Pages

Showing posts with label Cancer Drugs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cancer Drugs. Show all posts

Wednesday, 5 September 2018

Boosting our immune system to treat tumours

The immune system is our body’s armed forces, designed to defend our body against all intruders that seek to harm us.

SEPTEMBER 5, 2018

Boosting our immune system to treat tumours
A doctor examines a chest x-ray. One of the cancers immunotherapy has been successful in treating is non-small cell lung cancer. — Photos: AFP

So, why doesn’t it seem to work when it comes to cancer?
Well, the answer is that cancer cells can be really crafty, employing a number of strategies to avoid being sought out and destroyed by our body’s soldiers.
That is why we humans had to get even craftier.
Immunotherapy is a form of cancer treatment that helps our immune system in its fight against cancer.
According to consultant clinical oncologist Dr Tho Lye Mun: “Immunotherapy is probably the biggest, most exciting breakthrough we’ve had in cancer for a long, long time.”
He adds: “The success story of immunotherapy is in melanoma, but we don’t get a lot of that in Malaysia.
“But we get a lot of lung cancer. It is the number one cancer killer of men in Malaysia, and the third for women after breast and cervical cancer.
“And that’s where immunotherapy has had the greatest impact (in Malaysia).”
He explains that immunotherapy was initially used as second-line treatment after non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients had failed to improve after chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
However, immunotherapy has proved to work so well that it is now a first-line treatment.
According to Dr Tho, the majority of patients who are suitable for immunotherapy now receive it as their first treatment.
“And it’s been shown to be more effective than chemotherapy,” he says, adding that Malaysia actually took part in the international Keynote-042 clinical trial, which established that a particular immunotherapy drug, pembrolizumab, was more effective than chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC – the most common type of lung cancer.
Blocking proteins
Pembrolizumab, also known by the brand name Keytruda, is a type of immunotherapy known as a checkpoint inhibitor.
A checkpoint inhibitor is basically a monoclonal antibody that blocks proteins that stop the immune system from attacking the cancer cells.
A monoclonal antibody is a type of protein made in the laboratory that is produced by a single cell line and only binds to one substance, i.e. one particular antigen.
Dr Tho explains: “When tumour cells exist and when they die, they release antigens into the bloodstream, and these are picked up by antigen-presenting cells.
“These cells then travel to the lymph node where they ‘educate’ or prime T-cells (a type of immune cell) to recognise the antigens.
“These T-cells then exit the lymph nodes into the bloodstream and travel to the tumour, where they recognise it and kill it.”
However, some tumour cells have cleverly managed to incorporate a protein called programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) into themselves.
According to Dr Tho, PD-L1 exists in nature to prevent T-cells from recognising our own cells as foreign and killing them.
T-cells have a receptor called programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) that fits specifically with PDL-1. This is the signal to the T-cells not to attack the cell with PDL-1.
So, cancer cells that express PD-L1 are actually disguising themselves – or putting on a mask, as Dr Tho says – as one of the body’s normal cells in order to avoid being killed by our T-cells.
Immunotherapy, cancer treatment, targeted therapy, lung cancer, Dr Tho Lye Mun, Star2.com
Dr Tho explains how cancer cells trigger the immune system. According to him, the problem is not that cancer patients do not have a strong enough immune system, but that the immune cells are unable to recognise the cancer cells due to a number of reasons. — AZLINA ABDULLAH/The Star

