, or heart, disease.

    Last year, researchers in France found that even one small glass of soft drink or sugary juice can increase your chances of getting cancer or having heart problems.

    Now, in a study recently published in the Journal of the American Heart Association, California researchers in the United States have found that one serving daily of a sugary soft drink is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease.

    Sugar-sweetened beverages were defined as “caloric soft drinks, sweetened bottled waters or teas, and fruit drinks.”

    For their study, the scientists questioned 106.178 women free from cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus in the California Teachers Study, a cohort of female teachers and administrators who have been followed since 1995.

    The women were questioned for 20 years to determine beverage consumption and whether they had been diagnosed with heart disease, stroke or diabetes.

    During those two decades, many of the women began showing signs of those conditions.

    The study found that women who consumed fruit drinks with added sugar daily – “fruit drink” excluded fruit juices and included only flavoured fruity drinks with added sugar – were 42% more likely to develop cardiovascular disease, compared with those who drank no sugary beverages.

    Frequent (but not daily) soft drinkers had less risk, with a 23% greater likelihood for cardiovascular disease overall.

    The American Heart Association advises no added sugar for children younger than two years of age, no more than 100 calories from added sugar a day for children older than two years and most women, and no more than 150 calories from added sugar a day for most men.

    That’s about six teaspoons or 24g of sugar for children older than two years and women, and nine teaspoons or 36g of sugar for men.

    According to the Mayo Clinic in the US, one teaspoon of sugar (which equals about 4g) has about 16 calories.

    A 12oz (355ml) can of regular soft drink has about 160 calories – about 10 teaspoons or 40g of sugar.

    “We hypothesise that sugar may increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases in several ways,” said lead author Cheryl Anderson, a professor of family and public health at the University of California, San Diego.

    “It raises glucose levels and insulin concentrations in the blood, which may increase appetite and lead to obesity – a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease.”

    In addition, she said, excessive sugar is associated with inflammation, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.

    To avoid consuming too much added sugar, the American Heart Association recommends reading labels.

    Many foods – not just beverages – have sugar added, so checking labels can help keep amounts in check. – The Atlanta JournalConstitution/Tribune News Service

    https://www.pressreader.com/malaysia/the-star-malaysia/20200531/282368336860766

    Wednesday, 25 September 2019

    The 10 Point Plan for Preventing Cancer

    World-renowned independent experts gave us the most up-to-date and authoritative information about cancer prevention and survival – as seen from the perspective of conventional medicine

