Pages

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

New Science Destroys the Saturated Fat Myth

Healthwise

July 27, 2014

Story at-a-glance

  • The nutritional myth that saturated fat is bad for you continues to fall apart as a steady stream of new books and scientific studies hit the airways
  • With regard to heart health, nutrition policy has been derailed over the past half-century by corporate greed, political agendas, and bad science
  • A new meta-analysis involving a half million people found that those eating more saturated fats do NOT have more heart disease than those eating less
  • Cholesterol is critical for building your cell membranes, interacting with proteins inside cells, regulating your cell signaling and other biological processes
  • Saturated fats serve important functions such as building cell walls, mineral absorption, converting beta-carotene into vitamin A, and many others


By Dr. Mercola

The nutritional myth that saturated fat is bad for you continues to fall apart as a steady stream of new books and studies on this topic hit the media. The latest work to challenge the old dogma is a book called The Big Fat Surprise by journalist Nina Teicholz, interviewed above.
Her book comes alongside new research that raises questions about the long-held but false belief that cardiovascular disease is related to fat and cholesterol intake.
Teicholz points out the flaws in the original Ancel Keys study; how saturated fat has been a healthy human staple for thousands of years, and how the low-fat craze has resulted in excessive consumption of refined carbohydrates, which has resulted in increased inflammation and disease.1 Teicholz tells the Wall Street Journal:2
"There has never been solid evidence for the idea that these [saturated] fats cause disease. We only believe this to be the case because nutrition policy has been derailed over the past half-century by a mixture of personal ambition, bad science, politics, and bias."

Are We Seeing the Cholesterol Myth in a Scientific Free-Fall?


The cholesterol myth has suffered a bit of a triple whammy of late, making it harder and harder for heart specialists to uphold the company line. This information is just the latest in a long line of science disproving the need for the saturated fat phobia.
  1. In 2012, researchers at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology examined the health and lifestyle habits of more than 52,000 adults ages 20 to 74, concluding that women with "high cholesterol" (greater than 270 mg/dl) had a 28 percent lower mortality risk than women with "low cholesterol" (less than 183 mg/dl).
  2. Researchers also found that, if you're a woman, your risk for heart disease, cardiac arrest, and stroke are higher with lower cholesterol levels.3
  3. In 2013, a prominent London cardiologist by the name of Aseem Malhotra argued in the British Medical Journal that you should ignore advice to reduce your saturated fat intake, because it's actually increasing your risk for obesity and heart disease.4
  4. Then in March 2014, a new meta-analysis published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, using data from nearly 80 studies and more than a half million people, found that those who consume higher amounts of saturated fat have no more heart disease than those who consume less.
  5. They also did not find less heart disease among those eating higher amounts of unsaturated fat, including both olive oil and corn oil.56

Fat Has Been Blamed for Sugar's Evil Deeds

What do these journalists and scientists know that your physician might not? Going back forty years or more, fat has been misidentified as the culprit behind heart disease, when all along it's been sugar.
A high-sugar diet raises your risk for heart disease by promoting metabolic syndrome—a cluster of health conditions that includes high blood pressure, insulin and leptin resistance, high triglycerides, liver dysfunction, and visceral fat accumulation.
Insulin and leptin resistance is caused by factors inherent in our modern lifestyle, including diets heavy in processed carbohydrates, sugars/fructose, refined flours, and industrial seed oils.
Making matters worse, the average American gets inadequate exercise, suffers from chronic stress and sleep deprivation, is exposed to environmental toxins, and has poor gut health (dysbiosis). This is the perfect storm for chronic disease.

Cholesterol Is Not Only Beneficial for Your Body—It's Absolutely Mandatory

About 800,000 Americans die from cardiovascular disease annually. A quarter of these deaths could be prevented through simple lifestyle changes such as maintaining a healthy weight, exercising, and managing insulin and leptin levels.
By reducing your cholesterol, you may actually be increasing your risk for cardiovascular disease. Your body needs adequate cholesterol to perform a number of critical functions, and there is strong evidence that people have a higher risk for heart attacks by having their cholesterol levels driven too low, as is being done by drugs like statins.
Cholesterol plays important roles such as building your cell membranes, interacting with proteins inside your cells, and helping regulate protein pathways required for cell signaling. Having too little cholesterol may negatively impact your brain health, hormone levels, heart disease risk, and more. Therefore, placing an upper limit on dietary cholesterol, especially such a LOW upper limit as is now recommended, is likely causing far more harm than good.