Pembrolizumab and nivolumab are immunotherapies that block PD-1 from fitting with PD-L1, allowing the T-cells to go ahead and kill the cancer cells.
Pembrolizumab was recently approved in Malaysia as a first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC where over 50% of the cancer cells express PD-L1.
It is also approved as both first- and second-line treatment for unresectable or metastatic melanoma, and recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, which has progressed while either on or after receiving platinum-containing chemotherapy.
Meanwhile, atezolizumab, also known by the brand name Tencentriq, is an immunotherapy that works by blocking PD-L1 itself, effectively “unmasking” the cancer cells and allowing the T-cells to recognise them as “foreign” and kill them.
It was approved recently in Malaysia for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC, which has progressed while either on or after receiving platinum-containing chemotherapy.
Another checkpoint inhibitor, ipilimumab, blocks the action of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4).
Explains Dr Tho: “This CTLA-4 inhibitor acts at the lymph node level. They basically cause the T-cells to be up-regulated.
“They are not specific (to the cancer), they turbocharge the T-cells, overwhelming the cancer with large forces.”
He adds that while ipilimumab, which is used to treat advanced melanoma, is not approved in Malaysia, it has been allowed to be used in certain cases.
Occasionally, our body’s T-cells do not even know that there is a cancer in the body as they cannot get to the tumour, due to various reasons.
In cases like this, Dr Tho says that radiotherapy comes in handy.
“Basically, you’re blasting it, you’re sending in a missile to kill the tumour cells, and in killing the tumour cells, the tumours release all these antigens, and these antigens are picked up by the T-cells, which now know who they are suppose to kill.
“This is why we now have a lot of studies combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy – this is the next wave.”
Caution needed
However, checkpoint inhibitors do not work in all situations.
For example, it does not work in NSCLC that have driver mutations like EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) and ROS1.
Dr Tho explains that a driver mutation is an oncogene that produces a protein all the time – it has no off switch.
“The normal proteins in our body, if it’s done its job, the body can send a negative feedback signal to say, ‘Ok, right, you’ve done your job, you can stop now.’.
“But these overactive proteins just keep working and working and never stop, and this causes the cancer to develop.”
He adds: “In those situations, immunotherapy doesn’t work. What you need is a treatment for that particular gene, to tell them to stop working.”
This treatment is known as targeted therapy.
Immunotherapy is also not without its side effects.
“The side effects of immunotherapy are basically ‘-itis’, which means inflammation, and it can happen in any part of the body, so that is a scary thing.
“We’ve had patients die from immunotherapy due to autoimmune lung damage, autoimmune liver damage, autoimmune gut damage.
“So, immunotherapy is not something benign, you can overstimulate the immune system to such an extent that it basically destroys the own body, so that is the caveat,” he explains.
Due to this, Dr Tho recommends that any doctor wanting to prescribe immunotherapy needs to be aware of how to manage its toxicities, adding that there are many guidelines available on this.
“So, I would say, if a hospital wants to embark on an immunotherapy programme, they must have a structure in which all the other clinicians are involved, so it’s not just oncology.
“So when a patient develops lung problems, they need the lung specialist to be involved; if they develop a liver problem, the gastroenterologist must be involved; if they develop skin problems, a dermatologist needs to be involved.
“And the accident and emergency doctors need to be aware that the symptoms the patient gets may be due to immunotherapy,” he says.
