Pages

Showing posts with label Paleo Diet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paleo Diet. Show all posts

Sunday, 8 September 2019

BBC: We don't need nearly as much protein as we consume

Many of us consciously eat a high-protein diet, with protein-rich products readily available, but how much protein do we really need? And does it actually help us lose weight?

Most people get more than their daily recommended allowance of protein from food

This story is featured in BBC Future’s “Best of 2018” collection. Discover more of our picks
In the early 20th Century, Arctic explorer Vilhjalmur Stefansson spent a collective five years eating just meat. This meant that his diet consisted of around 80% fat and 20% protein. Twenty years later, he did the same as part of a year-long experiment at the New York City’s Bellevue Hospital in 1928.
Stefansson wanted to disprove those who argued that humans cannot survive if they only eat meat. But unfortunately for him, in both settings he very quickly became ill when he was eating lean meats without any fat. He developed "protein poisoning”, nicknamed “rabbit starvation”. His symptoms disappeared after he lowered his protein intake and he raised his fat intake. In fact, after returning to New York City and to a typical US diet with more normal levels of protein, he reportedly found his health deteriorating and returned to a low-carb, high fat, and high protein diet until his death aged 83.
His early experiments are some of the few recorded cases of high protein intake having extreme adverse effects – but despite soaring sales of protein supplements, many of us are still unsure how much protein we need, how best to consume it, and if too much, or too little, is dangerous.
Despite obesity rates doubling over the past two decades, we’re becoming increasingly conscious of what we’re eating. In recent years many of us have swapped white bread for brown and wholemeal bread and full-fat milk for skimmed. Taking centre stage in our health kick is protein, with protein balls, bars and enhanced protein versions of staple products, from cereals to soup, dominating supermarket shelves. And with the global protein supplements market valued at $12.4bn (£9.2bn) in 2016, it’s clear we’re buying into the idea that we need as much protein as possible.
But some experts now argue that foods with inflated protein (and prices) are a waste of money.
Supplement brands advise drinking protein shakes after a workout
Supplement brands advise drinking protein shakes after a workout to help the growth and repair of muscle tissue (Credit: Getty Images)
Protein is essential for the body to grow and repair. Protein-rich food such as dairy, meat, eggs, fish and beans are broken down into amino acids in the stomach and absorbed in the small intestine, then the liver sorts out which amino acids the body needs. The rest is flushed out in our urine.
Adults who aren’t especially active are advised to eat roughly 0.75g of protein per day for each kilogram they weigh. On average, this is 55g for men and 45g for women – or two palm-sized portions of meat, fish, tofu, nuts or pulses.
Not getting enough protein can lead to hair loss, skin breakouts and weight loss as muscle mass decreases. But these side effects are very rare, and largely only occur in those with eating disorders.
Despite that, most of us have long associated protein with building muscle. This is accurate. Strength-based exercise causes a breakdown of protein in the muscle. For muscles to grow stronger, the proteins need to rebuild. A type of amino acid called leucine plays a particularly big part in triggering protein synthesis.
Some experts even argue that not consuming protein post-workout could cause the breakdown of muscle to be higher than the synthesis – meaning there’s no net gain in muscle mass. Supplement brands advise drinking protein shakes after a workout to help the growth and repair of muscle tissue, usually in the form of leucine-rich whey protein, a by-product of making cheese.
Many people consume sport nutrition products such as protein bars and shakes
Many people consume sport nutrition products such as protein bars and shakes (Credit: Getty Images)
Many consumers agree. Research company Mintel’s 2017 Report found that 27% of Brits use sport nutrition products such as protein bars and shakes. This figure rises to 39% for those who exercise more than once a week. But more than half of the individuals who use the products (63%) find it difficult to tell whether they’re having any effect.
Protein bars are really just candy bars with a bit of extra protein
Indeed, research on the muscle-building power of protein supplements is varied. A 2014 analysis of 36 papers found that protein supplements have no impact on lean mass and muscle strength during the first few weeks of resistance training in untrained individuals.
Over time and if the training becomes harder, supplements can promote muscle growth. However, the paper also concludes that these changes have not been proven over the long term. A 2012 review paper further says that protein “increases physical performance, training recovery and lean body mass”… but for the benefit to be optimal, it should be in combination with a fast-acting carbohydrate.
But even if athletes and gym goers may benefit from a post-workout protein boost, that doesn’t mean they should reach for the supplements and smoothies. Most people get more than their daily recommended allowance from food, says Kevin Tipton, a sport professor of the University of Stirling. “There’s no need for anyone to have supplements. They’re a convenient way to get protein, but there’s nothing in supplements you can’t get in food. Protein bars are really just candy bars with a bit of extra protein.”
