Pages

Showing posts with label Pasteurization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pasteurization. Show all posts

Monday, 3 October 2022

The truth about drinking raw milk

 



The truth about drinking raw milk

03 OCTOBER 2022|FOOD & DRINK

There is a new appetite in the food and wine industry for unpasteurised milk products, also known as raw milk. Foodies and restaurant diners are often wowed by the complex flavours of raw milk products, but are they safe to eat and drink?

In response to the raw milk movement, retail sales of raw milk are banned in about 20 US states. Some people say that pasteurisation kills off important nutrients, but scientists don’t believe that anything lost during pasteurisation is important for human health. We uncover the truth about raw milk.

Script by Jessica Bradley
Narration by Cherry Stewart-Czerkas
Animation by Dominika Ożyńska
Commissioning Editor: Cagney Roberts




Tuesday, 28 January 2014

Raw Milk on the Rise -- No Illness Seen

27 January 2014

Raw Milk

Story at-a-glance

  • In 2013, Arkansas Governor Mike Beebe signed into law HB 1536, which legalized the sale of locally produced raw milk from the farm.
  • Four months after the bill took effect, as of January 20, no illnesses have been caused as a result of this increase in raw milk sales
  • Statistics suggest raw milk produced by grass-fed cows from small, clean, well-run farms is actually less dangerous than drinking pasteurized milk
  • Whether you drink milk or not, the assault against raw dairy products is an assault to your food freedom
By Dr. Mercola
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) commonly warns against drinking raw milk, citing numerous “outbreaks” linked to the product.
But drinking raw milk produced by grass-fed cows from clean, well-run farms is actually far LESS dangerous than drinking pasteurized milk. In fact, not only does raw milk contain good bacteria that are essential for a healthy digestive system, raw milk also offers protection against disease-causing bacteria.
CDC data show there are about 412 confirmed cases of people getting ill from pasteurized milk each year, while only about 116 illnesses a year are linked to raw milk.1 Eventually, as the numbers of raw milk dairies increase, and so too do their happy customers, the CDC may be forced to change its tune.

No Illnesses Linked to Raw Milk in Arkansas

Last year, Arkansas Governor Mike Beebe signed into law HB 1536, which legalized the sale of locally produced raw milk from the farm. Four months after the bill took effect, as of January 20, no illnesses have been caused as a result of this increase in raw milk sales. According to Arkansas Online:2
Four months after a state law took effect allowing the sale of unpasteurized milk, the Arkansas Health Department has yet to identify an illness 'definitively linked' to consuming the beverage.”
The new bill impacts both cow and goat milk. Previously, Arkansas allowed farmers to sell up to 100 gallons of raw goat milk per month at the farm, but HB 1536 will increase that to 500 gallons. Additionally, raw cow’s milk is now also allowed, with a few caveats. According to RealMilk.com:3
Arkansas permits the sale of up to 500 gallons of raw cow or goat milk per month directly to consumers on the farm where the milk is produced.
Farmers must post a sign at the farm and their products must display a label noting that the milk is not pasteurized. Farms and cows are not state inspected and buyers assume all liability for any health problems that may arise from drinking raw milk.”
So far, those “health problems” are non-existent, adding further support for those seeking to legalize raw milk sales across the US.

Health Risks? What About the Health Benefits?

Public health agencies are conspicuously silent about the proven benefits linked to drinking unpasteurized dairy products versus their conventional pasteurized counterparts.
For instance, school-aged children who drank raw milk were 41 percent less likely to develop asthma and about 50 percent less likely to develop hay fever than children who drank store-bought (pasteurized) milk, according to one study that used data from more than 8,000 children.4
And while public health agencies are quick to say that there are no nutritional differences between raw and pasteurized milk, this study suggests otherwise. The researchers believed that the beneficial effect may have been due to whey proteins, including bovine serum albumin (BSA) and alpha-lactalbumin, in the raw milk, which were destroyed by the heating process in the pasteurized milk.
While the study didn't find an association between any health outcomes and thebacterial contents of the milk, it did demonstrate noted differences between raw and pasteurized varieties, which the CDC continues to deny. Additionally, high-quality raw milk has a mountain of health benefits that pasteurized milk lacks. For example, raw milk is:
  • Loaded with healthy bacteria that are good for your gastrointestinal tract
  • Full of more than 60 digestive enzymes, growth factors, and immunoglobulins (antibodies)
  • Rich in conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), which fights cancer and boosts metabolism
  • Rich in beneficial raw fats, amino acids, and proteins in a highly bioavailable form, all 100 percent digestible
  • Loaded with vitamins (A, B, C, D, E, and K) in highly bioavailable forms, and a very balanced blend of minerals (calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and iron) whose absorption is enhanced by live lactobacilli