He shares that there have been certain cases where a cancer patient on immunotherapy has come in with a cough to the emergency department and been prescribed antibiotics.
“Then they go home and they die. Because they didn’t have a chest infection, what they were having was an autoimmune reaction – the right treatment is steroids,” he says.
“So this has to be disseminated throughout the whole hospital, not just the oncologists. We give patients alert cards, so that they know what they are on and can present it to the physician that they see.”
Dr Tho also notes that because immunotherapy is quite new in Malaysia, there are two things patients should be aware of.
One, that there are some unscrupulous people offering what purports to be immunotherapy, but is not – “they’re just trying to make a fast buck”.
And two, that there are doctors prescribing immunotherapy, who might not be trained to do so, and this can be very dangerous for patients due to the side effects.
Other immunotherapies
Immunotherapy, cancer treatment, targeted therapy, lung cancer, BCG vaccine, bladder cancer, cancer vaccine, Star2.com
The tuberculosis vaccine is now also used as a cancer vaccine to prevent the recurrence of
early-stage bladder cancer.
The tuberculosis vaccine is now also used as a cancer vaccine to prevent the recurrence of early-stage bladder cancer.
While checkpoint inhibitors have proven to be the most successful form of immunotherapy, there are also other types of immunotherapy being developed.
Cytokines are proteins that are important in cell signalling and can affect the behaviour of other cells.
Cytokines like interferon-alpha have been used to treat kidney cancer, melanoma, multiple myeloma and certain types of leukaemia, while interleukin-2 has been used for kidney cancer.
However, Dr Tho says: “In kidney cancer, cytokine therapy such as interferon-alpha has largely been superceded by newer and more effective targeted agents (such as VEGF inhibitors) and checkpoint inhibitors.
“Older therapies such as high dose interleukin-2, even though associated with very good responses in some patients, resulted in significant side effects, and sometimes even ICU (intensive care unit) admissions and fatalities.”
Cancer vaccines are another form of immunotherapy under development.
Similar to how normal vaccines for infectious diseases stimulate the immune system to recognise the germs that cause these diseases and attack them, cancer vaccines stimulate the immune system to recognise certain cancer cells and attack them.
In fact, one familiar vaccine – the BCG (Bacillus Calmette–Guérin) vaccine for tuberculosis – has been repurposed to prevent recurrence in early-stage bladder cancer.
Dr Tho adds: “Limited success has been achieved with the vaccine sipuleucel-T, which is prostate cancer- specific, and talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), an oncolytic virus therapy, and both therapies are now approved by the US FDA (Food and Drug Administration).”
However, various vaccines for lung cancer have failed at the clinical trial stage.
According to Dr Tho, the most innovative and exciting type of immunotherapy currently under development is adoptive cell therapy, specifically chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.
This therapy involves removing the body’s own T-cells and genetically-engineering them to express a CAR that only fits a certain protein on the cancer cell.
With this specific recognition ability, the CAR-T cells can zoom in and kill the cancer cells when infused back into the patient.
“CAR-T cells have seen dramatic successes in haematological malignancies, especially acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and lymphomas. It’s science fiction come true!” he says.
Dr Tho adds that certain Malaysian cancer centres have collaborated with Singapore’s National Cancer Centre to offer the first-ever CAR-T cell therapy for advanced nasopharyngeal cancer patients, which is a disease prevalent in this region.
“The trial has completed recruitment in Malaysia and we are all eagerly awaiting the final results,” he says.
https://www.star2.com/health/2018/09/05/boosting-immune-system-treat-tumours

