Pages

Showing posts with label CRP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CRP. Show all posts

Monday, 27 May 2024

In the News: CoQ10 Linked to Better Liver Enzyme Levels

 Ultraprocessed foods boost cancer risk; CoQ10 improves liver enzyme levels; glucosamine reduces risk of vascular dementia; higher B12 levels linked to lower inflammation.

Scientifically reviewed by Amanda Martin, DC, in March 2024.



Eating Ultraprocessed Foods Increases Risk of Cancer and Other Diseases

A review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials concluded that coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) was significantly associated with better, reduced levels of the liver enzymes: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT).* These enzymes are often elevated in people with liver disorders.

The researchers analyzed the find- ings of 15 randomized, controlled trials that administered CoQ10 and reported changes in liver enzymes.

Participants included a total of 712 men and women with conditions such as coronary heart disease, type I or type II diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or elevated lipids.

CoQ10 supplemented participants had beneficial reductions in elevated liver enzymes.

Editor’s Note: Coenzyme Q10 doses ranged from 100 to 400 mg per day consumed for two to 24 weeks.

* Food Sci Nutr. 2023 Jun 7;11(9):4912-4925.


Higher B12 Levels Associated with Less Inflammation

Researchers uncovered a link between higher serum vitamin B12 levels and lower levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), which increase during inflammation.*

The study utilized data from a sub- group of 136 participants in the PREDIMED trial who had available data concerning their serum con- centrations of vitamin B12 and CRP, and plasma IL-6. The PREDIMED trial was designed to evaluate the relationship between consuming a Mediterranean diet and cardiovas- cular disease prevention.

Men and women who had higher vitamin B12 levels had lower con- centrations of CRP and IL-6. Similar findings were obtained when the researchers measured these factors in aged mice.

Editor's Note: "Since chronic inflammation is associated with a wide range of diseases, understanding how vitamin B12 status influ- ences inflammation could have significant implications for disease prevention and management," the authors noted.

* J Sci Food Agric. 2024 Jan 30;104(2): 875-882.


Glucosamine May Also be Beneficial Against Vascular Dementia

People with osteoarthritis who used glucosamine, a compound that supports joint health, were also at reduced risk of developing vascu- lar dementia, according to a study published in Alzheimer’s Research and Therapy.*

Participants included 214,945 men and women in the UK Biobank, over the age of 60, who did not have dementia at baseline. Their question- naire responses provided informa- tion concerning regularly consumed nutrients. During a median 12-year follow-up, 1,039 individuals developed vascular dementia, 1,774 developed Alzheimer’s disease and 122 developed frontotemporal dementia.

Habitual use of glucosamine was associated with an 18% lower risk of vascular dementia compared with non-use. People who additionally consumed calcium had a 54% lower risk of vascular dementia than those who did not use glucosamine. No association was observed between glucosamine and the development of Alzheimer’s disease or frontotemporal dementia.

Editor’s Note: “If further confirmed, habitual glucosamine use may act as a dietary supplement for primary prevention of vascular dementia in the elderly,” the authors stated.

* Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023 Sep 9;15(1):152.


Eating Ultraprocessed Foods Increases Risk of Cancer and Other Diseases

Consuming ultraprocessed food increases the risk of cancers of the upper digestive tract, which includes mouth, throat, and esophageal cancers, according to a study published recently in the European Journal of Nutrition1 and reported on by CNN and other news media.

Ultraprocessed foods include soda, chips, instant soups, cookies, ice cream, cereal bars, and many others that include ingredients you wouldn’t use in a regular kitchen.

These additives are designed to resist mold and bacteria and to keep ingredients from separating. They also include bulking and bleaching agents, artificial dyes, or added salt and sugar to make the product more appealing.

Participants included 450,111 adults in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. They were recruited from 1992 to 1999 from 10 different European countries and the United Kingdom.

Results showed that people who consumed just 10% more ultra- processed foods than others in the study had a:

  • 23% higher risk of head and neck cancers, and a
  • 24% increased risk of esopha- geal cancer.

These data were collected in the 1990s, when consumption of ultra-processed food was much lower than it is now, and so the link to health risks is even higher today.

Indeed, as of 2019, ultraprocessed food made up approximately 71% of the food supply in the United States.2

Many studies over the past two years have demonstrated the alarm- ing link between ultraprocessed foods and cancer and other serious health problems. Here are a few examples of the findings:

  • Men who consume ultraprocessed food have a higher risk of colorectal cancer, heart disease, and early death.3
  • For every 10% increase in ultraprocessed food, there is a 2% increase in developing any kind of cancer, and a 19% increased risk of ovarian cancer.4
  • Eating higher amounts of ultra- processed animal foods and sweetened beverages increases the risk of having multiple chronic conditions like cancer, diabetes, and heart disease.5
  • Consuming more ultraprocessed foods is connected to depression in women.6
  • Consuming about 20% of daily calories in ultraprocessed foods is linked to 28% increased risk of dementia.7

In the most recent study, researchers dug deeper to determine if excess weight accounted for the increased cancer risk.

Ultraprocessed foods are calorie dense and can contribute to obesity, and being obese or overweight is connected to an increased risk of 13 different types of cancer.

However, results showed that weight alone did not account for the increased cancer risk. Increased hip-to-weight ratio accounted for 5% of the 23% increased risk of head and neck cancer.

And increased body mass index (BMI) accounted for 13% of the 24% increased risk of esophageal cancer.

This indicates that factors other than obesity contribute to the increased cancer risk.

Editor’s Note: According to a large number of recent studies, ultraprocessed foods are associated with an increased risk of cancer, heart disease, dementia, and more.


References

  1. Eur J Nutr. 2023 Nov 22.
  2. Nutrients. 2019 Jul 24;11(8).
  3. BMJ. 2022;378:e068921.
  4. EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Feb;56:101840.
  5. The Lancet Regional Health.2023;0(0):100771.
  6. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2334770.
  7. JAMA Neurol. 2023 Feb 1;80(2):142-50.

https://www.lifeextension.com/magazine/2024/3/coq10-linked-to-better-liver-enzyme-levels-in-the-news


Saturday, 26 March 2022

16 Medical Tests and LEPTIN and INSULIN RESISTANCE

 LEPTIN TEST and Other Medical Tests That Can Save Your Life....by Dr Ron Rosedale


Are you aware that you may have metabolic dysfunctions ? What about LEPTIN RESISTANCE and INSULIN RESISTANCE? Most probably. Just sharing.....

Dr Ron Rosedale: Founder of the North Carolina Center of Metabolic Medicine; Rosedale Metabolic Medicine in Dencer, Colarado.

(This article was originally posted on this blog on 5th April 2013. Because of its relevance and interest, I am re-posting it today)

....If there is a known single marker for a longer life span, as they are finding in the centenarian and laboratory animal studies, it is insulin sensitivity, or low insulin levels. When your cells are not sensitive to insulin, your insulin levels go up.
 
What is the purpose of insulin? If you ask your doctor, he or she will tell you that it's to lower blood sugar, but I believe that's a trivial side effect. Insulin's evolutionary purpose is to store excess energy for future times of need. It lowers blood glucose levels for the purpose of storing it away, not regulating it. For our ancestors, this was a good thing. Remember, our ancestors survived on whatever food they could find, and they did not typically find food that elevated glucose. They ate some fruits when it was in season, but much of the sugar was burned in gathering it. High glucose wasn't a big problem back then! Very often, they were forced to survive for days, weeks or even months on little food. Insulin helped our ancestors store away nutrients for the proverbial rainy day when they would need it.


Our diet is completely different today. Food is plentiful, and high glucose is the norm, not the exception. As a result, our insulin levels are typically much higher than they were among our ancestors. When your cells are constantly bombarded with insulin, they become insulin resistant, meaning they stop hearing insulin's important message.....you are insulin resistance....creates a hormonal derangement that has a catastrophic effect on your metabolism.....Makes you fat; bad for your heart; cancer link; bad for your bones; ages you; memory problems; suppresses immune system; higher basal body temperature; high triglycerides; obesity; IR & LR;....and more.

...I lecture frequently to medical groups and I am passionate about teaching other physicians that food is indeed the most powerful medicine. I believe that physicians should strive to get patients on a good diet and off drugs, whenever possible. It has become fashionable these days to quote Hippocrates, who said, " Let food be your medicine and medicine be your food." In my case, that philosophy is the cornerstone of my medical practice.

...I am also a well-known specialist in the field of aging, and lecture on that topic as well. It is not unrelated to diabetes. In fact, my interest in diabetes was sparked by the observation that diabetics suffered from so-called diseases of aging, such as arthritis, heart disease, cataracts, and even dementia at a much earlier age than normal. They even look older at an early age. From that realization, it dawned on me that the metabolic disorder of diabetes is a disease of rapid aging, and what we consider to be the " normal " diseases of aging are in reality due to an underlying disease of metabolic dysfunction.

...I have come to believe that leptin resistance is at least related to, if not at the foundation of the majority of disorders related to aging, including heart disease, diabetes, obesity, osteoporosis, arthritis, and even aging itself. I know that many of you are probably thinking, how could one hormone --- let alone a hormone that most of you have probably never heard before --- be so important to health and longevity?

...Modern medicine has focused on merely treating symptoms, such as high cholesterol or elevated blood sugar, and not the true disease that underlies those symptoms, for that is far easier.... and therefore more lucrative. My experience has taught me that treating symptoms simply masks problems, and will almost make them worst, not better. If you lower leptin ( and also insulin ) to healthy levels, you will go a long way towards preventing and treating a main root of what we call the disease of aging and, in fact, aging itself. I believe that the disease of aging are not inevitable, and that they are aggravated, if not caused, by the typically poor American diet.

De-Age Your Body With The Rosedale Diet


...I am a metabolic specialist who has devoted my career to treating diseases such as obesity, heart disease , and diabetes.
 
Until then, the medical establishment had all but ignored the role of diet in disease. It was already thought that a high fat diet could increase cholesterol levels in the body, and after his research ( Dr. Jeremiah Stamler, one of the first to study the correlation between elevated cholesterol and heart disease. I had the privilege of working with him ) everyone jumped on the " no fat-no cholesterol " bandwagon. We were told that the ideal diet was low in fat and cholesterol, and high in carbohydrates, especially for diabetics, who were at greater risk of heat disease. We didn't know about leptin yet, nor did we understand the role of insulin in metabolic disease, nor did we differentiate between good fats and bad fats. I saw diabetic patients on this so-called ideal diet get worse, not better. Worst of all they were always hungry and couldn't stay on that diet. I asked myself why the standard diet wasn't working? Why did most of them require more, not less medicine on this diet? Why were they so unhappy and so hungry?

....One day it dawned on me that the high carb -- low fat diet that was being prescribed to diabetic patients was precisely the wrong therapeutic approach. The reason why now seems obvious, but a decade ago, it was revolutionary bordering on heretical. Carbohydrate in any form other than fiber is eventually metabolized by the body into sugar. In fact, it starts turning into sugar as soon as it hits the saliva in your mouth. It doesn't matter if it is a piece of fruit, a brownie, or a bowl of whole grain cereal, it still turns to sugar. ( There are some carbs that are better for you than others, but nevertheless, any carb that is not fiber eventually ends up as sugar. )

Excess Protein Is Just As Bad
 
...If high carb wasn't the right approach, that left two other major food categories on which to base a diet: protein and fat. It may surprise you to learn that the protein that the body doesn't quickly use to repair or make new cells is largely broken down into simple sugar, which increases sugar and promotes insulin resistance. Furthermore, protein itself triggers insulin production, which can worsen insulin resistance. ( That is why diabetics should never go on a very high protein diet. )

...Having rules out carbohydrates and protein, I decided to try putting my diabetic patients on a high fat diet, but only using healthy fats, such as those you'll eat on the Rosedale Diet. When I switched my patients to this new diet, I saw vast improvements in nearly every case. In addition to losing a lot of unwanted weight, patients were able to reduce or eliminate their medication. I was so impressed with these results that I recommended the diet for my non-diabetic patients who were trying to lose weight, many of whom were insulin resistant. The weight literally melted off them, and most were able to keep it off. Years later, after the discovery of leptin ( in 1995 ), I found out why my diet worked so well. It lowered leptin levels quickly and effectively. I also discovered why the other diets had failed. They didn't lower leptin levels nearly as well or as effectively, in fact, they often raised leptin levels! ( Shockingly, most diabetics are still treated with the high carbohydrate -- low fat diet. ) ... Thus, the longtime nutritional advice of the medical profession to eat a high carb, low fat diet is an oxymoron!

That's the preliminaries.


Now for the Rosedale recommended tests. These are tests I haven't known myself but it's important especially if you have Health Challenging Issues or chronic HCIs. It may strikes you that other tests are more important than others like HbgA1c vs Glucose; Basal Temperature ( very interesting ) and lastly, you will never imagine is how not so important is Cholesterol !

Have it downloaded. Read and reread it. Keep it for the next generation. Pass it to your friends. Who else ?

I've added my comments based on my past ignorant --- hope you don't mind....any further comments welcome......Alan

Happy reading.


...I also recommend, however, that you get the laboratory tests prior to starting the Rosedale Diet and do the appropriate follow-ups after three months, six months, and one year, or as indicated. Just as your doctor periodically checks your cholesterol, I much prefer to follow other lab tests that I feel are far more indicative of your overall health. These will provide concrete, irrefutable proof of the program's beneficial effects on your overall health.

