Pages

Showing posts with label 5G. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 5G. Show all posts

Saturday, 25 April 2020

Conspiracy theories blaming Bill Gates for the coronavirus pandemic are exploding online

Bill Gates’ vocal stance on how to combat the coronavirus has made him a massive target of online conspiracy theorists, a New York Times analysis suggested.



Bill Gates has become a target of coronavirus conspiracy theories.
Bill Gates has become a target of coronavirus conspiracy theories.
 
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
  • Conspiracy theories linking Bill Gates to the coronavirus pandemic have surged online, an analysis by The New York Times suggested.
  • The newspaper’s analysis found more than 16,000 Facebook posts linking Gates with the virus, as well as 10 YouTube videos espousing the conspiracy theories that had garnered 5 million views.
  • Gates has been vocal about taking measures to combat the spread of the virus, and his foundation has poured $250 million into response efforts.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.
Bill Gates’ vocal stance on how to combat the coronavirus has made him a massive target of online conspiracy theorists, a New York Times analysis suggested.
The media analysis company Zignal Labs found that posts on social media falsely claiming that the Microsoft founder engineered the virus had exploded since the beginning of this year, The Times reported. In total, Zignal Labs found that conspiracy theories involving Gates and the virus had been mentioned 1.2 million times on social media and TV broadcasts, The Times said.
The Times said its analysis found more than 16,000 Facebook posts about Gates and the virus that had garnered about 900,000 likes and comments. It said the 10 most popular YouTube videos in March and April spreading misinformation about Gates had attracted 5 million views.
The newspaper said it traced the theories back to a tweet in late January by a YouTube personality linked to QAnon claiming that Gates knew about the pandemic ahead of time, citing a vaccine patent filed by a British group called the Pirbright Institute that had received funding from the Gates Foundation. The theory was picked up two days later by Infowars.
However, the vaccine was not related to the novel coronavirus but a different coronavirus that affects poultry, The Times said. In late January, the fact-checking site Full Fact debunked rumors circulating on social media that the Pirbright Institute had filed for a patent related to the novel coronavirus in 2015.
According to The Times, the surge in conspiracy theories blaming Gates seemed to correlate with prominent right-wing and anti-vaccination figures picking up the narrative. Roger Stone, Trump’s former campaign adviser who earlier this year was sentenced to 40 months in prison, suggested on a radio show this week that “whether Bill Gates played some role in the creation and spread of this virus is open for vigorous debate” the New York Post reported.
Gates’ philanthropic organization, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, has pledged $250 million toward fighting the coronavirus pandemic, including developing and manufacturing a vaccine. Gates has appeared on TV and written op-ed articles voicing his opinions about how to fight the virus, and he recently criticized President Donald Trump for withdrawing US funding for the World Health Organization.
Gates is not the only focus of conspiracy theories about the virus. In Britain, over 50 phone masts have been targeted by arson attacks linked to a popular conspiracy theory about the coronavirus and 5G technology.
There is a degree of crossover between these theories. Full Fact has also debunked a popular Facebook post that circulated in mid-March claiming both that the coronavirus was a fiction designed to disguise physical damage being done by 5G and that Gates created the virus to control the world and create a vaccine.
https://www.businessinsider.my/report-theories-blaming-bill-gates-for-coronavirus-pandemic-explode-online-2020-4?r=US&IR=T

Friday, 24 April 2020

The wildest 5G conspiracy theories explained — and debunked

5G is finally here, but as with many major breakthroughs, the new cellular tech has spawned a set of conspiracy theories, with everything ranging from the idea that 5G can cause cancer to the claim that it causes the coronavirus.
Do these theories have any validity behind them? And where did they come from in the first place? We did some digging to debunk even the wildest conspiracy theory surrounding 5G.

The physics of 5G

Before diving into 5G conspiracy theories, it’s important to note that 5G refers to a number of different technologies. For starters, 5G, which is technically just the 5th-generation of wireless technology, can span a range of frequencies. There are low-band radio frequencies, which offer a relatively slow internet connection but can travel longer distances. At the other end of the spectrum, there are high-band frequencies, or millimeter-wave frequencies. Connections on mmWave are much faster, but they struggle to get through obstacles and can’t travel long distances. Mid-band frequencies, as you would expect, offer medium-speed connections at medium distances.

