Pages

Showing posts with label Men's Health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Men's Health. Show all posts

Tuesday, 17 September 2019

Is soya bad for women's health?

Soy's isoflavones have oestrogenic properties — and have been blamed for raising the risk of breast cancer (as well as prostate cancer for men). But is this really the case?
Starting to consume soya products at an earlier age may make soya more beneficial

Consumed in many traditional Asian populations for millennia, soya has only been a common part of the Western diet for around 60 years. Now, many of our supermarkets are full of soy milk alternatives, soy burgers and other soya-based meat replacements – not to mention traditional soy-based products like tofu, tempeh, soya milk, miso and soya sauce.
In the meantime, soya has been linked to a lower risk of heart disease compared to other diets. As a good source of protein, unsaturated fatty acids, B vitamins, fibre, iron, calcium and zinc, it is becoming increasingly popular in the West as a healthy substitute for meat. But despite more people associating soya with health over the last decade, one fear has come to the fore: the idea that soya can disrupt our hormones.
The controversy around soya comes down to its uniquely high content of isoflavonesThese compounds have oestrogenic properties, which means they act like oestrogen, the primary female sex hormone, and bind to oestrogen receptors in the body – and oestrogen can fuel the growth of some types of breast cancer.
But while scientists have extensively researched the compound’s effects in the body over the last few decades, the answer about whether isoflavones themselves can contribute to cancer risk isn’t straightforward.
And often, it seems soya protects against cancer risk – rather than making it worse. But exactly why that is isn’t certain.
To start, there are the observational findings. High soya intake among women in Asian countries has been linked to their 30% lower risk of developing breast cancer compared to US women, who eat much less soya. (The average person’s intake of isoflavones in Japan, for example, is between 30 and 50mg, compared to less than 3mg in Europe and the US.)
High soya intake among women in Asian countries is linked to a lower breast cancer risk
High soya intake among women in Asian countries has been linked to their 30% lower risk of developing breast cancer (Credit: Getty Images)
 
Soya also has been correlated with reducing breast cancer’s severity. Fang Fang Zhang, associate professor at Tufts University in Massachusetts, carried out population research among 6,000 women with breast cancer living in the US and found a 21% reduction in mortality among those who consumed more soya
Population research among 6,000 women with breast cancer found a 21% reduction in mortality among those who consumed more soya
Its benefits were strongest in women with hormone-receptor-negative breast cancer, a more aggressive type of breast cancer where tumours lack oestrogen and progesterone receptors, and therefore doesn’t respond well to hormone therapies.
“Our findings suggest that, for women with hormone-receptor-negative breast cancer, soya food consumption may potentially have a beneficial effect to improve survival,” Zhang says.
Not soy easy
Even so, it’s difficult to conclusively isolate soya’s benefits – if there are any.
Soya is often consumed as part of a healthy diet and as a substitute for red meat, which is associated with a higher risk of heart disease and cancer.
Soya products often replace foods like red meat
Soya products often replace foods like red meat, which could be why soya intake is associated with healthier outcomes (Credit: Getty Images)
“No one has given people soya foods, then looked at whether they’re more or less likely to get breast cancer over time than those not given soya,” says Leena Hilakivi-Clarke, professor of oncology at Georgetown University School of Medicine in Washington DC.
One review of evidence into soya’s effect on breast cancer risk found that studies that adjusted for body mass index (BMI), a common marker of health, showed a weaker association for soya than those that didn’t.
This means a reduced risk of breast cancer could have been due to lower BMI, not to soya consumption.
If soya does lower breast cancer risk, it may be because its isoflavones can enhance apoptosis: a genetically programmed mechanism that tells cells to self-destruct when they get DNA damage they’re not able to repair. Without this process, damaged cells can form into cancer.
Do products like soya milk lower breast cancer risk?
If products like soya milk lower breast cancer risk, it may be by bolstering the mechanism that tells cells to self-destruct when they get DNA damage (Credit: Getty Images)
 