    By Lee Euler / October 21, 2018
    The World Cancer Research Fund published its Third Expert Report, Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Cancer: A Global Perspective, in May.
    World-renowned independent experts gave us the most up-to-date and authoritative information about cancer prevention and survival – as seen from the perspective of conventional medicine, of course.
    Their detailed analysis – running more than 10,000 pages – is based on three decades of studies involving 51 million people, 3½ million cases of 17 types of cancer.
    You will be relieved to learn they boiled this massive pile of documents down to ten recommendations we should follow. And some of the findings are surprising. . .
    By following healthy lifestyle recommendations, you can lower the risk of cancer by about one-third to one-half.
    The authors also state that you can gain additional protection from cancer by avoiding exposure to environmental pollution and carcinogens encountered in the workplace. But these aspects and others were not covered because they’re beyond the study’s original purpose.
    The report confined itself to steps where there was strong evidence – convincing or probable – that a given factor caused or prevented cancer. Where the evidence was “limited but suggestive,” it didn’t make the grade.
    1. Keep a healthy weight
    If current trends continue, overweight and obesity are expected to overtake smoking as the number one risk factor for cancer. The evidence is considered to be strong and has grown even stronger since the group’s Second Expert Report in 2007.
    Metabolic and hormonal abnormalities that come with obesity, such as elevated levels of fasting insulin, estradiol (a strong type of estrogen), and inflammation, all increase cancer risk.
    The microenvironment of tissues can be changed by obesity, making them more prone to act as colonization sites for tumors. Obesity is also linked to changes within cancer cells that make them more likely to spread.
    In addition, adipose (fat) connective tissue cells promote the establishment and growth of vascular networks (angiogenesis) that support and stimulate tumor growth.
    Chromosomes and genes are also more likely to mutate in obese people. This has been demonstrated in human studies of colorectal and endometrial cancer in women, and in cancer of the esophagus in lab studies.
    There is now convincing evidence that body fat causes cancers of the esophagus (adenocarcinoma), pancreas, liver, colorectum, breast (postmenopause), endometrium, and kidney. It’s also a probable cause of cancers of the mouth, pharynx, larynx, stomach, gallbladder, ovary, and prostate.
    2. Be physically active
    Appropriate activity creates a metabolic environment in the body that makes some cancers less likely to occur.
    Positive effects of physical activity take effect within the endocrine and immune systems. The result is to lower circulating estrogen, fasting insulin and inflammation, enhance innate and acquired immunity, and promote tumor surveillance.
    Keeping active also lessens the chance of becoming overweight or obese. Aerobic exercise decreases oxidative stress (free radical attacks) and enhances DNA repair mechanisms.
    Evidence is convincing that physical activity decreases the risk of cancer of the colon, and probably decreases the risk of endometrial and postmenopausal breast cancer.
    Vigorous, intense exercise probably decreases the risk of premenopausal breast cancer.
    3. Eat a diet rich in wholegrains, vegetables, fruit and beans
    Make wholegrains, non-starchy vegetables, fruit, and pulses (legumes) such as beans and lentils a major part of the daily diet.
    Fruits and vegetables contain a host of micronutrients that protect against cancer, such as vitamins A, C, E, folate and selenium. Lab studies also demonstrate that many phytochemicals like carotenoids, dithiolthiones, isothiocyanates, flavonoids and phenols have anti-cancer effects.
    However, hard evidence is not easy to come by when looking at large population studies, so there was no convincing evidence that eating such a diet is protective.
    But a probable decreased cancer risk exists for wholegrains and fiber (colorectal cancer), non-starchy vegetables and fruit (aerodigestive) and dairy foods (colorectal).
    There was also convincing evidence for an increased risk from aflatoxin (mold) contamination in certain foods, leading to liver cancer.
    Other probable sources of cancer risk were foods preserved by salting (stomach cancer) and Cantonese-style salted fish (cancer of the nasopharynx – the upper part of the throat behind the nose).
    4. Limit consumption of ‘fast foods’ and other processed foods high in fat, starches and sugars
    An increased glycemic load (raised blood glucose) probably causes endometrial cancer. There was no other strong direct association with any other cancer. Fast foods and a Western-type diet are a concern in the context of cancer because they probably promote weight gain.
    5. Limit consumption of red and processed meat
    Eat no more than moderate amounts of red meat such as beef, pork and lamb each week (12 – 18 ounces cooked weight). Eat little if any processed meat, such as hot dogs, bacon and ham.
