Pages

Saturday, 18 March 2017

Gout: Why You Need to Be Careful of Conventional Medical Advice

Gout is a type of inflammatory arthritis, more commonly diagnosed among men. The prevalence of the condition is growing in the U.S. today. What used to be found almost exclusively in men over 40 now affects both young and old, men and women, thin and overweight people.

February 08, 2017

gout

Story at-a-glance

  • Gout is a form of inflammatory arthritis that used to be called the “disease of kings,” as it was related to dietary choices, such as an overindulgence in rich foods and alcohol
  • Physicians do not agree on long-term treatment options; one group recommends short-term pharmaceutical intervention and the other group, funded by Big Pharma, recommends long-term, chronic drug treatment
  • Using simple natural methods, you may reduce your potential for developing gout and for suffering a recurrence if you have already experienced an episode
By Dr. Mercola
Gout is a type of inflammatory arthritis, more commonly diagnosed among men. The prevalence of the condition is growing in the U.S. today. What used to be found almost exclusively in men over 40 now affects both young and old, men and women, thin and overweight people.
The nickname, “disease of kings” was given to the condition as it usually affected men who overindulged in rich foods and alcohol. King Henry VIII of England, Alexander the Great, Michelangelo, Christopher Columbus and Benjamin Franklin are just some of the historical figures who suffered from gout.
The prevalence of the condition has risen over the past two decades, now affecting 4 percent of Americans or 8.3 million people.1 Researchers associate rising prevalence to the increasing number of people who are overweight and hypertensive.
However, while it is a common condition, doctors and researchers have not come to a consensus about treatment. Confounding the issue is the relationship between doctors, lobbyists and big pharmaceutical companies.
However, if steering clear of long-term drug use is your goal, there are several strategies you can use to reduce your risk of gout and flare ups.

Gout Is a Form of Inflammatory Arthritis

Gout is a painful condition that generally affects the big toe, but may also attack the ankle, knee, hips, wrist and elbow. The pain is the result of uric acid crystals deposited in the joint space. These sharp crystals irritate and inflame the tissue at the joints, triggering inflammation and swelling.2
As your body breaks down purines found in food, uric acid is formed. Purine-rich foods include meats, gravies, beer and fish such as anchovies, mackerel, sardines and herring.3 Normally, uric acid dissolves in the blood, is filtered through the kidneys and passes out through your urine.4
When enough uric acid is not filtered and eliminated, hyperuricemia develops, which can precipitate uric acid crystals and the formation of gout. This is sometimes confused with a similar condition caused by the buildup of calcium phosphate crystals, called pseudogout.
However, while uric acid is formed through the metabolism of purines, sugar — and more specifically fructose — increases your risk of developing gout.
Using animal models, researchers demonstrated fructose increases the formation of uric acid5 and increases the risk of high blood pressure,6 a risk factor for gout. Fructose also reduces the excretion of uric acid.7
As explained by Dr. Richard Johnson, uric acid is actually a byproduct of fructose metabolism. In fact, fructose typically generates uric acid within minutes of ingestion. Another common substance that elevates uric acid is beer.
Interestingly, uric acid functions both as an antioxidant, and as a pro-oxidant once inside your cells. So, if you lower uric acid too much, you lose its antioxidant benefits. But if your uric acid levels are too high, it tends to significantly increase inside your cells as well, where it acts as a pro-oxidant.
Johnson believes the ideal range for uric acid lies between 3 to 5.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
That said, your risk of developing gout is not only based on the amount of uric acid you produce, but also on your body’s inability to filter and excrete uric acid in your bloodstream. To deter the development of gout you must address both the development of uric acid and your body’s ability to filter and excrete it.