The global protein supplements market was valued at $12.4bn (£9.2bn) in 2016
The global protein supplements market was valued at $12.4bn (£9.2bn) in 2016 (Credit: Getty Images)
Tipton adds that even among bodybuilders, products like whey protein aren’t as critical as they are hyped up to be. “There’s too much focus on which supplements to take, as opposed to getting in the gym and working harder. There are so many other variables, such as sleep, stress and diet,” he says.
We need to maintain our muscle mass as we age, because we become less active and frail
Most experts agree with Tipton that protein is best consumed in food instead of supplements. But there are some exceptions, such as athletes who find it difficult to hit their daily protein targets, points out Graeme Close, professor of human physiology at Liverpool John Moores University. “I believe most need more than the recommended daily allowance, and there’s good evidence to support this,” he says. In this case, he says, a shake can be useful.
Another demographic who can benefit from extra protein? The elderly. That’s because as we age, we need more protein to retain muscle mass. But we also tend to eat less protein as we get older because our taste-buds begin to prefer sweet over savoury.
Emma Stevenson, professor of sport and exercise science at Newcastle University, is working with food companies to get more protein into snacks that the elderly  are known to regularly buy, such as biscuits. “We need to maintain our muscle mass as we age, because we become less active and frail,” she says. 
Close says the elderly should increase protein intake to around 1.2g per kg body weight.
Most people get more than their daily recommended allowance of protein from food
Most people get more than their daily recommended allowance of protein from their diet (Credit: Getty Images)
Fortunately, it’s difficult to have too much protein. While we do have an upper limit of protein intake, it’s “virtually impossible” to reach, says Tipton. “There are concerns among some dieticians that a high protein diet can hurt the kidneys and bones, but evidence in otherwise healthy people is minimal. It is possible there could be a problem if someone with an underlying kidney [issue] eats high amounts of protein, but the odds of any adverse effects are very low.”
If you’re trying to lose weight, it’s more important to have a high-protein breakfast
But while protein itself isn’t harmful, many protein supplements are high in carbohydrates called FODMAPs that trigger digestive symptoms like bloating, gas and stomach pain. Stevenson advises reading labels carefully on supplements, bars and balls. “Often, they’re very high in calories and contain huge amounts of carbs, often in form of sugar. You shouldn’t necessarily think that because it says it’s high protein that its healthy,” she says.
Weight loss
Protein has long been linked to weight loss, with low-carb, high-protein diets such as Paleo and Atkins promising to prolong the feeling of fullness. People fail to lose weight often because they feel hungry, and MRI studies have shown that a high-protein breakfast can help stop cravings later in the day.
There is sufficient evidence that protein is satiating, says Alex Johnstone of the University of Aberdeen. If you’re trying to lose weight, it’s therefore more important to have a high-protein breakfast, such as beans on toast or a dairy smoothie, rather than to have supplements.
But she doesn’t advocate “Atkins-type” diets and has found that cutting out carbohydrates has adverse affects on gut health (and we now know that maintaining a healthy gut is crucial to many aspects of our health and well-being).
Protein balls are often  high in calories and contain huge amounts of carbs
Protein balls are often high in calories and can contain huge amounts of carbs (Credit: Getty Images)
Instead, Johnstone recommends that overweight people eat a high-protein and moderate-carb diet, consisting of 30% protein, 40% carbs and 30% fat – compared to the average diet of around 15% protein, 55% carbs and 30% fat.
But, of course, upping protein intake alone won’t help you lose weight. Choosing lean meat such as chicken or fish is key. Studies also show that eating large amounts of animal protein is linked to weight gain and red meat in particular is linked to an increased risk of cancer as well as heart disease.
Consuming more protein than need is wasteful in terms of money, and it’s paid down the toilet
There are, though, healthy proteins which are not meat, such as mycoprotein, which is derived from fungi. Quorn, for example, contains this type of protein, and is high in fibre too.
Researchers now are looking into how this unique composition (of both protein and fibre) can affect satiety and insulin levels, which are linked to type two diabetes. One team compared a mycoprotein diet to a chicken diet and found that the insulin levels in those who ate quorn achieved the same sugar control, but needed less insulin to be produced by the pancreas.
The risk of consuming too much protein is small, but the bigger risk might just be falling for overpriced products offering us more protein than we need. “Some products labelled as high protein aren’t, and they’re quite expensive. Anyway, consuming more protein than need is wasteful in terms of money, and it’s paid down the toilet,” says Johnstone.