Friday, 15 June 2018

China just approved its first cancer immunotherapy drug

C
hina’s drug regulator on Friday approved the country’s first immunotherapy treatment for cancer patients. Bristol-Myers Squibb won the approval for its blockbuster drug Opdivo, for patients with an advanced type of lung cancer who had previously tried chemotherapy.



The landmark approval is expected to be the first of many as China builds a booming biotech sector. For a detailed look at China’s immunotherapy pipeline, we turned to a 200-page Goldman Sachs research report distributed on Friday. The report, titled “China Biotech Primer” and authored by Goldman-affiliated analysts Richard Ye and Ziyi Chen, has not been made public but STAT obtained a copy.
Click on the link below for the rest of the article: Source: https://www.statnews.com/2018/06/15/china-cancer-immunotherapy/





A Cancer Blockbuster Gets Approved in China. Will the Floodgates Now Open?
By CLIFTON LEAF
June 15, 2018
Bristol-Myers Squibb announced today that its pioneering cancer immunotherapy drug Opdivo has been approved for sale in China.
A Chinese flag flies outside a residential compound in Beijing on April 30, 2017.
A Chinese flag flies outside a residential compound in Beijing on April 30, 2017. 
Greg Baker—AFP/Getty Images

Opdivo targets a protein called PD-1, which is effectively a braking signal in the immune system. Cancer cells are incredibly wily when it comes to evading the body’s own natural defenses, and one of the ways they manage this feat is by tricking the immune system into restraining its own attack dogs. So-called “checkpoint inhibitors” like Opdivo—which is often called by its biological name, nivolumab—essentially remove the biological leash, allowing immune cells to freely attack the cancer predator.
The strategy, along with other immuno-oncology, or IO approaches, has been remarkably effective in a small subset of cancer patients—and has even cured some people with terminal disease. There’s also an inherent danger in IO, as you can imagine. (There are reasons, after all, why the human body has put various limitations and border controls on the immune response.) But that said, from both a clinical point-of-view and a commercial one, there hasn’t been this much excitement over a new class of cancer drugs in a long, long while.
As big as the appetite and excitement for IO is in the U.S., though, the market in China—with its close to 1.4 billion people—could well be even bigger. And today’s approval of Opdivo by China’s national drug regulator may have helped open the floodgates for U.S. and other western biopharma companies.
One key question that’s likely to help determine the ferocity of that deluge is where Opdivo ends up being priced, says Brad Loncar, the CEO of Loncar Investments, an influential biotech investor and observer who has long had an eye trained on China. One Chinese source that Loncar follows estimates the price range will be 400,000 to 600,000 Renminbi, which is about US$62,000 to 93,000. That compares to an Opdivo sticker of about $150,000 in America. If the price finishes near the top of that range, that could be a problem for reimbursement, Loncar says. “They have the ultimate single payer system in China and it’s not really set up to pay high prices for innovative drugs currently.” There are a number of converging factors that should, together, yield a “really first-rate biotech sector” in the country, he says, “but one piece I’ve always felt that’s missing is reimbursement. So it’s very important to watch what the pricing ends up being on Opdivo and whether that turns out to be viable in the market.”
Opdivo—which is sold in more than 60 countries already and which has been approved by the FDA for a number of cancer indications, from non-small cell lung cancer to metastatic melanoma to Hodgkin lymphoma—was widely seen as the favorite U.S. blockbuster to break into the Chinese market this year. In January, Chinese biopharma database PharmCube predicted that Opdivo would be first to the gate—while naming 15 other big drugs from major Western companies that would likely be approved by China regulators in 2018, according to FiercePharma.
The sudden rush is part of what Goldman Sachs calls “a new chapter of healthcare investment.” In a somewhat breathless 213-page report-slash-“primer” the investment bank coincidentally issued today, Goldman analysts say “China’s biotech era has arrived.”
The “transformative shift [by China’s FDA] in favor of new drugs, significant capital in-flows, a highly specialized talent pool and a sizable Chinese pharma/biotech market [including upcoming new biotech listings in the Hong Kong Stock Exchange] are driving major new investment opportunities in the growing healthcare space,” says the report.
The Goldman analysts project China’s medical biotech market, which they estimate to be worth 35 billion RMB ($5.4 billion) in 2017, to grow by a compound annual growth rate of 15% to 20% over the next three years, up from their roughly 10% pace during the past five years, as fresh capital from private equity and venture capital pours in.
http://fortune.com/2018/06/15/opdivo-approval-china/

Monday, 26 June 2017

Behind big pharma's race to develop the next wave of cancer therapy

Pharmaceutical companies are betting big on a new wave of innovative cancer therapies they believe will be more effective than existing treatments and move them a big step closer to finding a cure for the disease.


medimmune

Staff working in Astrazeneca's Medimmune biologic laboratory in Cambridge CREDIT: DAVID PARKER/ANL/REX/SHUTTERSTOCK