The Real Issue Here Is Your Food Freedom

Increasing numbers of small farmers and Americans are challenging the “nanny state” mentality that the government should tell you what you can and can’t eat. If you desire to drink raw milk, and you have found a farmer who wants to provide it to you, should that not be your inherent right to eat the food of your choosing?
There have been some positive strides made, including not only the Arkansas legislation but also a bill has passed the Wisconsin Senate that would allow dairy farmers to sell raw milk directly to consumers. In Oregon, too, sales of raw milk from small farms directly to consumers are legal, but advertising that such milk is available is not (a restriction that’s currently being challenged).
Truth be told, many people should not consume dairy, as they are allergic to the milk proteins, whether it is raw or pasteurized. Additionally, many who are seeking to lose weight, have high blood pressure, or diabetes would likely be better avoiding raw or pasteurized milk, as it has the dairy sugar lactose and those carbs can worsen insulin/leptin resistance.
However, if you are healthy and want to drink milk, then it makes more sense to fear drinking pasteurized milk. While there has not been one single death due to raw milk between 1998 and 2008,5 the United States' largest recorded outbreak of Salmonella resulted from pasteurized milk. Yet this and other outbreaks of illness resulting from the consumption of pasteurized milk are kept from public knowledge, and escapes warnings from the CDC.

Do You Know How to Identify High-Quality Raw Dairy?

Ultimately, where you get your milk really matters and this is true of raw milk in particular. It’s contrary to reason that milk (and many other foods) that comes from concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) is thought of as safe, while raw milk sourced from a small carefully run farm is not. In CAFOs, large groups of animals are kept in a small space, oftentimes without natural light or access to the outdoors.
The conditions are filthy, with animals standing in one another's waste. Needless to say, harmful bacteria naturally thrive in these conditions. As a result, drinking CAFO milk raw would be extremely dangerous. It must be pasteurized for safety. On the other hand, milk from grass-fed cows raised on smaller, clean farms can be safely consumed without being pasteurized, provided the farmer is committed to providing a safe, quality product.
Getting your raw milk from a local organic farm is one of the best ways to ensure you're getting high-quality milk, but even then if you're thinking about purchasing milk from a small farmer, it would be very wise to visit the farm in person. Look around and ask questions about the following general conditions, which should indicate a source of high-quality raw milk.
Low pathogenic bacteria count (i.e. does the farmer test his milk regularly for pathogens?)The milk comes from cows raised naturally, in accordance with the seasonsThe cows are not given antibiotics and growth hormones to increase milk production
The milk is quickly chilled after milkingThe cows are mainly grass-fedCows are well cared for

You Can Stand Up for Food Freedom!

The fight for food freedom isn’t just for those who love raw milk – it’s for everyone who wants to be able to obtain the food of their choice from the source of their choice. Raw milk isn’t the only food on the chopping block. Raw-milk cheeses and heritage-breed pigs are also being targeted, and there’s no telling what other small-farm, niche foods may be next. So please, get involved! I urge you to embrace the following action plan to protect your right to choose your own foods:
  1. Get informed: Visit www.farmtoconsumer.org or click here to sign up for action alerts.
  2. Join the fight for your rights: The Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund (FTCLDF) is the only organization of its kind. This 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization provides a legal defense for farmers who are being pursued by the government for distributing foods directly to consumers.
  3. Your donations, although not tax deductible, will be used to support the litigation, legislative, and lobbying efforts of the FTCLDF.
  4. Support your local farmers: Buy from local farmers, not the industry that is working with the government to take away your freedom.
[+] Sources and References

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/01/28/drinking-raw-milk.aspx

Sunday, 19 May 2013

Still Taking a Probiotic Supplement?