...Of the sixteen medical tests described below, at least seven can be included as part of the routine CBC, or complete blood chemistry, that should be done at your annual physical. ( An asterisk * designates the tests that can be included as part of this routine workup. )

...Because some tests require a fasting blood serum sample, you will be instructed by your doctor to avoid eating or drinking besides water for at least eight hours prior to having your blood drawn. Several of the tests described below are outside the range of the usual blood tests and should be sent to one of the handful of specialized labs for analysis. ( See section for lab recommendations. )

[ Note: Through my search in S'pore and Australia, and assistance from Rosedale's office, I finally found the nearest to Malaysia is in India for the most important test. Leptin test.]
....The tests listed below in what I consider to be their order of importance.

01) LEPTIN
 
The most reliable test for monitoring leptin levels is the radioimmunoassay ( RIA ), which utilizes an antibody that responds to leptin in a fasting blood sample. This test will tell you whether or not you have leptin resistance ( LR ). If your level is in the healthy range --- the optimal fasting leptin level is between 4 and 6 ng/dL and up to 9 is acceptable --- your cells are sensitive to leptin's signals. You're a fat burner as nature intended you to be, and it is unlikely that you will have a weight problem. ( If you lower your leptin levels to optimal levels, as you most certainly will on the R'Diet, it is highly unlikely that you will continue to have a weight problem even if you started out with one. ) Of course, we don't want leptin levels to go too low, Anything below -4 ng/dL is a sign of either malnutrition, usually accompanied by very low body fat, or a generic inability to produce leptin that results in obesity. ( If a woman's leptin level falls below 3, generally caused by very low stores of body fat due to inadequate food intake or intensive exercise, she will stop menstruating. )

If your fasting leptin level is 10 ng/dL or higher, you will most certainly benefit from the leptin-sensitizing program outlined in this book. Most obese people have extremely elevated leptin levels: 20, 30, even 40 ng/dL ! Yet within only two to three weeks on the R'Diet, almost everyone experiences a dramatic decline in leptin levels. At the same time, they eat less because they do not feel hungry as often as they used to. They no longer experience food cravings and have little difficulty following the diet. If your leptin doesn't fall as quickly as it should ( younger people often have quicker results than older people ), you need to be especially careful about following the diet and perhaps add extra nutritional supplements. But if you follow the program, I promise that your leptin sensitivity will improve and your fasting leptin level will fall.

  Leptin: 4 to 6 ng/dL optimal; up to 9 acceptable; 10+ high.  
 
02) INSULIN
 
The most important test after leptin is fasting insulin, for this hormone is also involved in how your body utilizes energy. Insulin is best known for its effect on blood sugar. Secreted by specialized cells in the pancreas, called islet cells, in response to increases blood glucose, insulin binds to receptors on the surfaces of cells throughout the body and signals them to allow glucose to enter.

Insulin regulates the energy needs of nearly every cell in your body. In addition to clearing glucose out of the blood, it determines whether that glucose will be used for immediate energy needs, whether it will be converted into glycogen for use over the next few hours, or whether it will be converted into fat for future needs. This explains why elevated insulin and leptin resistance go hand in hand in promoting weight gain. It is also involved in the synthesis of protein.

It is easy to overlook the manifold actions of insulin because its blood sugar ---- influencing properties are all you hear about from your doctor and the media. But let's look at it from the evolutionary perspective. For most of human history, the challenge was uncertain access to a food supply of any kind ( remember the Hunters Gatherers era ). Storing nutrients for times of food deprivation was essential to survival, and this is exactly what insulin does. Thus, insulin lowers blood sugar secondary to its major role in trying to store excess sugar mostly as fat.

Unfortunately, the fine-tuned processes that kept us alive during times of scarcity are undermined by our present diet that keeps blood levels of insulin constantly elevated.

One of the earliest effects of excess insulin is weight gain, as it stimulates the storage of fat and the burning of sugar. It lowers cellular level of magnesium, a mineral that relaxes the arteries and improves blood flow. Insulin also increases accumulations of sodium, causing fluid retention, resulting in high blood pressure. Elevated insulin also increases inflammatory compounds in the blood that damage the arteries and promote the formation of blood clots that may cause a heart attack. It stimulates spasms in the arteries and arrhythmia in the heart. Furthermore, it causes abnormalities in blood fats, including reductions in protective HDL cholesterol and elevations in triglycerides and small dense LDL cholesterol. All this translates into a significant increase in risk of heart disease.

There's more. Excess insulin upsets hormonal balance and increase the risk of polycystic ovary disease. It is even strongly linked to cancer because of its role in cell proliferation. Finally, high levels of insulin interfere with the normal activity of leptin with very few exception; if you are insulin resistant, you are also leptin resistant.

The best way to determine if you are IR is to have a fasting insulin test to measure total and/or free fasting insulin in serum. Free insulin is the active form of insulin, not bound to antibodies or other proteins, and levels will be slightly lower than total insulin. Ideal level are less than 10 IU/mL...Anything above this means you are IR---and the higher your level, the more severe the condition. If your insulin is creeping towards 10, you have a window of opportunity to take steps to improve your insulin sensitivity. If your level is above 10, it is imperative that you do what it takes to get IR under control.

Because IR and LR are so closely intertwined, insulin levels response beautifully to the R'Diet. As you adopt the diet, your cells become more sensitive to insulin and your insulin level will drop. At the same time you will be losing weight, reducing your risk of diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and other ills, and setting the stage for a long and healthy life.

 Fasting Insulin: 10 IU/mL and below optimal; over 10 high.

[ Some local labs doesn't have the facility. They may do it for you by sending your blood serum to Singapore for a fees if you do the others common tests with them. ]
 
03) HBGA1C ( GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN )
 
Glucose interacts with proteins in a process called glycation or glycosylation. When that protein is hemoglobin, the iron-carrying pigment that gives red blood cells their color, the end result is glycated hemoglobin ( HbgA1c ). ( We could measure glycation in other blood proteins such as albumin, but this is the most economical and acceptable test. )

The HbgA1c test, which measures the percentage of hemoglobin that is glycosylated, is used by most doctors to estimate average blood sugar levels over the preceding 120 days ( the average life span of a red blood cell ). If your HbgA1c is 5.5 percent, this means your average fasting blood sugar for the past three months was approximately 100 mg/dL. An HbgA1c of 8 % translates into average blood sugars of approx. 200 mg/dL., and 11 % into approx. 300 mg/dL.

As opposed to measuring average blood sugars, this test really reveals the rate of glycation, and glycation can be modified especially by taking certain supplements. I have seen patients with similar blood sugars, yet one may have a HbgA1c of 6 % while the other's is 7 per cent. This is very important, for if diabetic patients can keep their glycation levels low they are that much less likely to be afflicted with complications of the arteries, nerves, eyes, and kidneys --- regardless of their glucose control. The non-diabetic HbgA1c range is from 4.5 percent to 6 percent, and the lower the level, the better.


There are several things you can do to curb glycation and lower HbgA1c. First, lower your blood sugar by changing your diet and improve your leptin and insulin sensitivity, Second, take targeted nutritional supple ments. Finally, reset your thermostat and lower your basal temperature ( by lowering leptin ), for higher temperatures accelerate glycation. All of these very important changes can be made by implementing the R'Diet.

  HbgA1c: 5.4 or less percent optimal; 5.6 - 5.8 acceptable; 5.9 - 6.9 high; 7.0 or higher at risk of diabetic complications.
[ You can have this test done at Malaysian Diabetes Association for RM 18/-. It's opposite the UH. ]
 
04) GLUCOSE *
 
A fasting glucose test measures the amount of glucose, or sugar, in your blood. Most of the carbohydrates you eat are broken down into glucose and released into the bloodstream. Some of that glucose is burned for energy. Excesses are either store in the liver and muscles in the form of glycogen for short-term energy needs or converted into fat for long-term storage.

Glucose testing is commonly used to screen for diabetes and to monitor blood sugars in people who have diabetes. Most physicians consider normal levels to be up to 110 mg/dL. A diagnosis of diabetes is made when fasting glucose is higher than 125 mg/dL. Levels between 110 and 125 are indicative of impaired glucose tolerance, often called prediabetes. I think we need to redefine normal; normal is not necessary healthy. If your glucose level is in the 70s or low to mid 80s, fine, but if it is in the 90s and above, you need to take steps to address the underlying hormonal imbalances that are driving your blood sugar up.

The R'Diet has a tremendous effect on glucose levels. By avoiding carbohydrates and excessive protein and adding more healthy fats to your diet, you can avoid dramatic spikes in glucose ( not to mention insulin and leptin ) --- the stresses that these unnatural spikes place on your energy-regulating system.
Glucose: 70 to 85 mg/dL optimal; 85 to 110 high; 110 to 126 very high; 126+ indicative of diabetes.

[
You can do this at home with your own meter.]



05) THYROID FUNCTION TESTS ( FREE T3, TSH )

 
Any discussion of metabolism must include the thyroid, a small gland located in the neck, straddling the windpipe. The thyroid produces two hormones, thyroxine (T4), and triiodothyronine (T3). Although the gland secretes much more T4 than T3, T3 is the more active of the two --- T4 is converted to T3 in tissues throughout the body, mostly in the liver. Thyroid hormone affects almost every cell in the body. It stimulates enzymes involved in the oxidation, or burning, of glucose in the cells and controls the body's metabolic rate and production of body heat.

When the thyroid produces excessive amount of hormones, the body runs hot, like a car idling too high. Body temperature is elevated, basal metabolism revs up, and fuel is rapidly burned up. It wears down the engine and wastes energy. Enormous appetite, insomnia, palpitations ( strong or irregular heartbeats ), trembling of the hands, irritability --- these are all symptoms of excessive thyroid hormone levels, or hyperthyroidism.

An under-active thyroid, or hypothyroidism, causes an excessive slowdown in metabolism accompanied by too low temperature, fatigue, slow heartbeat, high triglycerides, dry skin and hair, cold hand and feet, depression, menstrual problems, and memory disturbances. Our goal is to keep metabolism at the most efficient level so that the body can do its work without wasting too much energy as heat.

Where does leptin fit in ? It is the master hormone that helps to regulate the thyroid. In times of starvation, leptin level falls, signalling the thyroid and other hormones to switch into conservative mode. Metabolism slows down but becomes more efficient, body temperature lowers, and vital nutrients are conserved. Leptin resistance distorts the signals that this hormones sends to the thyroid and the rest of your body, and may direct well-fed, even obese individuals into energy accumulation and fat-storage mode.

There are several tests for thyroid function, but I only use two. One is free T3, which measures blood levels of the unbound form of the most active thyroid hormone. The other is TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone. TSH is the stimulus from the brain that tells the thyroid how much hormone to produce. The bulk of T3 is transported by thyroxine-binding globulin ( TBG ). Only 0.3 percent of the T3 in the blood is free, but that small percentage is responsible for the many biological actions of thyroid hormone. 
 
The ideal blood level of free T3 is 2.2 to 3.0 pg/mL and, within this range, the lower the level, the better, provided that TSH is within the healthy range of 1.5 to 3.50.





06) BASAL BODY TEMPERATURE

Another way to determine your metabolic rate is to measure your basal body temperature. This reflects your basal metabolism, the amount of energy your body is using when you're at complete rest. An elevated basal temperature is a clear sign that your metabolism is revved up and your thyroid is running on overdrive.

BBT is best measured upon awakening before you get out of bed and just before you fall asleep at night. It requires a basal thermometer, which is more sensitive than an ordinary thermometer. Digital basal thermometers are most convenient, but any basal thermometer will do. Have the thermometer at your bedside before going to bed. If it's a glass thermometer, shake it down below 96 degree the night before. When you awaken, before getting out of bed and while still lying down, take your temperature. Record it, and repeat for at least four to five consecutive days. Go through the same process at night, after lying in bed just before falling asleep. When you are done, remember to prepare the thermometer for your morning reading. A digital thermometer will beep when the temperature has been recorded.

The average BBT is about 97.8 degrees F. The 98.6 degrees you have always been told is normal reflects daytime temperatures, when we are more active. In any case, body temperature varies slightly from one person to the next. What you're looking for are trends and patterns. As the hormonal signals that govern your metabolism become more efficient, your basal temperature will likely go down. This decline will not be dramatic --- it may be as little as 0.2 degrees or as much as a full degree --- but it will be a very important sign that you're no longer wasting so much energy by generating excess heat. That fuel is instead being used to regenerate your body.
 
BBT: 96.8 - 97.5 degrees F or less optimal ( or decline of up to 1 degree F from baseline ).

[ You will have to own a digital thermometer. Do it yourself.....under the tongue. ]

07) INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR-1 ( IGF-1 )
 

IGF-1 also called somatomedin-C, is the most reliable test for human growth hormone. Growth hormone is produced in the pituitary gland, released in spurts most abundantly during sleep and exercise. It's a very short-lived hormone and within minutes is broken down in the liver into IGF-1 ( so-named because its molecular structure and some of its actions mimic insulin ), and remains in the blood for a day or two. Human growth hormone, as its name implies, is partly responsible for growth. Levels build gradually throughout childhood, peak during adolescence, and begin an inexorable decline by the age of twenty. By the time you reach your sixties, you're producing less than 20 percent as much growth hormone as you did in your teens.

