Pages

Showing posts with label Bill Henderson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill Henderson. Show all posts

Wednesday, 5 November 2014

Learn how to reverse 'Stage IV' cancer and live cancer free

Friday, October 31, 2014 by: Jonathan Landsman

This post is on Healthwise

cancer

(NaturalNews) The cut, poison and burn mentality of conventional oncology views cancer as an 'enemy' that must be destroyed. But, in order to live cancer free, holistically-minded physicians remind us that cancer (or any other chronic disease) is merely a symptom of the problem. In other words, to remove the threat of cancer - one must discover the underlying cause of its existence.

How to 'gently' remove a cancer tumor. 


On the next NaturalNews Talk Hour, we'll introduce you to the "Bill Henderson protocol" - which is a true "Stage IV" alternative cancer treatment, meaning it can give advanced cancer patients a much better chance of survival. If you or someone you know has cancer - don't miss this program, which will offer lifesaving information.

Shocking research: Mammography actually increases the risk of breast cancer


According to the World Health Organization, breast cancer 'is the most common cancer among women worldwide, claiming the lives of hundreds of thousands of women each year and affecting countries at all levels of modernization.' What's even more shocking is the continued promotion of mammograms - as a form of breast cancer "prevention", when it is ineffective and widely-known to increase the risk of developing cancer.

In 2011, a study published in the British Medical Journal, confirmed that conventional breast cancer screenings may actually cause more harm than good - especially during the early years - because women are subjected to unnecessary interventions like lumpectomies and mastectomies. Plus, let's not forget, the untold emotional stress (which can cause cancer) involved with false positive results.

In a 2009 Cochrane Database Systematic Review of breast cancer screening and mammography, the authors wrote:

"Screening led to 30 percent overdiagnosis and overtreatment, or an absolute risk increase of 0.5 percent. This means that for every 2000 women screened for 10 years, one will have her life prolonged, and 10 healthy women who would not have been diagnosed if they had not been screened, will be treated unnecessarily."


In addition, if you're a woman considering mammography, read what Dr. Samuel Epstein - one of the world's leading experts on cancer prevention - said:

"The premenopausal breast is highly sensitive to radiation, each 1 rad exposure increasing breast cancer risk by about 1 percent, with a cumulative 10 percent increased risk for each breast over a decade's screening."

So, instead of exposing yourself to harmful radiation exams, find a healthcare provider that will talk to you about nutrition; detoxification; emotional healing and the spiritual aspects of life. Remember, based on epigenetics, your thoughts and feeling have a direct influence over your biochemical terrain and the risk of getting cancer. To learn more - be sure to tune into the next NaturalNews Talk Hour.


What is the best weapon against cancer?


Obviously, it's a strong immune system. Yet, western medicine virtually ignores this fact by focusing all of its attention on surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. In truth, conventional cancer 'therapies' actually destroy immune function. Don't believe me?

According to the American Cancer Society:

"Some cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy may increase a person's risk of developing a different type of cancer later in life." I wonder how many conventional oncologists tell their patients about this fact.

If you're interested in treating cancer 'holistically' - I urge you to change your diet; take appropriate amounts of nutritional supplements - based on your personal situation; detoxify the body of harmful heavy metals, chemicals and pesticides; get your hormones in balance; exercise as much as your energy permits; reconnect with nature and improve your relationships with forgiveness and gratitude.

True healing is no easy task, but well worth the effort. Learn about natural ways to defeat cancer today.

This week's guest: Bill Henderson, cancer researcher, best-selling author and coach


Learn about the true cause of disease and how to reverse cancer naturally - Sun. Nov. 2


Bill Henderson is a health and wellness reporter and author of several books on alternative cancer therapies including "Cure Your Cancer" and his most recent, "Cancer Free: Your Guide to Gentle Non-Toxic Healing," co-authored by Carlos M. Garcia, MD.

Bill is a frequently invited guest on radio programs with natural health and wellness format, and a popular speaker at health symposiums and seminars. He is editor of "The Cancer Free Newsletter" and is the host of Web talk radio show "How to Live Cancer-Free." Also, he's served as a coach for thousands of cancer patients and their families, providing information and research findings about available, effective alternative therapies for those desiring to heal their bodies naturally.

You can REVERSE cancer. Bill Henderson invites you to learn more about how to stop disease without the need for toxic medications or risky surgical procedures. Learn about the real causes of cancer (and heart disease) plus literally hundreds of natural, non-toxic treatment options - without negative side effects.