Did 5G cause the coronavirus pandemic?

A relatively new theory suggests that 5G could be the cause of the coronavirus, officially known as COVID-19. Both the rollout of 5G and the first cases of coronavirus supposedly happened at the same time in late 2019, the theory claims.
Putting aside the fact that 5G actually started rolling out in 2018, this theory stems from linking the fact that the coronavirus was first discovered in Wuhan, China. China also recently deployed one of the largest 5G networks in the world.
There are a number of other ways in which this conspiracy theory is wrong. For starters, while China did recently start launching its 5G network, 5G first started rolling out in South Korea and parts of the U.S. In other words, if coronavirus was caused by 5G, then we would have seen the virus in other parts of the world first.
Of course, that’s setting aside the very nature of viruses and the fact that radio waves have no impact on a virus’ development. Research has shown coronavirus spreads through droplets generated when someone sneezes or coughs. These droplets can exist on surfaces for a matter of hours, and can even hang in the air for up to a few minutes after someone sneezes.
Radio waves, however, are a form of electromagnetic wave. No droplets involved. In fact, while radio waves can travel through water, it’s actually harder for them to do so than through air.
Now, areas with high infection rates of coronavirus may be the same as areas with 5G — but if that’s true, it’s only because carriers are deploying their networks in highly populated metro areas first. Highly populated areas, where people are closer to each other, also happen to make the spread of a virus easier.
Last but not least is the fact that China isn’t using mmWaves for its 5G networks just yet — it’s only using sub-6 GHz waves, which fall in the mid-band spectrum. These radio waves, however, have been used for other things for years — all 4G towers use frequencies in this range, they’ve just been repurposed for 5G.

Is 5G helping to spread the coronavirus?

There is, however, a slightly toned-down version of the theory that coronavirus and 5G are linked — and that’s that while 5G didn’t cause coronavirus in the first place, it does impact the immune system, potentially worsening symptoms and speeding up the spread of the virus.
Now, it’s important to note that in extreme amounts, radio waves can cause heating, and your immune system might have trouble operating were you to heat up too much. In fact, that’s how microwaves operate.
There’s just one problem: The radio waves emitted by cell towers are nowhere near as high as they would need to be to cause any health issues.
At extremely high frequencies, electromagnetic waves could potentially cause health issues. But the waves emitted by 5G towers aren’t just lower than that — they’re way lower. A number of scientific studies have been conducted on the link between non-ionizing waves — which are used for TV transmissions, and yes, 5G — and human health. Some organizations suggest that more research needs to be conducted, but at this point in time there is no reliable evidence proving 5G waves can impact the human immune system.
So don’t listen to YouTube on this one. Head to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or World Health Organization websites for real advice on how to stop the spread of coronavirus.
Can 5G cause cancer?
Theories about 5G causing cancer have been around for a few years now, and it likely stems from the use of the word “radiation.” All radio waves “radiate,” but that doesn’t necessarily mean that they have a negative impact on human health.
Only the upper end of the electromagnetic spectrum, which includes X-rays and gamma radiation, is “ionizing,” which essentially means that they can break apart molecular bonds and damage DNA. The rest of the spectrum is what’s called “non-ionizing;” these waves have wavelengths that are too long to be able to actually damage human cells. Even the highest of 5G waves are far below the boundaries between ionizing and non-ionizing waves.
There’s real-world data on the impact of radio waves on cancer too. While 5G is only just beginning to roll out, we’ve had waves in similar frequency ranges for decades — and few studies have linked the use of these waves with an increase in cancer rates.

Did a 5G tower cause the death of hundreds of birds?


RJ Sangosti/Getty

Wait — but didn’t a 5G network cause a flock of hundreds of birds to die? Well, no. A post has made the rounds on social media linking the deaths of hundreds of birds in The Hague with 5G tests. While it is true that a series of mysterious bird deaths was reported, no 5G tests were being conducted nearby at the time, Snopes reported.