For decades, IGF-1 concentrations were only measured in --- and growth hormone supplementation was only given to --- children of very short stature. Indeed, deficiencies of this hormone during critical stages of development severely retard growth. However, a small study published in 1990 by Daniel Rudman, M.D., in the New England Journal of Medicine turned growth hormone into an overnight celebrity. This study, which reported on the effects of six months of growth hormone supplementation in older men, concluded that their improvements in lean muscle mass, body fat, skin thickness, and bone density were " equivalent in magnitude to the changes incurred during ten to twenty years of aging. "

Many people, patients and physicians alike, have jumped on the growth hormone bandwagon, regarding it as the foundation of youth and a panacea for aging. I strongly disagree. I maintain that there is a reason why growth hormone and IGF-1 levels fall as we age --- and fall most significantly in those who live the longest. In caloric-restricted animals and those animals genetically modified whose longevity is dramatically increased, IGF-1 levels are almost always much lower than their shorter-lived peers.

IFG-1 is a growth factor. It promotes the growth of cells, and this includes cancer cells. There is a strong correlation between IGF1 levels and cancer rates. One study showed a fourfold increase risk of prostrate cancer in men with the highest IGF-1 levels compared to those with the lowest, and this was independent of baseline PSA levels. Other studies have shown that IGF-1 stimulates the growth of tumors of the breast, lung and colon and that lowering IGF-1 levels retards cancer growth. Reducing levels of this potent cancer stimulator can only bode well for health and longevity.

IGF-1 levels vary dramatically according to age, but for people who are forty and older, the typical range is 90 to 360 ng/mL. Your goal should be a downward trend, regardless of your baseline level. I have followed IGF-1 levels in several of my patients, and as they follow the R'Diet, IGF-1 levels decline. Similar to insulin, the goal is optimal sensitivity, not higher levels. At the same time, body fat drops, lean muscle mass increases, and bone density improves. In other words, they achieved the same, in fact higher, benefits that the purveyors of growth hormone offer --- without the risks. Improving leptin sensitivity converts energy from cellular replication/reproduction ( increased risk of cancer ) towards maintenance and repair ( increased health and life span ).

  IGF-1 : for ages forty and over, 90 to 360 ng/mL normal; optimal levels not yet determined, reduces " low normal " preferred.
 
08) NOREPINEPHRINE
 
Norepinephrine is a neurotransmitter that facilitates communication in the sympathetic nervous system, which engages during times of stress. This neurotransmitter along with epinephrine, prepares you to fight or flee from perceived dangers. Your heart rate speeds up and your blood pressure climbs. Glycogen stored in the liver is converted into glucose for anaerobic use, and fatty acids are mobilized for a burst of energy, among many other changes.

Without this crucial reflects it is unlikely that our ancestors could have outrun predators or chased down prey. The problem is that in modern life, most of our stressors do not require fight or flight. For the most part, stress leaves us all revved up with no place to go. When you are under a lot of stress, including the stress of leptin resistance, your sympathetic nervous system goes into overdrive. This takes a toll on the system and can lead to chronically high blood pressure and blood sugar, mental and emotional stress, and increased risk of disease.
 
The best marker of sympathetic nervous system activity is the blood or urine level of norephinephrine. Normal levels for a blood test [ not urine test ] are between 250 to 350 pg/mL. How can you keep norephinephrine levels on a low keel? Well, you can learn to relax, avoiding responding to stress, and you can lower your leptin levels by increasing leptin sensitivity. [ how about meditation, gigong, exercise, yoga, early nite nite before 10 pm, and the Metta, & B'Happy mode everyday? ] Leptin stimulates the sympathetic nervous system. LR is associated with high thyroid, high blood pressure, and elevated blood glucose and fatty acid levels; all are manifestations of sympathetic nervous system activity. The sympathetic nervous system also appears to be the mediator of leptin's effect on bone mass, and is yet another reason to keep tabs on your norepinephrine levels.
 
Norepinephrine: 250 to 350 pg/mL good, low normal is optimal.




09) HIGHLY SENSITIVE C-REACTIVE PROTEIN ( CRP )
 
Inflammation is part and parcel of your body's response to injury and disease. When cells or tissues are damaged, fibrinogen and other inflammatory compounds that encourage blood clotting are released to stem bleeding. There is a proliferation of immune cells to starve off infection and growth factors to replace damaged cells. After the crisis has passed, levels of these inflammation compounds should subside.

However, sometimes inflammatory chemicals are elevated in the blood of people who are not overtly sick or injured. This low-grade, chronic inflammation is associated with increased risk of heart disease, diabetes, cancer, autoimmune disorders, and other health problems.

One of the best markers for system inflammation is highly sensitive C-reactive protein ( CRP ), a protein that is produced during inflammation. Studies spearheaded bu Paul M. Ridker, M.d., a cardiologist and researcher at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, have found that a high level of CRP is a highly accurate predictor of future heart attack; people with the highest levels have up to 4.4 times the risk as those with the lowest levels. CRP is also a very reliable marker for IR and the risk of type 2 diabetes. In a recent study published in JAMA, researchers discovered that the women with the highest CRP levels were astounding 15.7 times more apt to develop type 2 diabetes than those with the lowest levels.

Evidence is also accumulating that inflammation is closely tied to LR. As body fat increases, CRP levels rise, for the fat cells themselves are a major producer of inflammatory molecules called cytokines. In fact, leptin itself is from the cytokine family. The most significant increases are with central or abdominal obesity, and as you now know, this type of fat deposition is linked to LR.
Highly sensitive C-reactive protein: less than 1.0 optimal and the lower the better
 
( Note: Request the highly sensitive CRP test, rather than the standard, less sensitive CRP test. ) [ This test is available in Malaysia. ]



10) TRIGLYCERIDES (TGLs)*
 

TGL is the medical term for fat. Most of the fats we eat, from healthful olive oil to undesirable saturated fats, are in the form of TGLs. It's also the body's dominant form of stored fat --- those love handles and saddlebags are primary comprised of TGLs. TGLs are ferried around the body by water-soluble chylomicrons, which pick up TGLs that are absorbed into the blood-stream after a meal, and by very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) that are produced by the liver to mobilize stored fats.

Your TGLs can be easily measured on a fasting blood test. A level of 50 to 100 mg/dL indicated that you are capable of burning fat efficiently, that your body is not churning excessive amount of fat into your bloodstream or, more likely than not, a combination of the two. A TGL off 100 - 150 is moderate and over 150 is high, both red flags that you may not br burning fat efficiently. Although they could be an indicator of liver disease, pancreatitis, or low thyroid function, high TGLs are in most case a marker of LR and IR. They are a clear sign that you're making lots of fat out of your sugar, and that the fats in your blood are not being burned --- you're storing fat and burning sugar.

A high TGL level is an independent risk factor for heart disease ( perhaps because of its association with leptin and insulin ). In fact, recent research suggests it's much more predictive of a heart attack tha elevated cholesterol.

Although the normal TGLs range for most labs is up to 150 mg/dL, I think this is too high. While I consider levels up to 125 mg/dL to be acceptable and around 100 mg/dL even better, the level most reflective of optimal leptin sensitivity is under 100 mg/dL. If your TGLs are elevated, I've good news for you: TGLs are extremely responsive to the R'Diet. I've had patients whose initial THG levels os 2,000 to 3,000 mg/dL have dropped down into the 200s in a matter of weeks after starting on the program. Cutting back on non-fiber carbohydrates, eating more healthy fats, and in stubborn cases, taking additional fish oil and niacin supplements work far better than any drug on the market for lowering TGLs.

 TGLs: 100 mg/dL optimal; 100 - 135 acceptable; 135+ high.


11) HOMOCYSTEINE

Homocysteine is a byproduct of the metabolism of methionine, an amino acid found in protein. In a process called methylation, homocysteinie is rapidly converted into harmless amino acids. However, sometimes the methaylation process goes awry, and homocysteine builds up in the blood. This is bad news, for this amino acid is extremely irritating to the arteries. It dampens the production of nitric acid, which protects the endothelial cells lining the arteries and allows arteries to dilate, and sets the stage for atherosclerosis. Homocysteinie also accelerates the oxidation of LDL cholesterol and makes the platelets in the blood sticker, increasing the risk of blood clots that may cause heart attacks or stroke.

If your homocysteine level is elevated, you've more to worry about than heart disease. It also damages neurons in the hippocampus, an area of the brain involved in memory and learning, conferring a threefold elevation in risk of Alzheimer's disease, according to some studies. Methylation is also crucial for DNA repair, so elevations in homocysteine may illuminate underlying problems that may lead to cancer and premature aging.

Most labs consider the normal range to be 5 to 15 umol/L. I suggest you aim for the low end of that range -- an ideal level would be no more than 6 umol/L. Some studies have shown a progressive increase in risk of heart attack when homocysteine climbs above 6.3 umol/L. Up to 7 umol/L is acceptable, but when you get over 9 umol/L and especially up toward 13, you can get into trouble.

Early studies suggest that homocysteine and leptin are, if not inter-active, then at least coexisting: when homocysteine levels are elevated, so are leptin levels, including the presence of LR. Fortunately, lowering homocysteine levels is relatively easy. Cutting back on coffee and methionine-rich meat will help to some degree, but getting adequate amounts of folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6 is a sure ticket to lowering homocysteine. The nutrient rich R'Diet supplies a good portion of your daily vitamin needs, and the supplement program provides the rest. If your homocysteine level does not respond to the suggested levels of these B-complex vitamins, you likely have a genetic variation that requires more intense supplementation. Simply increase your B-vitamin intake, and your homocysteine will drop.

The recommended levels of the homocysteine-lowering vitamins are 800 mcg of folic acid, 150 mcg of vitamin B12, and 75 mg of vitamin B6. ( If you're older than age 55, consider increasing your vitamin B12 intake up to 1,000 mcg to compensate for age-associated declines in vitamin B12 absorption. ) If your homocysteine level is high, double your folic acid intake and increase your vitamin B12 to 1,000 mcg. If that doesn't do the trick, you can go as high as 5,000 mcg of folic acid and 2500 mcg of vitamin B12 and add 1,000 mg of trimethyglycine ( TMG, sometimes called betaine ), which also facilitates the methylation process. These vitamins are quite safe, but I wouldn't go too high on vitamin B6, for prolonged use of very high doses has been implicated in nerve damage.


 Homocysteine: less than 6 umol/L optimal; Up to 8 acceptable; over 9 high; over 13 umol/L very high.
 
12) BUN (BLOOD UREA NITROGEN)*

BUN is a common blood test that measures for urea nitrogen, a product of urea metabolism. When you eat protein, it's broken down into nitrogen-containing amino acids. The nitrogen is removed and combined with other molecules to produce urea, which eventually makes its way to the kidneys where it's eliminated in the urine. If kidney function is compromised, BUN levels rise above the normal range of 7 to 25 mg/dL.

Although this test is routinely used to evaluate kidney function, I used it to monitor my patients' protein intake. The average BUN hovers around 18 - 22 mg/dL. If a person is eating too much protein, his/her BUN will be in the upper range of normal. A common mistake people make as they adjust to the R'Diet is eating too much protein. This is easy to do since fat and protein are often found in the same foods, and many assume that if they're following other low carb/high fat diets, they're okay. ( In reality, many "high-fat diets" such as the Atkins diet are really high protein diets. ) A key principle of the R'Diet is moderate, not high, intake of protein. Regular monitoring of BUN can help ensure dietary compliance. 

BUN: 17 mg/dL optimal; up to 21 acceptable; mothan 21 mg/dL high.


13) CREATININE*

Creatinine is a marker of kidney function. It's a breakdown of creatinine, a constituent of muscle tissue. When the kidneys are functioning properly, creatinine is excreted at a constant rate. If the kidneys are diseased or damaged, however, excretion becomes less efficient, and creatinine builds up in the blood.

A primary contribution to kidney damage is diabetes, and as the cells become more sensitive to insulin and blood glucose levels normalize on the R'Diet, creatinine levels often go down. The ideal range for creatinine is 0.7 to 1.0 mg/dL. (Levels vary among individuals depending on muscle mass; creatinine is generally higher in men than in women.) Although up to 1.4 mg/dL is considered within normal limits, levels of 1.3 to 1.4 mg/dL are indicative of borderline kidney function. When levels are over 1.4 mg/dL, you are looking at partial kidney failure. 
 

 Creatinine: 0.7 to 1.o mg/dL optimal; 1.1 to 1.2 mg/dl acceptable; 1.3 to 1.4 borderline; 1.4 and above high.
 

14) URIC ACID*

Uric acid is a breakdown of the metabolism of purines, which are produced in the body (they are the building blocks of DNA and RNA) and are found in the diet most abundantly in fish, shellfish, turkey, and some type of meat. When there is an overproduction of uric acid or an inability of the kidneys to excrete it, uric acid levels build up in the blood.

Until recently, elevated levels of uric acid were associated only with gout. Chronically high concentrations of uric acid can collect in the tissues and form sharp crystals in the joints, causing the intense pain and swelling characteristic of gout. However, research over the past years has determined that high levels of uric acid are also found in individuals with high blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, diabetes, and weight problems --- all signs and symptoms of leptin and insulin resistance. In one large study, increased uric acid levels were found to be highly predictive of increased risk of death from heart attack or stroke.

You would do well to keep your uric acid level within the normal range of 3 to 7 mg/dL. And no, you don't have to curtail your intake of purine-rich foods, which has been recommended to patients with gout for years. The R'Diet is a much surer path to lowering uric acid levels than the hopelessly outdated low-purine diet.

 Uric Acis: 3 - 7 mg/dL normal; more than 7 mg/dL high.
 

15) LIVER ENZYMES (ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE, ALT, and AST)*

In addition to its role in detoxification and digestion, the liver plays multiple roles in metabolism. It store glucose as glycogen, packages fats for storage and transportation, synthesizes proteins, and helps regulate blood sugar. Therefore, we like to keep an eye on how the liver is doing in the R'Diet.