    Red meat cooked at high temperatures forms compounds that potentially cause gene mutations. DNA damage can also be caused by the increase in heme iron, a form of iron that circulates in the blood.
    Processed meat is usually energy dense, has high amounts of salt which can damage the stomach lining, and the methods used to prepare it generate carcinogens.
    Red meat was found to be a probable risk, and processed meat a convincing risk for colorectal cancer. No level of processed meat intake can be considered risk-free.
    6. Limit sugar-sweetened drinks
    The offending sugars include sucrose, high fructose corn syrup and sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices and fruit juice concentrates.
    The report recommends sticking to water, (although they did point out that arsenic in drinking water was a convincing cause of some cancers. Have your water tested if this is a concern in your area.) If you’re a tea or coffee drinker, limit yourself to a maximum of four cups (to limit caffeine consumption), and don’t sweeten it. Coffee probably lowers the risk of cancers of the liver and endometrium.
    There is no strong evidence in humans for artificial sweeteners causing cancer, so drinks such as diet soda are acceptable in limited amounts. (I find this conclusion questionable.)
    Sugar sweetened drinks are not strongly linked to any cancer but convincingly put on the pounds.
    7. Limit alcohol consumption
    Their preferred option: Don’t drink at all. The report states that “there is no level of consumption below which there is no increase in the risk of at least some cancers.”
    Drinking alcohol increases the production of metabolites that are genotoxic and carcinogenic. These effects come from acetaldehyde, free radicals, changes in hormone metabolism and alcohol’s solvent properties which allow carcinogens to penetrate cells.
    A convincing increased risk was attached to cancers of the mouth/pharynx/larynx, esophagus (squamous cell), liver, colorectum, breast (postmenopausal) and a probable greater risk for stomach and premenopausal breast cancer. However, up to two drinks a day probably lowers the risk of kidney cancer. (Considering the other health risks, I would not drink this much merely because it may help one organ.)
    8. Do not use supplements for cancer prevention
    The report authors accept certain vulnerable groups even in high income countries may need to be helped, at least in the short-term, with supplements, but feel people should aim to eat “nutrient-dense” diets to protect against cancer.
    Trials of high dose supplements “have not consistently demonstrated” protective effects and there is “uncertainty as to the effects of dietary supplements on cancer risk.”
    Only calcium supplements above 200mg/day offered strong evidence for probably decreasing the risk of colorectal cancer.
    NOTE: This is probably the worst recommendation in the report, and flies in the face of tens of thousands of published studies on nutrition. How could the authors be so far off the mark?
    The explanation may be something like this: In studies of large populations, it’s almost impossible to determine who used what supplements, and for how long, and whether the supplements were of high quality (NOT the ones you buy at, say, Walmart or Walgreens.) It’s well-known that merely popping a cheap multivitamin provides little benefit, and that’s all it takes to get yourself classified as a “supplement taker.”
    9. For mothers, breastfeed your baby if you can
    Having been breastfed protects children against weight gain and probably protects the mother against breast cancer.
    10. After a cancer diagnosis, follow the above recommendations if possible
    The report states that diet, nutrition, physical activity and body fat are increasingly recognized as being important in cancer survival. People diagnosed with cancer should be able to consult with trained health professionals in these fields.
    A blueprint to beat cancer
    Dr. Kate Allen, the World Cancer Research Fund Executive Director of Science & Public Affairs, commented on their report:
    “Our Cancer Prevention Recommendations work together as a blueprint to beat cancer that people can trust, because they are based on evidence that has now proved consistent for decades.”
    “We are committed to giving you the most up-to-date and authoritative information about cancer prevention and survival, enabling you to make healthy lifestyle choices in your daily lives to reduce cancer risk.”
    Rowan Chlebowski, head of medical oncology at City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, agreed with the findings of the report:
    “I believe that the evidence is strong enough to make a compelling case that people should take the 10 recommendations for cancer prevention seriously.
    “A good number of scientific studies support the concept that cancer can be prevented with diet, nutrition, weight management, and physical activity.”
    In our last issue, we talked about a building you don’t want to enter, if you value your life. The article is running again below just in case you missed it.