Visit: http://www.naturalhealth365.com and enter your email address for show details + FREE gifts!

http://www.naturalnews.com/047464_mammography_breast_cancer_prevention.html


Go to Healthwise for more articles

Sunday, 23 June 2013

Mainstream medicine "discovers​" alternativ​e secret

23 June 2013

Newsletter #302
Lee Euler, Editor


    Alternative medicine has focused on the power of the immune system and immune-boosting treatments for years. Right here in this newsletter, we cover the many natural remedies known to strengthen the immune system—lactoferrin and colostrum come to mind as two of the most powerful, not to mention a whole slew of mushroom remedies.

    So it's hard to know whether to laugh or cry when we hear that mainstream medicine has discovered a powerful new tool for fighting cancer: the immune system. Hey, better late than never! At least they're now focusing their massive research budgets in the right direction. With luck, the new drugs they're developing could lead to a revolution in conventional cancer treatment.


In their quest to beat cancer, heavy-hitters like Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck & Co. are now focusing on experimental drugs that work with the human immune system (instead of against it, the way chemotherapy does). The results so far look very promising.

    Money is at the heart of it, of course, and investors are closely watching the progress of these drug tests. There's a chance we're going to see real results from these pharmaceutical treatments, and soon.

    At the very least, these new drugs may extend the length of time cancer patients stay in remission. And with luck they may add years to a patient's life — or even lead to an outright cure for some types of cancer. But research on that won't be available for another year.

    Equally exciting is that the new approach hints at a way to keep metastatic cancer under control for long periods of time, as opposed to jumping from one chemo drug to another as a tumor develops resistance. It turns out you don't need a succession of different chemo drugs to chase after shape-shifting cancer cells. You just need a strong immune system—exactly what cancer advocates like myself, Bill Henderson and Ty Bollinger have been saying for years.

    That's because immunotherapy drugs (or better yet, natural immune boosters) allow a patient's immune system to keep up with mutations in a tumor. Early results of the new drugs suggest that patients given as few as nine months to live could survive for several years.

    These new therapies could potentially bring in billions of dollars for the pharmaceutical companies promoting them. Really, it's the first innovative method for attacking cancer in a decade that's come out of Big Pharma. So much research in recent years has gone toward treating uncontrolled cell growth and genetic processes that little progress was made for treating advanced tumors.


They see dollars, and lots of 'em. . .
    Bristol-Myers is developing a new immune-boosting cancer drug candidate called nivolumab. If it works for lung cancer, as they hope, it could bring in sales close to the recent drug Avastin: $5.8 billion in sales just last year. Made by Roche, Avastin is used to fight colon cancer and other tumors.

    The concept behind drugs that strengthen the immune system is this: The immune system is able to respond to changes in the body's enemies. Get the immune system to adapt to fighting any dangerous malignancy, and you'll give mutating cancer cells a fair fight. The immune cells are able to change right along with the cancer cells. The new immunotherapy drugs target the immune system's T-cells, well known as our body's key defenders against germs and infections.

    T-cells have something akin to an off-switch, called PD-1. These new immune-boosting drugs essentially prevent this switch from ever going off. This makes it more likely for T-cells to recognize and attack invading tumors as dangerous. Prior to this, tumors were able to fly under the T-cell radar and weren't immediately recognized as a risk.

    But—and this is the most important point of all—many experts feel this new revolution in drug design will bring about a paradigm shift for fighting cancer. That is to say, it's a paradigm shift for mainstream medicine. Alternative therapies have focused on the immune system for decades.

    Merck's senior vice president Gary Gilliland stated immune therapy was the key to finally eradicating tumors. "We are pretty good at shrinking tumors," he said in an interview, "but not good at getting rid of them." This could be the key.
The results are astounding
    Bristol-Myers did something similar two years ago with a drug called Yervoy, tested on patients suffering from advanced, late-stage melanoma. Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer, and indeed one of the deadliest of all cancers.

    Yervoy doubled the number of patients surviving four years after their diagnosis to 19 percent. This success is what brought the idea of immunotherapy to light in conventional care. Now you might say immunotherapy has officially been accepted into mainstream medicine.

    A Merck drug, Lambrolizumab, shrank tumors in 38 percent of advanced melanoma patients, with even better results at the highest doses: a 52 percent tumor shrinkage.

    These immunotherapy drugs have shown such promising results early on that some doctors are speculating that patients with melanoma could be cured. Not just in remission — cured.