A number of blood tests monitor liver function. These include tests of certain enzymes, which are produced by all tissues in the body but are most concentrated in liver and muscle cells. Enzymes are released into the bloodstream when this issues are damaged or diseased. Minor elevations in the liver enzymes are no cause for concern unless they remain elevated on repeated tests. Commonly tested liver enzymes include alkaline phosphatase, or ALP; ALT, also called SGPT; and AST, sometimes referred to as SGOT.

 Liver enzymes: alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 44 to 147 IU/l normal; ALT (SGPT) 5 to 30 IU/l normal; AST (SGOT) 10 to 34 IU/l normal.


16) CHOLESTEROL (TOTAL, HDL, LDL, and SMALL DENSE LDL)
 
The quest to lower cholesterol has reached epidemic proportions in this country. More than 15 million Americans take drugs to lower their cholesterol, and public health officials are urging another 25 million to jump on the bandwagon. I think they're misguided, and I did like to tell you why. Cholesterol is an essential compound that is required in the production of steroid hormones such as testosterone and estrogen. It's also a key structural component of every cellular membrane and is involved in the synthesis of vitamin D and bile, which is required for the digestion of fats. You've probably heard about "good" cholesterol and "bad" cholesterol. The truth is, there's no such thing. Cholesterol is just cholesterol. It's a cholesterol molecule's transport vehicle that makes it more or less problematic.

These transport vehicles are water-soluble protein called lipoproteins. High density lipoprotein (HDL) is the so-called good cholesterol. This large carrier shuttles excess cholesterol to the liver where it's recycled ( because it's so important ) or excreted in the bile. Low density lipoprotein is the "bad' one by virtue of its smaller size. Although many doctors are unaware of it, LDL comes in more than one form. The most harmful of all is small, dense LDL, fir its small size enables it to slip into and damage the endothelium, or lining of the arteries --- an important step in atherosclerosis.

A fasting blood test will measure levels of total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and, if specifically required, small, dense LDL and other subfractions. LDL particle size including small, dense LDL is done by certain specialty labs. Optimal levels for colesterol are considered to be less than 200 mg/dL for total cholesterol, less than 100 mg/dL for LDL, more than 40 mg/dL for HDL, and less than 90 mg/dL for apo B. But frankly, I pay little attention to my patients' cholesterol levels. Only when a patient presents with a level in the 300s or 400s mg/dL. (almost always caused by an underlying genetic defect predisposition ) will I be very concerned. I do not believe that a high cholesterol levels is nearly as important as the medical profession has brainwashed us into believing. It is merely a symptom of a larger underlying problem. It is the metabolic hormones that regulate its amount and particle size that are much more important.

Cholesterol levels are really a reflection of how much your body needs to manufacture to repair damage and make steroid hormones. If you have leptin and insulin resistanc, you're going to need more cholesterol, and you're going to have lower HDL cholesterol, and higher LDL, particularly small, dense LDL. when you correct the underlying hormonal problems and fat burning processes by following the R'Diet, abnormalities in cholesterol will also be corrected. Total cholesterol will go down and, more important, protective HDL will rise while levels of the most dangerous small, dense LDL cholesterol will go down.

 Cholesterol: As far as I'm concerned, yhis test is highly over-rated, and that only with extremely high cholesterol (over 300 ) should worry about total cholesterol. I believe that what type of cholesterol you have is more important: HDL cholesterol higher than 40 mg/dL; a high proportion of large LDL to small, dense LDL.

************************************************************************************************************************************************
Getting Healthy with the Rosedale Diet


* HEART DISEASE

Heart disease is the # 1 killer of both men and women in the U'States. Although the incidence of HD had been on the decline since the '60s, it's beginning to creep up again. Since HD is so closely linked to obesity and diabetes, this is not surprising.

I consider the high incidence of HD to be " man-made " problem that is caused by metabolic malfunction, not an inevitable disease of aging. It ought to be a rare disease. Due to its close connection to obesity, leptin is also an obvious culprit in HD. LR is also an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, meaning that in and of itself, it can directly and negatively affect your heart and arteries. Restoring leptin sensitivity will go a long way in greatly reducing the risk of HD and extending your life.

* Carrying excess fat around your waist and abdomen ( having an apple-shaped body ), a result of and a telltale sign of LR, can put a severe strain on your heart, and increases your risk of heart attack..

* LR increase the risk ( and can be a primary cause ) of IR, which also increase the risk of HD.

* LR can activate the fight-or flight response, causing blood vessels to constrict, increasing blood pressure and putting extra strain on the heart, and increasing the risk of stroke.

* LR can cause blood vessels to go into spasm, a lesser known cause of heart attack.

* Elevated leptin levels can promote the formation of blood clots, which increases the risk of heart attack ( when a clot interferes with the blood flow to the heart ) and stroke ( when a clot interferes with the blood flow to the brain ).

* Elevated leptin increases the production of chemicals that trigger inflammation, which can promote the formation of plague, the cellular debris that forms in the lining of the arteries, impairing the flow of blood.

* LR confuses your body about where to put calcium. Instead of putting calcium in your bones, you will end up putting it in your arteries. You will simultaneously get both HD and osteoporosis.

* Elevated leptin can cause a thickening in the endothelium, the very thin inner lining of the artery. This cause the artery to be less flexible with each heartbeat, raising blood pressure and promoting clots. The endothelium is a very important part of your circulatory system. It produces its own array of hormones to regulate its own blood flow. Injury to the endothelium is the main trigger of inflammation that results in plague. LR also impair the ability of the endothelium to burn fat, thereby increasing fatty deposits in the artery.


The Standard Treatment

The standard medical treatment for HD is a high carbohydrate--low fat diet usually combined with prescription medicine to lower cholesterol. To me, this approach is backward. The medical fixation on lowering cholesterol reflects the typical " treat the symptom, not the underlying cause " approach that is not only ineffective, but in the long run, can be harmful. In recent years, statin drugs ( Lipitor, Mevacor, Pravacol, and Zocor, and others ) used to lower cholesterol have become among the most widely prescribed drugs in the world. Statin drugs, however, are not without significant side effects. Foe example, statin drugs can deplete the body of CoQ10, which is essential for providing energy to the cells of the body, especially heart cells that need lots of energy. CoQ10 depletion can result in muscle damage often associated with aches and pains ( a common side effect of " statin " drugs ).

Since your heart is basically a muscle, it is probably getting damaged also, impairing its ability to pump blood and increasing the risk of congestive heart failure. In other words, over time, these drugs can weaken the heart and impair its major function. Sure, in the short run, they may lower your cholesterol, but in the long run, they can kill you.



For all the " cholesterol causes HD " hype, it might surprise you to learn that cholesterol has never even been proven to cause HD. Even if high cholesterol were slightly correlated with HD, correlation and cause should never be confused ---- something else could be causing both. Statin drugs inhibit cholesterol production, but they don't get to the root cause of overproduction of cholesterol. Something is signalling the liver to produce more cholesterol.

Symptoms are the way your body has learned over the eons to deal with a disease. Extra cholesterol is being manufactured by the liver because it's getting instructions to do so, but why? The importance of elevated cholesterol is not that you have extra cholesterol, it's the fact that your liver is getting a message to make it. You have to know why, and you have to fix the why. The why could be that the liver is being smothered by too much fat because of LR and cannot then get the proper instructions from insulin. It could also be that your body, inflamed due to damage, is trying to repair the damage. New cells have to be manufactured to replace the damaged ones, and no cells can be made without cholesterol. What needs to be done is to reduce the damage and correct the instructions being given to the liver, not impair the body's capacity to repair it.

Cholesterol is also the precursor to manufacture any of the important steroid hormones such as testosterone, progesterone, estrogen, and cortisone. Far from being a villain, cholesterol is required for life. Even though oxygen can " oxidize " you and form dangerous free radicals, no one would ever suggest that you stop breathing! Oxygen is required to keep you alive. So, too, is cholesterol. No life on earth can be made without it.

Interestingly, it has recently been shown that " statin " drugs might offer benefits not by lowering cholesterol, but by reducing inflammation, and perhaps in spite of lowering cholesterol. Once again, it is important to get the root cause of the inflammation, not the body's response to it. There are a number of factors that can inflame your blood vessels and your heart, such as having elevated glucose, leptin, or insulin levels. Following the R'Diet will help solve this problems permanently and go a long way in reversing and preventing HD. Within a matter of weeks, you will increase blood flow to your heart and brain ( and the rest of the body! ) and you will start burning fat in your arteries as well as everywhere else. You don't need to take drugs for the rest of your live to keep your heart healthy.


The Rosedale Rx

If you have been diagnosed with heart or blood vessel disease, you should follow the R'Diet Supplement Plan Plus ( RDSPP ). I recommend that patients with HD add the following supplements to what they are already taking on the RDSPP.

Extra CoQ10: CoQ10 is included in the RDSPP. My patients with congestive heart failure take 200 mg three times daily for a total of 600 mg. CoQ10 improves your heart's ability to pump blood, which is fundamental to your survival.

Vinpocetine: Vinpocetine is not included in the RDSP. Vinpocetine is an extract of the periwinkle plant, Vinca minor, the same plant that has given us potent cancer treatments for childhood leukemia. For more than two decades, vinpocetine has been used in Europe and Japan to treat stroke victims and people suffering from dementia due to impaired blood circulation to the brain. It is also a potent antioxidant.

Take one 10 mg capsule twice daily.

If you have elevated homocysteine, I recommend the following additional supplements.

Vitamin B12: For best absorption, use the sublingual form ( a tablet that melts under the tongue ). Take one 1-mg tablet daily.

Trimethyglycine ( TMG ): This supplement can help convert harmful homocysteine into harmless by-products. Take one 250-mg tablet twice daily. ( Some people may need to go up to 1,000 mg daily to achieve the desired result. )

Folic Acid: This B-vitamin helps reduce homocysteine levels. Take one 400-mg tablet daily.

[ Do not ever take any drugs. It will degenerate your metabolism. You will looks very old besides the long-termed side effects. More sickness crops up and you will spent more to see more specialists. I've gone through these paths. Don't do it. Yes, you can treat inflammations which is the root cause with foods. I did it. So can you.]


* DIABETES

The increased incidence in diabetes is as shocking as it is alarming. This is a disease that should be very rare, yet it is commonplace, even among children, and rapidly escalating. At one time, type 2 diabetes was called senile diabetes, a reflection of the fact that it usually did not affect people until they were well into their late decades. As more and more middle-age people began to develop this disease, the name was changed to adult-onset diabetes (no one middle-aged wants to be called senile!). Given the fact that so many children are now getting adult-onset diabetes, medicine has once again stuck a name onto a so-called new disease --- MODY, Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young. This is a prime example of how the so-called disease of aing are not related solely to chronological age, but to overall health.

Type 1 diabetes (also called juvenile diabetes) is a result of too little insulin, the hormone that is produced to rising glucose or sugar levels. Without enough insulin, blood sugar levels can climb dangerously high leading to organ damage and death. Type 2 diabetes (discussed in the paragraph above) is an entirely different story and accounts for 95 percent of all cases of adult diabetes. Type 2 diabetes is characterized by a condition called insulin resistance (IR), which occurs when the cells of the body are constantly exposed to high levels of insulin. Plenty of insulin is being made, but cells have become desensitized. In the case of type 2 diabetes, the cause is more closely linked to a failure in cellular communication, that is, how well your cells can "listen" to insulin and leptin, than your age.

When your cells become resisitant to insulin, the receptors on cell membranes no longer "hear" the signals from insulin. This can cause catastrophic problems down the road, including blood lipid abnormalities, high blood pressure, heart disease, and even cancer.

IR often goes hand in hand with elevated leptin levels and leptin resistance (LR), and both conditions are linked to eating too much of the wrong food. Lower your leptin levels and your insulin problems will greatly improve.

* LR results in deep pockets of fat in the waist and abdomen which "smother" the liver from receiving proper hormonal signals, a very important one being from insulin. When your liver become insulin resistant, it will make too much sugar, contributing to IR, and diabetes.

* Elevated leptin also increases fight-or-flight mode, which boosts blood glucose levels and production of cortisol (stress hormone) by the adrenal glands, which causes blood glucose levels to soar even higher.

The Standard Treatment


The current strategy for treating either form of diabetes is to use drugs to control blood sugar levels. I think this approach is backward. Contrary to what everyone is taught, including your doctor, diabetes is NOT a disease of blood sugar, it's a disease of insulin signaling. As the warden famously said to Paul Newman in the movie Cool Hand Luke, "What we have here is a failure to communicate." Diabetes is perhaps the quintessential disease of cellular miscommunication. Type 2 diabetes should more appropriately be called insulin resistant diabetes, the body is not effectively using insulin it produces. Once again, the real solution is to treat the underlying causes of the problem, not the symptom.

The conventional treatment of diabetes is typical of what happens when you treat symptoms instead of the underlying disease. Drugs used to treat diabetes most often cause more problems down the road than they help. There's only one standard drug that helps to improve insulin sensitivity somewhat: metformin, sold under the brand name Glucophage.


For decades, most drugs used to treat diabetes lowered blood sugar by "whipping" your pancreas to produce even more insulin, causing insulin resistant to worsen and further damaging the already stressed cells that manufacture insulin (islet cells of the pancreas).

Other drugs (such as pioglitazone, sold under the brand name Actos, and rosiglitazone maleate, sold under the brand name of Avandia) purported to restore insulin sensitivity work by lowering blood sugar levels in one of the worst possible ways --- they create new fat cells to store the excess sugar. If you weren't obese to begin with, once you've been taking these drugs for a while, you will be. Sure, you lower blood sugar temporary, but at a steep price. Being fatter will only increase your risk of many disease down the road, including diabetes.