So where did the concern that soya causes cancer come from?
It’s true that soya has been found to fuel the growth cancer cells in lab research. In one experiment from 2001, mice with inhibited immune systems and with cancerous tumours were fed isoflavones. Their tumours were measured for 11 weeks. The researchers found that the isoflavones resulted in increased cell growth. The mice were then switched to an isoflavone-free diet – and their tumours regressed over the following nine weeks. Meanwhile, in a study from 1999, researchers implanted human breast cancer cells into mice, and some were fed isoflavones. They also found that dietary isoflavones enhance the growth of cancerous tumours.
But a more recent, 2010 review of more than 100 studies concluded that, overall, lab experiments have shown no significant increased risk of breast cancer.
One reason there isn’t a more definitive answer is because isoflavone either acts like oestrogen in the body, or its opposite
One reason there isn’t a more definitive answer is because isoflavone either acts like oestrogen in the body, or its opposite. When we eat soya, isoflavone either binds to the alpha oestrogen receptor in the body, which stimulates a tumour’s growth rate, or the beta receptor, which decreases growth rate and induces apoptosis.
Isoflavone prefers to bind to beta receptors, says Bruce Trock, professor of epidemiology and oncology at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Maryland in the US. That makes it more likely to reduce potential cancer risk.
The impact of soya on breast cancer risk may depend on when we start eating it.
Most studies on Asian populations included women who have eaten it since early childhood and were probably also exposed to it in the uterus, says Trock, compared to Western studies involving women who mostly didn’t eat soya until later in life. 
Starting to consume soya products at an earlier age may make soya more beneficial
Starting to consume soya products at an earlier age may make soya more beneficial (Credit: Getty Images)
 
“Giving soya to animals at the equivalent of middle age doesn’t seem to reduce risk or growth rate of tumours,” he says.
“But if researchers feed mice [soy] prior to puberty, then expose them to carcinogens, they get fewer and smaller tumours than if you don’t give them soya.”
Soya cycle
Meanwhile, clinical and population data shows daily soya intake can halve the frequency and severity of hot flashes even when the placebo affect is taken into consideration, says Mindy Kurzer, professor of nutrition at the University of Minnesota. (Taking oestrogen medication, on the other hand, brings hot flushes down by 75%.)
Some research has found that these benefits are largely determined by a woman’s ability to produce equol, a bacteria that around 30 to 50 percent of adults produce in their intestines after eating soy. One study found that giving equol supplements to menopausal women who don’t produce it themselves significantly lowered the incidence and severity of hot flushes.  
It could be that a person’s ability to produce equol, rather than the equol itself, is responsible for the benefits of soya. One paper argues that Chinese populations, for example, may be better able to digest and extract nutrients from soya because their ancestors have been eating it for thousands of years.
This could explain why research has found that, while people who move from Asian countries to the US have an increased risk of breast cancer by the second generation, their risk remains lower than Westerners even when they adopt a Western diet.
Soya intake could reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (Credit: Getty Images)
Soya intake could reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (Credit: Getty Images)
 
Early soya intake has also been found to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. In fact, population studies suggest isoflavone intake could be responsible for the different rates of cardiovascular disease between Asian and Western countries. This is because soya has been found to reduce levels of harmful low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in the blood, which is a risk for heart disease.
But may have nothing to do with soya, per se – it could simply be because diets higher in soya are lower in unhealthier foods.
“Soya foods are normally eaten in place of other higher saturated fat foods, such as fatty meat and full-fat dairy products,” says JoAnn Pinkerton, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at the University of Virginia Health System. “Whereas most soya foods are naturally low in saturated fat.” 
There are also concerns soya could be linked to prostate cancer. However, a review of evidence last year found that regular soya food intake was associated with an almost 30% reduction in risk of developing prostate cancer. Soya doesn’t affect testosterone levels in men, so how this happens isn’t yet known – except that a diet containing more soya is often healthier overall.
We maintain the current conclusion that soya is beneficial in preventing prostate cancer – Catherine Applegate
“Throughout the years and despite the constant emergence of new research that could contain potentially conflicting results, we maintain the current conclusion that soya is beneficial in preventing prostate cancer,” says the study’s author Catherine Applegate, a predoctoral fellow from  the University of Illinois's Tissue Microenvironment Training Program.
Unprocessed soya like edamame beans has higher isoflavone levels than processed versions
Unprocessed soya, like edamame beans, has higher isoflavone levels than processed versions, like soya milk (Credit: Getty Images)
 