5 Reasons to Consider Ditching It

Newsletter #291
Lee Euler, Editor


19 May 2013

 In the Greek, the term probiotic means "for life" — so you can easily figure out what the term antibiotic means.

    There are reams of published research surrounding probiotic microorganisms to suggest they actually do support a healthy life. In fact, many doctors who don't advocate a lot of supplements include probiotic pills among the few they do recommend.

    So why ditch them if they're so awesome? Five reasons…

Reason #1: There's an incredible alternative that, according to some sources, contains 100 times more beneficial bacteria than an entire bottle of high potency probiotic supplement.

    And this alternative isn't some new fangled product either.

    It's been a part of the diet of nearly every traditional culture throughout the history of mankind. I'm talking about cultured vegetables, though there are other cultured foods highly regarded in various parts of the world. More on this is a minute.

    Only since the widespread use of refrigeration have we stopped using traditionally fermented foods.

    Reason #2: It may be impossible to say whether the bacterial strains in any particular probiotic supplement are really the best ones — or if they represent a wide enough selection of those needed for health. Scientists are constantly discovering new facts about the human body. For example, the Belly Button Biodiversity Project by scientists at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, has been analyzing navel swabs from volunteers. New Science reports that so far, they've found 1,400 distinct bacterial strains, nearly half of which have never before been seen.1 Who knows what beneficial bacteria are still undiscovered?

    Reason #3: The trust factor. While we can't deny the benefits of probiotic supplementation — and it's certainly a whole lot safer than taking dangerous pharmaceuticals — I trust the thousand-plus year history of fermented foods more than its modern lab-formulated counterparts. There are serious questions about how many live microorganisms are actually left in a probiotic capsule or softgel by the time it gets to you. They can't tolerate high temperatures, and if your pills haven't been refrigerated every step of the way, they may have lost most of their live cultures.

    Reason #4: What's more, at about $40 per bottle for a "high quality" probiotic, you stand to save a lot of money by eating cultured vegetables — especially if you make them yourself.

    Reason #5: They're tastier than supplements any day. And the flavor will likely grow on you over time. If you make them yourself you get a degree of personal satisfaction too. It's easy. And inexpensive. It's also…
A true living food
    True raw cultured vegetables are a 100% organic, unheated, fermented food, loaded with beneficial enzymes.

    The lactic acid produced during fermentation helps you digest other foods eaten at the same time as cultured ones, especially important for digesting proteins and starchy foods.

    Cultured vegetables "pre-digest" sugars and starches, which helps support overall digestive function. They are alkaline-forming due to their abundance of vitamins and minerals. And they can help you replenish your mineral stores and balance your whole body's pH levels.

    Want to overcome starch cravings? Enthusiasts report that eating cultured vegetables on a regular basis can help you regain control over these cravings.

    And as I said, cultured vegetables are teeming with beneficial microorganisms — a true "living" food.

    When you eat them, you're feeding your biological system with intelligent little beings that work hard to keep your health optimal.  
Nearly every ancient civilization prized them
    "The science and art of fermentation is, in fact, the basis of human culture: without culturing, there is no culture… Culture begins at the farm, not at the opera house, and binds a people to a land and its artisans," according to Sally Fallon, President of the Weston A. Price Foundation.

    Weston A. Price was a dentist who traveled the world to study isolated cultures (human ones, not microbial ones) for the relationship between their dental health and what they ate. He found that whenever a people abandoned their traditional native foods, both their dental and physical health rapidly fell apart. However, if they stuck with their native diet, their overall health stayed strong throughout life.2

    Long before modern scientists decided probiotics are the darlings of the microbial world, nearly every ancient civilization prized fermented foods and recognized their health benefits. Sadly, in modern day America, we've ditched these healthy foods, for the most part.

    Culturing was how our ancestors naturally preserved food to ensure they had nourishment when fresh food was scarce… although they probably did not realize these foods boost the immune system, support good health, and add years to our lives.