Wednesday, 26 June 2019

Could Carbs Help Us Live Longer?

Emerging evidence suggests a 10:1 ratio of carbohydrates to proteins may protect the body from the ravages of ageing

  • By David Robson BBC
18 January 2019


(Credit: Alamy)

The search for the “elixir of youth” has spanned centuries and continents – but recently, the hunt has centred on the Okinawa Islands, which stretch across the East China Sea. Not only do the older inhabitants enjoy the longest life expectancy of anyone on Earth, but the vast majority of those years are lived in remarkably good health too.
Of particular note is the number of people who reach 100 years of life. For every 100,000 inhabitants, Okinawa has 68 centenarians – more than three times the numbers found in US populations of the same size. Even by the standards of Japan, Okinawans are remarkable, with a 40% greater chance of living to 100 than other Japanese people.
Little wonder scientists have spent decades trying to uncover the secrets of the Okinawans’ longevity – in both their genes and their lifestyle. And one of the most exciting factors to have recently caught the scientists’ attention is the peculiarly high ratio of carbohydrates to protein in the Okinawan diet – with a particular abundance of sweet potato as the source of most of their calories.
“It is quite the opposite of current popular diets that advocate a high protein, low carb diet,” says Samantha Solon-Biet, who researches nutrition and ageing at the University of Sydney. Despite the popularity of the Atkins and Paleo diets, however, there is minimal evidence that high-protein diets really do bring about long-term benefits.
You might also like:
So could the “Okinawan Ratio” – 10:1 carbohydrate to protein – instead be the secret to a long and healthy life? Although it would still be far too early to suggest any lifestyle changes based on these observations, the very latest evidence – from human longitudinal studies and animal trials – suggest the hypothesis is worth serious attention. 
According to these findings, a low protein, high carbohydrate diet sets off various physiological responses that protect us from various age-related illnesses – including cancer, cardiovascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease. And the Okinawan Ratio may achieve the optimal dietary balance to achieve those effects.
(Credit: Getty Images)
The people of Okinawa remain active and independent into their 90s, and are less 
likely to develop age-related illnesses (Credit: Getty Images)
Much of this research comes from the Okinawa Centenarian Study (OCS), which has been investigating the health of the ageing population since 1975. The OCS examines inhabitants from across the Okinawa prefecture, which includes more than 150 islands. By 2016, the OCS had examined 1,000 centenarians from the region.
Rather than suffering a prolonged demise, the Okinawan centenarians appeared to have delayed many of the usual effects of ageing, with almost two thirds living independently until the age of 97. This remarkable “healthspan” was evident across many age-related diseases. The typical Okinawan centenarian appeared to be free of the typical signs of cardiovascular disease, without the build-up of the hard “calcified” plaques around the arteries that can lead to heart failure. Okinawa’s oldest residents also have far lower rates of cancer, diabetes and dementia than other ageing populations.
Genetic jackpot
Given these results, there is little doubt that Okinawa has an exceptional population. But what can explain that extraordinary longevity?
Genetic good fortune could be one important factor. Thanks to the geography of the islands, Okinawa’s populations have spent large chunks of their history in relative isolation, which may has given them a unique genetic profile. Preliminary studies suggest this may include a reduced prevalence of a gene variant – APOE4 – that appears to increase the risk of heart disease and Alzheimer’s. They may also be more likely to carry a protective variant of the FOXO3 gene involved in regulating metabolism and cell growth. This results in a shorter stature but also appears to reduce the risk of various age-related diseases, including cancer.
Even so, it seems unlikely that good genes would fully explain the Okinawans’ longevity, and lifestyle factors will also be important. The OCS has found that Okinawans are less likely to smoke than most populations, and since they worked predominantly in agriculture and fishing, they were also physically active. Their tight-knit communities also help the residents to maintain an active social life into old age. Social connection has also been shown to improve health and longevity by reducing the body’s stress responses to challenging events. (Loneliness, in contrast, has been shown to be as harmful as smoking 15 cigarettes a day.)
(Credit: Getty Images)
A feeling of social connection can protect your health, while loneliness is thought to be 
as damaging as smoking 19 cigarettes a day (Credit: Getty Images)