    Nivolumab, the drug in development by Bristol-Myers, is in final-stage trials for patients with lung cancer, kidney tumors, and melanoma. So far, nivolumab has been shown to shrink tumors for between 18 and 28 percent of patients who didn't respond to other treatments.

    And for 53 patients given a combination dose of nivolumab and Yervoy, 82 percent were alive after a year, which was a better rate than seen with Yervoy alone.

    The race is on for big drug companies to get their hands on a piece of this pie. Right now, at least six other companies are pursuing tests of immune therapy drugs for patients facing advanced cancer.

    Much is yet to be discovered, including side effects. Both Bristol-Myers and Merck drug tests showed potential inflammation of the lung as a side effect, among other complications.
Let's wait and see
    Isn't it nice that mainstream medicine has finally recognized the immune system as a reliable cancer-fighting strategy? And the field is quickly getting crowded. These PD-1-targeting, tumor-shrinking drugs aren't the only approaches to bolstering the immune system that are being studied right now. Amgen Inc. is testing an anti-cancer virus therapy. Because antibodies and viruses target the immune system in different ways, it's believed an anti-cancer virus approach may produce a synergistic effect when combined with other treatments like the ones being developed at Merck and Bristol-Myers.

    I think they're on to something. They do, too — Merck senior vice president Gary Gilliland told reporters they have their best people and best teams working on this angle for treatment.

    The thing to remember, at the heart of this, is the power of the human immune system. Stimulating it leads to great things. Personally, I'd rather stimulate it naturally, with supplements and dietary approaches that don't prompt dramatic, unknown side effect. Refer to our archives for information on the many ways you can boost your immune system naturally, using proven approaches such as chlorella and spirulina supplements, bovine colostrum, and even good old-fashioned exercise. There's so much material on this subject, it's hard to know where to begin, but I suggest you check out Issue #5, Issue #139, Issue #177, Issue #208 and Issue #220.

    Last week I covered one of the best foods you can eat to fight cancer (I eat it almost every day myself). If you missed the article, you can read it now below.
http://healthticket.blogspot.com/2013/06/can-one-tiny-seed-flaxseed-put-brakes.html

References

"Human Immune-Boosting Cancer Drugs Seen Extending Lives: Health." By Robert Langreth. The Washington Post, 13 May 2013.  http://washpost.bloomberg.com/Story?docId=1376-MMJLLE6S972O01-39S7ID84S63KC7FAO61215HTFJ

"Engineered molecules boost immune attack on cancer, researchers say." By Christopher Vaughan. 10 June 2013.  http://med.stanford.edu/ism/2013/june/sirp-0610.html

"New Cancer Treatments Boost Drug Firms." By Richard Davies, ABC News. 4 June 2013.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2013/06/new-cancer-treatments-boost-drug-firms/

"New medicine | Could immune-boosting drugs beat the deadliest form of skin cancer?" by Robert Langreth, Bloomberg News. Courier-Journal.com, 3 June 2013.
http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20130603/PRIME01/306030051/New-medicine-Could-immune-boosting-drugs-beat-deadliest-form-skin-cancer-


Source:  http://cancerdefeated.com/newsletters/Mainstream-Medicine-Discovers-What-Alternantive-Doctors-have-Known-for-Decades.html


Other articles on mushroom on Healthwise:

Wednesday, 29 May 2013

This cooking method increases cancer risk

29 May 2103

Newsletter #295
Lee Euler, Editor


   I thought I'd let you enjoy your Memorial Day cookout before springing this one on you.

    Grilled meat just might increase your cancer risk.

    So how great is the risk? Bad enough to compel you to give up this great American tradition? Read on to find out...


Are you serving cancer-causing foods from your grill?

    Research shows that cooking certain meats at high temperatures creates new chemicals that don't exist in uncooked meat. Some of them may increase your cancer risk. But take heart, there are ways you can reduce your risk.

Grilling creates two dangerous chemicals
    Two chemicals are synthesized when a piece of meat encounters fire: heterocyclic amines (HCAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

    HCAs form when muscle meats such as beef, pork, fowl, and fish are cooked at high temperatures. The high cooking temperatures cause amino acids (the building blocks of all protein) to react with creatin (a chemical in the muscle), thereby creating HCAs.

    Frying and broiling can also produce HCAs, but the charred edges of barbecued meat produce these chemicals in their purest and potentially most dangerous form.

