Pages

Showing posts with label Netherlands. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Netherlands. Show all posts

Saturday, 22 May 2021

03.04.21 Shame on Dutch's refusal to invest in AstraZeneca ...

Dutch PM Mark Rutte's refusal to invest in AstraZeneca cost EU millions of jabs


THE EU's threat of a jabs blockade on Britain has been undermined after it emerged the Dutch refused to invest in the factory at the centre of the dispute.

  1. https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1418647/...

Prime Minister Mark Rutte snubbed a plea from Oxford University for £8.5million to boost production of the AstraZeneca. When the request was made at the start of the pandemic last year, British taxpayers had already invested more than £21million in the Halix plant in the Netherlands.

“Most likely the quantities of available vaccines will be limited for several months. To avoid major delays production capacity must now be increased.”

Sources say the EU would have received millions more doses of the jab if the Dutch government had acted. Britain agreed to invest millions of pounds after experts identified Halix as a potential factory to produce the vaccine.

Mark Rutte

Mark Rutte subbed a plea for £8.5 to boost production of the AstraZeneca vaccine (Image: ANP/AFP via Getty Images)

Scientists then approached Mr Rutte for funding to build barrels capable of holding 1,000 litres of raw vaccine.

To avert a full-blown trade war, Downing Street has proposed sharing production capacity at the Dutch plant.

Wrangling over the Halix supplies is expected to continue next week.

It is understood the talks have hit a sticky patch because of the EU’s refusal to recognise Britain’s investment in vaccine production on the Continent.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1418647/dutch-prime-minister-mark-rutte-investment-astrazeneca-eu-vaccines



'Shame on you!' Britons furious at Dutch for not investing in AZ plant while UK spent £21m


BRITONS have launched a furious attack against the Dutch Government after it refused to invest in an AstraZeneca vaccines plant in its own country - while the UK pumped in more than £20million to boost production.

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte rejected an offer to help finance an expansion of the Halix plant in Leiden, which produces more than five million doses of the vaccine jab. A cross-Channel row over vaccine supplies had erupted after it was claimed AstraZeneca had used the firm to fulfil its order with the UK Government The EU is already furious with the vaccine maker after it significantly cut its expected shipment of jabs to the 27 member states.

Brussels eurocrats are now threatening to block exports from the factory in the Netherlands unless they are being sent to EU nations.

Last week, the Halix plant was given the green light to produce jabs for the EU by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Until then, it was reported to be shipping the active ingredient to be put into vials in the UK to assist Britain with its own vaccination drive.

The EU has continued to lash out at the lack of shipments from the facility, but it has now emerged the Dutch Government turned down the chance to invest in ramping up its production capacity.

eu vaccine news netherlands mark rutte

EU vaccine news: Mark Rutte ejected an offer to help finance an expansion of the Halix plant (Image: GETTY)

Britons are furious at the move, as tensions with the EU over vaccine supplies continue to boil over.

Reacting in the comments section of our initial story, one Express.co.uk reader wrote: "Rutte should hang his head in shame after all the attacks he made on the UK.

"But we have come to expect this sort of behaviour from the them."

A second person said: "I used to consider the Dutch a friendly nation to the UK, but this shows they are just neighbours, not friends.

eu vaccine news astrazeneca

EU vaccine news: AstraZeneca has been involved in a bitter war of words with Brussels (Image: GETTY)

"Shame on the Dutch."

Several other people chose to vent their fury towards the EU over the continued row over vaccine supplies.

One Express.co.uk reader commented: "The UK has acted professionally and altruistically in the development, licencing, manufacture and procurement of the Covid vaccine.

"Because they can't get their own way, the EU is acting like a spoilt brat - 'if we can't have it, we'll make sure no one else can'."

Another person added: "The EU is already finished. It's just people haven't realised yet.

"Once the UK finishes withdrawing it's restrictions while the EU is in the height of this new wave and in full lock down, that will be it."

Prime Minister Mr Rutte turned down an approach by scientists at Oxford University looking to secure £8.5 million in extra funding, according to Dutch broadcaster NOS.

Last April the Netherlands was approached by the experts as they looked to ramp up the number of vaccine doses they could produce from the Halix plant.