4 Stages of Pain

If you experience gout, you may suffer through four stages of the condition. The initial stage is asymptomatic, or without symptoms, called hyperuricemia. Elevated levels of uric acid in the blood stream are present, but crystal formation in the joints is not.8
While the prevalence of gout is 4 percent, the prevalence of hyperuricemia is slightly more than 21 percent of the population.9 During the acute stage, you’ll experience a sudden onset of pain and swelling in a joint, most often the big toe.
The inflammation, pain and swelling of the joint often strikes at night.10 An attack may be triggered by the use of alcohol or the presence of another illness. Usually, the pain, swelling and inflammation peak quickly and subside between three and 10 days, even without treatment.
The first attack is often the shortest, and subsequent attacks may last longer and occur more frequently as time goes on. The third stage of the condition is called interval or intercritical gout. This is the period between attacks, during which you have no symptoms.
Unfortunately, some experience the most disabling stage that can take up to 10 years to develop. Chronic tophaceous gout may cause permanent damage to the affected joints and sometimes to the kidneys as well. It is characterized by chronic arthritic changes, aching joints and tophi, or lumps of urate crystals in the soft tissue.11
Making proper lifestyle changes and using appropriate treatments significantly reduce your risk of reaching this stage.

Doctors Can’t Agree on Long-Term Drug Treatment

There are several medications on the market to treat the buildup of uric acid in the bloodstream, considered responsible for the development of gout.12 The disagreement isn’t about which drug, but rather how long patients should remain on medication.
The American College of Physicians (ACP) recently released clinical practice guidelines recommending less aggressive pharmaceutical treatment for gout.13 This move angered two professional groups developed to support gout research and encourage physicians to use long-term medical treatment.
Interestingly, both groups are financially backed by drug companies.14 Many medical recommendations are now being thoroughly evaluated and challenged, such as the number of mammograms necessary for early breast cancer diagnosis15 or how aggressive high blood pressure should be managed.16
Gout treatment is also being challenged. There is a lack of clinical trials indicating long-term pharmaceutical management of uric acid levels will actually reduce joint damage and patient pain.
Dr. Robert McLean, rheumatologist at Northeast Medical Group in New Haven, CT and associate clinical professor at Yale School of Medicine, commented on the lack of data necessary to support long-term pharmaceutical intervention, saying:17
“Strong data just doesn’t exist. It may be the right thing to do in many clinical situations, but we don’t have data to say that with certainty, so we can’t endorse it.”
The foundation of the argument to continue long-term pharmaceutical treatment is that Big Pharma will not pay for research on medication already approved and physicians should not wait until a patient suffers from a flare-up to initiate treatment.
Common medications used for gout include allopurinol, probenecid, colchicine and febuxostat. Side effects from these medications are not inconsequential, and include:18
Joint pain
Flu symptoms
Hepatotoxicity (reduced liver function)
Anorexia and weight loss
Pruritis or itchy skin triggered by reduced liver function
Renal failure secondary to cancer
Anxiety
Chest pain
Rash or hives
Confusion
Sudden numbness or weakness on one side
Nausea
Low grade fever
Dark urine
Sudden headache
Flushing
Constipation
Easy bruising
Stuffy nose
Shortness of breath
Fast, irregular breathing
Puffiness around the eyes
Changes in skin color
Bloody urine

Drug Company Money Sways Research Results and May Sway Treatment Decisions

It would appear that many of the side effects from the medications used to reduce uric acid levels are significant, and therefore would warrant cautious use, medicating only when necessary to treat the condition, and not as a prophylactic strategy. One key to the treatment debate is the question of how much influence drug companies have when they contribute to physicians income.
Verbal advocate of long-term drug use, Dr. Robert Terkeltaub, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego, received approximately $35,000 in consulting fees from drug companies making gout medication.19 Dr. Lawrence Edwards, vice chair of graduate medical education at the University of Florida college of medicine, is also an advocate who calls for long-term drug treatment and received $27,000 in consulting fees from drug companies.
These two physicians are considered leaders in their field. Terkeltaub dismisses the idea his consulting fees influence his recommendations, or have tainted the recommendations of three rheumatology groups who developed guidelines advocating the use of pharmaceutical intervention.20
However, the link between drug company money and research results have been studied, and on multiple occasions, research demonstrating favorable results for the medication were led by physicians who were receiving consulting fees by the drug company.21,22,23,24 One study finding the diabetes drug Avandia more effective than standard therapies may have subsequently been responsible for 83,000 subsequent heart attacks and death.25
Only later was it revealed this study was funded by the drug company, GlaxoSmithKline, and 11 of the authors received money from the company, either as employees with stock options or consulting fees.26 Needless to say, physicians rely on research studies and practice guidelines to determine treatments for their patients. When results of studies are not accurate, or influenced by drug companies, treatments may not result in the best outcome.
In an evaluation of studies published over a 12-month period in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) by the Washington Post, it was determined that 73 articles were original drug studies. Of those, 60 were funded by a drug company, 50 were co-written by a drug company and 37 had a lead author who had accepted outside compensation from a drug company.27 Published results in what might be the most prestigious medical journal in the world may not be accurate after all.