Soya’s benefits also depend on the type we consume. Isoflavone content varies in unprocessed soybeans, such as edamame beans, compared to processed soya foods – and the closer the food is to the soyabean, the higher its isoflavone levels. Edamame has around 18mg of isoflavones per 100g, while soya milk has between 0.7 and 11mg.
“The only thing we can say is that women should be safe to consume soya foods in amounts consistent with Asian diet, including tofu, fermented soya foods and soymilk, but studies shown that the more soya is processed, the lower the level of isoflavones, which we think are protective elements,” says Trock.
Soya has been extensively researched over the last few decades. No single study has been perfect, and as with other nutritional research, findings often show correlation – they don’t prove causation.
Even so, the consensus clearly indicates health benefits from eating soya – even if that’s simply because it replaces unhealthier foods.

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20190816-is-soy-bad-for-womens-health

Wednesday, 26 June 2019

Be in bed before 10.30 if you want to have kids, men told following new study linking lack of sleep to poor fertility

Men should get to bed before 10.30pm to improve their chances of fathering children, scientists have said following a groundbreaking new study.The data showed that tho...

sleep
Between seven and a half and eight hours sleep is ideal, the study says


Men should get to bed before 10.30pm to improve their chances of fathering children, scientists have said following a groundbreaking new study.
The data showed that those tucked up early had nearly four times greater sperm quality compared to those who went to sleep at 11.30 or later.
Fertility experts said they believe a lack of sleep provokes the immune system into overreacting and attacking healthy sperm.
It also puts men under physical and psychological stress, which is thought to further damage their chances of conceiving.
The team at Aarhus University in The Netherlands said the findings are increasingly significant in the age of Netflix where people tend to binge-watch television late into the night.
They studied 104 men with an average age of 34 over a two-year period, tracking their sleep patterns and comparing them against the results of sperm sample analysis.
The figures showed that even the difference between getting to sleep before 10.30 and between 10.30 and 11.30 yielded a 2.75-times greater healthiness of sperm.
Presented at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology conference in Vienna, the study contributes to a growing shift in focus towards the impact of substandard sperm in couples’ infertility, a factor scientists now believe has been underestimated for years.
Professor Hans Jakob Ingerslev, who co-authored the study, said: “The reasons could be psychological as sleep-deprived men suffer more stress and that can have an impact on fertility.
“These were men who had been trying to have a baby for about two years and an early bedtime was likely to be important because it allowed them to get more sleep.”
As well as investigating the time at which aspiring fathers went to sleep, the team also assessed sleep duration against the health of the participants’ sperm.
They found that between seven and a half and eight hours sleep was ideal.
The sperm of men who slept this length appeared to be more than six times healthier than that of those who got less than seven hours.
However, no link was found between sperm health and sleeping for eight hours or longer.
Dr Christopher Barratt, professor of reproductive medicine at the University of Dundee, said: “If you don’t get enough sleep, that has an impact on the metabolism, which will have a negative effect on sperm quality.
He added: “It is pretty basic advice but a lack of sleep is closely tied to feeling stressed and stressed men are also less likely to have sex once a day, as we recommend when trying for a baby.”
The new research follows a recent study from Imperial College London, which discovered that the sperm of infertile men is every bit as healthy as that of fertile men while it is still in the testicles.
However, by the time it has travelled through a series of ducts and left the body it has become damaged, suggesting something toxic is happening along its path to the outside.
It is thought discovery offers new hope for men who struggle to become fathers even with the help of IVF.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/06/24/bed-1030-want-have-kids-men-told-following-new-study-linking/

Young men with 'Western diets' of pizza, chips and burgers 'have poorer quality sperm and drastically lower counts'

Young men who eat pizza, chips and burgers may end up with drastically lower sperm counts.