Oxford and AstraZeneca had already secured funding from London, and had wanted to increase production from 200 litres per barrel to 1000 litres.

Downing Street said no to additional funding, instead choosing to invest more domestically.

eu vaccine news latest

EU vaccine news: Covid vaccinations live (Image: EXPRESS)

On April 28 last year, Dutch MP Omtzigt held talks with Mr Rutte and a day later, the Dutch Prime Minister received a letter from scientists at Oxford University confirming the request for a £8.5 million cash injection.

The letter said: “There will likely be enormous demand for vaccines if they pass the tests successfully,” the letter said.

“Most likely, the quantities of available vaccines will be limited for several months. To avoid major delays, production capacity must now be increased.”

But Mr Rutte rejected the chance to invest after AstraZeneca indicated it had secured funding from elsewhere.

However, UK insiders close to the matter claim the Dutch Prime Minister could still have given the go-ahead to the funding, as the money was not requested by Halix itself.

Now the EU has sparked a new row by claiming Britain apparently has first refusal over any doses made at the plant, with Brussels insiders also accusing AstraZeneca of using factories in Europe to produce doses to fulfil its contract with the UK.

The Anglo-Swedish pharmaceutical giant had initially said it would deliver up to 120 million doses of the Oxford-produced vaccine in the first three months of this year, but later slashed this commitment to just 30 million.

AstraZeneca chief Pascal Soriot then said the firm would only supply 70 million jabs from April-June, again significantly down from the expected delivery of 180 million.

The huge row has now resulted in the EU demanding the lion's share of the Oxford vaccines made at the Halix plant.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1418445/eu-vaccine-news-dutch-uk-investment-astrazeneca-halix-mark-rutte-netherlands

Tuesday, 28 November 2017

Netherlands fishmongers accuse herring-tasters of erring

Can the Dutch still trust their herring-tasters?





HERRING (genus Clupea, with four species found in the Baltic and North Seas) have been vital to northern Europe’s economy since the Middle Ages, when fishermen worked out how to preserve them in brine. Every north European country maintains that there is a right way to eat the fish, but they differ as to what it is. In Sweden Baltic surströmming are fermented until slightly rancid. In Denmark the sill are pickled, or cooked and eaten in long strips. In the Netherlands haring must be lightly salted for preservation but otherwise raw, dipped in minced onion and accompanied with a pickle. No food is more loved.

So the Dutch were shocked when accusations surfaced in November that there was something rotten about the national herring test. The test, sponsored by the Algemeen Dagblad, a newspaper, is carried out by two expert tasters, who each year rate the herring at over a hundred shops and stands across the country.

 Ben Vollaard, an economist at Tilburg University, was surprised when his respected local fishmonger scored zero. The merchant told Mr Vollaard that one judge routinely tipped the scales, giving higher scores to stores that get their fish from the Atlantic Group, a distributor in Scheveningen. The judge happened to be a consultant for Atlantic, giving courses on how to slice and serve herring.

“I saw how much damage a low rating could do. The judges act like God,” says Mr Vollaard, who specialises in using statistics to detect crime. He decided to run the numbers. The ratings include objective criteria, like weight and fattiness, and subjective ones such as taste and appearance. The economist contacted 85% of the shops surveyed in the past two years and asked who their distributors were. He found that whereas the overall average score was 5.5, the average for those supplied by Atlantic was 8.7. The extra boost for the Atlantic stores came mainly from the subjective scores.

Mr Vollaard’s study has blown the lid off the sealed world of Dutch herring. Fishmongers who long suspected the judge of bias towards Atlantic now say the test is rotten. Two who received low ratings have vowed to sue the Algemeen Dagblad for defamation.

The judge and Atlantic say they have been smeared, and that the statistical evidence is a red herring. They say Mr Vollaard’s figures are off, and that their high scores are due to their superior fish. But the charges of belangenverstrengeling (conflict of interest) have left the test’s reputation for impartiality gutted.

http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21731656-can-dutch-still-trust-their-herring-tasters-netherlands-fishmongers-accuse-herring-tasters?