Can 5G be used to control the weather?
I wish. If 5G could control the weather, we could have always sunny days. Or, we could limit the impact of climate change.
The root of this theory comes from the idea that the government is using the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program, or HAARP to control the weather. HAARP is a facility that was built to study the ionosphere, and it’s located in Alaska. Soon after completing the project, however, the government shut down the facility and transferred its ownership to the University of Alaska.
But what does that have to do with 5G? Well, according to those who believe in this theory, the ionosphere is where so-called “5G satellites” are. The only problem is, 5G is more of a terrestrial standard at this point, and while satellites could theoretically eventually be used for 5G connectivity, at this point satellites have too long a latency and aren’t being used for 5G.

Can 5G be used for mind control?

This is one of the more far-out theories out there — but again, it’s untrue. As mentioned, 5G waves have had no observable effect on human health at all, so 5G alone physically can’t be used to control people’s minds.
For some, however, this theory has other components to it — namely that 5G is used to control tiny robots that are injected into the body through vaccines. As sci-fi as that might sound, this one’s false too: No one has mind-controlling mini-robots.

Editors' Recommendations

https://www.digitaltrends.com/news/5g-conspiracy-theories-debunked/

Coronavirus conspiracy theories and myths debunked

COVID-19, commonly known as the coronavirus, is the biggest story in the world right now, a global pandemic forcing radical changes in society

With people constantly talking about it, it’s no surprise that rumors and conspiracy theories are circulating all over the internet. Here are some of the more popular conspiracy theories and rumors, and what they get wrong.




The rumor: The latest generation of cellular network technology, 5G, has inspired conspiracy theories in the past, with people claiming the radio waves can cause cancer, among other things. Now that the coronavirus is the biggest public health crisis in the world, conspiracy theorists are claiming that 5G is contributing to the problem, either by weakening peoples’ immune systems or even transmitting the virus. The theory is getting boosted by celebrities like Woody Harrelson, and arsonists have set fire to a number of 5G antennas in the United Kingdom, prompting YouTube to remove 5G conspiracy videos.

The truth: First, let’s tackle the idea that 5G can transmit the virus. At the moment, public health organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) describe the transmission mechanism like so: “The virus is thought to spread mainly between people who are in close contact with one another (within about 6 feet) through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs or sneezes.”
It should be noted that 5G is a spectrum of electromagnetic waves, not droplets. Although viruses can survive for a limited time outside of a host, it’s generally a short period (research indicates that coronavirus can survive for up to 72 hours on stainless steel or plastic surfaces). There is no evidence that radio waves can transmit the virus, nor that 5G towers could sustain the virus for any significant amount of time.
As for whether 5G weakens the immune system: According to the World Health Organization, “to date, and after much research performed, no adverse health effect has been causally linked with exposure to wireless technologies.” Finally, 5G falls under the non-ionizing portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, meaning that the waves lack the power to damage cells.

Ibuprofen is bad for coronavirus victims

The rumor:  The Lancet, an old and distinguished medical journal, published a letter hypothesizing that anti-inflammatory drugs, like ibuprofen, might increase the risk of coronavirus infection by spurring the increase of a particular enzyme called ACE2.


⚠️ | La prise d'anti-inflammatoires (ibuprofène, cortisone, ...) pourrait être un facteur d'aggravation de l’infection. En cas de fièvre, prenez du paracétamol.
Si vous êtes déjà sous anti-inflammatoires ou en cas de doute, demandez conseil à votre médecin.






French Health Minister Olivier Véran gave the idea an official backing with a tweet warning that ibuprofen could be dangerous.
The truth: The ibuprofen hypothesis was just that, a hypothesis. The Lancet letter was calling for investigation into the effects of drugs that stimulate ACE-2 .
One of the researchers involved, professor Michael Roth, later said, the letter “does not constitute a recommendation to use certain drugs or not. Patients should always follow the instructions given by their physicians.”
Q: Could worsen disease for people with ?

A: Based on currently available information, WHO does not recommend against the use of of ibuprofen.





View image on Twitter




The World Health Organization (WHO) stated on March 18 that it does not currently have any evidence that ibuprofen exacerbates coronavirus. That said, ibuprofen has always had some negative side effects, and you should talk to your doctor if you’re worried about them.