  • Researchers at Harvard studied almost 3,000 men who were aged 18 to 20
  • Those with a 'Western diet' had worse quality sperm than healthier eaters
  • Vegetarian men have higher sperm counts, as do those whose diets include fish 
A study of almost 3,000 men, aged only 18 to 20, found those with a 'Western diet', including processed meat, pizza, sugary drinks and snacks, have worse quality sperm than those who eat healthily.
Vegetarian men have higher sperm counts, as do those whose diets include fish and whole grains, making them more fertile.
Men's diets have worsened over the past few decades, coinciding with a fall in the average sperm count of almost 60 per cent, which some experts have warned could lead to the extinction of the human race.
A study of almost 3,000 men, aged only 18 to 20, found those with a 'Western diet', including processed meat, pizza, sugary drinks and snacks, have worse quality sperm than those who eat healthily, and some of the damage may be permanent
A study of almost 3,000 men, aged only 18 to 20, found those with a 'Western diet', including processed meat, pizza, sugary drinks and snacks, have worse quality sperm than those who eat healthily, and some of the damage may be permanent
When couples struggle to have a baby, in a third of cases it is because of problems with sperm, which some men could reverse by improving their lifestyle.
Researchers led by scientists from the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health compared the sperm counts of healthy young men eating western diets with those who were vegetarian and those who ate a 'prudent' diet high in fish, chicken and vegetables or a traditional Scandinavian diet including whole grains and dairy.
Men with a highly western diet produced 25.6 million fewer sperm than men whose diet was least like this.
A normal sperm count contains 39 million or more sperm, according to the World Health Organisation.
Dr Jorge Chavarro, who led the study from Harvard, said: 'We are seeing lower sperm counts and a few men fall below the WHO lower reference limits. This is the largest study to have found this in young men.
'You would be surprised to see how sensitive young men are to things that might affect sperm count, because it's a perceived measure of masculinity.'

WHAT CLASSES AS A LOW SPERM COUNT? 

A low sperm count, known medically as oligozoospermia, occurs when a man has fewer than 15million sperm per millilitre of semen.
The NHS warns a low count makes it harder to conceive naturally.  
Problems with sperm, including a low sperm count and problems with sperm quality, are quite common, it adds on its website. 
'They're a factor in around one in three couples who are struggling to get pregnant,' the NHS advice reads.
Problems with sperm quality and quantity can be linked with: 
  • Hormone imbalances
  • Genetic problems
  • Having had undescended testicles as a baby
  • Genital infections 
  • Previous surgery to the testicles or hernia repairs 
  • Excessive alcohol consumption
  • Smoking and using drugs
  • Certain medications
Commenting on the findings, Allan Pacey, professor of andrology at the University of Sheffield, said: 'This just shows the power of diet to the way that testicles function.
'It's almost certain that this is down to an effect that those with the better diets are taking more antioxidants.
'With pizza, chips and red meat we know that the antioxidant stress goes up and that is bad for sperm.'
The findings, presented at the annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), come from 2,935 men who took a compulsory medical exam to determine their fitness for military service.
Their diet was examined to see how 'western' it was, including foods such as pizza, chips, processed and red meat, snacks, sugary drinks and sweets.
Men with the most western diets had the lowest sperm counts.
The best counts were seen in those following a highly 'prudent' diet, including fish, chicken, vegetables, fruit and water.
They had an average of 42.8 million more sperm than the men who followed this diet least.
The next best diet for sperm count was a vegetarian diet followed by the Scandinavian one. 
Most previous research on diet and fertility has focused on older couples trying to get pregnant, rather than showing effects on the sperm of healthy young men.
Professor Pacey said: 'The fact you are seeing a group of young men who aren't trying to conceive is quite powerful.
'The concern would be, is it that poor diet younger in life will make a change that sticks with you?'  
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-7175203/Young-men-Western-diets-poorer-quality-sperm-drastically-lower-counts.html

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

Men who eat two portions of yoghurt are less likely to develop bowel cancer, major study finds