    Researchers have identified 17 different HCAs1 linked to stomach, colon, liver and skin cancer — but only in animal studies.2 Though scientists think HCAs can directly damage your DNA and initiate cancer, they have not yet confirmed that HCAs cause cancer in people.

    That hasn't stopped the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from naming HCAs as a possible carcinogen. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has also studied HCAs.

    An NCI study from its Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics studied 176 people diagnosed with stomach cancer and 503 cancer-free people, assessing their diet and cooking habits.

    They found that those who ate medium-well or well-done beef had more than three times the risk of stomach cancer compared to those who ate it rare or medium-rare. In addition, those who ate beef four or more times a week doubled their risk of stomach cancer.

    Another study also found that those who eat the most barbecued red meat nearly doubled their risk of colon polyps3, compared with those who don't eat them. And as you probably know, colon polyps can develop into colon cancer.

    Other studies link colorectal, pancreatic, and breast cancer to high intake of well-done, fried, or barbequed meats.

    Just as an aside, cigarette smoke also contains HCAs.

    The second chemical, PAHs, form when meat juices drip onto coals or other hot surfaces and create smoke.4 In this case, it's the smoke that contains the carcinogen, which then settles on the surface of the meat. PAHs have been associated with an increased risk of breast and stomach cancer.
The 4 factors that influence HCA formation
    Four factors determine HCA formation in food, so you can influence the risk, short of totally giving up cooked meat. They are (1) temperature, (2) type of food, (3) cooking method, and (4) time.

    Temperature is the most important factor. Frying, broiling, and barbecuing create the most HCAs because the meats are cooked at high temperatures.

    Researchers found a stunning 3-fold increase in HCAs when the cooking temperature increased from 392 degrees to 482 degrees Fahrenheit. Oven roasting and baking use lower heat and therefore create lower levels of HCAs. Stewing, boiling, and poaching are done at or below 212 degrees F, and so produce negligible amounts of chemicals.

    Well-done (versus medium) meats also produce more HCAs, linked to both longer cooking times and usually higher temperature.

    HCAs are only found in muscle meats, whereas other protein sources (milk, eggs, cheese, and organ meats) contain very few HCAs whether uncooked or cooked.

    The NIH suggests partially cooking your meat in a microwave and then finishing it off on the grill. While that may reduce HCAs, I'm not sure I can recommend a microwave as a safe cooking method either. See my other suggestions coming up…
Put this into perspective
    Currently, no one knows for sure how many HCAs Americans eat, nor has a "safe" level been established. Scientists simply do not know at this time how many HCAs are needed for an increased cancer risk.

    But many feel that in the grand scheme of cancer prevention, there are much greater risks than grilling. Says Colleen Doyle, M.S., R.D., and director of Nutrition and Physical Activity for the American Cancer Society, "If you're 30 pounds overweight, that puts you at much greater risk for developing a number of cancers (than does eating grilled meats)."

    Incidentally, the other missing piece of information in all these studies is the quality of the meat in the first place.

    Nowhere in these studies do they discuss the dangers of conventional meats. For example, dangerous newly emerging antibiotic-resistant killer bacteria, E. coli and salmonella all "force" you to overcook your meat to offer some measure of protection… which isn't necessary with grass fed organic meats.

    Plus, grass-fed meat should always be cooked at lower temperatures… or it will become tough.
What do cancer experts do?
    I'm a realist. Rather than urging people to aim for perfection, I try to get them to change a few bad habits here and there. More than 200 million Americans enjoy outdoor cooking, and the typical household cooks outdoors at least 20 times throughout "the season".

    So I try to take into account what's going on in the real world. But in my view, 20 times a summer is too often. This should be a once-in-a-while treat.

    I'm not a frequent meat-eater — a couple of times a week at most, red meat once a week or less, grilled meat almost never (mostly when I'm a guest at someone's house). Quite aside from high-temperature cooking, there's other evidence that associates high meat consumption with cancer risk.

    Roasting and braising, not frying and grilling, are my favorite ways to cook meat. Once you've had a great braise, I don't know why you'd ever want to eat grilled meat.

    For the healthy individual, I think meat is okay as a treat once in a while, provided your other habits are good. Cooked properly, animal protein has enormous health benefits that are very hard to get from a pure vegetarian diet.

    If you're a cancer patient, most cancer advocates (the Gerson Institute and Bill Henderson, for example) say you should eat absolutely NO meat. It's not served at most of the alternative cancer clinics we've visited. These places are run by first-rate alternative and integrative doctors. I trust their judgment.