Medical Advice Being Lobbied in Congress and on Your Television

Drug companies may also exert an influence over your personal physician. In surveys conducted in 2004 and 2009, and subsequently published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), over 80 percent of physicians reported at least one type of financial relationship with a drug or medical device company.28 Indeed, drug companies have spread a blanket of influence from your personal physician to your congressman.
In an analysis of money spent to lobby U.S. Congress in 2016, the two largest trade groups spent $29 million and the top 15 drug companies spent an additional $80 million, well over $100 million in all.29 The largest trade group, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), spent nearly $20 million to express their views on Medicare drug pricing, importing drugs from Canada, and drug pricing transparency.30
In an effort to improve their image in the public eye after increasing drug prices and scathing remarks from the President,31 the industry has planned a massive television and digital ad campaign. This multimillion dollar campaign to defend its position will spend in the “high” tens of millions over the next four to five years.32
Americans rank drug prices as a primary health concern.33 The industry argues their products are better, lifesaving and are curing diseases, which helps keep overall costs down, even though Americans pay more for the same medications than other countries.34 Their ad campaign is designed to tell a story about biopharmaceutical breakthroughs and portray drug companies as bold risk-takers, hoping to alleviate public frustration and reduce an increasing environment of political battering.
The flood of money being thrown at public advertising, Congress and into pharmaceutical research represents a massive conflict of interest and undermines the truth in medical science. The conflict of interest within this practice is obvious, which is why the drug industry attempts to keep actual payment amounts quiet.
Although many medical, educational and research institutions require faculty members to disclose potential conflicts of interest, many do not actively monitor employees' activities. The new television, print and digital advertising planned to change the face of the pharmaceutical industry in the public eye will be taking advantage of powerful media strategies to overcome frustration with the industry.

Reduce Your Risk of Gout and Flare Ups Naturally

In this short video I discuss the causes of gout and how you may reduce your risk using natural methods. Gout is painful and can be chronic. More important than popping a few pills, which may trigger life-altering medical conditions, is to identify the real, underlying causes of gout, and to make different choices.
Reduce Fructose
Products containing high-fructose corn syrup are a major risk factor.35 In one study, men who drank two or more soft drinks per day had an 85 percent higher risk of developing gout. It doesn’t matter where you get the fructose from; even fruit juices and fructose-rich fruits will also increase your risk of developing gout or trigger a flare up.
Reduce your intake of fructose by reducing or eliminating processed foods and soda, reading labels, and limiting your fruit consumption. For optimal health, keep your total fructose intake to a maximum of 25 grams per day.
Body Weight Within Normal Limits
One risk factor for developing gout is obesity. In fact, the increasing waistline of people in the U.S. is one factor behind rising prevalence of gout.36 Data also demonstrates a high prevalence of people suffering from diabetes, insulin resistance, obesity, hypertension and heart disease in those diagnosed with gout.37
Keep your body weight within normal limits. Even a modest weight loss can reduce your risk of developing metabolic syndrome and subsequently, your risk of gout.38
Limit Alcohol
Alcohol is a strong risk factor for gout, obesity and diabetes.39 I believe it is best reserved for when you’ve achieved optimal wellness and do not have disease conditions such as gout, diabetes or other signs of ill health. At that point, you may use it sparingly, or in moderation.
Exercise Daily
Exercise is not recommended while your joints are in pain or when it might cause further injury, but once gout is under control, exercise is a necessary adjunct to a healthier lifestyle. Exercise will even help prevent further attacks by increasing circulation and normalizing your uric acids levels, which it does primarily by normalizing your insulin levels.40
Fight Inflammation With Antioxidants
Tart cherries contain two powerful compounds, anthocyanins and bioflavonoids. Both of these compounds slow down the enzymes cyclo-oxyygenase-1 and -2, which helps relieve and prevent gout and arthritis.41 Strawberries also help your body to eliminate uric acid.42
If fresh fruit is not available, one option is to purchase frozen or canned tart cherries or strawberries. Organic is best and look for canned cherries that are packaged in non-BPA lined cans.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/02/08/gout-treatment.aspx