Men who have two portions of yoghurt a week could cut the risk of precancerous growths by a fifth, a study suggests.
A bowl of yoghurt and fruitScientists said that two bacteria commonly found in live yogurt, may lower the number of cancer causing chemicals in the gut
 CREDIT: GETTY
Research by the University of Washington found those eating plenty of it had a significantly lower chance of developing adenoma which can lead to bowel cancer.
The study, published in Gut, which tracked more than 32,000 men for 25 years, found that those consuming at least two portions of yoghurt a week had 19 per cent fewer growths - and 26 per cent fewer of the most high-risk type.
The study was observational, and could not demonstrate why the foodstuff might have such an impact.
But scientists said that Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus, two bacteria commonly found in live yogurt, may lower the number of cancer causing chemicals in the gut.
The anti-inflammatory properties might also reduce gut leakiness, which could also protect against disease, they said. The study tracked a total of 32,606 men and 55,743 women, all of whom had a lower bowel endoscopy, which enables medics to view the inside of their gut.
Every four years they provided detailed information on lifestyle and diet - including how much yoghurt they ate. During the study period, 5,811 pre-cancerous growths developed in the men, and 8,116 in the women.
While men who ate yoghurt had a far lower risk of developing the growths, called adenoma, no association was seen in women.
Katie Patrick, health information officer, from Cancer Research UK, said: “The colon is home to trillions of microbes and how the bacteria in our gut might affect bowel cancer risk is a fascinating area of research. Lots of things affect the types of bugs in our gut and our overall gut health, including the foods we eat.
“But men don’t need to fill their shopping trolleys with yoghurt because it’s too early to say from this study whether eating more yoghurt could reduce the risk of bowel cancer. However, there is good evidence that you can reduce your risk by eating more foods high in fibre, like wholegrain bread or brown rice, and cutting down on processed and red meat.”
Bowel cancer is the fourth most common cancer in the UK, with almost 42,000 diagnoses annually.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/06/18/men-eat-two-portions-yoghurt-less-likely-develop-bowel-cancer/

Thursday, 13 June 2019

Two hours a week spent outdoors in nature linked with better health

Spending just 2 hours a week in green spaces such as parks, woodlands and fields has been linked with people feeling healthier and happier.

 Adam Vaughan

13 June 2019

A lady enjoying a woodland
Getty
The health benefits of being out in nature have been well-documented and will seem common sense to many of us, but until now no one has quantified exactly how much time might be beneficial. The magic number emerged from analysis of a survey of 20,000 people in England, who reported how long they spent in natural environments in the past week, plus their health and well-being.
While individuals who spent less than 2 hours in nature were no more likely to report good health or well-being than those who spent no time there at all, those who spent more than 2 hours had consistently higher health and well-being levels.
“It’s not a huge amount of time. You can spread it over the course of a week or seem to get it in a single dose, it doesn’t really matter,” says Mathew White at the University of Exeter, UK. Moreover, the threshold is within reach for most people: the analysis found that the average person spent 94 minutes a week exposed to a natural environment.

Green is good

“We have long known that nature is good for physical and mental health and putting numbers on the critical ‘dose of nature’ which gives us the best health is a really important step forward,” says Rachel Stancliffe of the Centre for Sustainable Healthcare in Oxford, UK.
After 2 hours, the health benefits of being out in nature seem to give diminishing returns, with a cut-off after 5 hours. White says that could be explained by many of that group being dog walkers who are out in nature with little choice in the matter. The team controlled for the fact that the health benefits might be a byproduct of physical activity, not contact with nature.
The magnitude of health gains of 2 hours spent in nature appear to be significant, on a par with the health differences associated between living in a well-off area and a deprived one. They also seem to apply to everyone, regardless of age, gender, long term illness or disability. “You don’t have to be running around the park, just sitting on a bench will do,” says White.
Initial findings from an European Union project due to be published later this year suggests 2 hours is not just the magic number for the English, says White, but all Europeans.
Journal reference: Scientific ReportsDOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2206249-two-hours-a-week-spent-outdoors-in-nature-linked-with-better-health/