Pages

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

A Nobel soul

Published: Tuesday October 15, 2013 MYT 12:00:00 AM
Updated: Tuesday October 15, 2013 MYT 7:56:13 AM

by david pratt


Consecra ted to work: French scientists Pierre and Marie Curie embodied the cherished ideal of being utterly immersed in and dedicated to a task of great significance. - File photo
Consecrated to work: French scientists Pierre and Marie Curie embodied the cherished ideal of
being utterly immersed in and dedicated to a task of great significance. - File photo

With this year’s Nobel Prizes unveiled last week, here’s a look at some common denominators among laureates.

ARE there any predictors that point to who gets selected for a Nobel Prize? Here’s George Beadle’s (medicine, 1958) response: “Study diligently. Respect DNA. Don’t smoke. Don’t drink. Avoid women and politics. That’s my formula.”

Is precocity in childhood a predictor? When the 2001 economics laureate, George Akerlof, was in second grade, he was asked what he wanted for Christmas, and he said, “A steel mill.”

Asked the same question by his scientist father, Roger Kornberg (chemistry, 2006) said, “A week in the lab.”

But early privilege is not essential. Mario Capecchi (medicine, 2007) was an abandoned child on the streets of wartime Italy. Albert Camus (literature, 1957) grew up fatherless, in poverty in Algiers.

In addition to childhood hardship, many Nobel laureates, men and women, at some point in their lives suffered imprisonment. Nelson Mandela (peace, 1993) set a record with his 27 years in prison in South Africa. Autobiographies show that prison strengthened the convictions of future laureates and toughened their resolution.

Childhood deprivation and adult imprisonment are, however, atypical.

The typical Nobel laureate in science is a male, born in a Western country into a middle-class family.

His father is a professional, manager or professor. His family is Protestant, agnostic or Jewish.
His parents seek out good K-12 schools for him, and he proceeds to a good university.

He receives his doctoral degree before he is 25 and undertakes post-doctoral work under a Nobel-level supervisor. He does his groundbreaking research in his late 30s or early 40s, for which he is awarded the Nobel Prize 15 years later.

Rosalind Yalow (medicine, 1977) told women: “You can have it all!” But only 43 of 862 laureates have been women.

The prizes got their start in 1901, before women won universal suffrage in most nations, let alone an equal share of education. In the sciences, even in contemporary times, the difficulty of combining motherhood with experiments that have to be checked at 3am has channelled many women into teaching universities rather than research institutes.

In their autobiographies, many Nobel laureates pay tribute to an outstanding mentor. Five of Enrico Fermi’s (physics, 1938) post-docs went on to win the Nobel Prize, and 12 of Ernest Rutherford’s (chemistry, 1908).

Otto Warburg (medicine, 1931) advised an American doctoral student, “If you wish to become a scientist, you must ask a successful scientist to accept you in his laboratory, even if at the beginning you would only clean his test tubes.”

Is eccentricity a concomitant of Nobel-level genius? In fact, laureates are mostly down-to-earth and unpretentious. In the United States, 44% of marriages end in divorce. Among Nobel laureates in the 20th century, the rate was 11%.

Much time and energy are saved by a stable family life. Naturally, there are exceptions.

Erwin Schrodinger (physics, 1933) lived for some years in a middle-class Dublin suburb with his wife and his mistress, while simultaneously carrying on affairs with his students and fathering children with two other Irish women.

There remains one quality that is essential. It is what Leon Lederman (physics, 1988) called “compulsive dedication”. What distinguishes Nobel laureates is passion for their work, work that engages their hearts as well as their heads.

Let the example of Marie Curie (physics, 1903; chemistry, 1911) and her husband Pierre (physics, 1903) stand for the experience of many others.

The Curies became convinced that radium could be isolated from the mineral pitchblende The Sorbonne assigned them a shed with a leaking roof and a dirt floor, where the Curies worked for years, freezing in winter and sweltering in summer.

“And yet,” Marie Curie wrote in her biography of her husband, “it was in this miserable old shed that the best and happiest years of our life were spent, entirely consecrated to work.

“I sometimes passed the whole day stirring a mass in ebullition, with an iron rod nearly as big as myself. In the evening, I was broken with fatigue. ... We worked in the unique preoccupation of a dream.”

This experience – being utterly immersed in and dedicated to a task of great significance – is common to all Nobel laureates, and it is cherished by them as much as the prize itself. – Los Angeles Times / McClatchy-Tribune Information Services

David Pratt compiled The Impossible Takes Longer: The 1,000 Wisest Things Ever Said By Nobel Prize Laureates. He wrote this for the Los Angeles Times.

http://www.thestar.com.my/Lifestyle/Features/2013/10/15/A-Nobel-soul.aspx

Human guinea pigs



Published: Tuesday October 15, 2013 MYT 12:00:00 AM
Updated: Tuesday October 15, 2013 MYT 7:59:33 AM

ALTHOUGH nearly 85% of Nobel Prizes in physiology or medicine have relied upon animal research, a few laureates have used themselves as guinea pigs. Below, the organisation Understanding Animal Research details some of these self-experimenters, who each took a risky step for their own reasons – bravery, desperation and hope.


Werner Forssmann (1956)

In the 23 years preceding winning the Nobel Prize, Werner Forssmann had worked as a urologist, served as a Major in the German Army and was captured as a prisoner of war. But none of that concerned the Nobel committee, who were honouring Forssmann for his work as a young surgical intern when he first demonstrated cardiac catheterisation in a human: himself.