The Truth About Saturated Fats

Just as your body has requirements for cholesterol, it also needs saturated fats for proper function. One way to understand this is to consider what foods humans consumed during their evolution. Many experts believe that since the Paleolithic Era, we evolved as hunter-gatherers.Paleolithic nutrition states that we have eaten animal products for most of our existence on Earth. To suggest that saturated fats are suddenly harmful to us makes no sense, especially from an evolutionary perspective.
As recently as 2010, the current recommendations from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) call for reducing your saturated fat intake to a mere 10 percent of your total calories or less. This is astounding, and quite the opposite of what most people require for optimal health! The latest science suggests healthy fats (saturated and unsaturated fats from whole food, animal, and plant sources) should comprise anywhere from 50 to 85 percent of your overall energy intake. Saturated fats provide a number of important health benefits, including the following:
Providing building blocks for cell membranes, hormones, and hormone-like substancesMineral absorption, such as calciumCarriers for important fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K
Conversion of carotene into vitamin AHelping to lower cholesterol levels (palmitic and stearic acids)Acts as antiviral agent (caprylic acid)
Optimal fuel for your brainProvides satietyModulates genetic regulation and helps prevent cancer (butyric acid)

Seven Good Tests for Assessing Cardiac Risk



The best indicators for heart disease risk are outlined in the table that follows. Be aware that these same indicators have also been found to be fairly accurate in predicting your dementia risk.
1. HDL/total cholesterol ratio: HDL percentage is a very important heart disease risk factor. Just divide your HDL level by your total cholesterol. This percentage should ideally be above 24 percent. Below 10 percent, it's a significant indicator of heart disease risk.
2. Triglyceride/HDL ratios: Divide your triglyceride number by your HDL. This ratio should ideally be below 2.
3. NMR lipoprofile: Possibly the most powerful test for evaluating heart disease risk, this test determines your proportion of smaller, more damaging LDL particles.Small LDL particles get stuck easily, cause more inflammation, and are tied to insulin and leptin resistance. This test is not typically ordered, so you might need to request it from your physician or order it yourself through a third-party. (For more information on the NMR Lipoprofile, please watch my interview with Chris Kresser, above.)
4. Fasting insulin: A normal fasting blood insulin level is below 5, but ideally, you'll want it below 3. If your insulin level is higher than 5, the most effective way to optimize it is to reduce or eliminate all forms of dietary sugar, particularly fructose, and processed grains.
5. Fasting blood glucose: Studies have shown that people with a fasting blood glucose of 100-125 mg/dl had nearly three times the risk of coronary artery disease of people with a blood glucose below 79 mg/dl.
6. Waist-to-hip ratioVisceral fat, the type of fat that collects around your internal organs, is a well-recognized risk factor for heart disease. The simplest way to evaluate your risk here is by simply measuring your waist-to-hip ratio. (For further instructions, please see the link to my previous article.)
7. Iron level: Excess iron can exert very potent oxidative stress, so if you have excess iron in your blood, you can damage your blood vessels and increase your risk of heart disease. Ideally, you should monitor your serum ferritin level and make sure it is below 80 ng/ml. The simplest ways to eliminate excess iron are blood donation and therapeutic phlebotomy.

What REALLY Constitutes a Heart-Healthy Diet?