Friday, 17 March 2017

Even Harvard Urges Eating Organic

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) states that organic farming emphasizes the use of renewable resources and conserving soil and water in food production. Produce can’t be labeled “organic” until a government-approved certifier ensures farmers are following USDA organic standards.

March 06, 2017

eat organic food

Story at-a-glance

  • The European Parliament recently commissioned a report outlining the benefits of organic food and farming techniques over conventionally grown food, usually grown using pesticides on crops
  • Conventional farming operations commonly use pesticides on the foods they produce hoping for greater yields, faster, but the report revealed pesticides are toxic to humans and particularly damaging to children’s brains
  • Studies show farmworkers and communities in close proximity to pesticide application are at greatest risk during application and harvest, but overspray can get on clothes and be carried home, endangering workers’ families
  • Choose organic versions of the “dirty dozen,” the foods with the greatest pesticide load, such as apples, cucumbers, peaches and celery, but there’s also the “clean 15” list of the safest, least contaminated fruits and vegetables
By Dr. Mercola
Besides air, water and shelter, the fourth basic human essential is food. For centuries, the biggest challenges were getting enough of it and obtaining the nutrients necessary from it to maintain health.
Today, the world is faced with a food conundrum that may have been unforeseen a century ago. It stems from the fact that crops for human consumption aren’t grown for optimal health as much as they are to be more easily produced. The term “pesticide”encompasses insecticides, fungicides, herbicides and rodenticides.
Recently, experts from several countries were asked to review the possible health advantages of organic food and farming practices when the European Parliament commissioned Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health to prepare a report outlining possible benefits.
Researchers used in vitro and animal studies, epidemiological studies and food crop analyses to determine that the most pressing concern regarding conventionally grown food is the use of pesticides, which are still detectable even after being washed. In comparison, organic foods are generally pesticide-free.

Are Pesticide Residues on Produce Safe?

While authorities in both the European Union (EU) and the U.S. are adamant that the pesticides on produce, as well as the amounts used, are perfectly safe, the limits were based on animal studies, and scrutinized one pesticide at a time rather than cumulative amounts of several types. One reason that’s a problem, the report asserted, is because:
“The human brain is so much more complex than the rat brain, and our brain development is much more vulnerable because there are so many processes that have to happen at the right time and in the right sequence — you can’t go back and do them over.”1
The subsequent report also highlighted the dangers of antibiotics usage in farm animals, concluding:
“The prevalent use of antibiotics in conventional animal production is a key driver of antibiotic resistance. The prevention of animal disease and more restrictive use of antibiotics, as practiced in organic production, could minimize this risk, with potentially considerable benefits for public health.”2

Three Studies Confirm: ‘Pesticides Are Harming Children’s Brains’