    Dr. Price found that almost every ethnic group had its own version of cultured food that people made themselves and ate regularly. These medicinal foods ranged well beyond cultured vegetables like sauerkraut, natto, miso and kimchi. The list must also include yogurt, kefir, aged cheeses, kombucha, sourdough breads, pickled fruits, lassi and more.

    The Chinese have been fermenting cabbage for thousands of years. Cultured vegetables were eaten in ancient Rome — and in medieval Europe. Genghis Kahn used them around 1200 A.D., and Captain James Cook, the 18th century English explorer, took cultured sauerkraut on his ships to prevent scurvy in his crews.

    In her book Nourishing Traditions, author Sally Fallon considers our modern-day proliferation of mysterious new viruses, parasites, chronic health problems, and even Superbugs. She asks, "Could it be that by abandoning the ancient practice of lacto-fermentation and insisting on a diet in which everything has been pasteurized, we have compromised the health of our intestinal flora and made ourselves vulnerable to legions of pathogenic microorganisms?"

    Seems we've hijacked our health and even our economic well-being by insisting on "more, faster, cheaper"…
A host of benefits awaits you
    A basic tenet of holistic medicine is that digestive dysfunction is either a cofactor or the main cause of most chronic and degenerative diseases. Research suggests that bacterial imbalances (between "good" and "bad" bacteria) can disrupt your intestinal function — and that matters because it's your first line of defense against pathogens occurring in food or water.

    Probiotic organisms, whether from cultured foods or supplements, replenish our good bacteria and tip the balance in the battle against bad bacteria.

    While probiotic supplementation is very common, why not take a "food as medicine" approach and use cultured foods instead?

    You already know vegetables provide a low-calorie wealth of nutrients. Fermenting them just makes them into real superfoods, easier to absorb and utilize.

    Cultured vegetables can enrich your level of B vitamins (even vitamin B12, which is hard to obtain from food), vitamin C, omega-3 fatty acids, digestive enzymes, lactase and lactic acid and other immune chemicals that can fight off harmful bacteria, and yes, possibly even cancer cells.

    Cultured vegetables can help you lose weight, as they're linked to how well things flow through your digestive tract, how regular you are, and how alkaline you are.

    They can fight unhealthful microorganisms such as candida and E. Coli, and help with diarrhea, gastroenteritis, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease and cancer.

    There's even anecdotal evidence that kimchi may fight bird flu. Kimchi is a traditional Korean dish of spiced, fermented vegetables. In 2005, scientists at Seoul National University reported feeding an extract of kimchi to 13 infected chickens. A week later, 11 of them had started recovering. Eating kimchi to cure the flu may sound like a dubious folk remedy, but the theory is being floated by some of Korea's most eminent scientists.3

    While it certainly seems plausible that we can benefit from turning ordinary vegetables into cultured superfoods with more live enzymes and predigestive qualities, most of what we know at this point comes from anecdotes and clinical reports, not peer reviewed science. After all, how much money could the drug companies make from studying the lowly cultured vegetable?
Beware of foods that appear
to be naturally cultured, but aren't!
    To get your money and your health's worth from fermented foods, be aware of the HUGE difference between healthy fermented foods and commercially processed ones. Sauerkraut — potentially the most useful processed food you could buy — is in fact nutritionally worthless when purchased in a store because it's all been pasteurized. Pasteurization kills any live cultures in a food. Likewise, cheeses are pasteurized so they harbor few if any live cultures.

    Setting aside the fact that the government makes food companies pasteurize everything, fermentation is a somewhat inconsistent process… some say it's more an art than a science. So it stands to reason commercial processors would develop ways to standardize their results. They don't want their brand's taste to vary from one batch to the next, and that's rather likely to happen with fermented foods (think of wine, for example — every bottle is unique).

    In the search for standardization and "safety," Americans have traded the many benefits of cultured foods for the convenience of mass-produced pickles, yogurt, kefir and more.

    Technically, anything "brined" in a salt stock is fermented. But watch out! Vinegar's acidic pH, refrigeration, and high-heat pasteurization all slow or stop the fermentation and enzymatic process.

    For example, olives were traditionally fermented. Now they're treated with an acidic solution of lactic acid, acetic acid, sodium benzoate, and potassium sorbate — a far cry from the old-time natural lactic acid fermentation of salt alone.