    On those rare occasions when you do indulge in grilled meat, take these steps. . .
13 tips for grilling without serving up cancer
    Fortunately there are many ways you can reduce your cancer risk while still enjoying this backyard summer tradition.
  • I suggest you always choose organic grass-fed meats for what they do contain, as well as for what they don't. Grass fed animals have much higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids, and a much healthier nutritional profile overall.

    Grass fed meat has much lower fat content than conventional meat. So conventional meat is much more likely to drip down and form PAH-laced smoke that settles on your meat. In addition, you may want to avoid it for other reasons — such as second hand consumption of fattening and grains (which are genetically modified, more than likely).
  • In any case, lower the cooking temperature on your grill. Get used to eating your meat medium-rare instead of well-done.
  • Use the leanest cuts you can find. Use thinner cuts, which cook more quickly. Be sure your meat is completely defrosted before cooking, to reduce cooking times.
  • Cut meat up into cubes, which cook more quickly. Enjoy them as kabobs.
  • Don't cook directly over coals. Use indirect cooking methods.
  • Keep the grill rack farther from the fire.
  • Flip filets before they become charred. Now recommended: flipping every minute or two, to prevent charring.
  • Keep your grill really clean! Scrape off charred residue every time you cook, so you don't transfer carcinogenic chemicals to your food the next time you use it.
  • Use marinades. Besides creating superb flavor, some studies show it also reduces carcinogens.

    The Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry says that marinating red meat for two hours significantly reduced HCAs.5,6,7. Beer, wine, lemon, and vinegar are thought to create an "invisible shield" that protects from the formation of HCAs and PAHs.

    A Kansas State University study found that rubbing rosemary onto meats before grilling cut HCA levels by up to 100 percent8 — apparently due to its high antioxidant levels. Do basil, mint, sage and oregano offer similar benefits? I don't know, but it's possible.

    However, sugary toppings like barbeque sauce tend to burn very easily and should be avoided.

    Important Note: Heat any extra marinade you intend to use as a sauce at least three minutes to kill bacteria it picked up from its contact with uncooked meat, poultry or fish. And always marinate meats in the refrigerator to keep bacterial levels low. You have to bring the sauce to a boil to kill microbes. Otherwise, set aside sauce beforehand and don't reuse the marinade.
  • The best food for grilling is vegetables and fruits, which do not form HCAs. They also provide you with a host of cancer-fighting nutrients and phytochemicals.

    In fact, there's some evidence that these natural phytochemicals may convert HCAs to an inactive, stable form that you can easily eliminate from your body.

    Try grilling asparagus, bell peppers, carrots, zucchini, eggplant, onion, portobello mushrooms, and even mangoes brushed with a bit of olive oil.

    Cruciferous veggies have especially high potential to negate HCAs. One study of men who ate 2½ cups of Brussels sprouts daily for three weeks reduced their DNA damage significantly. Don't like Brussels sprouts? Try broccoli and cabbage instead.
  • Avoid charred meat like the plague. Cut off offending spots to protect yourself.
  • Grill fish instead of meats. They tend to form fewer HCAs.
  • Place juicy foods in a foil packet to reduce dripping.
    And before you fire up the grill, go enjoy a 40-minute walk — which will help reduce the greater risk of that "extra 30 pounds".

    At least there's one silver lining: You may be better off grilling your own meats in your back yard, versus eating meat in a restaurant. That way you're able to control what you eat including how many additives, antibiotics, and other health saboteurs are in your food.
Footnotes:
1http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=47818
2http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/07/02/how.make.grilling.safe/index.html
3http://preventcancer.aicr.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8484&news_iv_ctrl=0&abbr=pr_hf_
4http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/07/02/how.make.grilling.safe/index.html
5http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19241593
6Olga Viegas, L. Filipe Amaro, Isabel M. P. L. V. O. Ferreira, and Olívia Pinho J. Agric. Food Chem., 2012, 60 (24), pp 6235-6240 Publication Date (Web): May 29, 2012 (Article)DOI: 10.1021/jf302227b
7Armindo Melo, Olga Viegas, Catarina Petisca, Olívia Pinho and Isabel M. P. L. V. O. Ferreira J. Agric. Food Chem., 2008, 56 (22), pp 10625-10632 Publication Date (Web): October 24, 2008 (Article)DOI: 10.1021/jf801837s
8
http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/handle/2097/913

http://cancerdefeated.com/newsletters/This-cooking-method-increases-cancer-risk.html