    References:

    1. https://www.wcrf-uk.org/uk/preventing-cancer/cancer-prevention-recommendations
    https://www.cancerdefeated.com/the-10-point-plan-for-preventing-cancer/

    Thursday, 11 July 2019

    Are sugary drinks causing cancer?

    Sugary drinks - including fruit juice and fizzy pop - may increase the risk of cancer, French scientists say.
    Fizzy drinkImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES
    The link was suggested by a study, published in the British Medical Journal, that followed more than 100,000 people for five years.
    The team at Université Sorbonne Paris Cité speculate that the impact of blood sugar levels may be to blame.
    However, the research is far from definitive proof and experts have called for more research.

    What counts as a sugary drink?

    The researchers defined it as a drink with more than 5% sugar.
    That included fruit juice (even with no added sugar), soft drinks, sweetened milkshakes, energy drinks and tea or coffee with sugar stirred in.
    The team also looked at diet drinks using zero-calorie artificial sweeteners instead of sugar but found no link with cancer.

    How big is the cancer risk?

    The study concluded that drinking an extra 100ml of sugary drinks a day - about two cans a week - would increase the risk of developing cancer by 18%.
    For every 1,000 people in the study, there were 22 cancers.
    So, if they all drank an extra 100ml a day, it would result in four more cancers - taking the total to 26 per 1,000 per five years, according to the researchers.
    "However, this assumes that there is a genuine causal link between sugary drink intake and developing cancer and this still needs further research," said Dr Graham Wheeler, a senior statistician at Cancer Research UK.
    Of the 2,193 cancers found during the study, 693 were breast cancers, 291 were prostate cancers and 166 were colorectal cancers.
    Drinking OJImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES

    Is this definitive proof?

    No - the way the study was designed means it can spot patterns in the data but cannot explain them.
    So, it did show that the people who drank the most (about 185ml a day) had more cancer cases than those who drank the least (less than 30ml a day).
    And one possible explanation is that sugary drinks are increasing cancer risk.
    But, alternatively, people who drink the most sugary drinks could have other unhealthy behaviours (eating more salt and calories than then rest, for example) that raise their cancer risk and the sugary drinks themselves could be irrelevant.
    So, the study cannot say that sugary drinks cause cancer.
    "While this study doesn't offer a definitive causative answer about sugar and cancer, it does add to the overall picture of the importance of the current drive to reduce our sugar intake," said Dr Amelia Lake, from Teesside University.
    She added: "Reducing the amount of sugar in our diet is extremely important."

    Is this just about obesity?

    Obesity is a major cause of some cancers - and excessive consumption of sugary drinks would increase the odds of putting on weight.
    However, the study said it was not the whole story.
    "Obesity and weight gain caused by sugary-drink excessive consumption certainly played a role in the association but they did not explain the whole association," Dr Mathilde Touvier, one of the researchers, told BBC News.
    Infographic shows female human body and indicates parts of the body where obesity is linked to cancer

    So what might be going on?

    The French researchers say the link "was strongly driven by sugar content" and they blame blood sugar levels.
    They also suggest some chemicals in the beverages, such as those that give an appealing colour, may be to blame.
    However, their study does not attempt to answer this question.
    "I find the biological plausibility of this difficult, given there was no significant difference between groups in relation to body weight or incidence of diabetes, which is often cited as an associated risk," Catherine Collins, an NHS dietitian, said.

    What do the researchers say?

    The team at Université Sorbonne Paris Cité say more large scale studies are needed to corroborate the findings.
    "Sugary drinks are known to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, overweight, obesity and diabetes," said Dr Touvier.
    "But what we show is they are also associated, maybe, with cancer risk."
    They say their research is further evidence that taxing sugary drinks is a good idea.
    "These data support the relevance of existing nutritional recommendations to limit sugary drink consumption, including 100% fruit juice, as well as policy actions, such as taxation and marketing restrictions targeting sugary drinks," their report says.
    The UK introduced a sugar tax in 2018, with manufacturers having to pay a levy on high-sugar drinks they produce.

    What do drinks companies have to say?

    The British Soft Drinks Association said the study "does not provide evidence of cause, as the authors readily admit".
    Its director general, Gavin Partington, added: "Soft drinks are safe to consume as part of a balanced diet.
    "The soft drinks industry recognises it has a role to play in helping to tackle obesity, which is why we have led the way in calorie and sugar reduction."

    https://www.bbc.com/news/health-48939671