The following table outlines my version of a "heart-healthy diet," which minimizes inflammation, reduces insulin resistance, and helps you reduce your risk for cardiovascular disease. If you want further details, I suggest reviewing my Optimized Nutrition Plan, which will guide you through dietary changes in a step-by-step fashion, moving from beginner to intermediate to advanced.
1. Limit or eliminate all processed foods
2. Eliminate all gluten and highly allergenic foods from your diet
3. Eat organic foods whenever possible to avoid exposure to harmful agricultural chemicals, such as glyphosate
4. Avoid genetically modified ingredients (GMO), which wreak biological chaos on a cellular level and are linked to abundant health problems, including chronic inflammation and heart disease
5. Eat at least one-third of your food uncooked (raw), or as much as you can manage; avoid cooking foods at high temperatures
6. Increase the amount of fresh vegetables in your diet, locally grown and organic if possible
7. Eat naturally fermented foods, which help optimize your gut bacteria and prevent inflammation-causing superantigens from pathogenic bacteria, as well as providing valuable vitamin K2, B vitamins, and other nutrients
8. Avoid all artificial sweeteners.
9. Limit fructose to less than 25 grams per day from all sources, including whole fruits. If you have insulin resistance, diabetes, hypertension, or heart disease, you'd be well advised to keep your fructose consumption below 15 grams per day until your insulin resistance  has normalized
10. Swap all trans fats (vegetable oils, margarine etc.) for healthy fats like avocado, raw buttercheese, and coconut oil; avoid consuming oxidized cholesterol (cholesterol that has gone rancid, such as that from overcooked scrambled eggs)
11. To rebalance your omega-3 to omega-6 ratio, take a high-quality animal-based omega-3 supplement, such as krill oil, and reduce your consumption of processed omega-6 fats from vegetable oils
12. Drink plenty of pure water every day

Five Other Heart-Healthy Moves

In addition to following the heart-healthy plan discussed above, there are several more strategies that can be profoundly helpful in reducing chronic inflammation and thereby lowering your cardiovascular risk:
  1. Exercise regularly. One of the primary benefits of exercise is that it helps normalize and maintain healthy insulin and leptin levels. Exercise also boosts HDL, increases your growth hormone production, helps curb your appetite, and improves your mood and sleep.
  2. Intermittent fasting. Fasting is an excellent way to "reboot" your metabolism so that your body can relearn how to burn fat as its primary fuel, which helps you shed those excess fat stores. Intermittent fasting has a far greater retention and compliance rate compared to conventional all-day fasting regimens. Another version is alternate-day fasting.
  3. Grounding yourself to the earth. When you walk barefoot, free electrons are transferred from the earth into your body, and electrons are some of the most potent antioxidants known. Grounding (also called Earthing) helps alleviate inflammation, as well as thinning your blood and causing your red blood cells to repel each other, making them less likely to clot.
  4. AVOID statin drugs. Statin drugs can reduce your cholesterol to dangerously low levels, while doing nothing tomodulate LDL particle size. Statin drugs may even accelerate heart disease. A 2012 study showed that statin use is associated with a 52 percent higher prevalence of calcified coronary plaque compared to those not taking them.7 And coronary artery calcification is the hallmark of potentially lethal heart disease. Antidepressants have also been associated with heart disease.
  5. AVOID chemicals whenever possibleBPA, for example, has been linked to heart disease: adults with the highest levels of BPA in their urine are more than twice as likely to develop coronary artery disease as those with the lowest levels.
[+] Sources and References

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/07/27/saturated-fat-cholesterol.aspx

Healthwise

Monday, 28 July 2014

World's most expensive city for airport taxis revealed

- and it isn't London or New York

Healthwise
  • New infographic names and shames cities with most expensive airport cabs
  • New Zealand and Australia fare badly in poll with seven cities in top ten
  • London is the most expensive city in Europe - and costlier than any US city


It can be one of the biggest – and costliest – banes of travellers’ lives.

You land at an airport and you need to make a quick journey into the city centre – so grab a taxi to take you there in the quickest possible time.

Scroll down for video

Hang on to your wallet: Airport taxis in New Zealand and Australia are likely to prove expensive
Hang on to your wallet: Airport taxis in New Zealand and Australia are likely to prove expensive

Only then do you discover that the cost of this transfer is something akin to the national budget of one of the planet’s smaller nations.