Monday, 14 August 2017

Contaminated eggs scandal spreads from Europe to Asia

BRUSSELS: A scandal involving eggs contaminated with insecticide spread to 15 EU countries, Switzerland, and as far away as Hong Kong on Friday as the European Commission called for a special meeting on the growing crisis.
Saturday Aug 12 2017
Eggs are pictured at an egg farm in Gaesti on August 11, 2017. AFP/Daniel Mihailescu
Ministers and food safety chiefs from around the European Union are set to meet on September 26 in a bid to get countries to stop "blaming and shaming" each other over the scare involving the chemical fipronil.
Millions of eggs have been pulled from supermarket shelves across Europe and dozens of poultry farms closed since the discovery of fipronil, which can harm human health, was made public on August 1.
The issue has sparked a row between Belgium, the Netherlands, and Germany, the three countries at the epicentre of the crisis, about how long they knew about the problem.
"Blaming and shaming will bring us nowhere and I want to stop this," Vytenis Andriukaitis, the European Commissioner for health and food safety, told AFP as he announced the meeting.
"We need to work together to draw the necessary lessons and move forward instead."
European Commission spokeswoman Mina Andreeva said that "this is not, let's be clear, a crisis meeting" and it is being held next month to get "distance to the events".
Fipronil is commonly used to get rid of fleas, lice, and ticks from animals but is banned by the European Union from use in the food industry.
The EU insists there is no threat to human health, but the World Health Organization (WHO) says that when eaten in large quantities it can harm people's kidneys, liver, and thyroid glands.

Dutch admit 'errors'

Brussels said the 15 affected EU countries were Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Sweden, Britain, Austria, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Denmark, along with non-EU Switzerland.
But in a sign the crisis is going global, Brussels also announced that Hong Kong had received some tainted eggs from the Netherlands, with the southern Chinese city becoming the first place in Asia known to be affected.
As well as dealing with the immediate food safety issue, the EU is also seeking to calm tempers over the egg row after a series of divisive crises in the bloc in recent years, from Brexit to migration.
Belgium earlier this week accused the Netherlands of knowing about the fipronil eggs since November 2016 and failing to notify other countries.
On Thursday Dutch Health Minister Edith Schippers admitted the government had made "errors" but denied a cover-up.
"We were well aware of a report of the presence of fipronil in the pens of egg-laying hens in November 2016, but there was no indication at the time that fipronil itself was found in the eggs," said Schippers.
A Dutch whistleblower separately said he had told the authorities that Chickfriend, the Dutch company at the centre of the scandal, was illegally using fipronil in the treatment of lice in chicken pens in The Netherlands.
"I am the anonymous whistleblower," Nick Hermens told the NPO public broadcaster.
A Belgian company, Poultry Vision, has said it provided Chickfriend with the chemical.
Dutch and Belgian investigators carried out coordinated raids on several premises on Thursday, arresting two people at Chickfriend.
However, Belgium itself has been forced to admit that it knew about fipronil in eggs back in June but kept it secret for nearly two months because of a criminal investigation.

Fresh discoveries

Fresh discoveries of contaminated eggs have continued daily.
Denmark said on Friday it had found two tonnes of fipronil-tainted scrambled eggs, bringing the total of contaminated eggs to 22 tonnes, mainly from Belgium.
Poland said it had discovered about 40,000 eggs imported from Germany.
French Agriculture Minister Stephane Travert said that since April the country had sold nearly 250,000 contaminated eggs, imported from Belgium and the Netherlands, but the risk for consumers was "very low" given French eating habits.
The food scare is one of the biggest to hit Europe since the 2013 horsemeat scandal when equine meat was falsely labelled and mis-sold.
Previous food scandals include contamination of chickens and eggs by dioxin in 1999, which began in Belgium, and mad-cow disease – cattle feed contaminated by the ground-up carcasses of animals infected with a deadly brain disorder – which ran from roughly 1986-1998 and started in Britain.

BBC: Fipronil egg scandal: What we know

Millions of eggs have been pulled from supermarket shelves in more than a dozen European countries - including the UK - after it was discovered that some had been contaminated with the potentially harmful insecticide fipronil.