The virus is a biological weapon/made in a lab


The rumor: Conspiracy theories make for great drama, and what could be more dramatic than learning that the coronavirus was engineered in a lab, a mad experiment run amok, or even released on society intentionally. This theory is surprisingly popular: According to a Pew survey, 23 percent of Americans think the virus was created intentionally in a lab, while an additional 6 percent think it was made accidentally.
The truth: While it might be fun to imagine coronavirus is a government creation (it would certainly make for a great HBO miniseries), science suggests the truth is that coronavirus came about through boring, old-fashioned natural selection.
In a study published in Nature, researchers analyzed the structure of the coronavirus to glean insights into how it may have evolved, and whether it might really have been man-made. First, they examined the virus’s ability to bind to an enzyme called ACE2, which is found in the lungs, heart, and other organs. Although the coronavirus binds well to ACE2, the researchers noted that “computational analyses predict that the interaction is not ideal” and that the combination of high affinity with room to improve “is most likely the result of natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2 that permits another optimal binding solution to arise. This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not the product of purposeful manipulation.”
The researchers also noted that, if humans had made the coronavirus, they would have used one of the previous human-compatible coronaviruses as a foundation, yet the genetic data indicates that COVID-19 was not derived “from any previously used virus backbone.” Instead, they find it likely that this coronavirus adapted, making the leap from animals (such as bats or pangolins) to humans.

Vitamin C, bleach, and supplements can cure it

The rumor: In times of plague, people naturally grow desperate for cures. Social media, with its lack of fact-checking, has been a breeding ground for rumors about miracle treatments to ward off the virus, including, shockingly enough, people recommending you drink bleach (don’t). President Donald Trump has even speculated exploring whether to inject household cleaners into patients to treat the virus.
The truth: Bleach is great for disinfecting household surfaces, not the inside of your body. People have turned to other supplements, such as colloidal silver, in the hopes of preventing the virus, but the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) maintains that these products are fraudulent and may even harm you.
Vitamin C has long had a reputation for boosting the immune system, and as a result, people are spreading claims that big doses of it can cure coronavirus. As Peter McCaffery, a professor of biochemistry, writes in The Conversation, although vitamin C is important for your body, past evidence indicates “it’s unlikely that taking vitamin C will prevent or cure you of a COVID-19 infection.”
And the makers of Lysol have warned users never to drink or inject household cleaners into their bodies.

The virus is not that bad

The rumor: Coronavirus is no worse than the flu, and maybe even less dangerous. This is a common thread you’ll see in public discussions about the disease. Even President Donald Trump has compared the coronavirus to the flu, pointing out that the U.S. never shuts down over the latter.
The truth: There are certainly similarities between the coronavirus and the flu. Both can have similar symptoms (fever, cough, body aches, fatigue, pneumonia) and both can be spread through droplets.
For coronavirus skeptics, the flu’s high yearly numbers are a reason to dismiss coronavirus panic. There are a few reasons that the coronavirus is causing so much more panic, however. First, what we call the flu is actually a variety of different strains of viruses, whereas the coronavirus is just one virus, yet capable of doing all this damage. Second, coronavirus appears to spread more than the flu; the coronavirus has a reproductive number between 2 and 2.5, meaning that each person who gets it will infect 2 to 2.5 others, whereas the seasonal flu has about a 1.3 reproduction rate.
Finally, while the flu does kill a staggering number of people every year, it has a much lower mortality rate than the coronavirus so far. In fact, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, testified to Congress that coronavirus has a mortality rate 10 times that of the flu.

The U.S. Army started the virus

The rumor: An official in China’s Foreign Ministry, Zhao Lijian, suggested that the U.S. Army started the virus, pointing to its presence at the Military World Games in Wuhan (where the pandemic began) in October.
The truth: All evidence points to Wuhan as the origin of the outbreak, but China first reported cases December 31. As for the soldiers involved in the Military World Games, the Pentagon reported “no illnesses have been tied to American service members from October,” according to the New York Times. One might suspect that, given its early failings in trying to downplay and suppress information about the virus, the Chinese government is now looking to keep the world’s attention elsewhere while it rehabilitates its image.
For the latest updates on the novel coronavirus outbreak, visit the World Health Organization’s COVID-19 page.

Editors' Recommendations