It is the Okinawans’ diet, however, that may have the most potential to change our views on healthy ageing. Unlike the rest of Asia, the Okinawan staple is not rice, but the sweet potato, first introduced in the early 17th Century through trade with the Netherlands. Okinawans also eat an abundance of green and yellow vegetables – such as the bitter melon – and various soy products. Although they do eat pork, fish and other meats, these are typically a small component of their overall consumption, which is mostly plant-based foods.
Japan: Untold Stories
The traditional Okinawan diet is therefore dense in the essential vitamins and minerals - including anti-oxidants - but also low in calories. Particularly in the past, before fast food entered the islands, the average Okinawan ate around 11% fewer calories than the normal recommended consumption for a healthy adult.
For this reason, some scientists believe that Okinawans offer more evidence for the life-enhancing virtues of a “calorie restricted” diet. Since the 1930s, some doctors and scientists have argued that continuously limiting the amount of energy you consume could have many benefits above and beyond weight loss – including a deceleration of the ageing process.
In one of the most compelling experiments, a group of resus macaques eating 30% fewer calories than the average monkey showed a remarkable 63% reduction in deaths from age-related diseases over a 20-year period. They also looked younger – they had fewer wrinkles and their fur retained its youthful lustre rather than turning grey. Due to practical difficulties, long-term clinical trials in humans have yet to be completed to test the effects on longevity, but a recent two-year experiment, funded by the US National Institute on Aging, was highly suggestive: participants on a calorie restricted diet showed better cardiovascular health – including lower blood pressure and cholesterol.
It’s still not clear why a calorie restricted diet would be so beneficial, but there are many potential mechanisms. One possibility is that calorie restriction alters the cell’s energy signalling, so that the body devotes more resources to preservation and maintenance – such as DNA repair – rather than growth and reproduction, while limiting ‘oxidative stress’ caused by the toxic by-products of metabolism that can cause cellular damage.
(Credit: Alamy)
Sweet potatoes are one of the principle ingredients in traditional Okinawan cuisine (Credit: Alamy)
The benefits of the Okinawan Diet may not end with its calorie restriction.
Solon-Biet has conducted a series of studies examining the influence of dietary composition (rather than sheer quantity) on ageing in animals, and her team has consistently found that a high-carb, low-protein diet extends the lifespan of various species, with her most recent study showing that it reduces some of the signs of ageing in the brain. Amazingly, they have found that the optimum ratio is 10 parts carb to one part protein – the same as the so-called Okinawan Ratio.
Although there aren’t yet any controlled clinical trials in humans, Solon-Biet cites epidemiological work across the world that all point to similar conclusions. “Other long-lived populations have also been shown to have dietary patterns that include relatively low amounts of protein,” she says. “These include the Kitavans, [who live on] a small island in Papua New Guinea, the South American Tsimane people and populations that consume the Mediterranean diet.”
Once again, the exact mechanisms are murky. Like calorie restriction, the low protein diets seem to promote the cell repair and maintenance. Karen Ryan, a nutritional biologist at the University of California, Davis, points out that the scarcity of amino acids can encourage cells to recycle old material (rather than synthesising new proteins).
“Together, these changes may prevent the ageing-associated accumulation of damaged proteins within cells,” she says. This build-up of damaged proteins may usually be responsible for many diseases, she says – but the regular clean up when we eat a low-protein diet could prevent it.
So should we all start adopting the Okinawan Diet? Not quite. Ryan points to some evidence that low protein intake may limit bodily damage up to the age of 65, but you may then benefit from increasing your protein intake after that point. “Optimal nutrition is expected to vary across the life history,” she says. And it’s also worth noting one study, which found that the relative merits of protein and carbohydrates may depend on the protein's source: a diet higher in plant-based protein appears to be better than a diet rich in meat or dairy, for instance. So the Okinawans may be living longer due to the fact that they are eating (mostly) fruit and vegetables, rather than its high carb, low protein content.
Ultimately, the Okinawans’ health is probably due to a lucky confluence of many factors, Ryan says. “And specific interactions among these factors will also be important.” And we may need many more years of research to understand the importance of each of those ingredients before we finally come up with a true recipe for the “elixir of youth”.