  • 11 August 2017

  • Egg production line in Wortel near Antwerp, Belgium, on 8 August 2017

    Fipronil is commonly used to get rid of fleas, lice and ticks but is banned by the European Union for use on animals destined for human consumption, such as chickens.
    The insecticide got into the food chain in the Netherlands, which is one of Europe's biggest egg producers, but contaminated eggs have now been found as far away as Hong Kong. There is no evidence yet that it has harmed anyone.

    What is fipronil and is it harmful to humans?

    Fipronil is a popular pesticide, often used to de-flea household pets such as dogs and cats. It is also effective at treating red lice, which are commonly found in poultry.
    The World Health Organization (WHO) says fipronil is "moderately toxic" to people if it is eaten in large quantities, and can have dangerous effects on the kidneys, liver and thyroid glands.
    It can also cause "nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, dizziness, and epileptic seizures," says the Dutch food standards agency NVWA, although its effects are reversible.

    Should we stop eating eggs?

    NVWA has published a list of certain batch codes of eggs that should not be consumed. It said one batch in particular - with the code 2-NL-4015502 - could pose "an acute danger to public health".
    While tests have found levels higher than the recommended EU limit of 0.72 mg/kg in eggs, both food standards' agencies and toxicologists are playing down the risks for anyone who has already eaten contaminated eggs or other food products they were used in.
    Photo of Dutch food and safety board labratory worker testing eggs for contaminationImage copyrightAFP
    Dutch toxicologist Martin van den Berg told local media that it would only be harmful "if you eat them every day throughout your life."
    The German food standards' agency said that an excess of fipronil in the short term "does not automatically mean that consumption of the food in question involves a health risk".
    The UK's Food Standards Agency (FSA) said 700,000 eggs imported to Britain had been affected, up from an earlier estimate of 21,000.
    But it cautioned that this number represents only about 0.007% of eggs consumed in the UK each year and that it was "very unlikely there is any risk to public health from consuming these foods".

    Where and how did the contamination originate?

    The contamination was discovered on Dutch poultry farms, and some 180 farms - which produce millions of eggs a week - have been temporarily shut down while further tests are carried out.
    It is thought that Fipronil was used in chicken farms to combat lice, affecting the eggs of laying hens.
    A criminal investigation is now under way in Belgium and the Netherlands, centring on two firms - Poultry Vision, a pest control firm from Belgium, which is alleged to have sold the treatment to a Dutch poultry farm cleaning company, Chickfriend.
    Those firms have not yet publicly commented on the allegations although the AFP news agency reports that a lawyer for Poultry Vision has confirmed the firm sold the treatment to Chickfriend, but did not say where it had come from.
    A number of police raids have been carried out in the two countries in connection with the contamination, and Dutch police have arrested two people.

    What has been the political reaction?

    The scandal only became public in late July, and soon after eggs were pulled from supermarket shelves in the Netherlands, Germany and elsewhere. It has since continued to widen.
    Belgium came in for criticism when it emerged it knew about the fipronil contamination in early June but did not notify the European Commission until late July because of a fraud investigation.
    However, Belgian Agriculture Minister Denis Ducarme has since hit back, accusing the Dutch of knowing about the problem as far back as November 2016. The NVWA has rejected the claim.
    The European Commission's food safety chief has called for an end to the "blaming and shaming". The commission will hold a meeting with ministers and regulators on 26 September.
    But the suggestion that fipronil may have been in the food chain for longer than previously thought has alarmed many.
    German Agriculture Minister Christian Schmidt called the circumstances "criminal".

    Dutch organic farmers feel duped in tainted eggs scandal

    Dutch farmers producing organic eggs, supposedly free from insecticides, joined a chorus of outrage Friday over the growing tainted-egg scandal, claiming they were duped by the suppliers of a reputedly natural pesticide.