The upshot of three long-term U.S.-based birth cohort studies was that pesticides are wreaking irreversible havoc on children’s brains.
Urine samples revealed that women’s exposure to pesticides during pregnancy can be linked to lower IQ, neurobehavioral development problems and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in their children.3
Magnetic resonance imaging also showed altered brain structure. In fact, the higher their mothers’ exposure to organophosphates, a common pesticide first developed as nerve gas during World War II, the thinner their children’s grey matter.
While some scientists say evidence on the negative impacts of pesticides on the developing brain is incomplete, the report made one thing clear: Pregnant or breastfeeding women or those planning to become pregnant, “may wish to eat organic foods as a precautionary measure because of the significant and possibly irreversible consequences for children’s health.”4

Conventional Farming May Promote Antibiotic Resistance and Harm Farmworkers

That’s not all the report revealed. There’s the “overly prevalent” use of antibiotics in farm animals to consider, as this practice contributes to the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria.
One reason this is such a threat to public health is because this resistance can spread from animals to humans. On organic farms, antibiotic use is restricted.
Animals are given more space to roam in natural conditions, hence the emphasis on “pasturing” animals to lower infection risks, prevent disease and minimize antibiotic resistance.
Something many people don’t consider is that farmworkers who apply the farm chemicals, as well as those who harvest the crops, are at high risk for pesticide exposure. It seeps into their clothing, and they carry it home to their families.
Populations living in areas where pesticides are frequently used for agriculture are also at risk.
Pregnant farm workers unknowingly expose their unborn babies, and in one study, male pesticide applicators in close proximity to a pesticide spill or related accident are more likely to undergo altered DNA associated with a higher prostate cancer risk.5
Beyond Pesticides6 contends that because organic farming methods don’t rely on toxic pesticides, the incalculable hazard to the health of these workers, their families and communities is eliminated.

What Constitutes 'Organic?'

According to Organic.org:
“‘Simply stated, organic produce and other ingredients are grown without the use of pesticides, synthetic fertilizers, sewage sludge, genetically modified organisms or ionizing radiation. Animals that produce meat, poultry, eggs and dairy products do not take antibiotics or growth hormones.”7
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) states that organic farming emphasizes the use of renewable resources and conserving soil and water in food production. Produce can’t be labeled “organic” until a government-approved certifier ensures farmers are following USDA organic standards.
Companies handling or processing organic food must also be certified before they’re shipped to supermarkets or restaurants.8 As a caveat, it’s important to know that some organic farms sometimes do use natural pesticides to get rid of or at least limit weeds or bugs, but it’s the origin of the product that makes the difference.
Using caution with any material on crops is advisable, because even pesticides given the organic label may be harmful to humans and the environment.

The ‘Dirty Dozen’ and ‘Clean 15’ List of Best and Worst Produce

If you want to know which conventionally grown fruits and vegetables carry the greatest toxic load in terms of pesticides, the Environmental Working Group (EWG)9provides a list of the worst offenders, called the “Dirty Dozen.” These are among the most important foods to buy organic. Here’s the latest:
Peaches
Apples
Sweet Bell Peppers
Celery
Nectarines
Strawberries
Cherries
Tomatoes
Grapes
Spinach
Cherry Tomatoes
Cucumbers
Additionally, EWG notes:
“A small amount of sweet corn, papaya and summer squash sold in the United States is produced from GE [genetically engineered] seedstock. Buy organic varieties of these crops if you want to avoid GE produce.”10
Fortunately, EWG also lists plant-based foods considered to be the safest bets to purchase conventionally grown, as they generally have the lowest amount of pesticide spray residue. These are known as the “Clean 15”:
Onions
Avocado
Sweet Corn
Pineapple
Mango
Sweet Peas (frozen)
Eggplant
Cauliflower
Asparagus
Kiwi
Honeydew Melon
Grapefruit
Cabbage
Papaya
Sweet corn
If organic food where you live is simply unattainable, one way to minimize potential ill effects from eating heavily sprayed produce is to peel fruits and vegetables, such as sweet potatoes and pineapple, whenever possible.
Unfortunately, this may mean sacrificing some nutrition, since oftentimes the peel contains the most valuable nutrients.