Friday, 27 February 2015

Could going Paleo give you cancer?

In the past several years, the Paleolithic diet (or “caveman” diet) has become a huge diet trend.
You’ve probably heard about it—and possibly even tried it for yourself. Quite a few doctors encourage it because it includes only foods we were designed to eat.

This post is on Healthwise


26 February 2015

Newsletter #477
Lee Euler, Editor


In brief, the theory is that humans were hunter-gatherers for hundreds of thousands of years, but we’ve been farmers chowing down on grains (i.e. calorie-dense carbohydrates) for only 12,000 years. Our bodies haven’t adapted to the change.

At first glance, avoiding all processed foods while increasing your intake of plants, proteins, and healthy fats appears to have no downside. But it turns out there may be a downside after all – and quite a big one.

The Paleo diet’s effects – losing weight, increasing antioxidant intake, and reducing systemic inflammation from processed foods and sugars – are all proven health benefits … and well-known ways to reduce cancer risk.

But recent studies from the University of California-San Diego have found that one key part of the Paleo diet … and the American diet in general … could be causing cancer.

Quick review of Paleo basics


The Paleo diet is based on the foods that would have been available to “cavemen” historically, including unprocessed, organic foods like fish, meat, eggs, nuts, fruit and vegetables.

The eating plan generally cuts out dairy products, grains, legumes, excess sugar and vegetable oils, with a few exceptions.

Basically, it’s a plant-based, high protein, clean fat diet.

Of the relatively few nutritional objections I’ve heard about the Paleo diet — the lack of carbohydrates, primarily — the emphasis on consuming red meat seems most concerning. As readers of this newsletter know, I think the fewer carbs you eat the better. But you have to eat something, and if you never touch a carb, red meat tends to be what you do eat.

A history of cancer


There is plenty of evidence that red meat — i.e. beef, pork, and lamb — increases your risk for cancer, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and the sum total of deaths from all causes.

23 separate studies spanning 1986 to 2014, from populations around the world, show that red meat consumption has a positive correlation with breast, prostate, and GI tract cancers. Be aware that the GI tract category includes cancers of the esophagus, stomach, bladder, pancreas, colon and rectum. High red meat consumption even correlates with a higher risk of head and neck cancers.1

The World Cancer Research Foundation report actually listed eating red meat in the top 10 risk factors associated with cancer worldwide. And, there is a low rate of cancer in populations that eat little to no red meat.2

Researchers tell us that red meat is an inflammatory food, but until recently they didn’t know exactly why it was causing such a problem.

Thanks to a team from University of California-San Diego, we may now have a clue why red meat causes inflammation … and therefore, cancer.

My own private theory (unbacked by studies) has been that corn-fed beef raised with hormones and antibiotics is the source of the higher cancer rates, and that organic beef may not be carcinogenic. The UC-San Diego findings cast some doubt on my idea.

The “alien sugar” hiding in your body


Researchers from UC-San Diego have been working with sialic acids — sugars found in most mammalian cells that play a fundamental role in cell communication.3

These aren’t like table sugar. Think biomolecular structure, not the white stuff that sweetens your coffee. There are four major classes of molecules: sugars, proteins, nucleic acids (DNA and RNA), and lipids (fats). Sugars are also called carbohydrates and saccharides.4

What’s caught their attention more specifically is the predominant sialic acid in most mammal’s cells, called N-glycolylneuraminic acid … or Neu5gc.