    Yogurt in the U.S. today is pasteurized and generally so full of sugar that it's little more than a highly sweetened pudding. All that sugar, unfortunately, tends to cancel out the potential benefit from any cultures that do manage to survive the over-processing. Ditto for kefir.
How to make sure you're getting real
Lacto-fermented foods
    You can still find some healthy traditional lacto-fermented foods.

    The strong-flavored traditional Greek olives in many olive bars are not lye-treated and are still alive with active cultures, according to our sources.

    Many Korean and Japanese markets still sell their traditional cultured foods, like natto, miso, and kimchi. In general, the stronger the flavor (excluding jalapeno and hot peppers), the more likely the food still has active and beneficial lacto-bacteria.

    You can also find fermented foods in some gourmet stores, farmer's markets and health food stores.

    But the surest way of all is to make your own. And it's really pretty easy.
The satisfaction and cost savings of DIY…
    Real fermentation fans look to the past to define the wave of the future. And since, in days of old, people fermented their own foods, why not take it up yourself? 60 years ago it wasn't unusual at all for people to make their own sauerkraut or pickles.

    While there are many ways to go about it, and individual tastes vary, making your own gives you the latitude to customize these foods with your own favorite (or local, in-season) vegetables, fruits and spice preferences (e.g., jalepenos and hot peppers).

    Basically, you either shred or dice the vegetables (usually with cabbage as a base), season, and place them in sanitary jars, covered, for about 7 days at a steady temperature of 59 to 71 degrees Fahrenheit. Some people choose to add a starter to speed up the process.

    Either way, expect the rapid multiplication of lactobacilli microbes that pre-digest the sugars ad starches and speed your digestive process.

    Culturing is a great way to use up cabbage when it's in season, or when you have a surplus from your garden.

    Some people advocate cultured vegetables as a substitute for salsa. Others recommend eating a little on a salad, on top of a small serving of meat or fish, or simply as a side dish. 
What's YOUR Favorite Recipe?
    As far as recipes go, there are entire cookbooks now devoted to cultured foods, available at your library, bookstores, or online. Plus, there are a host of recipes online. You can use them as starting points, and with time develop your own personal favorites. There are far too many possibilities to cover them here.
http://cancerdefeated.com/newsletters/5-reasons-to-ditch-your-probiotic-supplement.html

Friday, 20 April 2012

The Darker Side Of Milk

Though your bones are made of calcium, consuming calcium-rich dairy products won’t necessarily strengthen your skeleton. As a matter of fact, research shows that many milk drinkers have weak bones, and milk consumption may contribute to bone depletion.

Dairy Difficulties

When you talk about the milk that most people drink, you’re talking about supermarket milk that has been severely processed since it left the farm. Initially it is pasteurized, heated to very high temperatures that kill its healthy, acid-loving bacteria naturally present which your body needs for proper digestion. If they weren’t incinerated during pasteurization, these friendly microbes known as probiotics would contribute to the well-being of your digestive tract. Not having these types of microorganisms in our food has been linked to skin problems, obesity and immune dysfunction.

Another potential defect in supermarket milk stems from pharmaceutical residues from drugs given to dairy cows. These animals are not only regularly given antibiotic injections to prevent sickness, they are also given hormone shots to boost their milk productivity.

Milk Tales

It seems pretty evident that advertising slogans like “Got Milk” and other milk-promoting efforts are frankly deceiving the American public. They spread the false notion that cow’s milk reinforces bones or facilitates weight loss. The fact is, no valid studies support these claims. In fact, large, well-designed studies show the opposite. Animal protein-rich dairy products are correlated with decreased bone calcium and increased hip-fracture rates. This is because animal proteins in milk trigger loss of calcium in urine. Got confusion? Let me explain further.

The true test of bone strength is its resistance to breaking, not just how bone appears on X-ray studies. The June 1997 issue of the American Journal of Public Health reported a study of 77,761 women ages 34 to 59 who were followed for hip fracture rates for 12 years. They found that the women who drank two or more glasses of milk per day had nearly 50 percent more hip fractures than women drinking one glass or less per week. This correlates with a large multinational hip fracture study which also found that the countries in which more dairy is consumed have the worst problems with osteoporosis.