Organic Food and Farming Gaining Appreciation Around the World

Since the early 1990s, people in the U.S. and other parts of the world have begun appreciating the concept of organic farming. In fact, most people are aware on some level that eating conventionally grown food may expose them to a number of harmful synthetic chemicals, antibiotics and hormones.
However, there’s not a lot of data on the true impact a lot of these chemicals, by themselves or in combination, have on human health, especially low exposures over long periods of time. Scientists agree more testing is in order, but toxin detection from mere handling has given organic food production methods more credence.
While most agricultural experts have approached the idea of organic farming with skepticism because they believe conventional methods produce greater yields, research has shown that production from organic farming methods may be comparable when it comes to bottom line yield and profit. Harvard Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health and the Global Environment asserts:
“As more and more studies are demonstrating, organic, and various integrated and mixed farming systems, are capable of producing yields that approach, or even exceed, those of conventionally-managed systems, particularly during times of drought. And they can do so over large scales and with greater energy efficiency.”11
In fact, organic farming is increasing rapidly in many industrialized countries because consumers are becoming more aware of potential dangers associated with conventional methods and realizing there are options; there are foods available that aren’t loaded with poison pesticides.
Some people feel that eating organic is too expensive, but when you look at the long-term cost of choosing foods with residues of potentially harmful pesticides to eat and feed to your family, the sometimes higher price tag is worth it. However, the marketplace is changing, and more stores and restaurants are realizing that consumers are informed and choosing quality over quantity.

Nutritional Aspects of Eating Organic Foods Versus Conventional

A British study12 found that organically grown foods contain “significantly” higher antioxidants than the conventionally grown variety. Jessica Shade, Ph.D., director of science programs for The Organic Center,13 a non-profit research and education organization, reported in Whole Foods Market’s blog, Whole Story,14 that, compared to conventional, organic foods have:
19 percent more phenolic acids
69 percent more flavanones
28 percent higher levels of stilbenes
26 percent higher levels of flavones
50 percent higher levels of flavonols
51 percent higher levels of anthocyanins
Additionally, organic fruit and vegetable consumption may up your antioxidant intake by 20 percent to 40 percent. Organic strawberries, for instance, have more nutrients and antioxidants than conventionally grown,15 and organic tomatoes contain 50 percent more vitamin C and had a 139 percent higher total phenolic content in comparison.16
Far from being bland, unappealing or otherwise peculiar, organic produce imparts a number of benefits you may never have thought of, according to the Huffington Post:17
  • Organic food is fresher, more filling and free of additives that could keep nutrients from being absorbed by your body.
  • Organic food tastes better because it’s real. Conventional growing methods often produce tough, mealy and/or tasteless fruits and vegetables, compared to organic.
  • Processed or “treated” foods, from apples to chicken to bread, can be cross-bred within an inch of their life, injected with hormones and preservatives, genetically engineered or subject to other processes and ingredients that are harmful to consumers.
  • Fast food restaurants are all about “hot and fast,” but the additives most contain can make you feel bloated and give you gas, heartburn or acid reflux, all while leaving you hungrier than before.
  • Having undergone no harmful treatments or additives, organic foods are naturally resistant to bacteria and decay.

Hope and Change: How European Support for Organics Could Influence the US

One might hope that the European Parliament’s support for organic foods and farming techniques might inspire the U.S. to make policy changes. A joint effort in organic farming in both Europe and the U.S. may even lead to more sustainability, both economically and environmentally. According to Harvard Chan School’s Philippe Grandjean, adjunct professor of environmental health, who co-authored the European Parliament report:
“There is a lot of exchange of foods between the European Union and the U.S. Clearly, if the EU is going to favor organic products more in the future, that will open up an opportunity for U.S. producers of organic foods. And vice versa: If more products become available from EU farmers that are organic, that could be attractive to U.S. consumers.”18
One way to begin the process might be for lawmakers to support additional research and learn for themselves how organic foods would benefit the U.S. as a whole.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/03/06/eating-organic-foods-versus-conventional.aspx