The fast-emerging branch of therapies – immuno-oncology (IO) – works by equipping the body’s immune system with the tools to kill cancer cells.
Britain’s FTSE 100 giant AstraZeneca and rival pharma conglomerates, including America’s Merck & Co and Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Switzerland’s Roche and Germany’s Merck KGaA are in a race to develop the most effective IO therapies.
When they work, the body learns to fend off cancer as it would a virus, developing a long-term memory for killing off tumours in the process.
They are already transforming lives, with tens of thousands of patients around the world benefiting from first generation IO treatments, which can extend lives for months or years longer than chemotherapy and radiotherapy with fewer debilitating side effects.
It’s this “long-term benefit” and “curative potential” that excites Stuart Farrow, director of biology at Cancer Research UK’s commercial arm Cancer Research Technology, which is partnering with industry on developing IO treatments. “It is the biggest breakthrough in oncology R&D for 20 years, possibly even since chemo,” he says.
Immuno-oncology is a huge opportunity for UK plc. We have an incredibly vibrant science community here.
As well as providing potential life-changing medical benefits, effective IO treatments bring big commercial rewards. IO drugs sales hit $8bn (£6.3bn) last year, led by blockbuster forerunners Keytruda and Opdivo, produced by Merck & Co and BMS respectively.
But analysts say the potential prize is much larger – a $50bn a year market if the future pipeline of IO drugs realise their full potential. That’s because there are still substantial gaps to plug in the market, both for Merck and BMS and its international rivals playing catch-up, including AstraZeneca. Only around 25-30pc of patients have been responsive to the early IO treatments. They also haven’t been approved for every type of cancer, with lung cancer remaining the largest – and largely unmet – potential market opportunity, worth up to an estimated $10bn a year. It is also the biggest cancer killer, responsible for more than 1.6m deaths each year.
So the race is on, with pharma companies increasingly turning to trials of combinations of drugs to try to boost response rates.

Pfizer 
For AstraZeneca, Mystic can go a long way to validating CEO Pascal Soriot’s decision to rebuff Pfizer’s £69bn takeover approach CREDIT: CHRIS RATCLIFFE/BLOOMBERG
Two such closely watched trials are due to report by the end of the year – AstraZeneca’s Mystic this summer and BMS’s CM-227, both of which are phase three lung cancer trials that will go some way to demonstrating the medical and commercial potential of IO treatments.
They are also likely to be big market-movers. AstraZeneca investors expect a positive result in Mystic would lead to a 17pc jump in the company’s share price, while a negative result would send them crashing 12pc, according to an average of responses to a Credit Suisse survey.
David Cook, analyst at Panmure, cautions: “Everyone is watching Mystic to see what happens. If it’s a failure the reaction will likely be severe. With clinical trials the market tends to punish you when it goes wrong.”
Meanwhile, BMS shareholders will be hoping the company’s combination of Keytruda and Opdivo will garner positive results, after a failed lung cancer trial last August sent shares nosediving. They are still more than 20pc down since the news, slashing its market capitalisation by more than $30bn to $92bn.
For AstraZeneca, Mystic can go a long way to validating CEO Pascal Soriot’s decision three years ago to rebuff American rival Pfizer’s £69bn takeover approach in order to focus on its drugs pipeline, and on oncology R&D in particular. Since then AstraZeneca has doubled its spending on oncology R&D to around $2.6bn, almost half its total $6bn spend. A group of 1,118 patients in 17 countries are taking part in the Mystic trial, which combines IO drug durvalumab, commercially known as Imfinzi, with antibody tremelimumab.
For its part AstraZeneca insists Mystic should not be seen as the “binary” market event some investors are making it out to be.
Robert Iannone, head of IO at AstraZeneca, stresses “there’s quite a bit of optionality” built into the Mystic trial, as it will capture data for a variety of types of patients, as well as produce further “more robust” overall survival data in 2018.

AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca has seven late stage cancer drug trials underway, and another seven outside the cancer space
Nor is AstraZeneca a one-horse stable when it comes to cancer drug development. Mystic is one of seven late stage cancer drug trials the firm is working on, while it has another seven outside the cancer space.
Imfinzi has already generated positive headlines for AstraZeneca this year, boosting investor confidence ahead of Mystic, by winning US approval for use by some bladder cancer patients and producing positive trial results in a separate group of lung cancer sufferers.
Elsewhere, fellow FTSE 100 firm GSK has largely vacated the oncology market after selling its cancer drugs portfolio to Novartis in 2015, but it retains an oncology R&D operation that investors will want to keep an eye on.
Yet the IO drugs space is not just the domain of massive conglomerates. A whole host of innovative start-ups are investing in developing IO therapies, including UK firms working in partnership with Britain’s world-leading bioscience universities.
If it’s a failure the reaction will likely be severe. With clinical trials the market tends to punish you when it goes wrong
Smaller firms working in IO include Crescendo Biologics, Cell Medica, e-Therapeutics, F-star, Targovax, ANGLE, IGEM and Scancell.
“IO is a huge opportunity for UK plc,” says Cancer Research’s Mr Farrow. “We have an incredibly vibrant science community here.” The fierce race among big pharma companies to become IO market leaders means even small firms with limited clinical data can be candidates for takeovers or successful IPOs, industry insiders say.
But companies working in this cutting-edge field still face big challenges. IO drugs are known to produce significant side-effects for some patients, including the immune system mistakenly attacking normal organs and gut problems such as severe diarrhoea.
Then there’s the cost, put at around £150,000 a year per patient for a typical IO treatment. Will the NHS and other country’s health services be willing to pay this?
Scientists in the field say the potential for side-effects and the high costs make it more crucial than ever to identify which patients stand to get the best outcomes from particular treatments, by identifying biomarkers that make them most suitable and through more targeted treatments.
IO nonetheless offers up huge potential, with scientists estimating the approach may be able to address 60pc of all cancers through combinations of drugs within five years.
Dr David Berman, head of oncology innovative medicines at MedImmune, part of AstraZeneca, is bullish for the future of his field: “This is a golden age for patients and an exciting time.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/06/25/behind-big-pharmas-race-develop-next-wave-cancer-therapy/

Sunday, 25 June 2017

New cell therapy offers hope of a leukaemia cure

Early trial of pioneering treatment eradicated the disease in 94% of cases

  • Procedure is administered during three or four hospital outpatient appointments
  • It has shown particular promise for leukaemia and blood cancers


A revolutionary cancer treatment that alters the body’s cells so they attack tumours has offered hope of a cure.

The procedure is administered during three or four hospital outpatient appointments which last up to four hours each.

It has shown particular promise for leukaemia and blood cancers which collectively affect 30,000 new patients in the UK each year.

Mike Brandon, 32, is now disease free after having CAR-T cell therapy last summer. He is pictured with his partner, Kate
Mike Brandon, 32, is now disease free after having CAR-T cell therapy last summer. He is pictured with his partner, Kate

Early trials presented at the world’s largest cancer conference showed that treatment was able to eradicate all traces of cancer for almost all patients.

Known as CAR-T cell therapy, it involves doctors taking a sample of blood and then genetically altering the body’s own killer cells.

These cells are then injected back into the body whereupon they multiply and start attacking the tumours.

One trial presented to the American Society for Clinical Oncology Conference in Chicago showed that it had eradicated tumours in eight out of nine patients.

The patients had an aggressive type of leukaemia which is considered incurable – chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Yet six months after receiving the cell treatment they still have no traces of the disease in their bodies.

Dr Saar Gill, assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, who lead the trial, said he hoped they would remain cancer-free ‘forever.’

‘Our hope is that this disease is so deeply in remission that it never comes back.’


A second trial showed that the treatment eradicated leukaemia in 33 out of 35 patients ¿ 94 per cent
A second trial showed that the treatment eradicated leukaemia in 33 out of 35 patients – 94 per cent

A second trial showed that the treatment eradicated leukaemia in 33 out of 35 patients – 94 per cent.

These patients had multiple myeloma, a type of blood cancer, and were followed for two months after their treatment.

Dr Wanhong Zhao, the lead author from the Xi’an Jiaotong University in Xi’an, China, said that the treatment may offer ‘a chance for a cure in multiple myeloma.’

‘We will need to follow patients much longer to confirm that.’
Leukaemia, which affects the bone marrow, and myeloma, a blood cancer, are particularly hard to treat as unlike solid cancer tumours like breast and prostate they cannot be surgically removed.

About half of patients do not survive beyond five years and many of those who live longer have to take drugs for the rest of their lives.