There is more you need to know. Milk does not promote weight loss. Two recent studies by the University of Vermont and Purdue University found no difference in weight loss between those who consumed a high-dairy diet and those on a low-dairy diet. Another study published in the June 2005 issue of Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, followed dairy consumption among 12,829 U.S. children for three years. Researchers found that the more skim and 1 percent milk the children drank, the fatter they became. (I’m sure they were not drinking raw milk from a farm.) Dairy’s alleged ability to boost weight loss is based on studies of a single experimenter paid by the dairy industry who used questionable research methods.

Milk Urges

If you feel you must drink milk, you should drink unpasteurized whole milk from a reputable farm. Even better is goat’s milk, because it naturally is less susceptible to pathogens. In addition, clinical reports show that milk from goats and goat whey protein powder cause less lactose intolerance and allergies compared to cow milk and whey protein powder from cow’s milk.

Troublingly, peer-reviewed studies clearly link dairy milk with ischemic heart disease.1 Dairy-milk consumption is also associated with testicular2 and prostate cancer. Consuming 2.5 servings of dairy per day boosts the risk of prostate cancer by more than 30 percent.3

For women, dairy-milk consumption has been connected to an increased risk of ovarian cancer: Among 80,326 women in the Nurses’ Health Study, those who consumed one or more dairy servings per day had a 44 percent higher risk for all types of invasive ovarian cancer compared to those who consumed three or less servings per month.4

Adding to the cancer risk, dairy-milk may contain suspected carcinogens such as the dioxin-like chemicals called polychlorinated biphenyls.5

Milk Substitutes

If you need a milk substitute, you can drink similar-tasting beverages made from vegetable sources without running these health risks. In my home we prefer almond, rice or unpasteurized milk.

Just be careful not to over-consume soy milk. Refined and processed soy foods such as soymilk, soy meats, soy ice cream and soy energy bars have been linked to digestive problems in children, thyroid dysfunction, reproductive disorders, immune system breakdown, heart disease and even cancer in animals. And many soy products are too high in sugar. (In soy milk, this may be listed on the label as evaporated cane juice.) Better choices than refined soy milk are unprocessed and naturally fermented soy foods like tempeh, miso and natto.

Think twice before gulping down a big glass of cow’s milk. Store shelves are replete with other healthy beverages that won’t deplete your health.

To your better health,
Michael Cutler, M.D.
Author, Easy Health Options

1 Grant WB: Milk and other dietary influences on coronary heart disease, published in Alternative Medicine Review vol. 3:281-94. Also, Segall JJ 1997: Epidemiological evidence for the link between dietary lactose and atherosclerosis, in Colaco,C. ed. The Glycation Hypothesis of Atheroscleorosis; Austin, TX: Landes Bioscience, pp. 185-209. Also, Artad-Wild SM, Connor SL, Sexton G, et al. Differences in coronary mortality can be explained by differences in cholesterol and saturated fat intakes in 40 countries but not in France and Finland: a paradox. Circulation 1993; 88: 2771-79.
2Davies, TW, Palmer CR, Ruja E, Lipscombe JM. Adolescent milk, dairy products and fruit consumption, and testicular cancer. British Journal of Cancer 1996; 74(4):657-60.
3 Chan JM, Stampfer MJ, Ma J, et al. Dairy products, calcium, and prostate cancer risk in the Physicians Health Study. Presentation, American Association for Cancer Research; San Francisco, CA, April 2000.
4 Fairfield K. The Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine: “Dairy products linked to ovarian cancer risk.” Family Practice News June 11, 2000; p.8.
5 Patandin S, Dagnelie PC, Mulder PG, et al. Dietary exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins from infancy until adulthood: a comparison between breast-feeding toddler, and long-term exposure. Environmental Health Prospectives 1999;107(1):45-51. Also, Skrzycki C, Warrick J. EPA Report Ratchets up Dioxin Peril. Washington Post May 17, 2000.

http://www.easyhealthoptions.com/alternative-medicine/the-darker-side-of-milk/

See also Milk tainted with BGH - MUST READ:
http://healthticket.blogspot.com/2012/09/beware-of-milk-you-are-drinking.html