The weird part is that humans don’t produce this substance — we get it only from “red meat” animals, like cows, sheep, and pigs.

And – this is important – these sialic-acid-type sugars don’t lead to the usual problems associated with carbs – high blood sugar, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, etc. The reason they pose a danger is that they are foreign bodies that provoke an immune-system reaction, i.e. inflammation.

Despite its “species-specific” nature, the “red meat sugar” Neu5gc has been found circulating in almost all human blood, in our tissues, and densely packed in certain cancers.

Because it is a “non-human sugar,” our bodies have developed and are constantly generating antibodies to identify and remove the foreign substances. This causes systemic inflammation known as xenosialitis.3

The UC-San Diego researchers used a mouse model to not only prove that Neu5gc is bioavailable from red meat sources, but to prove it is a cause of systematic inflammation.

Long-term exposure caused a five-fold increase in tumor growth.5

“The final proof in humans will be much harder to come by,” said UCSD’s Dr. Varki of their results. “But, this may also help explain potential connections of red meat consumption to other diseases exacerbated by chronic inflammation, such as atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes.”6

To be honest, I wasn’t aware of a link between diabetes and red meat consumption. But it’s possible, if red meat promotes inflammation.

We need to take this new research with a grain of salt. The findings have not yet been extrapolated to humans … and to do so may prove too difficult, and possibly unethical. This one study doesn’t settle the matter.

But I have to admit it has unsettled me, and I’m reexamining my belief that organic red meats are safe. I find it hard to ignore the evidence they found … as well as the overwhelming epidemiological evidence that red meat increases cancer and all-cause mortality.

I mostly eat chicken. But having lately gone on a very-low-carb eating plan, I’ve allowed myself to indulge in organic beef and pork more often. As I said, you have to eat something, and doing totally without carbs puts you on the spot to figure out what.

Carbs grown on farms are the easiest, cheapest and most abundantly available foods on earth. There is a reason the human population vastly increased and the first towns and cities came into being after the development of agriculture: there was more food.

The role of resistant starch


If you can’t imagine giving up red meat entirely, there may be hope …

One study found that even when doubling the recommended intake of red meat, eating 40 grams of resistant starches daily — such as bananas, beans, chickpeas, lentils, and whole grains — reduced colorectal-cancer-promoting proteins back down to baseline.

The Australian researchers believe the effect is thanks to butyrate, a beneficial short-chain fatty acid produced in the large intestine where resistant starches are fermented. Butyrate is known to promote the growth of healthy cells in the colon, while inhibiting tumor cells.7

However, the only “Paleo friendly” resistant starch the authors mentioned are bananas. (Personally, I see nothing wrong with eating beans, chickpeas, and lentils, but that choice is up to you.)

The bottom line


I believe following a Paleolithic diet is beneficial in many, many ways—and most people would do well to build their diets on whole, organic, plant-based nutrition with clean protein and healthy fats.

But the possible inflammatory characteristics of red meat, combined with lack of high-fiber starches that could combat inflammation and tumor growth, is reason for worry.

Until we have definitive, long-term studies on the antioxidant (and thus anti-inflammatory) properties of the fruit, vegetables and fats in the Paleo diet … and how they work in combination to mitigate oxidation and inflammation in the body … you may want to take a “better safe than sorry” approach.

Focus your protein-intake on organic white meat, such as chicken and turkey … increase your visits to the fresh fish and seafood counter (the fish low on the food chain, not the carnivorous fish that are high in mercury) … and snack on known body-healthy proteins like nuts and seeds.

You can also supplement with a clean protein powder. Look for whey
concentrate powder with no sugar or artificial sweeteners — whey isolate is overly processed and deficient in nutrients.8

If you’re going to eat red meat, the American Heart Association recommends limiting it to 6 ounces per day. And you should also consider a Paleo-friendly side of resistant starches like bananas or lentils.

From what I’ve seen, I’m thinking of limiting my red meat intake to one meal a week, at most.

Kindest regards,
Lee Euler, Publisher

http://www.cancerdefeated.com/could-going-paleo-give-you-cancer/3092/

Go to Healthwise for more articles