And according to new research, travellers seeking to keep as much of their money in their wallets as possible should avoid New Zealand – and Australasia in general.
    A survey, conducted by a New Zealand company – presented below as a neat infographic – has found that Christchurch has the most expensive airport taxi rides on the planet.

    According to the research, conducted by Digital Hothouse, taxi passengers in the biggest city on New Zealand’s South Island face an eye-watering average rate per kilometre of NZ$4.50 – a figure which equates to £2.30 for 1000 metres.

    Taxi infographic
    Taxi infographic

    And with 10km separating the city’s airport from the centre, that equates to an overall cost of NZ$45 (£23) for a ride into town.

    Christchurch’s near neighbour Queenstown was barely any cheaper, coming second in the poll at an average rate of NZ$4.38 (£2.25) per kilometre, with the cost of an airport transfer spiralling to a total of NZ$35 (£18) for an 8km transfer from the airport.

    Two other New Zealand cities – the capital Wellington and the biggest metropolis Auckland – also made the top ten.

    And costs seem to be barely any less budget-busting on the other side of the Tasman Sea – where three Australian cities also make the top five for expensive airport cab journeys.

    Sydney is listed as the chief Australian offender, with an average rate per kilometre of NZ$4.23 (£2.17) (for the purposes of uniformity, the survey’s results were presented in New Zealand Dollars) – NZ$51 (£26) for the 12-kilometre journey to the centre.

    Where can I take you, gov? London is the most expensive city in Europe for an airport taxi transfer
    Where can I take you, gov? London is the most expensive city in Europe for an airport taxi transfer

    West-coast metropolis Perth, and the capital of Victoria, Melbourne, are also named and shamed for the price of their airport taxis.

    British readers may be surprised to know that London only ‘achieved’ eighth place in the table, below the likes of Wellington and Perth – but also unsurprised to hear that it was listed as the most expensive city in Europe, and pricier than any city in the United States.

    The cost of an airport taxi in the British capital was calculated at NZ$3.67 per kilometre (£1.88), with the average ride into the centre listed as 29 kilometres and NZ$105 (£54).
    The UK also featured towards the top of the tree when the cost of airport taxi rides was compared on a country-by-country basis.

    The average cost of a British airport taxi ride was listed as NZ$3.48 per kilometre (£1.78) – a figure that was high enough to leave the UK at third place in the ‘most expensive’ table, behind New Zealand and Australia but ahead of the likes of Russia, Spain and Italy

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-2685864/Worlds-expensive-city-airport-taxis-revealed-isnt-London-New-York.html

    Healthwise

    Sunday, 27 July 2014

    Dog talk: The big snip

    Healthwise

    Sunday July 27, 2014



    Curious to know what happens when you spay or neuter your dog? Read on.

    SHELTERS neuter pets before the public is allowed to adopt them, and vets routinely advise pet lovers to neuter because of the many advantages the procedure offers.

    The biggest benefit is that neutering takes sex out of the equation. If you think it’s not a big deal, think again!

    Girl dogs – bitches – have a six-month reproductive cycle that is punctuated by times when they go “on heat”, meaning that they are fertile and ready to mate. This time lasts about 18 days on average.

    During this time, she will have an increased sexual drive, which means she’ll be scratching at the door and howling to go out and have fun. We’re not talking the odd whine here: we’re talking commotion 24/7.

    What’s more, every boy dog in the neighbourhood will know it. The neutered males will know but won’t be too bothered. But the ones that are intact will be hanging about, waiting for her.

    The bold ones will be howling, too, and scratching at the door. They get over-excited and will fight each other. If you’re in a doggy neighbourhood, there could be half a dozen of them at your gate.
    Again, they’ll be there 24/7 for the whole 18 days. They can’t help it: this is nature at work.

    Being in thrall to this drive makes pets miserable – and owners, too. By neutering your pets, you will have a girl who won’t be reduced to a sex slavering wreck every few months and a male who won’t be running off all the time.

