Pages

Showing posts with label Diesel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Diesel. Show all posts

Thursday, 1 June 2017

MUST READ: What those diesel fumes are REALLY doing to your health

What those diesel fumes are REALLY doing to your health: Heart attacks, strokes and 40,000 deaths a year are blamed on rising air pollution levels


  • Air pollution kills more in the UK than in most Western European countries
  • Serious conditions, from stroke to cancer, are increasingly linked to air pollution
  • About a third of the country's air pollution is from transport


Air pollution has become a major health problem in Britain
Air pollution has become a major health problem in Britain
Taking a breath of ‘fresh air’ may not be quite as healthy as you thought. Air pollution has become a major health problem in Britain, claiming more lives here than in most Western European countries, an alarming UN report revealed last week.

This followed research published last year that blamed air pollution for at least 40,000 deaths a year in the UK.

It is well known that pollution can aggravate and possibly trigger health conditions such as asthma.

‘Over short periods, high pollution levels can cause damage to the lining of our lungs,’ explains Stephen Spiro, honorary professor of respiratory medicine at University College Hospital, London. ‘This can lead to coughing, wheeziness and breathlessness, particularly among people with a pre-existing lung condition.’

But other conditions, from stroke to cancer, are increasingly being linked to air pollution.

One of the major culprits is traffic fumes — about a third of our air pollution is from transport, explains Alastair Lewis, a professor of atmospheric chemistry at the University of York.

This pollution consists largely of nitrogen dioxide — most of which comes from diesel engines — and fine particles known as particulates, released from exhausts and by the wearing down of brakes and tyres.

Official figures show that 37 out of 43 areas across the UK breach legal European Union limits for nitrogen dioxide, which is linked mainly to breathing problems.

‘Almost every combustion process — such as functioning power stations — produces particulates,’ adds Professor Lewis.

‘The difference with cars is that unlike power stations, they are everywhere and close to where most people live. So the pollution they cause is disproportionately more important for public health.’

Polluting particles of soot, carbon and from aerosols are categorised by size and typically divided into two groups: coarse particles less than ten micrometres wide, known as PM10, and fine particles less than 2.5 micrometres wide (PM2.5).

Last week diesel vehicles were described as one of the ‘worst offenders’ for PM2.5 by researchers who found that even PM2.5 levels well within the EU maximum can cause inflammation in the body and raise blood pressure.

Last week diesel vehicles were described as one of the ‘worst offenders’ for PM2.5
Last week diesel vehicles were described as one of the ‘worst offenders’ for PM2.5

In a study funded by the British Heart Foundation (BHF) and the Wellcome Trust, the researchers found that the greater the exposure to this size of particulate, ‘the larger the heart becomes and the worse it performs’, raising the risk of death from heart disease.

‘This adds to the growing evidence that air pollution, particularly from small particles in diesel fumes, is dangerous for your heart and health,’ said Professor Jeremy Pearson, the BHF’s associate medical director.

And the smaller the particulate, the more harmful, it seems.

‘Ultra-fine particles even smaller than PM2.5 can penetrate the skin and enter the lungs much more easily,’ says Prashant Kumar, a professor in air quality and health at the University of Surrey.

This month researchers at Imperial College London revealed that tiny diesel particles just 0.1 micrometres in diameter can directly affect the lungs and cause tighter airways and coughing.

Here, with the help of leading experts, we reveal the latest evidence on what traffic pollution could be doing to your health . . .

How they can hurt your heart

Almost one stroke in three is triggered by air pollution, according to a worldwide study by Auckland University of Technology, in New Zealand.

The research, published last year, found air pollution was among the top ten causes of stroke, along with better-known risks such as smoking.

One theory is that over the long term, air pollution makes blood thicker and this in turn raises blood pressure, so boosting the risk of clots in the brain.

But even short-term exposure to air pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide and particulates increased the risk of hospital admission or death from stroke in the following seven days, according to a review of studies involving six million people published in 2015 by Edinburgh University.