    August 12, 2017




    “Organic breeders are very depressed and feel they were fooled by the Chickfriend company, which supposedly sold them a clean and natural product,” said Miriam van Bree, spokeswoman for the Bionext organisation for organic farming.
    At least 20 organic egg farmers have been affected by the scandal in which millions of eggs have been contaminated with fipronil — a chemical which can be harmful to humans. They believed they were using a product which was based on eucalyptus and menthol.
    “Organic breeders always are doing everything they can to have the cleanest, healthiest and longest-lasting eggs that they can be proud of,” Van Bree told AFP.
    “Today their eggs are contaminated with an insecticide… it’s a huge disappointment,” she said.
    The presence of a mildly toxic substance like fipronil in organic eggs also had “repercussions for consumer confidence” which has been given “a huge knock”, she added.
    Organic farmers now too have to rid their chicken pens from fipronil and were hamstrung because they could not use the same chemical products as commercial farmers.
    “They will have to think hard about how they can clean their farms — it’s a unique situation for them,” said Van Bree.
    The best way was to “put the contaminated chickens on a diet, as fipronil is concentrated in the bird’s fat,” said Van Bree, who excluded the possibility of slaughter because of animal welfare concerns.
    https://www.independent.co.ug/dutch-organic-farmers-feel-duped-tainted-eggs-scandal/

    Friday, 21 February 2014

    Netherlands is healthiest country for food

    February 11, 2014

    BY PATRICIA REANEY


       
    In a new list that ranks countries according to the quality of their food, The Netherlands came out on top, while Malaysia only managed 44th.
    The Netherlands nudged past France and Switzerland as the country with the most nutritious, plentiful and healthy food, while the United States and Japan failed to make it into the top 20, a new ranking released by Oxfam showed.
    Chad came in last on the list of 125 nations, behind Ethiopia and Angola, in the food index from the international relief and development organisation. Meanwhile, Malaysia ranked 44th on the list.
    “The Netherlands have created a good market that enables people to get enough to eat. Prices are relatively low and stable and the type of food people are eating is balanced,” Deborah Hardoon, a senior researcher at Oxfam who compiled the results, said in an interview. 
    “They’ve got the fundamentals right and in a way that is better than most other countries all over the world.”
    Oxfam ranked the nations on the availability, quality and affordability of food and dietary health. It also looked at the percentage of underweight children, food diversity and access to clean water, as well as negative health outcomes such as obesity and diabetes.
    European countries dominated the top of the ranking but Australia squeezed into the top 12, tying with Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Luxembourg at No. 8.
    The United Kingdom failed to make the top 10, tying for the 13th spot, because of the volatility of its food prices compared to other goods, which Oxfam said is on a level with Peru (51), Malta (33) and Kyrgyzstan (65).
    African nations, along with Laos (112), Bangladesh (102), Pakistan (97) and India (97), were predominant in the bottom 30 countries.
    Although the United States has the most affordable and good quality food, high levels of obesity and diabetes pushed the nation into 21st place in the ranking, tying with Japan, which scored poorly on the relative price of food compared to other goods.
    The Netherlands got top marks for its low food prices and diabetes levels, while Chad had the worst score for the cost of food in the country and the number of underweight children at 34%. The only countries where food is more expensive are Guinea and the Gambia, which were both at the lower end of the ranking.
    Burundi (119), Yemen (121), Madagascar (122) and India have the worst rates of nutrition and the most underweight children, according to Oxfam.
    People going hungry
    Oxfam said the latest figures show 840 million people go hungry every day, despite there being enough food for the hungry. It called for changes in the way food is produced and distributed around the world.
    The causes of hunger, it added, include a lack of investment in infrastructure in developing nations and in small-scale agriculture, security, prohibitive trading agreements, biofuel targets that divert crops from food to fuel and the impact of climate change.
    Research suggests that climate change could raise the number of people at risk of hunger by 20% to 50% by 2050, according to the group.
    “This index quite clearly indicates that despite the fact of there being enough food in the world we are still not able to feed everybody in all the countries around the world,” said Hardoon.
    “If we had a more equal distribution of wealth and resources, and particularly food, this wouldn’t be a problem,” she added.
    Oxfam compiled the data between October and December 2013 using the latest information from the World Health Organisation, the Food and Agriculture Foundation, the International Labour Organisation and other international organizations.
    The index provides a snapshot based on the relative differences in various countries based on the number of factors. But Hardoon said it is not the comprehensive picture of any one nation. – Reuters