Diabetes is mostly a nutritional disease and must be treated as such. The real "cure' for diabetes is to eat a diet that promotes insulin and leptin sensitivity.


Friends,
Make sure you test yourself.

Your HbgA1c MUST be 5.4 or less % is optimal; 5.6 - 5.8 acceptable BUT watch what you put into your mouth. DON'T accept Malaysian Diabetes Association report. Trust the above. I was tested for 6.1%. It said good. I told them no. They were dumbfounded! Next test, 5.8, I told them I'm still diabetes and must improve my diet. Again, they were dumbfounded. My metta to them.

Your glucose MUST be 70 to 85 mg/dL optimal; 85 and above is NOT acceptable by my standard because it's very, very easy to creep up to become DIABETES. I have being on this torturous path. Here is another sure sign. Belly fats, big buttock, chipmunk cheek is a SURE sign of LR and IR. I also have being on this torturous path. How? Remember PPMM ! I was "honored" with heart attack; high blood pressure, angina, neuropathy, erectile dysfunction, not sleeping well, and a "walking time-bomb" that is a very high risk of getting a stroke.

Don't trust the local reports. Trust Rosedale's guidelines and my adapted local food "NF4L" from the westernized R'Diet.

Please, I beg you folks to love your health for the sake of those you loves. Metta.


The Rosedale Rx

The good news is that type 2 (insulin resistant diabetes) can not only be improved, but can be completely reversed. Even type 1 diabetes can be greatly helped by following my program. With proper insulin sensitivity, a relatively small amount of insulin is necessary to communicate its vital messages of what to do with energy. As long as the diabetes --- or the dugs used to treat diabetes --- have not completely destroyed the ability of the pancreas to produce insulin, following the R'Diet will in most case 
reverse the disease. You will likely need to lower your dose of many medications, including high blood pressure medications and insulin, and many of you will be able to go off them altogether. This should be done only under your doctor's supervision. Even if your pancreas is not producing any insulin and you must always take insulin, you can still benefit from my program. The diet and supplement regimen will gratly improve your insulin sensitivity so that you can manage on less insulin. In addition, your blood sugar will ne much less of a roller coaster, with fewer low sugar episodes.

Moderate exercise is also a wonderful way to burn off sugar, as long as you don't overdo it and overstress your body (which can raise blood sugar levels).


[Friends, insulin is the only hormone in the body with this function, that is, getting into cells. Two exceptions. Firstly, glucose can enter without insulin into the brain. The second exception is most important in the control of diabetes. When you exercising, the muscle cells can remove glucose from the blood without insulin. This is one of the key concept for a diabetic. Exercise.]

If you've been diagnosed with diabetes, you should follow the RDSPP. I recommend that patients with diabetes take additional amounts of the following supplements.

Vanadyl Sulfate. Take 20 mg three times daily for a total of 60 milligrams until blood sugar is under control. Discontinue if sugar goes low after stopping your diabetic medications.

Extra Thiamine. Take one 50 mg capsule twice daily.

Extra Alpha Lipoic Acid. Take one 200 mg capsule three times daily for a total of 600 mg. ( Always take lipoic acid with food; it's easier on the stomach.
.
* OSTEOPOROSIS

* ARTHRITIS


Parting messages...Dr. Ron Rosedale:

(01) A disease is NEVER a disease of the individual part. Diabetes is NOT a disease of blood sugar, osteoporosis is NOT a disease of calcium and heart disease is NOT a disease of cholesterol. A disease is caused NOT by the breakdown of the part itself, but corruption in the instruction of that part, a disruption in the unity of the whole.

(02) We are all metabolically damaged to some extend. None of us has perfect insulin and leptin sensitivity...it is for that reason that I say we all have diabetes some more than others, and should be treated as such.
 
 
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/SMI60Group/message/14182?var=1

Monday, 14 October 2019

Margaret’s curcumin PROTOCOL (with updates)

Margaret's Corner

LIVING WITH SMOLDERING MYELOMA IN TUSCANY



Margaret’s curcumin PROTOCOL


May 17 2007 post. Here it is, finally. I have been procrastinating about posting the protocol on my blog, even though I have written it out in countless private e-mails, mainly because I felt I should add a disclaimer, and, to be honest, I didn’t want to do that. The only reason I decided I needed to put a disclaimer here is because I have seen other alternative cancer treatment blogs do it.
So, first, let’s get the disclaimer out of the way: my blog presents information based on my own experience and research. I do NOT intend to tell others what to do, or to become a substitute for anybody’s healthcare provider. I am not a doctor, just a researcher who has come up with a protocol that so far has worked to keep my myeloma stable. I cannot be held responsible for any adverse effects resulting from the application of the information contained in my blog. So, for instance, if curcumin gives you a bit of diarrhea, don’t say I didn’t warn ya! (please see my Warnings Page).
Phew. Now that the disclaimer is out of the way, let’s get down to business. This is the protocol that I followed in January of 2006, when I first started taking curcumin, based on what I read etc.:
Week One: one gram of curcumin
Week Two: two grams of curcumin
Week Three: four grams of curcumin
Week Four (and thereafter): eight grams of curcumin
1. I will NOT recommend any specific curcumin brands. For one thing, I live in Italy, so my experience with U.S. brands is rather limited. For another, I do not want to sponsor any particular brand. Truth be told, I do not have a favourite brand. However, make sure your curcumin contains at least 95 % curcuminoids. Anything less than that is apparently useless.
(UPDATE (January 2008): well, okay, I finally did create a curcumin brands page, so please ignore the preceding paragraph. I was simply getting too many private and public requests for advice on this matter, and decided to go ahead and write out what I know thus far. See my curcumin brands page for that info)
2. Curcumin with or without bioperine (from black pepper)? That is an issue that I am still thinking about and researching. My capsules do contain bioperine, which apparently increase bioavailability. And it is true that my IgG count plus other markers have improved. So it’s up to you to decide.
(UPDATE: I tried curcumin without bioperine, summer 2007, and the experiment failed. That doesn’t mean that it won’t work for you, just that it didn’t work for me.)
3. Divide your curcumin intake into two or three doses a day, if possible. I am considering another experiment (for the fall): dividing my curcumin intake into four doses in order to keep curcumin in my bloodstream in a more constant manner. But I haven’t tried that yet, so I don’t know if it works. For now, I am sticking to the twice a day protocol.
(UPDATE: I am now not convinced that dividing the dose into two or more doses per day is such a good idea. My friend Sherlock takes her curcumin all at once, in the evening, and her most recent test results showed an IgG decrease of 18%. She believes in throwing an “atomic bomb” (made of curcumin!) at the myeloma cells. I think I agree, but more work is needed. UPDATE on the update: I now believe in the “atomic bomb” theory…but only for curcumin, mind you. I am a pacifist in real life!)
4. If possible, take curcumin on an empty stomach. If your stomach rumbles, and you would prefer to take it with food, please leave me a comment or write me an e-mail, and I will get back to you with some advice. And please let me know if you experience any weird side effects, so I can post them on my Warnings Page. Thanks!
5. Other curcumin-takers and I take our curcumin with some sort of fat, as follows: flaxseed oil or fish oil capsules. Curcumin has poor bioavailability (see my Bioavailability Page), so until researchers come up with a more bioavailable formula, we will simply have to rely on our own research and the experience of others. Based on that experience etc., it appears to be best to take curcumin WITH some sort of oil capsule, so it will be better absorbed.
6. Since January, I have been taking quercetin about 15 minutes before curcumin. See my page on quercetin for more details. I now take one gram of quercetin a day. 
7. Before taking curcumin, check with your healthcare provider, especially if you are doing chemotherapy. Also, check my Warnings Page, I repeat. Some folks should NOT take it, as a precaution.
8. Last but not least, have blood tests done before and after you try the initial eight-week protocol. Otherwise, how will you know that curcumin works for you? ) And please keep me posted! Thank you!
May 18 2007 post. My Curcumin Protocol (Continued). Since posting my protocol, I have received a few questions that I would like to address. Yes, it’s true, I HAVE done a lot of research on curcumin, but the more I do, the more I discover there is to do!, which is a very good thing, of course. As Mahatma Gandhi said, Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.
One of the questions concerns why a curcumin-taker should build up slowly to eight grams (or more, actually; I know a few people who take 10-12 grams). As with any substance except perhaps for water, I think it’s a good idea to see how our body reacts to it. What if you began growing a second nose or something? Seriously, though, it’s merely a precaution. I personally have had no bad reactions to curcumin, even when I went up to nine grams of powder at one point last year. But a few people have reported diarrhea, which perhaps can be taken care of by cutting back on fiber intake (an MD Anderson nurse suggestion), and one person developed some kidney trouble, which may (or may not) have been caused by curcumin, even though Prof. Aggarwal replied that curcumin has a protective effect on the kidneys. And, in fact, I have never read of curcumin affecting the kidneys. But, hey, you never know, we are all different and react differently to the exact same thing. So, for those reasons, I think it’s best to err on the side of caution and build up to eight grams slowly.
A listserv friend, who plans to start taking curcumin soon, wrote about having chronic pain and headaches. I don’t recall if I have written anything about headaches on my blog, but this is what happened to me. I used to have horrendous headaches almost daily. I think they might have been caused by my very high blood viscosity (that seems to be one of my main MM symptoms), which essentially means that I have thick blood. Well, curcumin is a natural blood-thinner. Not long after I began taking curcumin, my headaches stopped. Gone. Poof! Just like that. I still get occasional mild headaches, probably because my blood viscosity is still on the high side, but nothing like those terribly painful pre-curcumin ones. I hope curcumin will take care of my friend’s headaches, too.
Another potential benefit: arthritic pain. Through Prof. Aggarwal, I met an Italian urologist who works in a Tuscan hospital. A wonderful man. He just sent me three books that he has written on curcumin and prostate cancer. Fascinating, well-written and containing historical and etymological information, which always makes me as happy as a little kid opening birthday presents. There is also some very useful information on curcumin bioavailability, so I will soon be posting a few comments on that issue. At any rate, he told me that he takes curcumin for his arthritis. And that rang a bell. Before I took curcumin (and I know I posted a few words on this topic, but it doesn’t hurt to reiterate a point, sometimes), I had a difficult time walking up the stairs in my house. I had to go up slowly, and pause now and again. My knees hurt and made scary creaky noises. I now dart up my stairs like an adolescent mountain goat. No problem whatsoever. No more creaky noises, no more pain. Another stupid thing: I used to have to sit on a step stool in order to put laundry inside my washing machine (in Italy, we have front loaders), because it hurt me to kneel down. I now can kneel with no problem, and pick up things from the floor (like cat bowls) without any trouble. There are studies on curcumin and arthritis, I have discovered. I am not surprised.
There is no denying that I am obsessed with curcumin. But with good reason. Curcumin is keeping me stable AND giving me many side benefits, including, as I have reported elsewhere, a substantial decrease in cholesterol, which is almost normal now (yippee!) for the first time in years. I checked as far back as 1999: it was 73 mg/dL HIGHER then. Plus, I am mentally more alert. I actually remember things now. I used to be such a scatterbrain: I would write notes to remember things and then forget where I put them. Check out the studies on curcumin and Alzheimer’s disease. Curcumin may prevent AD, which comes as no surprise to me. The AD-curcumin topic would merit a post of its own.
May 19 2007 post. I should have emphasized the following point more forcefully: before taking curcumin, or any other substance for that matter, I think it’s a good idea to speak with your healthcare provider, even if you are NOT doing chemotherapy. In January of 2006, my husband and I took the curcumin-myeloma studies to my former haematologist (who retired in August) and discussed the matter with him. At the time, he was suggesting that I do two cycles of Velcade, then an autologous SCT (stem cell transplant) in the summer of 2006. Happily, none of that ever came to pass, thanks to curcumin.
His reactions during that January meeting gave me the distinct impression that he was sceptical, but he did tell me to go ahead with the initial eight-week curcumin protocol. However, he added that I would have to start chemo if curcumin did not work. At the time, I said, “sure, okay.” Of course, curcumin DID work, and, as a result, my surprised (I think!) haematologist informed me that he had started sprinkling turmeric over his food. But the point is, I didn’t start taking curcumin without informing my doctor. I should add that I felt (feel!) so strongly about curcumin that I would have followed the eight-week protocol even if he had advised me against it. I can be stubborn at times! But the bottom line is: I feel that it is best to be open with our doctors, even if we think they will disapprove.
Of course, nobody can predict the long-term effects of curcumin and the other substances that I am taking or plan to take. So, while I remain cheerfully (and stubbornly!) confident that I will remain stable on my protocol, only time will tell.
Update (November 2008). In January-March 2008 Sherlock and I tested BioCurcumax, or BCM-95. Allegedly a more bioavailable form of curcumin. Well, it didn’t work for us. See my March 18 2008 post. My markers have not recovered since then. Bummer. I had high hopes for BCM-95. From now on I will stick to C3 Complex. Period.
See link for comments:
https://margaret.healthblogs.org/life-with-myeloma/discovery-of-curcumin/my-curcumin-protocol/