There is a strong link between pollution and heart problems
There is a strong link between pollution and heart problems

‘The evidence suggesting air pollution as a risk factor for stroke is very strong,’ says Pippa Tyrrell, a professor of stroke medicine at the University of Manchester. ‘It’s vital this issue is addressed by the Government. But in the meantime it is even more important to avoid other stroke risk factors and take more exercise.’

There is also a strong link between pollution and heart problems, says Professor David Newby, BHF John Wheatley Chair of Cardiology at Edinburgh University — as an acute trigger causing a heart attack, for example, or associated with long-term heart disease.

‘The mechanism isn’t exactly clear but these tiny particles may get deep into the lungs, then into the bloodstream,’ says Professor Newby. ‘This affects the blood cells, causing blood to become stickier and more likely to clot.’

He adds that compounds on the surface of particles of pollution are associated with processes that could lead to the build-up of fatty material inside the arteries.

Bad news for your sleep 

Air pollution could be to blame for bad sleep, too. A study presented to the American Thoracic Society conference this month measured how long participants spent asleep and found their quality of sleep was affected by air pollution: the more exposure someone had to nitrogen dioxide and PM2.5, the worse their chances of a good night’s sleep.

‘Your nose, sinuses and the back of your throat can all be irritated by those pollutants, so that can cause some sleep disruption,’ says Martha Billings, a professor at the University of Washington, who led the research.

Study volunteers with raised nitrogen dioxide in their bodies were up to 60 per cent more likely to suffer from sleep deprivation than those living in areas with lower pollution levels.

A study found the more exposure someone has to nitrogen dioxide and PM2.5, the worse their chances of a good night’s sleep
A study found the more exposure someone has to nitrogen dioxide and PM2.5, the worse their chances of a good night’s sleep

They can make your eyes acidic 

High levels of air pollution can raise the risk of dry eye syndrome as well as allergic conjunctivitis — inflammation of the eye.

‘Particulates from diesel emissions can act as an irritant to the surface of the eye, causing dryness and irritation,’ says Marsel Bregu, a consultant ophthalmologist at Warrington Hospital and the Spire Cheshire.

Contact lenses may make matters worse, as particulates can lodge between the contact lens and the surface of the eye.

‘We have been seeing more cases of dry eyes in the past few years, as well as the inflammatory condition red eye. There must be a correlation between this and air pollution,’ says Mr Bregu.

There is a direct correlation between pollution levels and various eye infections, according to a study by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in 2002.

The researchers also suggested that high levels of air pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide make the tear film of the eyes more acidic.

‘This could cause a burning, stinging discomfort to the eyes,’ says Dr Jeff Kwartz, a consultant ophthalmologist at the Royal Bolton Hospital.

There is a direct correlation between pollution levels and various eye infections
There is a direct correlation between pollution levels and various eye infections

A worrying link to cancer

Pollution has contributed to a 10 per cent rise in cancer diagnoses, according to a study by the University of Illinois, published this month — equivalent to more than 28,600 cancer diagnoses in Britain.

While someone’s chance of developing the disease may be partly down to genetics, the report’s authors say it could also be that pollution damages DNA and the way hormones function, leading to cancer.

Air pollution caused by traffic and industry may increase the risk of lung cancer independently of factors such as smoking and age, according to research by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

Analysing data from more than 16,000 men between 1971 and 1998, the researchers estimated that the risk of developing lung cancer was 8 per cent higher for men living where levels of nitrogen dioxide, mainly produced by traffic, were higher.

It could be that inhaled pollutants damage DNA in the lung cells. Or soot particles may get lodged deep in the lungs, causing long-term inflammation. This could increase the rate at which cells divide and the chance of random mutations growing and spreading.

Why they can trigger eczema and age spots

Air pollution is a particular issue for those with eczema. This condition occurs when the skin barrier — the outermost protective layer of skin — does not work, explains Daniel Glass, a consultant dermatologist at the Harley Street Dermatology Clinic.

‘So those who are genetically predisposed to eczema may find it is triggered by air pollution.’