Generally thought to be impossible without causing severe damage to the heart, cardiac catheters require inserting a catheter into a vein and threading it through until it reaches the heart.

This would allow clinicians to measure the pressure in the heart and determine if a defect needs to be operated on.

Inspired by researchers who had achieved this in a horse in 1861, Forssmann saw the potential this technique could have.

2005 Nobel Prize laureate Prof Barry Marshall drank a broth of bacteria from the lab to prove that it was a bacterium that caused stomach ulcers. - File photo

2005 Nobel Prize laureate Prof Barry Marshall (above) drank a broth of bacteria from the lab to prove that it was a bacterium that caused stomach ulcers while the late Dr Ralph Steinman’s work on dendritic cells helped prolong his life after he was diagnosed with advanced pancreatic cancer. — File picture
Refused permission to experiment on patients, Forssmann set out to test the technique on himself. First he had to convince the operating room nurse to give him access to surgical instruments.

She relented on the condition that Forssmann would place the catheter in her instead, which he accepted. However, once he had strapped the nurse down onto the operating table,

Forssmann quickly anaesthetised his own arm, made an incision and inserted the catheter 30cm along his veins.

He then walked up two flights of stairs to the X-ray room before extending the catheter the full 60cm to enter his heart and capturing the image.

Forssmann’s reckless bravery generated much annoyance and excitement.

The annoyance eventually won out and Forssmann was forced to withdraw from his residency.

Although he moved out of research, Forssmann’s paper on his work was read many years later by André Frédéric Cournand and Dickinson W. Richards who built on the technique and shared the Nobel Prize with him.

On hearing news of the prize, Forssmann said: “I feel like a village parson who has just learned that he has been made bishop.”


Barry Marshall (2005)

Marshall must be the poster boy for self-experimenters everywhere. He drank a heady broth of bacteria from the lab to prove to his peers that the bacterium Helicobacter pylori was the cause of stomach ulcers.

Stomach ulcers were long thought to be due to stress, with the only treatments being rest, antacids and surgery in extreme cases. But in 1979, pathologist Robin Warren noticed inflammation in regions of stomach biopsies that were colonised by small, curved bacteria.

Marshall, intrigued by his findings, contacted Warren and the pair began a survey of 100 patients and biopsies.

For them, it became clear that the bacteria, which they named H. pylori, were the cause of stomach ulcers and gastritis.


The culprit: The H. pylori bacterium, which Marshall proved caused stomach ulcers – by testing his theory on himself! — Understanding Animal Research
The culprit: The H. pylori bacterium, which Marshall proved caused
stomach ulcers – by testing his theory on himself! — Understanding Animal Research

This discovery was a radical departure from medical opinion at the time, and many researchers and doctors were sceptical. The presence of the bacteria and inflammation did not prove cause and effect.

With no suitable animal model susceptible to the bacteria (this was before the Mongolian gerbil had been found to model the human condition), Marshall decided to demonstrate the role of bacteria using himself as a guinea pig.

Five days after drinking the broth, he began to experience loss of appetite before then vomiting regularly each morning. An endoscopy revealed the truth: Marshall had given himself gastritis. Under orders from his wife, Marshall began taking antibiotics and the symptoms subsided.

This proved that peptic ulcers and gastritis could be cured, saved thousands of lives and rendered the billion-dollar industry of previous treatments obsolete.


Ralph Steinman (2011)

When Steinman was announced as one of the winners of the Nobel Prize in 2011 friends, colleagues and journalists were quick to try to contact him. Outside of his family, no one knew that he had died just three days earlier.

Along with Bruce Beutler and Jules Hoffmann, Steinman was being honoured for his work on the immune system.

He had discovered a new type of cell, which he named dendritic cells because of their tree-like structure, that activate T-cells to fight off an infection.

The immune system is primed to attack foreign and unusual cells in the body, but some cancer cells can slip past its defences.

Being able to control the dendritic cells would allow researchers to train them to target camouflaged cancer cells.

This was a new approach, highly experimental and likely to take decades before it could be available to the public.

So when Steinman was diagnosed with advanced pancreatic cancer in 2007, he saw the opportunity to start a human trial and potentially buy himself more time.

He had little to lose, with less than a 5% chance of surviving a year.

Dozens of his colleagues and collaborators came forward with ideas and techniques for improving his “experiment”.

They worked to grow portions of the tumour in mice, test the effects of different drugs, sequence the cancer’s DNA and extracted proteins from the surface of the cells. In addition, Steinman received three different, personalised vaccines that were based on his work on dendritic cells. Steinman received eight experimental treatments, in addition to conventional chemotherapy.

Despite the range of these treatments, Steinman still succumbed to the cancer, but he had survived four and a half years – far longer than expected.

Although he never learned that he had won the Nobel Prize, he was sure that his work had prolonged his own life and may one day extend many more.

Article courtesy of Understanding Animal Research, a not-for-profit organisation based in Britain that aims to achieve broad understanding and acceptance of the humane use of animals in biomedical research to advance science and medicine. Website: http://www.understandinganimalresearch.org.uk/


http://www.thestar.com.my/Lifestyle/Features/2013/10/15/Human-guinea-pigs.aspx

Thursday, 10 October 2013

DASH - The Easiest Diet Ever



October 2013