    After the procedure (see sidebar), you won’t see any difference in your dog’s personality. For one thing, dogs don’t have the op and then suddenly become sluggish, slow and fat! Dogs, when they get older, get a little fatter for exactly the same reason that we get fatter: Pups are constantly rushing around while older dogs lie on the sofa and watch the footie.

    If your pet is a bouncy, cheerful character like Charlie – who is up for adoption this month – he will stay a bouncy, cheerful character. What you will see is a little more control.

    Specifically, when a bitch is on heat, dogs will fight each other to get to her. They also mark their territory with strong-smelling urine. As neutering eliminates sex from the equation, it means your dogs won’t be involved in fights and their urine will be less smelly.

    Neutering also means fewer trips to the vet. In sweet stories, the dogs fight, bark and snap and nobody gets hurt but, in real life, we’re talking blood and stitches.

    In addition, some people think that as neutering reduces the level of hormones (like testosterone), you will also see dogs becoming less aggressive; however, studies are divided over whether this actually happens.

    One way to interpret the studies is that dogs that are not neutered become used to fighting. As such, they become used to solving any problem with their teeth. So if you can prevent your dog from learning to fight, you are less likely to have a pet that bites when it feels threatened. However, as studies haven’t yet looked into this, this is speculation.

    What is not speculation is that there are several important health benefits to neutering.

    Every time a bitch goes into heat, she increases her risk of getting mammary tumours. Although spaying at any young age is considered useful, those who are spayed before they get into their first heat cycle have a significantly reduced risk for mammary gland tumours.

    Unspayed bitches are at risk of pyometra and other uterine diseases that can be treated but that are expensive to deal with. Spaying means you avoid these problems.

    Although you don’t see it every day, dogs are quite susceptible to false pregnancy. Bitches who think they are pregnant produce milk, become irritable, and display all sorts of behavioural problems during this time, and frequently become depressed, too. Spaying prevents this.

    For male dogs, neutering removes the testes. As older dogs are prone to testicular cancer, having the operation reduces but does not entirely eliminate the risk of this life-threatening disease.

    Also, intact dogs will have their prostate enlarge as they age. This can become uncomfortable, cause urinary problems and the prostate can become infected. Neutering prevents enlargement and reduces the possibility of infection.

    Finally, while there are no official figures, an estimated 11,000 unwanted pets are put down (killed) every year in Selangor alone. We don’t like to talk about it but when we drop off animals at these places, there is a big chance that what we’re doing is asking someone else to put down the animal. So when you neuter, you become part of the solution: You are helping to make sure that your pet isn’t adding to the unwanted animal population.

    This is why shelters often adopt the slogan: Save lives! Spay and neuter!


    Ellen Whyte is currently ruled exclusively by cats but she sneaks out to talk to her dog friends.

    BEST TIME TO NEUTER 

    AN OLD rule of thumb is to spay and neuter dogs at six months, just before they become sexually mature. The modern rule of thumb is that dogs need to be healthy and of adult weight. This can be at five months or even slightly earlier.

    As the new rules are hard to interpret – they go according to a dog’s size and breed – you should talk to your vet. If you’re far away from a clinic, then the old rule of “six months and healthy” works fine. Tip: Do catch your girl dog before her first heat! You can take her during heat but it’s best to be just before.

    Although you should ask your vet, the usual procedure is that you don’t feed your dog after midnight but let her or him have all the water they like. The next morning, go to the clinic and hold your pet while the anaesthetic is administered. Then go home while the vet carries out the procedure. You can pick up your pet in the afternoon after the anaesthetic has worn off.

    In our home, we have a policy of treating pets who’ve had “the op” with extra gentleness and care for a week after, because of bruising that typically comes with any operation. Also, anaesthetic can make your pet feel a bit queasy for a day or two as well.

    Both our boy dogs bounced back in a day, whereas our girl dog took five days to heal completely. In the last 10 years, heavy anaesthetic and huge stitches have given way to lighter sedation and keyhole surgery; for a proper explanation of the op, you should speak with your vet.