- - - - - - - - - - - - 




CURCUMIN BRANDS/SOURCES in the U.S. and Europe

September 24 2007 post. Yesterday I received a blog comment that turned out to be the straw that broke the camel’s back. In a good sense! Until then, I had rather stubbornly decided not to recommend or even list any curcumin brands or sources on my blog, but I realize that this type of information might be useful to those thinking of taking curcumin but with no idea where to buy it (so many websites sell it now, and it’s hard to separate reliable from unreliable ). So I have changed my mind. Of course, let me state first and foremost that I have no financial or other type of interest in any of the brands or sources that I will be listing below. Okay, with that out of the way, here goes.
Curcumin brands and sources in the U.S.A.: capsules
1. Please go see Don’s excellent list: http://tinyurl.com/34byoj. He does us the huge favour of comparing costs (per capsule, even). The only addition that I would make is that Doctor’s Best can be bought a bit more cheaply at Vitacost, which is where I generally order most of my supplements. Okay, I take that back, the price has recently gone up to $ 14.74. Still, a few cents cheaper. As we say in Italy, tutto fa brodo, which literally means everything makes broth, but is properly translated as it’s all grist to the mill, hey, even just a few cents. 😉 Ok, seriously, now. Don has also posted a lot of good information about curcumin, and, in particular, I would suggest a read of his post on curcumin and nanotechnology: http://tinyurl.com/3as7we Of the brands listed by Don, I have taken NSI and Doctor’s Best. I had fewer stomach gurglings with the former, but of course that doesn’t mean it is better or worse. I know that Don mixes and matches his capsules a bit, which I think is a good idea, especially in order to avoid taking too much bioperine. I read that too much black pepper is not good for us in the long run (I have posted about this), so please remember not to add black pepper to your food if you are taking eight grams of curcumin WITH bioperine.
2. There is also another source for capsules (and perhaps even powder, but that is a question you would have to ask the company) at: http://www.turmeric-curcumin.com/ I have never personally ordered from them, so I cannot say much except that their curcumin does not contain bioperine and is not the C3 Complex curcumin by Sabinsa. Just another option. Ah, if you scroll down their homepage, you will also find up-to-date news about curcumin, which can be very useful.
3. November 10 2007 UPDATE, taken from my September 15 post: Life Extension Foundation sells a product called Super Bio-Curcumin”: http://tinyurl.com/2aarkp Here is an excerpt from the LEF web page: The 100% natural curcuminoids complex in Super Bio-Curcumin ® is a patent-pending synergistic blend of curcuminoids and sesquiterpenoids with enhanced bioavailability and sustained retention time in the body confirmed by human clinical studies. Super Bio-Curcumin ® is a next generation’ in delivery of curcumin compounds that no longer requires high doses of curcumin to reach sustainable levels of curcumin in the blood plasma. Each 400 mg capsule of Super Bio-Curcumin ® is equivalent to 2772 mg of a typical 95% curcumin extract. This product is actually BioCurcumax, which you can read about in my “Bioavailability Page.” Interesting. Hope it works! Update: it made my MM markers WORSE. Too bad!
Curcumin Powder
There are (still) two main U.S. sources for curcumin powder, as far as I know.
1. UPDATE November 26 2008: a blog reader (thank you!) informed me that my very first supplier of curcumin, a company called Supplemental Health Formulations, or SHF, has apparently disappeared. I will leave its name on my blog, in case the company reappears some day, but he’s right, the website is gone, so I am getting rid of the link. Too bad. My blog reader orders his curcumin powder from Pure Bulk: http://purebulk.com/curcumin-95-turmeric-pe-c-96.html. He says that Pure Bulk provides “good service and cheap shipping.” It’s 95%, so that is good. But it’s not the C3 Complex curcumin. This company does not ship to Italy.
2. You can buy the C3 Complex used in the MD Anderson clinical trial directly from Sabinsa, apparently. The cost is $ 73.00 per kilo, plus shipping costs. I took this information from an e-mail exchange I had in January of 2007 with Kavita Subramanian who at that time was the Senior Manager, International Business, for Sabinsa Corporation, 70 Ethel Road West, Unit 6, Piscataway, NJ 08854. Please contact her for more information (UPDATE: this info is not recent, so please take with a grain of salt). I should add that I have never ordered directly from Sabinsa U.S.A., but I have ordered from their Italian distributor, see below.
Curcumin brands and sources in Europe: capsules
U.K.: a couple of blog readers (thank you!) sent me their source for Doctor’s Best: http://tinyurl.com/yto9uh
Italy: capsules and powder can be ordered from the Italian distributor of Sabinsa, Sochim International. This is the Sochim homepage: http://www.sochim.it/ Their catalogue can be downloaded in English and in Italian. Sochim does not sell to private citizens, so you must order curcumin (capsules or powder) through your pharmacy or herbal store or whatnot. I have ordered both C3 Complex curcumin capsules and powder (both sans bioperine) from Sochim through my friendly pharmacist here in Florence. A slight drag, but it works.
UPDATE November 2008. A wonderful friendly helpful and knowledgeable pharmacist who will ship anywhere over Italy is Dr. Balducci, whose pharmacy is in Calenzano, near Florence. Here are the details: Farmacia Balducci, via Giuseppe Giusti, 15, Calenzano (FI) 50041, tel: 055 8824687 or 055 8879004. He has a galenic lab, too, which is very useful. Curcumin capsules with or without bioperine and curcumin powder are available here. It is the C3 Complex type, which he gets directly from Sochim.
There is also a French company called Anastore (the website may be viewed in four languages) that uses the C3 Complex curcumin: http://www.anastore.com/ I placed my first curcumin capsule order with Anastore, as a matter of fact. Prompt and free delivery. But it got to be a bit expensive because at the time they were making only a 400 mg capsule. Now I see that they make a 500 mg capsule. Much better. However, if I have done the math correctly (always double-check me, I am not good at all with numbers!), even the 3+1 offer would last only 15 days on eight grams a day. Not very long. Anastore is also my source for black cumin oil capsules, by the way.
UPDATE, October 2008: an Italian pharmaceutical company called “Steve Jones,” based in Prato, near Florence, has developed curcumin capsules, the C3 Complex kind, with bioperine and a bit of selenium. The product is called TAMIL, and it can be found at, or ordered from, any pharmacy in Italy. For more info, see: http://www.stevejones.it/index.php?id=136,525,0,0,1,0
Curcumin powder
I have ordered the C3 Complex powder from the Italian Sochim Int., see details above.
There is a Spanish distributor for Sabinsa, Goerlich Pharma Espana, S.L., but I don’t know if they sell curcumin to individuals, although I see that they do list the C3 Complex powder here: http://tinyurl.com/ytn2ng. The website also lists contact numbers, etc.
Sabinsa Europe is based in Germany, see contact information here: http://tinyurl.com/yq8m8t. Again, no idea if they sell to individuals. The only way to find out is to contact them directly.
I will make an effort to find other sources in Europe, which I fear won’t be easy until curcumin becomes a common household word. Of course, Sabinsa’s homepage lists their branches throughout the world. Easy.
Have I missed anything? Probably. As always, I welcome suggestions and comments. Thank you!
UPDATES (2007). A blog reader wrote: “I buy my curcumin powder (Turmeric Extract) from Tattva’s Herbs based in Seattle, WA. Their website is www.tattvasherbs.com. Phone: 877-828-8824. Their curcumin is Curcumin C3 Complex from Sabinsa. They also have it in capsules. A jar of 200 grams is $67.95. However, those in the healthfield can purchase it at wholesale price. I do not think it is so hard to get it at wholesale,though. A cancer clinic in Seattle gets its curcumin from this company.”
Another blog reader (from Germany) got in touch with Sabinsa Europe, and was told that one of their customers is a chemist (who makes curcumin capsules with the C3 Complex curcumin) in Koblenz, as follows: Schloss Apotheke, Schlossstr. 17, 56068 Koblenz, 0261/18439, 0261/12449; http://www.schloss-apotheke-koblenz.de He also discovered a website that sells the NOW curcumin: http://tinyurl.com/35cvpl

35 Comments

  1. dear Margaret,
    I am Marjo Go and live in Holland. nearly 6 years ago I got the diagnose Multiply myoloma but after a while they told me it is mgus (1.9. I am at the university hospital (heamatology)in Amsterdam. My mother had a test at her 70th for osteoporose and they told her that bones where very tranparant. So four years ago I ask to have a DEXA scan they told me that it was ok. 2 months ago a asked for another dexa scan and now i am diagnosed osteoporose and they gave me pills fosamax and calcium and vit. D2.with a substance aspartaam. I do not like aspertaam so I looked for an other possibility bio calcium and D3 and K1. Today it is the first time I came on your site. It is not easy to understand all in one time reading. But I have a question (probably in future more) who can help me with curcumin powder how do I know how much is good for me. and on the of the page stands a lot of myeloma’s (L or smm etc) How will I get to know what I have?? what questions could I ask my specialist to know which one? I hope to hear something from you. Thank you for reading this.
    with kind regards and love,
    marjo go (from holland)
  2. Margaret, would you be so kind as to send me Kavita Subramanian’s email? I would like to check on the availability and current pricing of Sabinsa’s C3 curcumin.
    Thank you for sharing your journey. Even though I don’t have MM, I still find it to be an incredible informational resource.
  3. Margaret,
    I have been diagnosed with MGUS. First was told it was myeloma, and now, to my great relief, it has been downgraded to MGUS. 8% Plasma cells and the compression fracture that started all this appears not to be a lytic lesion. However . . . with osteopenia and MGUS I am VERY interested in curcumin.
    Thank you for this amazing blog, by the way, I keep returning here to learn as much as I can take it . . . in between trying to pretend none of this is happening 🙂
    Anyway, I have found a new one in the Doctor’s Best line called”Doctor’s Best, Meriva, Phytosome Curcumins, 500 mg, 60 Veggie Caps .” (I’m loving the veggie caps as I’m a vegetarian.)
    Have you any information on this? I would appreciate any comments.
    I found it on the iHerb.com site which by the way has some good prices, and if you use the coupon code BET844 you can get $5.00 off your first order.
  4. Hi Margaret,
    Thanks for your blog. It is a useful source of information. I came accross your blog and started giving cucurmin to my mom who has ovarian cancer. She is in india I was wondering if sabinsa has distributors for cucurmin in india. Can you share with me the contact information of sabinsa corp. My mom is having chemotheraphy also so wanted to if it is advisable to take cucurmin with it. Can you share email of Dr. Aggarwal also with me?
    I will appreciate your reply
    Thanks,
    Sachin
  5. I want to try using turmeric. So far all I have found in capsule form in Australia is caps containing 500mgs. These work out at about $1 a capsule meaning it would cost $16/day to reach the recomended 8gms. I am not sure I can afford it. How do I work out the dose by just using bulk powder which I can get very inexpensively., HELP PLEASE
  6. hi, I just realised that Doctors Best Curcumin C3 Complex with BioPerine – 120 x 1000mg became more expensive. from 33,07 pound in july, now I paid 44.95 for an item. I always ordered it from UK (bodykind.com) living in italy and having problems with italian customs if I ordered from USA. but still
    spending 3,5 euro a day is not so expensive…
  7. Hi Michael
    I also live in Australia and have found that curcumin is really expensive. I order mine from the USA, it does take about two weeks to arrive but at least it is far cheaper. I get it through Ageless Cures on the website. Hope this helps the cost is around 32.00 USD for 150 500mg capsules. This is the C3 COmplex with Bioperine,
  8. Margarete,
    Just starting reading your blog. What a wonderful resource – thanks so much! I started taking turmeric for 2 reasons: ulcerative colitis and thyroid cancer that was successfully removed with minimal consequences. I never gave much thought to the actual dose i consume. I wonder if you could help me to evaluate the following:
    Organic India Turmeric Formula: each capsule contains
    370mg organic turmeric rhizome
    80mg turmeric extract 95% curcummoids
    50mg organic ginger rhizome
    Does it mean that there is 450mg curcumin per cap? I am totally confused! I’d be very happy and grateful to hear from you. Thanks in advance!
  9. I get my c3 complex with Bioperine from Vitacost.com in the US. $23.99 for 1160mg 120 caps. I take ten caps a day. I have 70% plasma cells, free light chain count 2,500 (normal is 30-50) Holding steady since first diagnosed last January wheb I started curcumin regime. Haven’t told my sceptic doctor I’m taking curcumin – he’s puzzled that I’m so stable!! Now down to six-weekly visits from previous four-weekly. No symptoms wharsoever except get tired easily – but I am 77!. Maye there really is something to this curcumin! If so, all thanks to Saint Margaret.
  10. Re above, I should say that I live in the UK. My Vitacost packages take about 20 days to arrive (postage and packing only $7) and to date I have incurred no import duty or customs charge.
  11. Hi John
    Its wonderful that you have been stable since diagnosis. I also get my curcumin from Vitacost, I live in Australia, it has kept me stable for a year now, good on Curcumin, would be nice to hear from others whom it has kept stable as well. Good luck for the future and hope you stay well.
  12. Hello Libby,
    Yes, nice to be stable but I wonder if a slightly higher dosage might actually roll back those plasma cells through apoptosis. I’m on 11gr daily, more than Margaret’s absolute limit of 8gr, but I reason that I’m almost certainly a good deal heavier (bigger) than her so it’s probably much the same dosage, gram for kilo weight. Maybe I’ll try 15 grams for a while – there have been no studies I know of setting any upper limit, just one concluding 10gm was ok.
  13. My wife and I are simply using the spice turmeric mixed with black pepper, taken with fish oil. I assume we are not getting the same benefits as from the brands listed, but what are the major differences between the spice and what is listed? We take about 3.5 grams per day orally, and both do the atomic bomb or all at once protocol.
    Thanks this is an excellent source of information.
  14. Colvan
    I’d just get the Doctor’s Best or Vitacost brand that Margaret uses. They were shown to be what they say they are. Then add a supplement of Bromelain if you think it will help.
  15. Colvan
    I forgot to mention to get a high GDU value for the bromelain. The biomor has 2600. Some low value GDU products cost as much or more than a good high GDU product.
  16. I haven’t been able to get the Dr’s Best 500 mg with Bioperene. The only one I see is the Meriva one…do you think they are discontinuing it?
  17. Margaret,
    I know you have much of the information on Curcumin products and I was wondering if you have looked into Longvida™ Curcumin? Would you be so kind to share any information you might have? Thank you.
    Nora Brock
  18. Another source of Doctor’s Best Curcumin C3 Complex® with BioPerine® 500mg is Netrition.com. They will ship almost anywhere in the world, unless prohibited.
    Vitacost has been out of stock recently.
  19. Diane: Thanks for the inks on the curcumin. My wife has MM and her Indian oncologist called her aside one day and said to take as much as she can! Sure beats chemo at $7000 per dose.
  20. Wow! Glad to help.
    Be sure to change the location of the search to match your locale. I noticed after posting that the results were for my area.
    I wish you both well.
  21. Hi Margaret n the rest..I begun reading about curcumin quite a while back as I had no serious ailments to compel me to take prescriptions. Nevertheless I was introduced to curcumin by my neighbor whose sister has cancer. And this curcumin is purely curcumin serum which is soluble in liquid and was said to be bioavailable. Recommended daily dosage was like 250mg added to drinking water. The first nite’s sleep was the best in years but after 1 week of consuming it, my body experienced some healing crisis, and shoulder and hips went achy. But it lasted for abt 5 days but after that period my body has been wonderful.
    I’ll update soonest…
  22. I bought five pounds of curcumin when visiting the Sechelles Islands off NE coast of Africa. I thought it was safrin when I bought it and was really bumbed out when I found it was curcumin. However, I have been eating it in soups, stews, and with boiled rice and honey and pepper. Its an awesome digestive tract food therapy. I have had no stomach, bowel, problems since eating this stuff. However, I am about to run out and am wondering where I can get more in the quantity I have enjoyed. I don’t want to buy it in capsules since I use it to cook with. Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks!
  23. Upon closer examination, I believe they are selling Turmeric powder.
    Another site from is selling 5KG of 95% curcumin for $2610.00 plus shipping.
    Wow!
    Perhaps you have an acquaintance in the Seychelles who could help you obtain more?
  24. Hello Margaret, in europe where do you buy your curcumin powder from? I’ve been looking for a better source as 8 pills is a lot to swallow.
  25. Peter – I’m in Europe but I buy my curcumin from Vitacost in the US. Much cheaper. Comes within a couple of weeks and I’ve not paid any customs duty yet (in two years, seven shipments). Shipping only a few dollars. I take 17 capsules a day – seven of them curcumin. You get used to it. I’ve been stable for a year now – my consultant doesn’t wanr to believe it’s curcumin doing the trick. Maybe it’s not but he gave me a 55% chance of living only one year, two years ago. I haven’t taken any officially prescribed medicine in all that time, not even one paracetamol tablet. So, go for it!
  26. Dear Margaret,
    I have read about what you have done to keep your SMM in check and getting better with Curcumin protocol. My question relates to using both your protocol and TABs protocol. Would this be too disruptive to my system? I have just been identified SMM and am 74. I have read that my statistics donot look good for survival rate. I am determined to fight and not just “wait and see”. I need all the help I can get to arrest this disease and gain some time for life. I would appreciate any help you could give me.
    Thanks, Deanna
  27. I’ve been using the BIOMOR product for about 6 months. Seems to be working OK for me. (Preventative maintainence only) although a little while back got a bit rin-down and had a number of boils appear. Uped my daily dose and opened a cap and make a paste and applied topically. Cleared then up in about 4-5 days. Stings a bit but really cleaned them up. Live in Australia….postage from US hurts…hurts bad
  28. I have been taking a product called Curcumall for 1,5 years. It is produced in Israel (http://www.curcumol4u.com/index.php), and comes in a liquid form.
    It is a very effective anti-inflammatory. My pains have been reduced significantly and my hemoglobin has been stable. I decided to take it because they state that in this liquid form the absorptio of curcumin is higher than in its original form.
    Has anybody elese tried this product and would like to share their experience here?
  29. Margaret’s corner.
    Dear Margaret.
    Thank you for this very important information.
    Erik Venderby, Denmark
https://margaret.healthblogs.org/life-with-myeloma/what-is-curcumin/curcumin-brandssources-in-the-us-and-europe-powder-and-capsules/