These trials have offered hope that a one-off treatment – administered over three or four hospital visits – could offer a permanent cure.

The procedure is a form of immunotherapy, a class of drugs or treatment which involve teaching the body to fight the cancer itself.

They have been hailed as the ‘new era’ of cancer treatment and have shown particular success for harder to treat tumours.


CANCER-FREE AFTER JUST FIVE MONTHS

Mike Brandon, 32, is now disease free after having CAR-T cell therapy last summer.
He was only able to have the breakthrough procedure after his wife Kate raised more than £450,000 through a social media campaign.
Mr Brandon, from Bristol, was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in January 2014.
The illness was so advanced that his consultant told him that ‘all NHS routes were exhausted.’
He began CAR-T therapy in May at the University of Pennsylvania, and in October announced that he was cancer-free.
Mrs Brandon said at the time: ‘We have more tests ahead but, right now, we couldn’t be happier.
‘Prior to starting the trial, Mike’s bone marrow was made up of 90 per cent leukaemia cells and he was given weeks to live but thanks to the cutting edge CAR T-cell therapy he received in the US he is now cancer free.’
When launching the campaign, she had described her husband as a ‘kind, sincere and witty’ man who ‘deserved to have a chance at living life.’  
The procedure is currently only being developed by a handful of hospitals around the world, including the Great Ormond Street Hospital in London.

But charities hope that the success of these trials will result in the treatment becoming much more widespread.

Dr Áine McCarthy, senior science information officer at Cancer Research UK, said the results were ‘promising.’

‘Modifying cells from a patient’s own immune system and using them to treat cancer, called CAR-T cell therapy, has been showing potential in leukaemia and lymphoma in recent years.’

Dr Alasdair Rankin, Director of Research at the blood cancer research charity Bloodwise, said the findings were ‘clearly very promising.’

‘More follow-up time and further studies will be needed to establish whether its effects are long-lasting and if a wider range of patients could benefit from this specific approach.’ 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4579164/New-cell-therapy-offers-hope-leukaemia-cure.html

Colorectal Cancer: At last...the no side effect cancer drug

A breakthrough drug that mimics human immune cells is boosting survival chances of patients with incurable bowel cancer.


Specialist are hailing it as the first life-extending cancer drug without significant side effects.

The new drug may mean that those with advanced disease no longer have to make the ‘quantity versus quality’ trade-off – either having gruelling chemotherapy in the hope of extending life, or concentrating on best enjoying their last remaining days.

Normally patients lose weight, suffer fatigue, nausea, anaemia, lack of energy and suffer pain as a result of cancer treatment. 

Normally patients lose weight, suffer fatigue, nausea, anaemia, lack of energy and suffer pain as a result of cancer treatment
Normally patients lose weight, suffer fatigue, nausea, anaemia, lack of energy and suffer pain as a result of cancer treatment

But Xilonix leaves patients feeling ‘unbelievably well’, say experts.

The drug is a synthetic version of a human immune system cell known as an antibody that is naturally present in 20 per cent of the population and gives a degree of protection against bowel cancer.

Because the drug targets cancer cells rather than indiscriminately attacking the rest of the body, it causes far fewer side effects.

Results from a British trial of 309 patients showed that Xilonix arrested the growth of tumours and those on it experienced fewer symptoms. The trial also indicated that the so-called monoclonal antibody treatment would help some patients live longer.

Oncologist Tamas Hickish, from Bournemouth Hospital, who led the trial, said: ‘I have never come across a cancer drug for advanced cancer that has almost zero side effects.’

And Dr Mark Sanders, an oncologist at The Christie hospital in Manchester, explained: ‘This drug latches on to the cancer and doesn’t affect the rest of the body.’

Ray Pollicott, 74, tried the experimental new drug after being told in 2015 that his cancer had spread so far he probably had only a few months to live. He said: ‘I am amazed at how well I’ve felt. I’ve been on five-mile walks and at times was almost able to forget I had cancer.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4635768/DIY-kit-given-patients-bowel-cancer-tests.html