He adds that as eczema is associated with the subsequent development of asthma, pollution increases the likelihood of both.

Air pollution is a particular issue for those who suffer from eczema
Air pollution is a particular issue for those who suffer from eczema

Pollution also damages skin cells, speeding up breakdown of the collagen that keeps our skin supple and eventually leading to problems with pigmentation and wrinkles.

Particulates have been linked to signs of ageing in the skin, especially pigment spots and more pronounced nasolabial folds (the lines that run from each side of the nose to the corners of the mouth), according to a 2010 study published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

The researchers looked at the skin of 400 women living either in rural areas or near busy roads in Germany and marked out signs of ageing such as pigmentation and wrinkles. Almost all had remained at the same address for the previous 30 years.

The study concluded that pollution may have caused skin ageing by triggering oxidative stress.

‘The study suggests that because of exposure to pollution, the skin is hindered from repairing itself, leading to signs of ageing,’ says Andrew Wright, a professor of dermatology at the University of Bradford.

Risk of problems in pregnancy

Expectant mothers living close to busy roads are at greater risk of serious complications because of their exposure to air pollution, research suggests.

This year, a study led by the University of Copenhagen of 73,000 women found that pre-eclampsia — a form of high blood pressure that affects 42,000 pregnant women in Britain each year — is made more likely by noise and pollution from roads.

Researchers believe the toxins may raise stress levels and cause inflammation leading to rising blood pressure. In severe cases, pre-eclampsia can lead to stillbirth or be fatal to the mother.

‘There is robust evidence to link low birth weight with exposure to pollution such as diesel,’ says Jonathan Grigg, a professor of paediatric respiratory and environmental medicine at Queen Mary University of London.

Research suggests expectant mothers living close to busy roads are at greater risk of serious complications because of their exposure to air pollution
Research suggests expectant mothers living close to busy roads are at greater risk of serious complications because of their exposure to air pollution

‘The theory is that the particles of pollution may produce inflammation in the mother’s lungs which then triggers mediators — substances released from cells — that leach into the blood and affect development of the child.’

This year, researchers from the Stockholm Environment Institute also found that particulates under 2.5 micrometres could be to blame for millions of premature births globally each year.

Could they cause diabetes?...

Researchers in Munich found that children living in polluted areas were more likely to develop insulin resistance — a precursor to type 2 diabetes — by the age of ten. They suggest the link is due to inflammation in the body caused by cells reacting to air pollution particles.

Meanwhile, a 2012 study of 4,000 women living in Los Angeles by Boston University found that those living in polluted areas were more likely to have high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes.

Jim Zhang, professor of global and environmental health at Duke University in the U.S, who has researched links between diabetes and pollution, told Good Health: ‘The evidence is mounting to support the link between air pollution and risk factors for diabetes.’

... And make bones CRUMBLE faster

Air pollution has been shown to accelerate the development of osteoporosis, according to Amit Amin, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon at St George’s Hospital in South West London.

‘Advanced age, menopause, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption and a sedentary lifestyle are the most common risk factors but pollution is likely to contribute to the breakdown of bone cells, raising the chance of developing osteoporosis,’ he says

Will wearing a face mask protect you?

The easiest way to avoid pollution is to keep away from busy roads, says Alastair Lewis, a professor of atmospheric chemistry at the University of York. 

But what else may help protect you? We asked the experts.

Respro City mask
£29.99, respro.com

This moulded mask blocks airborne particles (or particulates) as small as 10 micrometres (PM10), such as those linked with vehicle exhaust emissions.

EXPERT VERDICT: ‘Good masks can stop us inhaling pollutants,’ says Roy Harrison, a professor of environmental health at the University of Birmingham. ‘This mask will filter out many harmful particles, such as diesel particles, efficiently.

‘However, it wouldn’t block all harmful gases in vehicle emissions such as nitrogen dioxide, as these can pass through the weave. The only way to keep them out is through an activated carbon filter, similar to those in World War II gas masks.