- - - - - - - - - - 



C-reactive protein levels


September 17 2007 post (scroll down for most recent entries). Last week a multiple myeloma listserv member posted a ScienceDaily article that initially puzzled me. The article (http://tinyurl.com/2k3acf) begins: Scientists report that a protein best known as a common marker of inflammation plays a key role in the progression of human cancer. The research, published by Cell Press in the September issue of the journal Cancer Cell, implicates C-reactive protein (CRP) as a potential target for cancer treatment. Well, that didn’t seem like breaking news to me. One of my regular blood tests measures my serum levels of CRP, and I know that it’s a myeloma marker. But then I read the showstopper: These results provide strong evidence that CRP is not just a marker for MM but is a critical regulator of myeloma cell survival.
Not good.
Reading on, this protein protects myeloma cells from the effects of chemotherapy and also enhances their production of IL-6 (an evil cytokine that protects myeloma cells from dying). So CRP and IL-6 work together to keep myeloma cells alive, in a sort of vicious circle. Also not good.
As I was reading this article and then the study abstract (http://tinyurl.com/2xop56), a question popped into my mind: are there any natural ways to decrease our CRP levels? The answer is YES. However, since this is a complex topic, both to understand and to investigate, and since my research has led me a bit astray (all over the place, actually!) given the overwhelming amount of information, I chose to post some of what I found out by degrees.
Let’s start with the C-reactive protein. What is it? In essence, it’s a protein produced by the liver and released into the bloodstream when there is an ongoing inflammatory process in the body. It is a non-specific marker for inflammation: an elevated CRP level indicates inflammation but won’t tell us where exactly it is located. So we might have high CRP levels due to a simple cold, arthritis or some type of infection.
The above-mentioned abstract reports that Elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) are present in many disease situations including malignancies and may contribute to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disorders. I didn’t know that an elevated CRP is a indicator also of cardiovascular problems, hypertension and other types of cancer (prostate, hepatocellular, e.g.) until I did research for this blog piece. Indeed, one interesting item that I came across is that people at risk of developing heart trouble or a stroke may, strangely enough, have normal LDL cholesterol levels but a high CRP. Quite an important recent discovery! Anyway, I double-checked my own CRP levels, which have never been above 9 mg/L (that is the normal range). The problem with this test, at least in Italy, is that it doesn’t quantify CRP. It simply reports that I have less than 9 mg of this protein in my blood. I prefer to have precise figures, so this test does not satisfy me at all. Besides, I noticed that in 2005 I had .5 mg, so at one point it WAS an actual number. Puzzling.
So we go back to the question of how to reduce CRP levels by natural means. I will give one example before stopping for the day (I have to get ready for my classes tomorrow). I found a couple of recent studies showing that one way to reduce CRP levels may be to increase our daily fiber intake. 
See: http://tinyurl.com/23hd2p and http://tinyurl.com/3xldst. That’s it for today!
November 10 2007 post: 
I recently read a study with a very long title, The anti-inflammatory flavones quercetin and kaempferol cause inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2 and C-reactive protein, and down-regulation of the nuclear factor kappaB pathway in Chang Liver cells (!), published in the European Journal of Pharmacology in February of 2007. The abstract can be seen here: http://tinyurl.com/26yy5q I was able to read the full study thanks to a friend (grazie, Sherlock!). As usual, I would be more than happy to forward the study upon request.
First, what are Chang liver cells? The online Dictionary of Cell and Molecular Biology tells us that these liver cells are derived from non-malignant human tissue. Now, I don’t want to get involved in a detailed explanation concerning inducible nitric oxide synthase, or iNOS, which is beyond my purpose here, anyway (phew!!!). Let it suffice to say that iNOS is linked to inflammation, and anything that inhibits it is good news. We already know about COX-2 (see my Ellagic Acid and Natural COX-2 Inhibitors Pages for more info) and CRP, and of course the ubiquitous NF-kappaB. Ah yes, and kaempferol is a natural flavonoid found in tea, broccoli, grapefruit and other plant sources. On with the study, then.

On page 222 we read that C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute phase protein produced by hepatocytes whose serum elevation is considered as indicator of chronic inflammation and whose interaction with endothelial cells may be the mechanistic link between CRP and atherosclerosis [ ]. It is known that IL-6 induces CRP through a mechanism involving NF-kappaB [ ], but no study has until now documented potential effects of flavonoids on CRP expression in liver cells. Hepatocytes, by the way, are liver cells (for the more scientifically-minded, epithelial cells found in the liver that, among other things, have the function of helping to detoxify our blood).

Both quercetin and kaempferol reduce iNOS and COX-2: The present study indicates that both flavones reduce iNOS protein level in activated Chang Liver cells and that kaempferol was a slightly more potent inhibitor at low concentrations. COX-2 protein level was also reduced [ ] And, most importantly for our purpose, i.e., identifying substances that reduce CRP levels naturally: Our data show that both quercetin and kaempferol significantly reduce CRP protein level in liver cells and that this inhibition is concentration-dependent [ ]. SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE? Well, I have been putting quercetin powder in my curcumin/chocolate mixture for other reasons (see my Bioavailability page for more information), but I am very pleased to discover that it may also be reducing my CRP levels.

The study ends: In summary, the present study indicates that the modulation of iNOS, COX-2 and CRP by quercetin or kaempferol may contribute to the anti-inflammatory effects of these two structurally similar flavonoids in the liver, via mechanisms likely to involve blockade of NF-kappaB activation. Sounds good to me!

March 30 2012 post:

I wanted to highlight something that I learned this morning from a blog reader who sent me the link to a study (full text available online) showing that low levels of magnesium might increase our C-reactive protein (= CRP) levels. Ooooh, that’s not good at all! Many myeloma patients take magnesium for leg cramps and neuropathy…but now there’s yet another reason to take it. See: http://goo.gl/jrcph 

Excerpt: Among the 70% of the population not taking supplements, magnesium intake below the RDA was significantly associated with a higher risk of having elevated CRP. The lower the magnesium intake, the higher was the likelihood of elevated CRP. ‘Nuff said.


- - - - - - - - - - 




Reishi/Ganoderma lucidum


July 30 2009 post. I found a verrry interesting item while reading “Jaymun’s Journey” (see: http://tinyurl.com/l5te4c Thanks, Dave! Incidentally, I am so thankful and happy that Jaymun is home now, what a relief!), which then led me to the following abstract: http://tinyurl.com/klxuvf Wowiezeewie!
In September, I will ask Sherlock if she can get me the full study…in the meantime, we will have to be content with what can be gleaned from the abstract, such as this glorious titbit: Ganoderma lucidum extract has a profound activity against leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma cells and may be a novel adjunctive therapy for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Profound effect??? That sounds super…but what is this stuff?
Well, ganoderma lucidum is a mushroom species…a fungus that has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for more than 4,000 years, making it one of the oldest mushrooms known to have been used in medicine, as we can read in its write-up in Wikipedia: http://tinyurl.com/n5szkn Perhaps many of you will recognize, as I did!, the Japanese word for this mushroom: Reishi. Ah yes. It seems to be another one of those fix-all-and-more remedies…it is used to treat conditions as diverse as rheumatism, heart problems, asthma, fatigue, psoriasis, high blood pressure, HIV and…cancer. And more…
I urge you to have a look at the above Wikipedia link. The “History” section is absolutely fascinating. For instance, the oldest book in oriental herbal medicine (2,000 years old!) states the following: “The taste is bitter, its energy neutral, it has no toxicity. It cures the accumulation of pathogenic factors in the chest. It is good for the Qi of the head, including mental activities… Long term consumption will lighten the body; you will never become old. It lengthens years.” Uhm…never become OLD?!!! Words escape me at the moment…
In Chinese, by the way, it is called “lingzhi,” which means “herb of spiritual potency” and my personal favourite: “mushroom of immortality.”
Wikipedia also provides suggestions on how to cook this mushroom as well as a list of scientific studies backing its rather impressive anti-this and anti-that properties. Can you tell that I am excited? There are also heaps of studies on the mushroom of immortality in PubMed…I have already found a reliable source and will buy some of the, er, immortal extract, even though I don’t have the time now to go through any of these studies (but what I have read is enough to convince me to give it a whirl…)…
Update. September 9 2009 post. On July 30th, I posted about Reishi, or Ganoderma lucidum, and its murderous effect on leukemic, lymphoma and MM cell lines. At the time, I had been able to read only the abstract.
Soon thereafter, a blog reader (thank you!) kindly let me know that the full study is available online: http://tinyurl.com/ljsbh7. Slight problem: my online copy (I hope this doesn’t happen to everyone!) comes to an abrupt halt at the end of page 7, which means that the final Discussion points are missing, as are the references. Very peculiar. As usual, though, Sherlock (grazieee!) came to the rescue by sending me the complete study, so I was able to fill in the missing bits.
Let’s see. Since the full study (or rather, most of it!) is online, I won’t make but a few comments. Reishi was tested against the above-mentioned cell lines together with other five herbs with known anti-cancer activities (see above link, the Discussion part, page 7) and was found to be the most active of all. It was especially effective against the blood cancer cell lines.
The following excerpt is from page 8, my mysteriously “missing” online page: Taken together, our study is the first to examine the effects of G. lucidum extract on a large panel of hematologic cell lines. Our results show that G. lucidum extract has activity against leukemia, lymphoma and myeloma cells and may be a novel adjunctive therapy for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Further research is planned to isolate the triterpenoid constituent of G. lucidum (ganoderic acid) and to examine its anti-cancer potential.
I bought a Reishi extract while in the U.S. this summer and plan to test it, on myself of course!, at some point this winter. Interesting times lie ahead…I hope!
- - - - - - - - - - 