    If you can watch operations on TV and don’t mind graphic illustrations, you can also visit this page: http://www.pet-informed-veterinary-advice-online.com/dog-spaying.html

    http://m.thestar.com.my/story.aspx?hl=The+big+snip&sec=lifestyle&id



    Don’t want your golden retriever to get cancer? Don’t neuter it

    Controversial new study says neutering your dogs can triple their risk of cancer or joint disorders

    Neutering golden retrievers at a young age can increase their chances of cancer or joint disorders, a controversial new study asserts.

    Neutering dogs can double or triple their risk of cancer or joint disorders, a controversial new study reveals.
    In fact, the risk of lymphatic cancer (lymphosarcoma) was three times more common in early neutered males than non-neutered males. And cancer of the blood vessel walls (hemangiosarcoma) was quadrupled in late-neutered females than non-neutered.
    The study also found neutering male and female golden retrievers produced weak protection against mammary or prostate cancer, contrary to popular belief.
    Researchers at the University of California Davis studied 759 golden retrievers registered at their Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital.
    Golden retrievers are popular and common but also more vulnerable to certain cancers and joint disorders than other breeds, the study pointed out.
    The results can only be extrapolated to other breeds to a certain extent, lead researcher Dr. Benjamin Hart told the Toronto Star.
    What’s a dog owner to do?
    “Two things. Certainly avoid early neutering, before a year. This takes away the developmental effect of gonal hormones,” said Hart, a veterinary professor and animal behaviourist at UCD.
    “A golden retriever is not much of a behaviour (aggressive) dog. Why not just not neuter unless you have to? There is nothing to be gained by neutering a male early.”
    “If it’s females, don’t spay too early. Wait until she’s a year or 13 months so you can get past the knee and elbow and hip dysplasia problems. That’s early enough in goldens.”
    The president-elect of the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association, Dr. Jim Berry, called the research “very interesting” and said vets hadn’t had anything “quite as comprehensive” to refer to before.
    He cautioned the golden retrievers studied by Hart were sicker dogs than in the general population because they had been brought to a university clinic. The research, he also said, wasn’t conclusive enough yet for him to change his advice to patients but it did add an important element.
    Berry also cautioned that the “outrageous” numbers of dogs and cats who are killed to deal with overpopulation outweighs other considerations right now.
    Hart has been debating his results — since they were published in PLOSone — with staff at animal shelters, which often forbid adoptions of unneutered animals regardless of age.
    “I don’t want to adopt a dog if the neutering doubles or triples the chance of a hip disorder,” Hart said. “I can be a responsible pet owner. People should have the dignity of deciding for their pets.”
    He advocated a vasectomy or tubal tying for dogs before a shelter adoption instead of neutering.
    “These operations are much less expensive and less traumatic for the dogs. The weird thing is we don’t teach these simple operations yet in vet schools, but shelter vets could learn it in an afternoon wet lab.”
    The Ontario SPCA chief veterinary officer disputed the findings.
    “There is no clear or obvious link between these diseases and neutering, we can say there is no clear nor proven causal relationship. There were various issues with this study such as the lack of numbers of cases for comparison, lack of discussion of limitations and potential bias, and therefore we would conclude very little from this study,” said Dr. Magdalena Smrdelj.
    “We recommend spay/neuter for all animals, preferably at early age.”
    The study is the first to examine the effects of early (before one year) and late neutering on several types of joint disorders and cancers in one breed of dog, the report said.
    Hart made it clear that even with the strong evidence in the study, the numbers of golden retrievers that developed cancer or joint disorders were still low.
    For example, while the number of early-neutered males diagnosed withlymphosarcoma was tripled, it was still only 10 per cent of the golden retrievers studied.
    And while cases of hemangiosarcoma in late-neutered females quadrupled, compared with early-neutered or unspayed females, it was still only 8 per cent.
    “You have to remember most of the dogs did not get cancer. It’s a matter of risk. Most people don’t want to double or triple the risk.”
    The UCD researchers next intend to study the effects on Labrador retrievers and then German shepherds.
    http://www.thestar.com/life/2013/03/01/dont_want_your_golden_retriever_to_get_cancer_dont_neuter_it.html

    Healthwise