‘A mask must not leak air from the sides, which can occur if you have a beard. This mask is a good tight fit.’

8/10

Clarins UV+ Anti-Pollution Cream
30ml, £32, Boots

This contains cantaloupe melon extract, which has antioxidant properties; blackcurrant extract to limit inflammation; and an anti-pollution complex with white tea and succory to neutralise free radicals.

EXPERT VERDICT: ‘Pollution can damage the skin barrier, leaving it vulnerable to inflammation and irritation,’ says Justine Hextall, a consultant dermatologist at Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. ‘Damaged cells release free radicals that raise levels of the enzyme MMP-1, which breaks down collagen and elastin, our skin’s scaffolding.

‘While there may be some, albeit limited, evidence for blackcurrant and white tea to protect cells from free radical damage, this is a topical application and it is unclear how much you would absorb.’

4/10

Health Plus Detox Pack supplement
28 sachets, £15.45, healthplus.co.uk

This ‘advanced anti-pollutant formula’, with antioxidants such as glutathione, helps remove ‘toxins and heavy metals’ from the body.

EXPERT VERDICT: ‘The theory is that “oxidant” molecules and free radicals released in the body as a result of pollution are associated with inflammation and a range of diseases,’ says Professor Harrison. ‘In response, your body produces antioxidants — and this product helps to supplement these. But I know of no trials showing that antioxidants in supplement form help protect you from diseases or pollution.’

Glutathione is a strong antioxidant ‘but it’s broken down in the digestive tract and may not get to the cells, where it is needed,’ adds Dr Hextall.

3/10

Dyson Pure Cool Link Tower filter
£449.99, John Lewis

Air is drawn into a filter that traps particles as small as 0.1 micrometre (PM 0.1). It has pollution sensors to monitor and adjust the airflow.

EXPERT VERDICT: ‘The use of a HEPA (high efficiency particulate air) filter means it will catch a range of particles and sizes,’ says Professor Harrison. ‘The filter may need replacing after a time. Gases such as nitrogen dioxide — released when diesel is burnt — are so small, they may pass through the filter.’

9/10

London Air app
Free for iPhone and Android, see londonair.org.uk

This displays the latest air pollution levels in your area of London.
EXPERT VERDICT: ‘The information is reliable,’ says Professor Harrison, ‘and there is explicit health advice for people with illnesses such as asthma.’

Some local authorities around the country are developing similar apps, but you can also access this information at uk-air.defra.gov.uk.

9/10

Awair device
£179.99, getawair.co.uk

This tracks volatile organic compounds (chemicals released by cleaning products, burning fuel and cooking), dust and carbon dioxide. It sends this data via an app to your smartphone.

EXPERT VERDICT: ‘This claims to measure five key factors of air quality but how it can sense all the known pollutants at once I don’t know,’ says Professor Harrison. ‘To do this reliably I would expect it to be much more expensive.’

4/10


REN Flash Defence Anti-Pollution Mist
60ml, £24, escentual.com

A mist that forms a barrier against ‘free radicals and pollution’, with quercetin.

EXPERT VERDICT: ‘How can this claim to shield the skin from external free radicals when free radicals, by definition, come from within the skin?’ says Dr Hextall. ‘Whether quercetin has any antioxidant effect in spray form is unknown.’

2/10 

Jinan Harb

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4553248/What-diesel-fumes-REALLY-doing-health.html

Wednesday, 6 May 2015

We’ve all been taken for a ride over diesel

Diesel is a major environmental menace that kills thousands of people a year, yet the green movement gave it a free pass


12:09PM BST 02 May 2015



Capital crime: there are as many as 4,300 deaths a year from air pollution in London alone
Capital crime: there are as many as 4,300 deaths a year from air pollution in London alone  Photo: ALAMY