My fall 2010 protocol

See October 18 2010 post. Some blog readers have recently asked me what my current protocol is. So, even though I have no earth-shattering update concerning my daily protocol, I decided to publish a post about it today…One of my super-organized blog readers asked me a series of questions, so the easiest thing to do is to answer them one by one…
Question: What is your current curcumin “ritual” (i.e., do you divide it into doses? do you combine it with bioperine or any other supplements or foods to help bioavailability? do you take it in pill form or as a powder? do you take it before, after or during meals?).
Answer: For a long time now, I have been taking one big dose about an hour before dinner (=16 capsules just of curcumin…). I make an exception if we are having a curry or another Indian dish for dinner: in that case, since I always use heaps of organic turmeric, I take all my capsules with dinner, hoping to increase their bioavailability. What type of curcumin? Well, I take either Doctor’s Best, the 500 mg capsules (which do not contain any silicon dioxide), or NSI, the Vitacost brand (ditto). Both contain bioperine (black pepper extract). By the way, I have eliminated pepper from my diet (not red pepper, of course), just to be cautious…too much pepper could be too much of a good thing!
Question: Please specify your current schedule of other supplements (specifying the exact dosages, the forms in which you take them and the time of day — including whether before, after or during meals).
Answer: right before I take my curcumin capsules, I take 2 grams of fish oil and 1.5 grams of quercetin, all in capsule form (i.e., not caplets or pills or gummy bears). I make sure that the fish oil is molecularly distilled/purified…This is the easy protocol that I have been following this summer, but I should mention that I soon plan to add ashwagandha for three-month cycles. I am a big fan of “less is more,” so I plan to be very careful…
Question: Are there any supplements that you started and then stopped taking due to side effects or other reasons?
Answer: Yes. Details:
-Parthenolide, or PTL (feverfew extract). I will probably never take any more PTL, even though it attacks leukemic stem cells, which is obviously fantastic. You see, I recently found out (see my October 6 2010 post) that it induces cellular protective responses that likely function to reduce its overall cytotoxicity in leukemic cells. That is not good at all, but it also might explain why my PTL experiment (May 2009) was such a failure…
-BCM-95 or Biocurcumax. Sherlock and I tested BCM-95 in 2008, and our myeloma markers worsened…a lot! So, until I am 1000% sure that there is a truly fabulous (backed up by solid proof etc.) new curcumin on the market, I will stick with C3 Complex curcumin, which has been tested in various clinical trials. Case closed.
-Resveratrol. The jury is still out. Back in 2008, I took one of the two best brands available on the market, but my results ended up being only so-so: some markers slightly improved (monoclonal component, total IgG, e.g.), and some got slightly worse (total protein, red and white cell counts, blood viscosity, e.g.). All in all, no dramatic changes, though. I should make the point that I tested resveratrol in the summer. Well, I don’t test anything during the summer anymore. It simply gets too hot here, and, based on what I have been told, I am afraid that my blood tests would not be entirely reliable, since the test tubes sit around in a hot lab for a certain amount of time…blablabla… Anyway, that is a reason I might try resveratrol again…
–Ganoderma lucidum or Reishi (the New Chapter brand). I began testing it last spring but had to stop taking it when we left for the UK (=so I still don’t know if it did any good or not…). Reason for stopping: I just couldn’t travel with too many supplements. Now that I am over my bout with bronchitis, though, I plan to test it again, taking the recommended daily dosage, no more. In order to avoid taking so many capsules at once, however, I will take it in the early afternoon whenever possible. I have a huge amount of faith in the anti-myeloma effects of Ganoderma lucidum, so it had better not let me down!
Side effects: no, I have never taken anything that has given me any trouble…not even when my experiments ended up being complete failures.
SUMMARY: Just before dinner (with the above-noted exception), every day, I take 8 grams of curcumin, 2 grams of fish oil and 1.5 grams of quercetin. To that I am soon going to add almost 1 gram of ashwagandha (also known as Indian ginseng) for three months. That is my basic protocol, to which I will add anything I plan to test for a couple of months or so. Next test: G. lucidum (=Reishi). Okay, I think I have answered all of my blog readers’ questions now. If I haven’t, though, or if you have any more, please feel free to ask…
Oh wait, another question that I frequently get asked is: “have you ever had any chemotherapy?” Well, this seems like a really good time to declare publicly that I have never had any chemotherapy or any other conventional treatments (=nothing stronger than antibiotics!).
I also do not have any CRAB symptoms and do not take bisphosphonates. Hmmm, what else? Ah yes, I do not take any multivitamins or, indeed, any individual vitamins, with the exception of vitamin D, which, as I have written countless times, I believe should be on the list of the routine testing/screening of all MGUS, SMM and MM patients (see my Page on myeloma and vitamin D). Every single one of us should have our vitamin D levels monitored. Indeed, all cancer patients should probably have their vitamin D levels tested! 
That’s it, folks!
Afterthought: I have also started drinking a cup of green tea almost every afternoon (if I have the time, that is)…

6 Comments

  1. Hello Margaret,
    I understand that you accept the idea of your friend, Sherlock : Atomic Bomb before the dinner. And I can also understand that you want to take Fish Oil together with Curcumin for better absorption and digestion. Once I read about it regarding to the olive oil.
    But why are you taking Quercetin with them? I mean, why not any other time of the day, why together?
    Isn’t it bad for the stomach and body? Is it really better that way for the absorption?
    I was always thinking of dividing natural supplements should be better instead of taking all of them once and together. It seemed more logical to me…?
    I will be very glad if you answer me.
  2. Margaret
    When I started taking Vit D 50,000 iu 1 a week for 12 weeks as recommeneded by a CAM dcotor. My Ca shot from 2.58 to 2.69 when I re-tested at the 7 week period.
    My myeloma doctor (separate from CAM) told me to IMMEDIATELY stop taking Vit D, and my Ca evels returned to 2.65 withint about 6 weeks, currently.
    My Vit D levels were normal before CAM put me on Vit D
  3. Hallo Magaret,
    Wat kost de curcumine in Italie?
    Misschien kan mijn dochter dan beter wat meenemen
    vanuit daar.
  4. Hello Margaret,
    I was diagnosed in June 2012 with Asymptomatic Myeloma and upon discovering your blog began taking Curcumin. I have been on a 6 grams/ daily regimen for about 5 months and have recently increased the daily dose to 7 grams daily using your once a day bomb theory along with 1.5 grams of quercetin and Cod Liver Oil. My numbers remain stable and I have none of the CRAB symtoms. I eat a healthy diet what I would describe as a Mediterranean diet. Are you still following the same Curcumin protocol? Also, I would be interested in knowing if you consume any alcool?
  5. Thank you, Margaret, for being here…for all of us!!! Questions; why the Quercetin and do you have any advice/thoughts on taking IP6 and Inositol.? Doing fish oil and almost up to 8 grams VitaBreeze Pure Turmeric Curcumin C3 Complex with BioPerine 750mg extra Strength. Thanks in advance for ANY advice.
  6. Hi Margaret,
    After four years of totally drug-free SMM, I’ve now been advised that I’ll need to start treatment within the next few months, due to bone lesions appearing for the first time and fairly significant increases in my M proteins although I continue to feel great.
    As an avid follower of your blog since I was diagnosed, I re-read your Fall 2010 protocol regarding ashwangandha and would like to know if you still recommend trying this? If so, any dosage recommendations.
    I’m hoping to buy enough time to get down to our cottage this summer for a couple of months before beginning treatment or,ideally,stave off drug treatment even longer. I am inclined to add ashwangandha to my neutraceutical protocol.
    Also, search as I might, I can’t seem to locate your current protocol. Can you kindly direct me to it?
    Would really appreciate hearing from you!
    Best Regards,
    Yolande
https://margaret.healthblogs.org/life-with-myeloma/discovery-of-curcumin/my-curcumin-protocol/my-fall-2010-protocol/


- - - - - - - - - -




Future myeloma treatments (February 2011)


February 9 2011 post. A MMA list member recently posted an item from the CancerCare bulletin titled “the latest in multiple myeloma research,” which lists a series of different conventional drugs and their anti-myeloma activity. I went down the list, did a wee bit of research and made a discovery…not a very startling one, come to think of it…but anyway, here goes:
  1. Monoclonal antibodies. Often compared to guided missiles, monoclonal antibodies zero in on cancer cells whose surfaces have a “target molecule.” For example, the combination of lenalidomide with a monoclonal antibody called elotuzumab holds promise in treating multiple myeloma that comes back after traditional treatments.
  2. Growth blockers. These drugs are designed to block the growth of myeloma cells by depriving them of substances they need, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). When tumor cells spread through the body, they release VEGF to create new blood vessels. These blood vessels supply oxygen, minerals, and other nutrients to feed the tumor.
  3. Proteasome inhibitors. Bortezomib was the first in its class of proteasome inhibitors. Another promising drug, called carfilzomib, appears to work the same way as bortezomib.
  4. Immunomodulators. A new form of the drug thalidomide is showing promise in people whose multiple myeloma has returned after previous treatment. Called pomalidomide (Actimid), this medication stops the growth of blood vessels that feed tumors. It also boosts the immune system and may kill cancer cells directly.
  5. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. This class of drugs works by killing cancer cells or stopping their growth. Two HDAC inhibitors, vorinostat (Zolinza) and panobinostat, have been combined with bortezomib. This combination has been shown to be effective in many people whose tumors resist treatment with bortezomib alone.
  6. Akt inhibitors. These drugs aim to disrupt cancer cell membranes and block the actions of proteins involved in cancer growth. An Akt inhibitor called perifosine holds promise as a treatment for multiple myeloma, when combined with bortezomib.
  7. Heat shock protein-90 (Hsp90) inhibitors. Heat shock proteins are key players in a number of processes that cancer cells use to survive and grow. Multiple myeloma cells contain more of a heat shock protein, called Hsp90, than normal cells. Two drugs—alvespimycin and tanespimycin—block the actions of Hsp90. Research suggests that combining these drugs with bortezomib may be more effective than treatment with bortezomib alone.
  8. mTOR inhibitors. This class of drugs blocks a mechanism called the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, which promotes tumor growth. Preliminary research suggests that combining lenalidomide with an mTOR inhibitor called everolimus (Afinitor) may stall the growth of multiple myeloma.
  9. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors. CDK inhibitors, such as the drug flavopiridol, block proteins that promote the growth of multiple myeloma cells.
  10. Telomerase inhibitors. One drug, known as imetelstat, blocks an important enzyme found to be active in myeloma cells. This enzyme allows cancer cells to resist chemotherapy.
  11. RANK ligand inhibitors. This new class of drugs works differently from other types of drugs that treat bone complications. They are designed to block a factor in bone development known as RANK ligand. RANK ligand stimulates cells that break bone down. By blocking RANK ligand, RANK ligand inhibitors may increase bone density and strength. Denosumab (Xgeva) is being tested in people with multiple myeloma for the treatment of bone complications. The FDA has recently approved denosumab to help prevent bone fractures and bone pain in non-myeloma patients whose cancer has spread (metastasized) and damaged the bone.
Now, with the exception of item #1 (=monoclonal antibodies), the myeloma targets mentioned in the remaining 10 items on this list are inhibited, all of them!!!!!, by something that many of us already take….a non-toxic something that inhibits VEGF, HDAC, mTOR, Akt, blablabla…all the way down to RANKL, the final item. Can you guess what the “something” might be?
And there is more.
Just this morning I read a newly published “Blood” abstract (yes, I am finally able to read an abstract without falling asleep…  ): http://goo.gl/MMFMp It mentions a new myeloma target (I think I’ve seen this one before, but I don’t have the energy to check right now…) called “glycogen synthetase kinase-3 beta” (GSK3beta).
Well, the above-mentioned, not-so-mysterious-after-all substance happens to inhibit GSK3beta, too. Have you guessed yet?
This is bloody ridiculous. And frustrating. I mean, how much more proof will we need to provide before our official myeloma organizations begin taking notice of non-toxic, anti-myeloma substances…substances that can target myeloma via multiple pathways, which is the only way a cure for myeloma will ever be found???
Let me give you this image: if you hit a tumor with only one missile, its chances of surviving the strike are high, very high indeed. But if you hit the tumor in different areas and with many different types of missiles, you stand a good chance of annihilating it…
It all boils down to plain common sense…
So I ask my question once again: how much more proof do we need in order for some money to be poured into non-toxic research? I am sick and tired of hearing about denosumab (see my posts on this topic) and conventional treatments that are really, or potentially, toxic…really sick and tired…
Basta, I say!!!
- - - - - - - - - -


Myeloma and curcumin links:

Curcumin And Multiple Myeloma: Preclinical And Early Clinical Studies Are Promising; Still Awaiting More Clinical Evidence






- - - - - - - - - - - - -


MOSTLY PERSONAL BLOGS OF MYELOMA PATIENTS OR THEIR CAREGIVERS