Imagine if there was an industry in Britain that annually churned out thousands of tonnes of carcinogens that scientists found were killing more than 7,000 of us every year. Imagine these polluters were given encouragement by successive governments to spew their waste into the environment. If this were the case, then you would think the green movement would be enraged.
Well, there is such an “industry” and it has taken not the greens, who have remained largely silent about the most pressing environmental scandal of our time, but the Supreme Court to finally do something about it: the Great Diesel Scandal.
Last week, the government was ordered by the Supreme Court to curb the diesel menace, or face multi-million-pound fines. This will, probably, mean the end of not only the diesel car but also the entire current British commercial fleet.
Diesel exhaust comprises a foul mixture of gases and soots containing more than 40 contaminants. Modern petrol engines, in contrast, emit almost no poisons at all.
But squirrel through the Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth websites for data on diesel and you find almost nothing.
So why the easy ride for a fuel which we know kills, by groups who have devoted millions in campaigns against GM foods which we know have never harmed anyone?
The reason is simple: diesel has been sold as a “low-carbon” fuel. Historically, diesel engines emitted slightly less carbon dioxide than petrol ones, and carbon dioxide causes climate change and climate change is all that greens care about. This meant that diesel trumped petrol every time.
According to Friends of the Earth, the priority is climate change-friendly fuel. But even if this could be justified (it cannot; today’s petrol engines have almost closed the CO2 gap with diesel), that would still not excuse it. Remember, this is a major environmental menace that kills thousands of people a year and which has given some European cities, notably London and Paris, the worst air quality in the world.
Emissions have fallen considerable in the last 12 years
After all, Nuclear power is low carbon too and globally nuclear power has killed fewer than 200 people, but most Greens still campaign against it.
Martin Withers, Professor of Air Quality Research at Kings College London, told me that the problem is that the Greens – and the regulators – concentrate solely on carbon emissions. “In California there is a 'smog index’ so you get an overall measure of a vehicle’s environmental impact. Here we only publicise CO2.”
It’s all a reminder that being 'green’ often has little to do with logic. Diesel is about public transport, and to a green the bus is totemic. Never mind that a fleet of petrol Ferraris will create far less pollution than a single London bus (buses and trucks can run on natural gas, as they do in many US cities, but here the industry’s investment is almost entirely diesel-focused).
Successive governments have promoted diesel as a “green” fuel for decades. Admitting the whole thing was a terrible mistake, as the Mayoress of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, to her great credit has done, is hugely embarrassing.
Company car tax rates, based on (wholly fictitious) CO2 emissions, are skewed so much in favour of diesel that many fleet managers have a “diesel only” policy. It is true that diesel is in Britain now taxed more highly than petrol, but this message is muted by the vehicle manufacturers who have invested hugely in diesel since the late Seventies.
Diesel cars are likely to be targeted under new plans because they issue the most nitrogen dioxide
The reality is that for ordinary motorists the fact that diesel cars are more expensive to buy, are far less reliable and use more expensive fuel massively outweighs any savings. But such is the might of the diesel market that Autocar magazine routinely reviews only diesel versions of best-selling models.
You could argue that the diesel menace is new, but scientists have known the truth for decades. Government reports from the early 2000s pointed out the dangers, but these have been ignored, such is the power of the road haulage lobby which is terrified of any attempt to ban diesel.
If Greens are for anything, it is surely reducing pollution. If London still suffered the smogs that killed thousands in the Fifties, I have no doubt that Greenpeace and the like would be on the case. But diesel seems to have acquired a Teflon coat. Perhaps the nuclear industry ought to hire some ex-diesel lobbyists. They have been doing a sterling job.

Go to Healthwise for more articles

Thursday, 14 June 2012

Diesel exhaust fumes can cause cancer, WHO says


Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:23pm EDT

* Diesel fumes now in same risk group as asbestos, arsenic* Exposure causes lung cancer, linked to bladder cancer
* WHO expert says public health action is needed
* Auto industry says diesel has cleaned up in recent years

By Kate Kelland

LONDON, June 12 (Reuters) - Diesel engine exhaust fumes can cause cancer in humans and belong in the same potentially deadly category as asbestos, arsenic and mustard gas, World Health Organisation (WHO) experts said on Tue sday.

In an announcement that caused consternation among car and truck makers, the France-based International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the WHO, reclassified diesel exhausts from its group 2A of probable carcinogens to its group 1 of substances that have definite links to cancer.

The experts, who said their decision was unanimous and based on "compelling" scientific evidence, urged people across the world to reduce exposure to diesel fumes as much as possible.

"The (expert) working group found that diesel exhaust is a cause of lung cancer and also noted a positive association with an increased risk of bladder cancer," it said in a statement.

The decision is a result of a week-long meeting of independent experts who assessed the latest scientific evidence on the cancer-causing potential of diesel and gasoline exhausts.

It puts diesel fumes in the same risk category as noxious substances such as asbestos, arsenic, mustard gas, alcohol and tobacco.

Christopher Portier, chairman of the IARC working group, said the group's conclusion "was unanimous, that diesel engine exhaust causes lung cancer in humans".

"Given the additional health impacts from diesel particulates, exposure to this mixture of chemicals should be reduced worldwide," he said in a statement.


PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE

Diesel cars are popular in western Europe, where tax advantages have encouraged technological advances and a boom in demand.

Outside of Europe and India, diesel engines are almost entirely confined to commercial vehicles. German carmakers are trying to raise awareness for diesels in the United States, where the long distances travelled on highways suit diesel engines.

IARC noted that large populations all over the world are exposed to diesel exhaust in everyday life, whether through their jobs or in ambient air.

"People are exposed not only to motor vehicle exhausts but also to exhausts from other diesel engines...(such as diesel trains and ships) and from power generators," it said.

IARC's director Christopher Wild said that against this background, Tuesday's conclusion "sends a strong signal that public health action is warranted".

"This emphasis is needed globally, including among the more vulnerable populations in developing countries where new technology and protective measures may otherwise take many years to be adopted," he said in a statement.


DIESEL HAS CLEANED UP

For about 20 years, diesel engine exhaust was defined by IARC as probably carcinogenic to humans - group 2A - but an IARC advisory group has repeatedly recommended diesel engine exhaust as a high priority for re-evaluation since 1998.

The global auto industry had argued diesel fumes should be given a less high-risk rating to reflect tighter emissions standards.

Reacting to the decision, Allen Schaeffer, executive director of the Washington-based Diesel Technology Forum said diesel engine and equipment makers, fuel refiners and emissions control technology makers have invested billions of dollars in research into technologies and strategies to reduce emissions.

"New technology diesel engines, which use ultra-low sulphur diesel fuel, advanced engines and emissions control systems, are near zero emissions for nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons and particulate matter," he said in a statement.

A spokeswoman for the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association said she was surprised by the move and the industry would "have to study the findings in all their details".

"These technologies have been developed to address precisely these concerns," Sigrid de Vries told Reuters. "The latest diesel technology is really very clean."

After the IARC report was issued, General Motors Co, said in a statement: "We will continue with our plans to introduce new fuel saving technologies and engines that run on alternate fuels, including diesel."

GM said diesel engines being made today have lower sulfur content and emit much less particulate matter than engines from a few years ago.

Alan Baum, principal of Baum and Associates in Michigan, said it is unlikely that the IARC report will cause companies to change plans for expansion of diesel fuel in the United States.

About 5.5 percent of new autos, including light-duty pickup trucks, sold in the United States run on diesel, said Baum, and he said that figure is expected to rise to 8 or 9 percent by 2015.

IARC said it had considered recent advances in technology which had cut levels of particulates and chemicals in exhaust fumes, particularly in developed economies, but said it was not yet clear how these might translate into health effects.

"Research into this question is needed," it said. "In addition, existing fuels and vehicles without these modifications will take many years to be replaced, particularly in less developed countries, where regulatory measures are currently also less stringent."

IARC said gasoline exhaust fumes should be classified as "probably carcinogenic to humans", a finding that was unchanged from its previous assessment in 1989.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/12/cancer-diesel-who-idUSL5E8HCL3I20120612